Intracoronary brachytherapy with beta-radiation for the treatment of long diffuse in-stent restenosis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of intracoronary brachytherapy with beta-radiation (Sr/Y) for the treatment of long diffuse in-stent restenosis (ISR). METHODS: As recurrent ISR depends on intimal injury after coronary angioplasty, long in-stent restenotic lesions were defined as lesions with a treatment length >26 mm (lesion length >20 mm plus a treatment margin of 3 mm at each end). Seventy-eight patients with long ISR were treated at our institution with beta-brachytherapy after coronary angioplasty. Patients were irradiated with either an approximate dose of 12 Gy at 1 mm vessel wall depth or with 18 Gy at 1 mm vessel wall depth. Clinical follow-up was available for 69 patients and angiographic follow-up for 65 patients. Late lumen loss (LLL), binary restenosis (stenosis >50%), target lesion revascularization (TLR) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were assessed for a follow-up time of 6.6+/-2.2 months. RESULTS: Mean interventional treatment length was 46+/-18 mm. TLR was performed in all 23 patients with binary restenosis (33%). Death of cardiac cause was reported for two patients, one of whom did not undergo TLR. Thus, overall MACE rate was 35%. Recurrent ISR was significantly more frequent in patients with geographic miss. Comparison of the different radiation dose regimens revealed significantly lower LLL in patients irradiated with the higher dose (0.20+/-0.68 mm compared with 0.65+/-0.96 mm, P=0.03). CONCLUSION: Intracoronary brachytherapy with beta-radiation (Sr/Y) is a safe and effective therapeutic option for the reduction of recurrent ISR in long diffuse lesions. We recommend a high-dose irradiation with 18 Gy at 1 mm vessel wall depth.

Clinical quality assurance for endovascular brachytherapy devices.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Endovascular brachytherapy is still an important therapy modality with a high number of treated patients per year. Quality assurance of devices used has been addressed already in several publications (AAPM, DGMP, ESTRO, NCS). However, there are no clear recommendations given on test procedures and related equipment. Our experience with four different devices containing beta- ((32)P, (90)Sr/Y) and gamma-sources ((192)Ir), which were used in clinical routine during the last 3 years is described. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The incoming check includes leakage radiation, missing catheter interlock, positioning test, timer check, interrupt button check, power-off test and verification of the manual retraction facility. Dose profiles are measured using GafChromic film. Source strength verification is performed using well type chambers or air-kerma measurements. In addition, the proposed reference absorbed dose rate at 2 mm distance from the source centre is measured with a dedicated film dosimetry technique where two additional films are exposed to two known doses in a (60)Co field for calibration. RESULTS: Dosimetrical parameters (dose profiles, source strength) are found to be within +/-10% of the manufacturers specifications. The reference dose rate measured with film is on average +3.1% for 13 (90)Sr seed trains, +8.1% for three (32)P wire sources and -3.7% for one (192)Ir seed ribbon compared to the source certificate. The activity of 30 individual (32)P wire sources measured by using a calibrated well type chamber showed a deviation of mean -0.3%, the activity of 16 (192)Ir seed ribbons determined with air kerma measurements a deviation of mean 2.8%. CONCLUSIONS: The QA programme introduced in our department provides methods to verify all relevant parameters proposed by international recommendations. Film dosimetry can be used as independent verification of the reference dose rate within a 10% limit.