ABSTRACT
ImportanceWhile much of the attention on the COVID-19 pandemic was directed at the daily counts of cases and those with serious disease overwhelming health services, increasingly, reports have appeared of people who experience debilitating symptoms after the initial infection. This is popularly known as long COVID. ObjectiveTo estimate by country and territory of the number of patients affected by long COVID in 2020 and 2021, the severity of their symptoms and expected pattern of recovery DesignWe jointly analyzed ten ongoing cohort studies in ten countries for the occurrence of three major symptom clusters of long COVID among representative COVID cases. The defining symptoms of the three clusters (fatigue, cognitive problems, and shortness of breath) are explicitly mentioned in the WHO clinical case definition. For incidence of long COVID, we adopted the minimum duration after infection of three months from the WHO case definition. We pooled data from the contributing studies, two large medical record databases in the United States, and findings from 44 published studies using a Bayesian meta-regression tool. We separately estimated occurrence and pattern of recovery in patients with milder acute infections and those hospitalized. We estimated the incidence and prevalence of long COVID globally and by country in 2020 and 2021 as well as the severity-weighted prevalence using disability weights from the Global Burden of Disease study. ResultsAnalyses are based on detailed information for 1906 community infections and 10526 hospitalized patients from the ten collaborating cohorts, three of which included children. We added published data on 37262 community infections and 9540 hospitalized patients as well as ICD-coded medical record data concerning 1.3 million infections. Globally, in 2020 and 2021, 144.7 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 54.8-312.9) people suffered from any of the three symptom clusters of long COVID. This corresponds to 3.69% (1.38-7.96) of all infections. The fatigue, respiratory, and cognitive clusters occurred in 51.0% (16.9-92.4), 60.4% (18.9-89.1), and 35.4% (9.4-75.1) of long COVID cases, respectively. Those with milder acute COVID-19 cases had a quicker estimated recovery (median duration 3.99 months [IQR 3.84-4.20]) than those admitted for the acute infection (median duration 8.84 months [IQR 8.10-9.78]). At twelve months, 15.1% (10.3-21.1) continued to experience long COVID symptoms. Conclusions and relevanceThe occurrence of debilitating ongoing symptoms of COVID-19 is common. Knowing how many people are affected, and for how long, is important to plan for rehabilitative services and support to return to social activities, places of learning, and the workplace when symptoms start to wane. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSWhat are the extent and nature of the most common long COVID symptoms by country in 2020 and 2021? FindingsGlobally, 144.7 million people experienced one or more of three symptom clusters (fatigue; cognitive problems; and ongoing respiratory problems) of long COVID three months after infection, in 2020 and 2021. Most cases arose from milder infections. At 12 months after infection, 15.1% of these cases had not yet recovered. MeaningThe substantial number of people with long COVID are in need of rehabilitative care and support to transition back into the workplace or education when symptoms start to wane.
ABSTRACT
COVID-19 shows an unexplained, strong male bias for severity and mortality. Loss of Y (LOY) in myeloid cells is a risk factor candidate in COVID-19 because of associations with many age-related diseases and its effect on transcription of immune genes. We report the highest levels of LOY in cells that are crucial for the development of severe COVID-19 phenotype, such as low-density neutrophils, granulocytes, and monocytes reaching 46%, 32%, and 29%, respectively, from men with critical COVID-19 (n=139). LOY in sorted subpopulations of leukocytes correlated with increased thrombocyte count, thromboembolic events, invasive mechanical ventilation and a history of vessel disease. In recovered patients, LOY decreased in whole blood and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Moreover, sc-RNA-seq analysis of CD14+ monocytes from 30 COVID-19 males and 34 controls revealed pervasive transcriptional downregulation in LOY-cells, notably affecting HLA class I and II genes important for antigen presentation. The data support a link between LOY and emergency myelopoiesis as well as the role of LOY in modulation of COVID-19 severity. Our results might also be relevant for other viral infections showing similar male bias.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic liver surgery is evolving and the best technique for dividing the liver parenchyma is currently under debate. The aim of this study was to study different techniques during a full laparoscopic lobe resection, and determine the efficacy and risks of bleeding and gas embolism. METHODS: Sixteen pigs were randomized to two groups: group US underwent an operation with Ultracision shears (AutoSonix) and ultrasonic dissector (CUSA) and group VS with a vessel sealing system (Ligasure) and ultrasonic dissector. A left lobe resection was performed. Transesophageal endoscopic echocardiography (TEE) was used to detect gas emboli in the right side of the heart and pulmonary artery. The operations and TEE were recorded for later assessment. RESULTS: Compared with group VS, group US exhibited significantly more intraoperative bleeding (p = 0.02), a trend towards a longer operation time (p = 0.08), and a trend towards more embolization for grade I emboli. In total, 10 of 15 animals had emboli during the operation. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that a laparoscopic left lobe resection can be performed with a combination of AutoSonix and CUSA as well as with Ligasure and CUSA instrumentation. In our hands, less bleeding was incurred with Ligasure than with AutoSonix.