Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 60(5): 887-890, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33773922

ABSTRACT

External fixation with a bilateral frame configuration (delta frame, DF) is a routine approach for treating ankle fractures and dislocations with severe soft tissue damage. The purpose of this study was to evaluate to what extent adding a first metatarsal fixation contributes to the stability of the fixation as evidenced by reduced frequency of early loss of reduction. A retrospective study was performed to compare the rate of early reduction loss in patients treated with a bilateral frame external fixation as part of a 2-stage treatment protocol for periarticular ankle fractures, in a level one trauma center between 2006 and 2016. The cohort was divided into 2 groups according to the frame configuration that had been used: DF only and DF with first metatarsal fixation (DF+1MT). A multivariate analysis assessing risk factors for postoperative loss of reduction was conducted. A total of 67 patients were included in the study, of which 30 underwent fixation by DF and 37 by DF+1MT. Early loss of reduction was recorded in 13 (19.4%) patients, 6 (20%) in the DF group and 7 (18.9%) in the DF+1MT group (p = .576). None of the assessed risk factors reached statistical significance. To conclude, the addition of a first metatarsal pin as an enhancement of external fixation with a delta frame configuration did not reduce the incidence of early loss of reduction. There is no evidence to support the claim that adding this pin contributes to the stability of the fixation in a clinically relevant manner.


Subject(s)
Ankle Injuries , Metatarsal Bones , Tibial Fractures , Ankle , External Fixators , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Humans , Incidence , Metatarsal Bones/diagnostic imaging , Metatarsal Bones/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Orthop Sci ; 20(1): 168-73, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25308213

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The most common major complications following surgical fixation of patellar fractures are infection, nonunion and reoperation. In this study, we sought to define the predisposing factors to the development of these complications. METHODS: Open reduction and internal fixation surgeries for patellar fractures that were performed in a single institution between 2006 and 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' demographic data (age, gender, comorbidities), injury and fracture data (associated injuries, type of fracture, open or closed fracture), surgical data (type of surgery and interval between fracture occurrence and surgery) and major postoperative complications (infection, nonunion, symptomatic hardware and revision surgery) were collected from the medical records and verified by a telephone survey. Correlation analysis identified the major variables influencing the development of these complications. RESULTS: The cohort of 188 patients had an average follow-up of 908 days. Thirteen (6.9 %) patients developed infection, 3 (1.6 %) had fracture nonunion and 42 (22.3 %) required a second operation. A history of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) correlated significantly with the development of infection (OR 6.18, CI 1.1-35.6, p = 0.041) and nonunion (OR 14.9, CI 1.2-188.1; p = 0.037). A history of diabetes significantly increased the risk of a second operation (OR 8.69, CI 95 % 1.8-41.9, p = 0.007). Open fracture did not increase the risk of any of these complications. CONCLUSIONS: A history of CVA and diabetes mellitus significantly increased the risk of complications following patellar fracture fixation. Patients with these comorbidities should be informed of their increased risk of these complications and be followed up more rigorously.


Subject(s)
Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Fractures, Ununited/etiology , Patella/injuries , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Fractures, Bone/diagnosis , Fractures, Bone/etiology , Fractures, Ununited/diagnosis , Fractures, Ununited/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surgical Wound Infection/diagnosis , Surgical Wound Infection/therapy , Treatment Failure , Young Adult
3.
Surg Innov ; 18(4): 400-5, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21502204

ABSTRACT

The authors retrospectively reviewed 27 consecutive patients with 29 fractures of the distal femur treated with the new retrograde expandable nail. One 10-mm diameter nail that expands to 16 mm was used with the possibility of locking in the condylar area only. Retrieved data included single versus multiple injuries, fracture type, operation time, reaming or nonreaming, hospitalization and healing times, and intra- and postoperative complications. The overall average operation time was 96 (range 40-320) minutes, but only 65 (range 40-120) minutes for isolated fractures. The overall mean hospitalization time was 16 (range 3-40) days, but only 7 (range 4-10) days for isolated fractures. Follow-up continued until fracture healing or for a minimum of 1 year (average 14 months, range 12-24 months). The average clinical union time was 83 (range 43-179) days, and the mean radiographic healing was 87 (range 43-179) days. One patient developed a nonunion that required exchange of the nail to the same device. Another patient underwent hardware removal during a procedure for a torn meniscus. These preliminary results demonstrate satisfactory healing and alignment for the treatment of distal femoral shaft fractures by means of this new device without jeopardizing the knee joint by nail protrusion.


Subject(s)
Bone Nails , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/instrumentation , Adult , Equipment Design , Female , Femoral Fractures/diagnosis , Femoral Fractures/etiology , Fracture Healing , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
4.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 130(12): 1429-32, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20069428

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Templating is now the standard approach for preoperative planning of total joint replacement and fracture fixation. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of new software, TraumaCad™, for preoperative planning for total hip replacement. METHODS: This software enables the import and export of all picture archiving communication system (PACS) files from local working stations. It can integrate with all PACS systems. We retrospectively reviewed TraumaCad™-generated templates of digitalized preoperative radiographs of 73 consecutive patients. RESULTS: The acetabular component, measured within ± 1 size, was accurate in 65 patients (89%), and the femoral stem design component was accurate in 70 patients (97%). The accuracy of the femoral size was predicted in 57 patients within 1 size (87%) and in 65 patients within 2 sizes (96%) out of 68 patients in the Corail femoral component group. TraumaCad™ successfully predicts the sizes of femoral and acetabular component and easily integrates with all PACS files.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Decision Making, Computer-Assisted , Patient Care Planning , Software , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiography , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...