Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Lancet Neurol ; 20(5): 341-350, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33765420

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cervical artery dissection is a major cause of stroke in young people (aged <50 years). Historically, clinicians have preferred using oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists for patients with cervical artery dissection, although some current guidelines-based on available evidence from mostly observational studies-suggest using aspirin. If proven to be non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists, aspirin might be preferable, due to its ease of use and lower cost. We aimed to test the non-inferiority of aspirin to vitamin K antagonists in patients with cervical artery dissection. METHODS: We did a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial in ten stroke centres across Switzerland, Germany, and Denmark. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients aged older than 18 years who had symptomatic, MRI-verified, cervical artery dissection within 2 weeks before enrolment, to receive either aspirin 300 mg once daily or a vitamin K antagonist (phenprocoumon, acenocoumarol, or warfarin; target international normalised ratio [INR] 2·0-3·0) for 90 days. Randomisation was computer-generated using an interactive web response system, with stratification according to participating site. Independent imaging core laboratory adjudicators were masked to treatment allocation, but investigators, patients, and clinical event adjudicators were aware of treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was a composite of clinical outcomes (stroke, major haemorrhage, or death) and MRI outcomes (new ischaemic or haemorrhagic brain lesions) in the per-protocol population, assessed at 14 days (clinical and MRI outcomes) and 90 days (clinical outcomes only) after commencing treatment. Non-inferiority of aspirin would be shown if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% CI of the absolute risk difference between groups was less than 12% (non-inferiority margin). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02046460. FINDINGS: Between Sept 11, 2013, and Dec 21, 2018, we enrolled 194 patients; 100 (52%) were assigned to the aspirin group and 94 (48%) were assigned to the vitamin K antagonist group. The per-protocol population included 173 patients; 91 (53%) in the aspirin group and 82 (47%) in the vitamin K antagonist group. The primary endpoint occurred in 21 (23%) of 91 patients in the aspirin group and in 12 (15%) of 82 patients in the vitamin K antagonist group (absolute difference 8% [95% CI -4 to 21], non-inferiority p=0·55). Thus, non-inferiority of aspirin was not shown. Seven patients (8%) in the aspirin group and none in the vitamin K antagonist group had ischaemic strokes. One patient (1%) in the vitamin K antagonist group and none in the aspirin group had major extracranial haemorrhage. There were no deaths. Subclinical MRI outcomes were recorded in 14 patients (15%) in the aspirin group and in 11 patients (13%) in the vitamin K antagonist group. There were 19 adverse events in the aspirin group, and 26 in the vitamin K antagonist group. INTERPRETATION: Our findings did not show that aspirin was non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of cervical artery dissection. FUNDING: Swiss National Science Foundation, Swiss Heart Foundation, Stroke Funds Basel, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Academic Society Basel.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Carotid Artery, Internal, Dissection/drug therapy , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Vertebral Artery Dissection/drug therapy , Acenocoumarol/therapeutic use , Adult , Carotid Artery, Internal, Dissection/complications , Carotid Artery, Internal, Dissection/diagnostic imaging , Denmark , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Phenprocoumon/therapeutic use , Stroke/diagnostic imaging , Stroke/drug therapy , Stroke/epidemiology , Switzerland , Vertebral Artery Dissection/complications , Vertebral Artery Dissection/diagnostic imaging , Warfarin/therapeutic use
2.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair ; 35(5): 393-405, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33745372

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evidence from animal studies suggests that greater reductions in poststroke motor impairment can be attained with significantly higher doses and intensities of therapy focused on movement quality. These studies also indicate a dose-timing interaction, with more pronounced effects if high-intensity therapy is delivered in the acute/subacute, rather than chronic, poststroke period. OBJECTIVE: To compare 2 approaches of delivering high-intensity, high-dose upper-limb therapy in patients with subacute stroke: a novel exploratory neuroanimation therapy (NAT) and modified conventional occupational therapy (COT). METHODS: A total of 24 patients were randomized to NAT or COT and underwent 30 sessions of 60 minutes time-on-task in addition to standard care. The primary outcome was the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity motor score (FM-UE). Secondary outcomes included Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), grip strength, Stroke Impact Scale hand domain, and upper-limb kinematics. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, and days 3, 90, and 180 posttraining. Both groups were compared to a matched historical cohort (HC), which received only 30 minutes of upper-limb therapy per day. RESULTS: There were no significant between-group differences in FM-UE change or any of the secondary outcomes at any timepoint. Both high-dose groups showed greater recovery on the ARAT (7.3 ± 2.9 points; P = .011) but not the FM-UE (1.4 ± 2.6 points; P = .564) when compared with the HC. CONCLUSIONS: Neuroanimation may offer a new, enjoyable, efficient, and scalable way to deliver high-dose and intensive upper-limb therapy.


Subject(s)
Occupational Therapy/methods , Recovery of Function/physiology , Stroke Rehabilitation/methods , Stroke/therapy , Upper Extremity/physiopathology , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Acuity , Single-Blind Method
3.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair ; 33(7): 568-580, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31170880

ABSTRACT

Background. After stroke, recovery of movement in proximal and distal upper extremity (UE) muscles appears to follow different time courses, suggesting differences in their neural substrates. Objective. We sought to determine if presence or absence of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) differentially influences recovery of volitional contraction and strength in an arm muscle versus an intrinsic hand muscle. We also related MEP status to recovery of proximal and distal interjoint coordination and movement fractionation, as measured by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA). Methods. In 45 subjects in the year following ischemic stroke, we tracked the relationship between corticospinal tract (CST) integrity and behavioral recovery in the biceps (BIC) and first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. We used transcranial magnetic stimulation to probe CST integrity, indicated by MEPs, in BIC and FDI. We used electromyography, dynamometry, and UE FMA subscores to assess muscle-specific contraction, strength, and inter-joint coordination, respectively. Results. Presence of MEPs resulted in higher likelihood of muscle contraction, greater strength, and higher FMA scores. Without MEPs, BICs could more often volitionally contract, were less weak, and had steeper strength recovery curves than FDIs; in contrast, FMA recovery curves plateaued below normal levels for both the arm and hand. Conclusions. There are shared and separate substrates for paretic UE recovery. CST integrity is necessary for interjoint coordination in both segments and for overall recovery. In its absence, alternative pathways may assist recovery of volitional contraction and strength, particularly in BIC. These findings suggest that more targeted approaches might be needed to optimize UE recovery.


Subject(s)
Arm/physiopathology , Brain Ischemia/physiopathology , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Hand/physiopathology , Motor Activity/physiology , Motor Cortex/physiopathology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Recovery of Function/physiology , Stroke Rehabilitation , Stroke/physiopathology , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
4.
Ann Neurol ; 85(4): 502-513, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30805956

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Patients with chronic stroke have been shown to have failure to release interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) from the intact to the damaged hemisphere before movement execution (premovement IHI). This inhibitory imbalance was found to correlate with poor motor performance in the chronic stage after stroke and has since become a target for therapeutic interventions. The logic of this approach, however, implies that abnormal premovement IHI is causal to poor behavioral outcome and should therefore be present early after stroke when motor impairment is at its worst. To test this idea, in a longitudinal study, we investigated interhemispheric interactions by tracking patients' premovement IHI for one year following stroke. METHODS: We assessed premovement IHI and motor behavior five times over a 1-year period after ischemic stroke in 22 patients and 11 healthy participants. RESULTS: We found that premovement IHI was normal during the acute/subacute period and only became abnormal at the chronic stage; specifically, release of IHI in movement preparation worsened as motor behavior improved. In addition, premovement IHI did not correlate with behavioral measures cross-sectionally, whereas the longitudinal emergence of abnormal premovement IHI from the acute to the chronic stage was inversely correlated with recovery of finger individuation. INTERPRETATION: These results suggest that interhemispheric imbalance is not a cause of poor motor recovery, but instead might be the consequence of underlying recovery processes. These findings call into question the rehabilitation strategy of attempting to rebalance interhemispheric interactions in order to improve motor recovery after stroke. Ann Neurol 2019;85:502-513.


Subject(s)
Functional Laterality/physiology , Recovery of Function/physiology , Stroke Rehabilitation/methods , Stroke/physiopathology , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Adult , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Neurological Rehabilitation/methods , Neurological Rehabilitation/trends , Reaction Time/physiology , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke Rehabilitation/trends , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/trends , Young Adult
5.
Eur Stroke J ; 3(1): 47-56, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31008337

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In patients with stroke attributable to cervical artery dissection, we compared endovascular therapy to intravenous thrombolysis regarding three-month outcome, recanalisation and complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a multicentre intravenous thrombolysis/endovascular therapy-register-based cohort study, all consecutive cervical artery dissection patients with intracranial artery occlusion treated within 6 h were eligible for analysis. Endovascular therapy patients (with or without prior intravenous thrombolysis) were compared to intravenous thrombolysis patients regarding (i) excellent three-month outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-1), (ii) symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, (iii) recanalisation of the occluded intracranial artery and (iv) death. Upon a systematic literature review, we performed a meta-analysis comparing endovascular therapy to intravenous thrombolysis in cervical artery dissection patients regarding three-month outcome using a random-effects Mantel-Haenszel model. RESULTS: Among 62 cervical artery dissection patients (median age 48.8 years), 24 received intravenous thrombolysis and 38 received endovascular therapy. Excellent three-month outcome occurred in 23.7% endovascular therapy and 20.8% with intravenous thrombolysis patients. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage occurred solely among endovascular therapy patients (5/38 patients, 13.2%) while four (80%) of these patients had bridging therapy; 6/38 endovascular therapy and 0/24 intravenous thrombolysis patients died. Four of these 6 endovascular therapy patients had bridging therapy. Recanalisation was achieved in 84.2% endovascular therapy patients and 66.7% intravenous thrombolysis patients (odds ratio 3.2, 95% confidence interval [0.9-11.38]). Sensitivity analyses in a subgroup treated within 4.5 h revealed a higher recanalisation rate among endovascular therapy patients (odds ratio 3.87, 95% confidence interval [1.00-14.95]), but no change in the key clinical findings. In a meta-analysis across eight studies (n = 212 patients), cervical artery dissection patients (110 intravenous thrombolysis and 102 endovascular therapy) showed identical odds for favourable outcome (odds ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval [0.38-2.44]) among endovascular therapy patients and intravenous thrombolysis patients. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In this cohort study, there was no clear signal of superiority of endovascular therapy over intravenous thrombolysis in cervical artery dissection patients, which - given the limitation of our sample size - does not prove that endovascular therapy in these patients cannot be superior in future studies. The observation that symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage and deaths in the endovascular therapy group occurred predominantly in bridging patients requires further investigation.

6.
J Neurol Sci ; 344(1-2): 94-9, 2014 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25064444

ABSTRACT

Amyloid-ß has been shown to interact with the α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor on neuronal cells. Not much is known on the effect on microglial cells and whether this effect can be modulated by the endogenous α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist kynurenic acid. Our aim was to investigate the effect of kynurenic acid on amyloid-ß-treated BV-2 microglial cells with respect to α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor expression, cell viability, cytokine production and phagocytotic abilities. Therefore BV-2 cells were treated with oligomeric or fibrillar forms of amyloid-ß(1-40) and co-treated with kynurenic acid. α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor quantity was investigated using Western blotting. Cell viability was assessed by staining cells with fluorescein diacetate and propidium iodide. Pro-inflammatory cytokines were measured in cell culture supernatants of treated cells with ELISAs; NO with Griess reagents and amyloid-ß uptake were investigated with fluorescence-activated cell sorting and verified by Western blotting. Amyloid-ß nor kynurenic acid did have an effect on the protein level of the α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Amyloid-Beta induced cell mortality was unchanged after addition of kynurenic acid. However, kynurenic acid co-treatment reduced the pro-inflammatory cytokines tumour necrosis factor-α and IL-6 and amyloid-ß phagocytosis. We provide evidence for an immunomodulating effect of the endogenous α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist kynurenic acid. Our findings indicate a role for kynurenic acid in amyloid-ß associated neuroinflammation in Alzheimer disease.


Subject(s)
Kynurenic Acid/pharmacology , Microglia/drug effects , alpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor/metabolism , Amyloid beta-Peptides/pharmacology , Animals , Cell Line, Transformed , Cell Survival , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists , Interleukin-6/metabolism , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Nitric Oxide/metabolism , Peptide Fragments/pharmacology , Phagocytosis/drug effects , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/metabolism , alpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...