Variation in survival after surgery for peri-ampullary cancer in a regional cancer network.

BACKGROUND: Centralisation of specialist surgical services requires that patients are referred to a regional centre for surgery. This process may disadvantage patients who live far from the regional centre or are referred from other hospitals by making referral less likely and by delaying treatment, thereby allowing tumour progression. The aim of this study is to explore the outcome of surgery for peri-ampullary cancer (PC) with respect to referring hospital and travel distance for treatment within a network served by five hospitals. METHODS: Review of a unit database was undertaken of patients undergoing surgery for PC between January 2006 and May 2014. RESULTS: 394 patients were studied. Although both the median travel distance for patients from the five hospitals (10.8, 86, 78.8, 54.7 and 89.2 km) (p < 0.05), and the annual operation rate for PC (2.99, 3.29, 2.13, 3.32 and 3.07 per 100,000) (p = 0.044) were significantly different, no correlation was noted between patient travel distance and population operation rate at each hospital. No difference was noted between patients from each hospital in terms of resection completion rate or pathological stage of the resected tumours. The median survival after diagnosis for patients referred from different hospitals ranged from 1.2 to 1.7 years and regression analysis revealed that increased travel distance to the regional centre was associated with a small survival advantage. CONCLUSION: Although variation in the provision and outcome of surgery for PC between regional hospitals is noted, this is not adversely affected by geographical isolation from the regional centre. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is part of post-graduate research degree project. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (unique identifier NCT02296736 ) November 18, 2014.

Rebound growth of hepatic colorectal metastases after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy: effect on survival after resection.

BACKGROUND: A period of recovery is commonly allowed between completion of chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and resection, during which tumour progression may occur. The study-aim is to assess the growth of CRLM in this interval and association with outcome. METHOD: Data on 146 patients were analysed. Change in tumour size was assessed by comparing size determined by imaging performed on completion of chemotherapy with that determined by examination of the resected specimen, categorised by RECIST criteria. RESULTS: In the interval before surgery sixteen patients (11%) fulfilled criteria for partial response (PR), 48 (33%) had stable disease (SD) and 82 (56%) had progressive disease (PD). Among patients with PD following chemotherapy the median disease-free survival of patients who initially responded (26 months) was longer than in those who initially had stable disease (7 months) (P = 0.002). No association was noted between rate of tumour growth after completion of chemotherapy and disease-free survival. CONCLUSION: Change in tumour size after completion of chemotherapy is variable and can be rapid, especially in patients who initially respond to treatment. However, disease-free survival is determined by tumour behaviour during treatment and not by change in size after completion of chemotherapy.

Assessment of the effect of interval from presentation to surgery on outcome in patients with peri-ampullary malignancy.

BACKGROUND: Delay between diagnosis of peri-ampullary cancer (PC) and surgery may allow tumour progression and affect outcome. The aim of this study was to explore associations of interval to surgery (IS) with pathological outcomes and survival in patients with PC. METHOD: A database review of all patients undergoing surgery between 2006 and 2014 was undertaken. IS was measured from diagnosis by imaging. Potential association between IS and survival was measured using Cox regression analysis, and between IS and pathological outcome with multivariate logistic analysis. RESULTS: 388 patients underwent surgery. The median IS was 49 days (1-551 days), and was not associated with any of the evaluated outcomes in patients with pancreatic (149) or distal bile duct (46) cancer. For patients with ampullary cancer (71) longer IS was associated with improved survival, with median survival of 27.5 months for patients waiting ≤ median IS (35) and 38.3 months for patients waiting > median IS (36) for surgery (p = 0.041). A higher rate of margin positivity (31.4%) was also noted among patients who waited less than the median IS compared to those waiting longer than this interval (11.4%) (p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: For patients with ampullary cancer there is a paradoxical improvement in outcome among those with a longer IS, which may be explained by progression to inoperability of more aggressive lesions.

Clinical assessment before hepatectomy identifies high-risk patients.

BACKGROUND: Liver resection is associated with significant morbidity, and assessment of risk is an important part of preoperative consultations. Objective methods exist to assess operative risk, including cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX). Subjective assessment is also made in clinic, and patients perceived to be high-risk are referred for CPX at our institution. This article addresses clinicians' ability to identify patients with a higher risk of surgical complications after hepatectomy, using selection for CPX as a surrogate marker for increased operative risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospectively collected data on patients undergoing hepatectomy between February 2008 and November 2013 were retrieved and the cohort divided according to CPX referral. Complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo system. RESULTS: CPX testing was carried out before 101 of 405 liver resections during the study period. The median age was 72 and 64 in CPX and non-CPX groups, respectively (P < 0.001). The resection size was similar between the groups. No difference was noted for grade III complications between CPX and non-CPX tested-groups; however, 19 (18.8%) and 28 (9.2%) patients suffered grade IV-V complications, respectively (P = 0.009). There was no difference in long-term survival between groups (P = 0.63). CONCLUSIONS: This study attempts to assess clinicians' ability to identify patients at greater risk of complications after hepatectomy. The confirmation that patients identified in this way are at greater risk of grade IV-V complications demonstrates the value of preoperative counseling. High-risk patients do not have worse long-term outcomes suggesting survival is determined by other factors, particularly disease recurrence.

Socioeconomic status influences the likelihood but not the outcome of liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the socioeconomic profile of patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) in a regional hepatopancreatobiliary unit with that of the local population. A further aim was to determine if degree of deprivation is associated with tumour recurrence after resection. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing liver resection for CLM was performed. Geodemographic segmentation was used to divide the population into five categories of socioeconomic status (SES). RESULTS: During a 7-year period, 303 patients underwent resection for CLM. The proportion of these patients in the two least deprived categories of SES was greater than that of the local population (50.2% versus 40.2%) and the proportion in the two most deprived categories was lower (18.3% versus 30.1%) (P < 0.001). There was no difference in recurrence rate (P = 0.867) or disease-free survival among categories of SES (P = 0.913). Multivariate analysis demonstrated no association between SES and tumour recurrence (P = 0.700). CONCLUSIONS: Liver resection for CLM is performed more commonly among the least socioeconomically deprived population than among the most deprived. However, degree of deprivation was not associated with tumour recurrence after resection.

Extended pathology reporting of resection specimens of colorectal liver metastases: the significance of a tumour pseudocapsule.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of factors reported in the minimum histopathology dataset for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and other pre-operative factors compared with additional data relating to the presence of tumour pseudocapsules and necrosis on recurrence 1 year after a resection. METHODS: For a period of 14 months, extended histological reporting of CRLM specimens was performed, including the presence of pseudocapsules and necrosis in each tumour. The details of recurrence were obtained from surveillance imaging. RESULTS: In 66 patients there were 27 recurrences within 1 year. The rates were lower for patients with tumour pseudocapsules (8/27) than for patients without (19/36) (P = 0.030). Pseudocapsules were associated with a younger age (P = 0.005), nodal stage of the primary colorectal tumour (P = 0.025) and metachronous tumours (P = 0.004). In patients with synchronous disease and pseudocapsules, the recurrence rate was 2/12 compared with 13/23 patients without pseudocapsules (P = 0.026). DISCUSSION: These findings demonstrate that histological examination of resection specimens can provide significant additional prognostic information for patients after resection of CRLM, compared with clinical and radiological data. The present finding that the absence of a pseudocapsule in patients with synchronous CRLM is associated with a dramatically worse outcome may help direct patient-specific adjuvant treatment and care.

Serum arterial lactate concentration predicts mortality and organ dysfunction following liver resection.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine if the post-operative serum arterial lactate concentration is associated with mortality, length of hospital stay or complications following hepatic resection. METHODS: Serum lactate concentration was recorded at the end of liver resection in a consecutive series of 488 patients over a seven-year period. Liver function, coagulation and electrolyte tests were performed post-operatively. Renal dysfunction was defined as a creatinine rise of >1.5x the pre-operative value. RESULTS: The median lactate was 2.8 mmol/L (0.6 to 16 mmol/L) and was elevated (≥2 mmol/L) in 72% of patients. The lactate concentration was associated with peak post-operative bilirubin, prothrombin time, renal dysfunction, length of hospital stay and 90-day mortality (P < 0.001). The 90-day mortality in patients with a post-operative lactate ≥6 mmol/L was 28% compared to 0.7% in those with lactate ≤2 mmol/L. Pre-operative diabetes, number of segments resected, the surgeon's assessment of liver parenchyma, blood loss and transfusion were independently associated with lactate concentration. CONCLUSIONS: Initial post-operative lactate concentration is a useful predictor of outcome following hepatic resection. Patients with normal post-operative lactate are unlikely to suffer significant hepatic or renal dysfunction and may not require intensive monitoring or critical care.

A comparison of disease severity and survival rates after liver transplantation in the United Kingdom, Canada, and the United States.

The severity of preoperative liver disease influences the outcome of liver transplantation, is commonly used to determine priority on liver transplant waiting lists, and may differ between countries with different rates of liver disease and organ allocation systems. We compared the relative severity of liver disease in transplant recipients with chronic liver disease in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom and its relation to outcome. Data were obtained from national databases on patients who received transplants in the year 2000. The data included age, gender, diagnosis, the status at the time of transplantation, and indices of chronic liver disease [serum bilirubin and international normalized ratio (INR), and serum creatinine] from which a comparative score [model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score] was calculated. The data revealed marked differences between the three countries. No patient in the United Kingdom was in intensive care before transplantation compared with 19.3% of recipients in the United States and 7.5% in Canada. The median model MELD score of recipients in the United Kingdom was 10.9 compared with 16.1 in the United States and 17 in Canada. The median MELD score of transplant recipients in North America did not vary according to diagnosis, whereas in the United Kingdom, patients with cholestatic liver disease had a lower median MELD score (8.5) than those with alcoholic liver disease (15.7) at the time of transplantation. In conclusion, the disease severity of UK liver transplant recipients varied by diagnosis and was lower than recipients in North America; the 1-year survival rate was, however, similar between the countries.