Differences in efficacy of monepantel, derquantel and abamectin against multi-resistant nematodes of sheep.

Drug resistance has become a global phenomenon in gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep, particularly resistance to macrocyclic lactones. New anthelmintics are urgently needed for both the control of infections with multi-resistant nematodes in areas where classical anthelmintics are no longer effective, and the prevention of the spread of resistance in areas where the problem is not as severe. Recently, two new active ingredients became commercially available for the treatment of nematode infections in sheep, monepantel (Zolvix®) and derquantel, the latter used only in a formulated combination with the macrocyclic lactone, abamectin (Startect®). In order to assess the potential of the new actives for the control and prevention of spread of anthelmintic resistance, two characterized multi-resistant field isolates from Australia were used in a GLP (good laboratory practice) conducted efficacy study in sheep. Eight infected sheep in each group were treated orally according to the product labels with 2.5 mg/kg body weight monepantel, 0.2 mg/kg abamectin, or with the combination of 2.0 mg/kg derquantel and 0.2 mg/kg abamectin. The results demonstrate that monepantel was fully effective against multi-resistant species, Trichostrongylus colubriformis and Haemonchus contortus (99.9%). In contrast, the combination of derquantel and abamectin was effective against T. colubriformis (99.9%), but was not effective against larval stages of the barber's pole worm H. contortus (18.3%).

High-level ivermectin resistance in a field isolate of Haemonchus contortus associated with a low level of resistance in the larval stage: implications for resistance detection.

The IVPro isolate of Haemonchus contortus was isolated in 1999 after significant numbers of the parasite survived an ivermectin capsule treatment of grazing sheep acquiring a natural infection at Prospect, NSW, Australia. The isolate shows high-level resistance to ivermectin (faecal egg count is unaffected by ivermectin oral treatment at 0.2mg kg(-1)). The larval LC(50), as assessed by larval development assays (LDAs), is only approximately two-fold higher than several susceptible isolates, making it difficult to detect the resistance using larval LC(50) as an indicator. However, the isolate shows the presence of a small proportion of the population (<20%) able to develop at significantly higher drug concentrations than the susceptible isolates. Hence, if the IVPro and susceptible isolates are compared at the LC(99) level, the IVPro isolate is readily identifiable as resistant. This degree of distinction at the LC(99) allows the IVPro isolate to be identified as resistant by simply observing the highest drug concentration in the development assay at which some larvae develop relative to the susceptible isolates. Assessing the development assay using this criterion allows a distinction between IVPro and the susceptible isolates equivalent to 10-fold differences in drug concentration, greatly increasing the likelihood of detecting the resistant isolate in routine resistance tests. This study highlights the need to examine this aspect of LDAs in order to detect the type of resistance displayed by IVPro H. contortus.