Assessment of mumps virus-specific antibodies by different serological assays: which test correlates best with mumps immunity?

Mumps is one of the vaccine-preventable childhood diseases and it has not yet been eradicated in Germany. This raises the question as to whether the available mumps vaccines are effective enough to prevent mumps and which antibody test system allows the authentic assigning of mumps-specific immunity. In an attempt to answer this question, we analysed 227 sera samples from medical students of the University Hospital Frankfurt/Main, Germany, using different test systems: indirect immune fluorescence, neutralisation assay, routine ELISA and newly developed immunoassays, which contain the mumps nucleoprotein and the wild-type strain Enders ATCC VR106, respectively. Mumps vaccination coverage of the screened collective amounted to 75.1%, which differs notably from the detected mumps-specific seropositivity rates in the literature (range 53.3% to 82.4%). In contrast, a small group of unvaccinated students had much higher seropositivity rates. Of course, assigned vaccination coverage and calculated seropositivity rates are not effective enough to interrupt the transmission of the mumps virus. The often-occurring mumps outbreaks, some in highly vaccinated populations, may not always demonstrate vaccine failure. The investigation of newly developed test systems and the occurrence of different mumps virus genotypes should also be considered.

Comparison of ELISA and immunoassays for measurement of IgG and IgM antibody to West Nile virus in human sera against virus neutralisation.

Two commercial assays for the detection of IgG antibody to West Nile virus (WNV), an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (I-ELISA) and indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT), were evaluated against the virus neutralisation test. Excellent agreement with the virus neutralisation was obtained with both tests, i.e., 99.5% by I-ELISA and 100% by IFAT. The well-known serological cross-reactivity within the family of the Flaviviridae was analysed using sera with known antibodies against dengue virus, tick borne encephalitis virus and yellow fever virus. IgM and/or IgG positive sera were examined for reactivity by WNV-ELISA and WNV-IFAT. While cross-reactivity between 0 and 18.2% was recorded with IgM positive sera, there was extensive cross-reactivity of 15.7-100% with IgG positive sera.

Use of immunoglobulin G avidity assays for differentiation of primary from previous infections with West Nile virus.

Since its introduction in 1999, West Nile virus (WNV) infections have spread rapidly across the North American continent. Diagnosis of acute WNV infection by detection of WNV-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) is complicated by the persistence of detectable IgM for more than 1 year in some patients. IgG antibody avidity testing was assessed as a supplemental assay in the diagnosis of current infections. Three groups of serum samples were assayed in parallel by two different IgG avidity test systems (indirect immunofluorescence test [IIFT] and prototype enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]; EUROIMMUN, Luebeck, Germany). Group I (40 sera taken between 2 and 9 days after the onset of influenza-like symptoms) and group II (40 sera taken between 10 and 43 days after onset) were acute and convalescent specimens from patients with a positive anti-WNV IgM test (ELISA; Focus Diagnostics, Cypress, CA). Group III consisted of 43 patient sera collected between 6 and 12 months after infection. IgG antibodies specific for WNV were detected in 38% (ELISA) and 50% (IIFT) of group I sera, in 90% (ELISA and IIFT) of group II sera, and in 100% (ELISA and IIFT) of group III sera. Low-avidity IgG antibodies were demonstrated in 86% (ELISA) and 95% (IIFT) of IgG-positive patient samples taken between 2 and 43 days after the onset of symptoms (groups I and II). High-avidity IgG antibodies were detected in 100% of group III sera obtained 6 months or more after the onset of symptoms (ELISA and IIFT). IgG avidity tests for WNV infections are rapid and simple to perform. The determination of IgG avidity provides additional diagnostic certainty in differentiating between recently acquired and previous infections with WNV.

Cytomegalovirus infection with interleukin-6 response predicts cardiac mortality in patients with coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Prospective data relating previous exposure to cytomegalovirus (CMV) to the risk of cardiac mortality are controversial. We investigated the effect of previous exposure to CMV infection on the risk of future cardiac disease-related death in relation to an underlying inflammatory response. METHODS AND RESULTS: coronary angiography was performed in 1134 subjects, and 989 patients with documented coronary artery disease were studied prospectively. CMV-IgG titers and interleukin (IL)-6 levels were measured before angiography. Increasing titers of CMV correlated with the elevation of IL-6 levels (P<0.001) after adjustment for possible confounders. All patients were followed up for a median of 3.1 years (maximum 4.3 years). During follow-up, 96 patients died, 70 of cardiac disease. Overall, CMV seropositivity was not related to cardiac mortality after adjustment for confounding variables (P=0.19). In contrast, in patients with elevated IL-6 levels (>/=11.9 pg/mL, median level), CMV seropositivity was independently associated with a 3.2-fold (95% CI 1.4 to 7.3, P=0.007) increase in risk of future cardiac death, whereas in individuals without IL-6 elevation, previous CMV infection had no effect on cardiac mortality. CONCLUSIONS: MV seropositivity in patients with an inflammatory response is independently associated with future cardiac mortality, whereas this association is lost in patients who do not demonstrate an inflammatory response. These data support the hypothesis that the atherosclerotic effects of CMV are mediated through an underlying inflammatory response.