Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Respir Res ; 19(1): 238, 2018 Dec 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30509256

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is used by an increasing number of transplant centres. It is still controversial whether an acellular or cellular (erythrocyte enriched) perfusate is preferable. The aim of this paper was to evaluate whether acellular (aEVLP) or cellular EVLP (cEVLP) preserves functional lung ultrastructure better and to generate a hypothesis regarding possible underlying mechanisms. METHODS: Lungs of 20 pigs were assigned to 4 groups: control, ischaemia (24 h), aEVLP and cEVLP (both EVLP groups: 24 h ischaemia + 12 h EVLP). After experimental procedures, whole lungs were perfusion fixed, samples for light and electron microscopic stereology were taken, and ventilation, diffusion and perfusion related parameters were estimated. RESULTS: Lung structure was well preserved in all groups. Lungs had less atelectasis and higher air content after EVLP. No significant group differences were found in alveolar septum composition or blood-air barrier thickness. Small amounts of intraalveolar oedema were detected in both EVLP groups but significantly more in aEVLP than in cEVLP. CONCLUSIONS: Both EVLP protocols supported lungs well for up to 12 h and could largely prevent ischaemia ex vivo reperfusion associated lung injury. In both EVLP groups, oedema volume remained below the level of functional relevance. The group difference in oedema formation was possibly due to inferior septal perfusion in aEVLP.


Subject(s)
Citrates/administration & dosage , Lung/physiology , Lung/ultrastructure , Models, Animal , Perfusion/methods , Tissue Preservation/methods , Animals , Female , Lung/drug effects , Male , Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods , Random Allocation , Swine
2.
Transpl Int ; 29(1): 88-97, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26264867

ABSTRACT

Normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) has developed as a powerful technique to evaluate particularly marginal donor lungs prior to transplantation. In this study, acellular and cellular perfusate compositions were compared in an identical experimental setting as no consensus has been reached on a preferred technique yet. Porcine lungs underwent EVLP for 12 h on the basis of an acellular or a cellular perfusate composition after 24 h of cold ischaemia as defined organ stress. During perfusion, haemodynamic and respiratory parameters were monitored. After EVLP, the lung condition was assessed by light and transmission electron microscopy. Aerodynamic parameters did not show significant differences between groups and remained within the in vivo range during EVLP. Mean oxygenation indices were 491 ± 39 in the acellular group and 513 ± 53 in the cellular group. Groups only differed significantly in terms of higher pulmonary artery pressure and vascular resistance in the cellular group. Lung histology and ultrastructure were largely well preserved after prolonged EVLP and showed only minor structural alterations which were similarly present in both groups. Prolonged acellular and cellular EVLP for 12 h are both feasible with lungs prechallenged by ischaemic organ stress. Physiological and ultrastructural analysis showed no superiority of either acellular or cellular perfusate composition.


Subject(s)
Cold Ischemia/methods , Extracorporeal Circulation/methods , Lung Transplantation/methods , Lung/pathology , Organ Preservation/methods , Animals , Disease Models, Animal , Female , Flow Cytometry/methods , Graft Rejection , Graft Survival , Immunohistochemistry , Lung Transplantation/adverse effects , Organ Preservation Solutions/pharmacology , Perfusion/methods , Random Allocation , Risk Assessment , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sus scrofa , Swine , Time Factors , Tissue Donors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...