Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Rheumatol ; 42(8): 1478-83, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26136484

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To address the low prevention and treatment rates for those at risk of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP), we evaluated the influence of a direct-to-patient, Internet-based educational video intervention using "storytelling" on rates of antiosteoporosis medication use among chronic glucocorticoid users who were members of an online pharmacy refill service. METHODS: We identified members who refilled ≥ 5 mg/day of prednisone (or equivalent) for 90 contiguous days and had no GIOP therapy for ≥ 12 months. Using patient stories, we developed an online video addressing risk factors and treatment options, and delivered it to members refilling a glucocorticoid prescription. The intervention consisted of two 45-day "Video ON" periods, during which the video automatically appeared at the time of refill, and two 45-day "Video OFF" periods, during which there was no video. Members could also "self-initiate" watching the video by going to the video link. We used an interrupted time series design to evaluate the effectiveness of this intervention on GIOP prescription therapies over 6 months. RESULTS: Among 3017 members (64.8%) exposed to the intervention, 59% had measurable video viewing time, of which 3% "self-initiated" the video. The GIOP prescription rate in the "Video ON" group was 2.9% versus 2.7% for the "Video OFF" group. There was a nonsignificant trend toward greater GIOP prescription in members who self-initiated the video versus automated viewing (5.7% vs 2.9%, p = 0.1). CONCLUSION: Among adults at high risk of GIOP, prescription rates were not significantly affected by an online educational video presented at the time of glucocorticoid refill. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01378689.


Subject(s)
Bone Density/drug effects , Glucocorticoids/adverse effects , Osteoporosis/chemically induced , Osteoporosis/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Middle Aged
2.
Menopause ; 19(6): 616-21, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22648302

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Nearly a decade ago, landmark clinical trials revealed an increase in the risks associated with hormone therapy in postmenopausal women, leading to early changes in prescribing patterns. Long-term prescribing patterns in the United States after these trials are unknown. The objective of this study was to describe changes in hormone therapy prescribing including dose, formulation, patient age, and prescriber specialty from 2000 to 2009. METHODS: A national pharmacy claims database was used to describe the annual prevalence and incidence rates of hormone therapy prescribing from 2000 to 2009 in women 50 years and older. RESULTS: Throughout the decade, a number of prescribing trends were observed: a continuous decline in hormone therapy overall, an initial drop in new therapy that stabilized after 2003, a decline in oral formulations and increase in vaginal formulations, a decline in standard- and high-dose and an increase in low-dose oral formulations, and an increase in the proportion of women who received hormone therapy from gynecologists. CONCLUSIONS: Overall prescribing of hormone therapy continued to decline during the past decade, suggesting a long-term impact of the Women's Health Initiative findings. During this same time, treatment regimens shifted to favor vaginal and lower-dose oral formulations.


Subject(s)
Estrogen Replacement Therapy/trends , Postmenopause , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Women's Health , Administration, Intravaginal , Aged , Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic , Estrogen Replacement Therapy/adverse effects , Estrogen Replacement Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Estrogens/administration & dosage , Female , Gynecology , Humans , Middle Aged , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL