ABSTRACT
Hospital-based medical records are abstracted to create International Classification of Disease (ICD) coded discharge health data in many countries. The 'main condition' is not defined in a consistent manner internationally. Some countries employ a 'reason for admission' rule as the basis for the main condition, while other countries employ a 'resource use' rule. A few countries have recently transitioned from one of these approaches to the other. The definition of 'main condition' in such ICD data matters when it is used to define a disease cohort to assign diagnosis-related groups and to perform risk adjustment. We propose a method of harmonizing the international definition to enable researchers and international organizations using ICD-coded health data to aggregate or compare hospital care and outcomes across countries in a consistent manner. Inter-observer reliability of alternative harmonization approaches should be evaluated before finalizing the definition and adopting it worldwide.
Subject(s)
Clinical Coding/standards , Hospital Administration/standards , International Classification of Diseases/standards , Internationality , Humans , Reproducibility of ResultsSubject(s)
Diagnosis-Related Groups , Economics, Hospital , Fees, Medical , Insurance, Health , Patient Discharge , Humans , SwedenABSTRACT
In 75 patients with acute pneumonia of moderate severity a comparative study between transtracheal aspiration (TTA), sputum culture and epipharynx culture was carried out. Organisms considered as the probable etiological agent were found in 53% with TTA. The same organisms were found in only 27% in sputum samples and in 21% in epipharynx samples. No serious complications with TTA was noted.
