The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.

Näätänen's model of auditory processing purports that attention does not affect the MMN. The present study investigates this claim through two different manipulations. First, the effect of visual task difficulty on the passively elicited MMN is assessed. Second, the MMNs elicited by stimuli under attended and ignored conditions are compared. In Experiment 1, subjects were presented with mixed sequences of equiprobable auditory and visual stimuli. The auditory stimuli consisted of standard (80 dB SPL 1000 Hz), frequency deviant (1050 Hz), and intensity deviant (70 dB SPL) tone pips. In a first instance, subjects were instructed to ignore the auditory stimulation and engage in an easy and difficult visual discrimination task (focused condition). Subsequently, they were asked to attend to both modalities and detect visual and auditory deviant stimuli (divided condition). The results indicate that the passively elicited MMN to frequency and intensity deviants did not significantly vary with visual task difficulty, in spite of the fact that the easy and difficult tasks showed a wide variation in performance. The manipulation of the attentional direction (focused vs. divided conditions) did result in a significant effect on the MMN elicited by the intensity, but not frequency, deviant. The intensity MMN was larger at frontal sites when subjects' attention was directed to both modalities as compared to only the visual modality. The attentional effect on the MMN to the intensity deviants only may be due to the specific deviant feature or the poorer perceptual discriminability of this deviant from the standard. Experiment 2 was designed to address this issue. The methods of Experiment 2 were identical to those of Experiment 1 with the exception that the intensity deviant (60 dB SPL) was made to be more perceptible than the frequency deviant (1016 Hz) when compared to the standard stimulus (80 dB SPL 1000 Hz). The results of Experiment 2 also demonstrated that the passively elicited MMN was not affected by large variations in visual task difficulty; this provides convincing evidence that the MMN is independent of visual task demands. Similarly to Experiment 1, the direction of attention again had a significant effect on the MMN. In Experiment 2, however, the frequency MMN (and not the intensity MMN) was larger at frontal sites during divided attention compared to focused visual attention. The most parsimonious explanation of these results is that attention enhances the discriminability of the deviant from the standard background stimulation. As such, small acoustic changes would benefit from attention whereas the discriminability of larger changes may not be significantly enhanced.

"...and were instructed to read a self-selected book while ignoring the auditory stimuli": the effects of task demands on the mismatch negativity.

OBJECTIVE: The Mismatch Negativity (MMN) is commonly recorded while the subject is reading, and instructed to ignore the auditory stimuli. It is generally assumed that the demands of the diversion task will have no effect on the MMN. Several studies, however, have reported that a diversion task presumably requiring strong attentional focus is associated with a smaller MMN than that elicited during a less demanding task. This study examines the effect of variations in the classical reading paradigm on the MMN. METHODS: In Experiment 1, event-related potentials (ERP) were recorded while subjects were presented with standard (80 dB SPL 1000 Hz) and frequency deviant (1050 Hz) stimuli. Subjects were instructed to ignore the tone pips and, in separate conditions, engage in different tasks. They were asked to read a text or to sit passively. Subjects were informed that they would subsequently be queried or not about the content of the reading. In Experiment 2, the auditory sequence included the same standard (80 dB SPL 1000 Hz) but the deviant was changed to an intensity decrement (70 dB SPL). A different sample of subjects was again asked to ignore the auditory stimuli and engage in different reading tasks that would or not be followed by query. RESULTS: In all task conditions, MMN was elicited by the frequency and intensity change. The intensity MMN did not significantly vary with task. A significant effect of task was, however, found for the frequency MMN. Its amplitude was largest when subjects were later queried about their reading. CONCLUSIONS: This finding is counter-intuitive in light of previous research on the attentional modulation of the MMN. The pattern of frequency MMN results may relate to the differences in cortical excitability across tasks. SIGNIFICANCE: The present results indicate that the nature of the diversion task may affect the MMN. The choice of diversion task during MMN recording should thus be carefully considered.

Learning disability subtypes and the role of attention during the naming of pictures and words: an event-related potential analysis.

The role of attention in the processing of pictures and words was investigated for a group of normally achieving children and for groups of learning disability sub-types that were defined by deficient performance on tests of reading and spelling (Group RS) and of arithmetic (Group A). An event-related potential (ERP) recording paradigm was employed in which the children were required to attend to and name either pictures or words that were presented individually or in superimposed picture-word arrays that varied in degree of semantic relation. For Group RS, the ERP waves to words, both presented individually or attended in the superimposed array, exhibited reduced N450 amplitude relative to controls, whereas their ERP waves to pictures were normal. This suggests that the word-naming deficiency for Group RS is not a selective attention deficit but rather a specific linguistic deficit that develops at a later stage of processing. In contrast to Group RS and controls, Group A did not exhibit reliable early frontal negative waves (N280) to the super-imposed pictures and words, an effect that may reflect a selective attention deficit for these children that develops at an early stage of visuo-spatial processing. These early processing differences were also evident in smaller amplitude N450 waves for Group A when naming either pictures or words in the superimposed arrays.

Intelligence and information processing during an auditory discrimination task with backward masking: an event-related potential analysis.

The relation between mental ability and auditory discrimination ability was examined by recording event-related potentials from 60 women during an auditory oddball task with backward masking. Across conditions that varied in intensity and in the interval between the target and masking stimuli, the higher ability (HA) group exhibited greater response accuracy, shorter response times, larger P3 amplitude, and shorter P3 latency to target stimuli than the lower ability (LA) group. When instructed to ignore the stimuli, the HA group exhibited shorter mismatch negativity latency to deviant tones than the LA group. The greater speed and accuracy of auditory discrimination for the HA group, observed here with multiple measures, is not a consequence of response strategy, test-taking ability, or attention deployment.