Local excision for T1 rectal tumours: are we getting better?

AIM: The objective was to assess the effect of three different surgical treatments for T1 rectal tumours, radical resection (RR), open local excision (open LE) and laparoscopic local excision (laparoscopic LE), on overall survival (OS). METHODS: Adults from the National Cancer Database (2008-2016) with a diagnosis of T1 rectal cancer were stratified by treatment type (LE vs RR). We assumed that laparoscopic LE equates to transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) or transanal endoscopic microsurgery. The primary outcome was 5-year OS. Subgroup analyses of the LE group stratified by time period [2008-2010 (before TAMIS) vs 2011-2016 (after TAMIS)] and approach (laparoscopic vs open) were performed. RESULTS: Among 10 053 patients, 6623 (65.88%) underwent LE (74.33% laparoscopic LE vs 25.67% open LE) and 3430 (34.12%) RR. The use of LE increased from 52.69% in 2008 to 69.47% in 2016, whereas RR decreased (P < 0.001). In unadjusted analysis, there was no significant difference in 5-year OS between the LE and RR groups (P = 0.639) and between the two LE time periods (P = 0.509), which was consistent with the adjusted analysis (LE vs RR, hazard ratio 1.05, 95% CI 0.92-1.20, P = 0.468; 2008-2010 LE vs 2011-2016 LE, hazard ratio 1.09, 95% CI 0.92-1.29, P = 0.321). Laparoscopic LE was associated with improved OS in the unadjusted analysis only (P = 0.006), compared to the open LE group (hazard ratio 0.94, 95% CI 0.78-1.12, P = 0.495). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the use of a LE approach for T1 rectal tumours as a strategy to reduce surgical morbidity without compromising survival.

Glucose variability and inner retinal sensory neuropathy in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

PurposeTo quantify early neuroretinal alterations in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and to assess whether glycemic variability contributes to alterations in neuroretinal structure or function.MethodsThirty patients with T1DM and 51 controls underwent comprehensive ophthalmic examination and assessment of retinal function or structure with frequency doubling perimetry (FDP), contrast sensitivity, dark adaptation, fundus photography, and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Diabetic participants wore a subcutaneous continuous glucose monitor for 5 days, from which makers of glycemic variability including the low blood glucose index (LGBI) and area under the curve (AUC) for hypoglycemia were derived.ResultsSixteen patients had no diabetic retinopathy (DR), and 14 had mild or moderate DR. Log contrast sensitivity for the DM group was significantly reduced (mean±SD=1.63±0.06) compared with controls (1.77±0.13, P<0.001). OCT analysis revealed that the inner temporal inner nuclear layer (INL) was thinner in patients with T1DM (34.9±2.8 µm) compared with controls (36.5±2.9 µm) (P=0.023), although this effect lost statistical significance after application of the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Both markers of glycemic variability, the AUC for hypoglycemia (R=-0.458, P=0.006) and LGBI (R=-0.473, P=0.004), were negatively correlated with inner temporal INL thickness.ConclusionsPatients with T1DM and no to moderate DR exhibit alterations in inner retinal structure and function. Increased glycemic variability correlates with retinal thinning on OCT imaging, suggesting that fluctuations in blood glucose may contribute to neurodegeneration.

Does neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer increase postoperative morbidity or mortality?

Neoadjuvant therapy has proven to be effective in the reduction of locoregional recurrence and mortality for esophageal cancer. However, induction treatment has been reported to be associated with increased risk of postoperative complications. We therefore compared outcomes after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer for patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and patients treated with surgery alone. Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2005-2011), we identified 1939 patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Seven hundred and eight (36.5%) received neoadjuvant therapy, while 1231 (63.5%) received no neoadjuvant therapy within 90 days prior to surgery. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality, and secondary outcomes included overall and serious morbidity, length of stay, and operative time. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment were younger (62.3 vs. 64.7, P < 0.001), were more likely to have experienced recent weight loss (29.4% vs. 15.9%, P < 0.001), and had worse preoperative hematological cell counts (white blood cells <4.5 or >11 × 10(9) /L: 29.3% vs. 15.0%, P < 0.001; hematocrit <36%: 49.7% vs. 30.0%, P < 0.001). On unadjusted analysis, 30-day mortality, overall, and serious morbidity were comparable between the two groups, with the exception of the individual complications of venous thromboembolic events and bleeding transfusion, which were significantly lower in the surgery-only patients (5.71% vs. 8.27%, P = 0.027; 6.89% vs. 10.57%, P = 0.004; respectively). Multivariable and matched analysis confirmed that 30-day mortality, overall, and serious morbidity, as well as prolonged length of stay, were comparable between the two groups of patients. An increasing trend of preoperative neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer was observed through the study years (from 29.0% in 2005-2006 to 44.0% in 2011, P < 0.001). According to our analysis, preoperative neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer does not increase 30-day mortality or the overall risk of postoperative complications after esophagectomy.

Evaluation of the Parental Perceptions Questionnaire, a component of the COHQoL, for use in the UK.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability and validity of the Parental Perceptions Questionnaire (PPQ) for use in the UK and to investigate whether different approaches to the treatment of 'don't know' (DK) responses have any effect on the psychometric properties. METHODS: The parents of 89 children attending for an examination at a dental teaching hospital and a general dental practice completed the Parental-Caregiver Perceptions Questionnaire (PPQ), global oral health and global impact ratings. Clinical data were also collected. Four approaches were taken to the management of DK responses, one approach involved exclusion of DK responses and three approaches involved adjustment of DK responses (item mean, mean items answered and replacement of DK responses with zero). RESULTS: All four approaches demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the total scale. The mean items answered and replacement approaches had optimal internal consistency of the subscales of the PPQ. Assessments of criterion validity in relation to global oral health rating were similar when the DK responses were adjusted, but the exclusion of DK responses had a detrimental effect. Construct validity of PPQ in relation to global impact rating and clinical data was acceptable only when responses were adjusted. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that if DK responses are adjusted, the reliability and validity of this measure are acceptable for use in the UK.