ABSTRACT
Visual attention and saccadic eye movements are linked in a tight, yet flexible fashion. In humans, this link is typically studied with dual-task setups. Participants are instructed to execute a saccade to some target location, while a discrimination target is flashed on a screen before the saccade can be made. Participants are also instructed to report a specific feature of this discrimination target at the trial end. Discrimination performance is usually better if the discrimination target occurred at the same location as the saccade target compared to when it occurred at a different location, which is explained by the mandatory shift of attention to the saccade target location before saccade onset. This pre-saccadic shift of attention presumably enhances the perception of the discrimination target if it occurred at the same, but not if it occurred at a different location. It is, however, known that a dual-task setup can alter the primary process under investigation. Here, we directly compared pre-saccadic attention in single-task versus dual-task setups using concurrent electroencephalography (EEG) and eye-tracking. Our results corroborate the idea of a pre-saccadic shift of attention. They, however, question that this shift leads to the same-position discrimination advantage. The relation of saccade and discrimination target position affected the EEG signal only after saccade onset. Our results, thus, favor an alternative explanation based on the role of saccades for the consolidation of sensory and short-term memory. We conclude that studies with dual-task setups arrived at a valid conclusion despite not measuring exactly what they intended to measure.
