Isocapnic hyperventilation provides early extubation after head and neck surgery: A prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Isocapnic hyperventilation (IHV) shortens recovery time after inhalation anaesthesia by increasing ventilation while maintaining a normal airway carbon dioxide (CO2 )-level. One way of performing IHV is to infuse CO2 to the inspiratory limb of a breathing circuit during mechanical hyperventilation (HV). In a prospective randomized study, we compared this IHV technique to a standard emergence procedure (control). METHODS: Thirty-one adult ASA I-III patients undergoing long-duration (>3 hours) sevoflurane anaesthesia for major head and neck surgery were included and randomized to IHV-treatment (n = 16) or control (n = 15). IHV was performed at minute ventilation 13.6 ± 4.3 L/min and CO2 delivery, dosed according to a nomogram tested in a pilot study. Time to extubation and eye-opening was recorded. Inspired (FICO2 ) and expired (FETCO2 ) CO2 and arterial CO2 levels (PaCO2 ) were monitored. Cognition was tested preoperatively and at 20, 40 and 60 minutes after surgery. RESULTS: Time from turning off the vapourizer to extubation was 13.7 ± 2.5 minutes in the IHV group and 27.4 ± 6.5 minutes in controls (P < .001). Two minutes after extubation, PaCO2 was 6.2 ± 0.5 and 6.2 ± 0.6 kPa in the IHV and control group respectively. In 69% (IHV) vs 53% (controls), post-operative cognition returned to pre-operative values within 40 minutes after surgery (NS). Incidences of pain and nausea/vomiting did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized trial comparing an IHV method with a standard weaning procedure, time to extubation was reduced with 50% in the IHV group. The described IHV method can be used to decrease emergence time from inhalation anaesthesia.

Evaluation of lung and chest wall mechanics during anaesthesia using the PEEP-step method.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pulmonary complications are common. Between patients there are differences in lung and chest wall mechanics. Individualised mechanical ventilation based on measurement of transpulmonary pressures would be a step forward. A previously described method evaluates lung and chest wall mechanics from a change of ΔPEEP and calculation of change in end-expiratory lung volume (ΔEELV). The aim of the present study was to validate this PEEP-step method (PSM) during general anaesthesia by comparing it with the conventional method using oesophageal pressure (PES) measurements. METHODS: In 24 lung healthy subjects (BMI 18.5-32), three different sizes of PEEP steps were performed during general anaesthesia and ΔEELVs were calculated. Transpulmonary driving pressure (ΔPL) for a tidal volume equal to each ΔEELV was measured using PES measurements and compared to ΔPEEP with limits of agreement and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). ΔPL calculated with both methods was compared with a Bland-Altman plot. RESULTS: Mean differences between ΔPEEP and ΔPL were <0.15 cm H2O, 95% limits of agreements -2.1 to 2.0 cm H2O, ICC 0.6-0.83. Mean differences between ΔPL calculated by both methods were <0.2 cm H2O. Ratio of lung elastance and respiratory system elastance was 0.5-0.95. CONCLUSIONS: The large variation in mechanical properties among the lung healthy patients stresses the need for individualised ventilator settings based on measurements of lung and chest wall mechanics. The agreement between ΔPLs measured by the two methods during general anaesthesia suggests the use of the non-invasive PSM in this patient population. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT 02830516.

Evaluation of a method for isocapnic hyperventilation: a clinical pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Isocapnic hyperventilation (IHV) is a method that shortens time to extubation after inhalation anaesthesia using hyperventilation (HV) without lowering airway CO2 . In a clinical trial on patients undergoing long-duration sevoflurane anaesthesia for major ear-nose-throat (ENT) surgery, we evaluated the utility of a technique for CO2 delivery (DCO2 ) to the inspiratory limb of a closed breathing circuit, during HV, to achieve isocapnia. METHODS: Fifteen adult ASA 1-3 patients were included. After end of surgery, mechanical HV was started by doubling baseline minute ventilation. Simultaneously, CO2 was delivered and dosed using a nomogram developed in a previous experimental study. Time to extubation and eye opening was recorded. Inspired (FICO2 ) and expired (FETCO2 ) CO2 and arterial CO2 levels were monitored during IHV. Cognition was tested pre-operatively and at 20, 40 and 60 min after surgery. RESULTS: A DCO2 of 285 ± 45 ml/min provided stable isocapnia during HV (13.5 ± 4.1 l/min). The corresponding FICO2 level was 3.0 ± 0.3%. Time from turning off the vaporizer (1.3 ± 0.1 MACage) to extubation (0.2 ± 0.1 MACage) was 11.3 ± 1.8 min after 342 ± 131 min of anaesthesia. PaCO2 and FETCO2 remained at normal levels during and after IHV. In 85% of the patients, post-operative cognition returned to pre-operative values within 60 min. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients, a DCO2 nomogram for IHV was validated. The patients were safely extubated shortly after discontinuing long-term sevoflurane anaesthesia. Perioperatively, there were no adverse effects on arterial blood gases or post-operative cognition. This technique for IHV can potentially be used to decrease emergence time from inhalation anaesthesia.

Isocapnic hyperventilation shortens washout time for sevoflurane - an experimental in vivo study.

BACKGROUND: Isocapnic hyperventilation (IHV) is a method that fastens weaning from inhalation anaesthesia by increasing airway concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2 ) during hyperventilation (HV). In an animal model, we evaluated a technique of adding CO2 directly to the breathing circuit of a standard anaesthesia apparatus. METHODS: Eight anaesthetised pigs weighing 28 ± 2 kg were intubated and mechanically ventilated. From a baseline ventilation of 5 l/min, HV was achieved by doubling minute volume and fresh gas flow. Respiratory rate was increased from 15 to 22/min. The CO2 absorber was disconnected and CO2 was delivered (DCO2 ) to the inspiratory limb of a standard breathing circuit via a mixing box. Time required to decrease end-tidal sevoflurane concentration from 2.7% to 0.2% was defined as washout time. Respiration and haemodynamics were monitored by blood gas analysis, spirometry, electric impedance tomography and pulse contour analysis. RESULTS: A DCO2 of 261 ± 19 ml/min was necessary to achieve isocapnia during HV. The corresponding FICO2 -level remained stable at 3.1 ± 0.3%. During IHV, washout of sevoflurane was three times faster, 433 ± 135 s vs. 1387 ± 204 s (P < 0.001). Arterial CO2 tension and end-tidal CO2 , was 5.2 ± 0.4 kPa and 5.6 ± 0.4%, respectively, before IHV and 5.1 ± 0.3 kPa and 5.7 ± 0.3%, respectively, during IHV. CONCLUSIONS: In this experimental in vivo model of isocapnic hyperventilation, the washout time of sevoflurane anaesthesia was one-third compared to normal ventilation. The method for isocapnic hyperventilation described can potentially be transferred to a clinical setting with the intention to decrease emergence time from inhalation anaesthesia.

A simple method for isocapnic hyperventilation evaluated in a lung model.

BACKGROUND: Isocapnic hyperventilation (IHV) has the potential to increase the elimination rate of anaesthetic gases and has been shown to shorten time to wake-up and post-operative recovery time after inhalation anaesthesia. In this bench test, we describe a technique to achieve isocapnia during hyperventilation (HV) by adding carbon dioxide (CO2) directly to the breathing circuit of a standard anaesthesia apparatus with standard monitoring equipment. METHODS: Into a mechanical lung model, carbon dioxide was added to simulate a CO2 production (V(CO2)) of 175, 200 and 225 ml/min. Dead space (V(D)) volume could be set at 44, 92 and 134 ml. From baseline ventilation (BLV), HV was achieved by doubling the minute ventilation and fresh gas flow for each level of V(CO2), and dead space. During HV, CO2 was delivered (D(CO2)) by a precision flow meter via a mixing box to the inspiratory limb of the anaesthesia circuit to achieve isocapnia. RESULTS: During HV, the alveolar ventilation increased by 113 ± 6%. Tidal volume increased by 20 ± 0.1% during IHV irrespective of V(D) and V(CO2) level. D(CO2) varied between 147 ± 8 and 325 ± 13 ml/min. Low V(CO2) and large V(D) demanded a greater D(CO2) administration to achieve isocapnia. The FICO2 level during IHV varied between 2.3% and 3.3%. CONCLUSION: It is possible to maintain isocapnia during HV by delivering carbon dioxide through a standard anaesthesia circuit equipped with modern monitoring capacities. From alveolar ventilation, CO2 production and dead space, the amount of carbon dioxide that is needed to achieve IHV can be estimated.

Transpulmonary pressure and lung elastance can be estimated by a PEEP-step manoeuvre.

BACKGROUND: Transpulmonary pressure is a key factor for protective ventilation. This requires measurements of oesophageal pressure that is rarely used clinically. A simple method may be found, if it could be shown that tidal and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) inflation of the lungs with the same volume increases transpulmonary pressure equally. The aim of the present study was to compare tidal and PEEP inflation of the respiratory system. METHODS: A total of 12 patients with acute respiratory failure were subjected to PEEP trials of 0-4-8-12-16 cmH2O. Changes in end-expiratory lung volume (ΔEELV) following a PEEP step were determined from cumulative differences in inspiratory-expiratory tidal volumes. Oesophageal pressure was measured with a balloon catheter. RESULTS: Following a PEEP increase from 0 to 16 cmH2O end-expiratory oesophageal pressure did not increase (0.5 ± 4.0 cmH2O). Average increase in EELV following a PEEP step of 4 cmH2O was 230 ± 132 ml. The increase in EELV was related to the change in PEEP divided by lung elastance (El) derived from oesophageal pressure as ΔPEEP/El. There was a good correlation between transpulmonary pressure by oesophageal pressure and transpulmonary pressure based on El determined as ΔPEEP/ΔEELV, r(2) = 0.80, y = 0.96x, mean bias -0.4 ± 3.0 cmH2 O with limits of agreement from 5.4 to -6.2 cmH2O (2 standard deviations). CONCLUSION: PEEP inflation of the respiratory system is extremely slow, and allows the chest wall complex, especially the abdomen, to yield and adapt to intrusion of the diaphragm. As a consequence a change in transpulmonary pressure is equal to the change in PEEP and transpulmonary pressure can be determined without oesophageal pressure measurements.

Determination of 'recruited volume' following a PEEP step is not a measure of lung recruitability.

BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that the analysis of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-induced volume changes can quantify alveolar recruitment. The potential of a lung to be recruited is expected to be high in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), where collapsed lung tissue is very common. The volume change that is beyond the delta volume because of the patient's compliance has been termed 'recruited volume' (RecV). However, data of patients with low and high RecV showed less severe lung disease in high 'recruiters', indicating that RecV may not equal the 'potentially recruitable lung tissue' seen in computed tomography scans. We hypothesized that RecV is higher in lung-healthy (LH) patients with little collapsed lung compared with ARDS patients. METHODS: RecV and inspiratory capacity (IC) were determined in 12 LH and in 25 ARDS patients during incremental PEEP (steps of 2 cmH2 O). RecV was determined as the time-dependent increase in end-expiratory volume following the first expiration to the new PEEP level (ΔTDV). Gas distribution in LH patients was analyzed by electric impedance tomography. RESULTS: Cumulative RecV(ΔTDV) and IC were higher (P < 0.01) in LH compared with ARDS patients, 1739 ml vs. 832 ml and 4432 ml vs. 2020 ml, respectively. In both groups, RecV correlated excellently with IC (R(2) = 0.86). In LH, RecV emanated mainly from nondependent lung regions at PEEP below 15 cmH2O. Maximum plateau pressure was reached with fewer PEEP steps in ARDS compared with LH patients (11 vs. 14, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that RecV predominately measures a slow fraction of inflation of already aerated lung tissue and not recruitment of collapsed alveoli.

Nitroglycerine and patient position effect on central, hepatic and portal venous pressures during liver surgery.

BACKGROUND: To reduce blood loss during liver surgery, a low central venous pressure (CVP) is recommended. Nitroglycerine (NG) with its rapid onset and offset can be used to reduce CVP. In this study, the effect of NG on portal and hepatic venous pressures (PVP and HVP) in different body positions was assessed. METHODS: Thirteen patients undergoing liver resection were studied. Cardiac output (CO), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and CVP were measured. PVP and HVP were measured using tip manometer catheters at baseline (BL) in horizontal position; during NG infusion, targeting a MAP of 60 mmHg, with NG infusion and the patient placed in 10 head-down position. RESULTS: NG infusion reduced HVP from 9.7 ± 2.4 to 7.2 ± 2.4, PVP from 12.3 ± 2.2 to 9.7 ± 3.0 and CVP from 9.8 ± 1.9 to 7.2 ± 2.1 mmHg at BL. Head-down tilt during ongoing NG resulted in increases in HVP to 8.2 ± 2.1, PVP to 10.7 ± 3 and CVP to 11 ± 1.9 mmHg. CO at BL was 6.3 ± 1.1, which was reduced by NG to 5.8 ± 1.2. Head-down tilt together with NG infusion restored CO to 6.3 ± 1.0 l/min. CONCLUSION: NG infusion leads to parallel reductions in CVP, HVP and PVP at horizontal body position. Thus, CVP can be used to guide NG dosage and fluid administration at horizontal position. NG infusion can be used to reduce HVP. Head-down tilt can be used during NG infusion to improve both blood pressure and CO without substantial increase in liver venous pressure. In head-down tilt, CVP dissociates from HVP and PVP.

Current use of nitrous oxide in public hospitals in Scandinavian countries.

BACKGROUND: The use of nitrous oxide in modern anaesthesia has been questioned. We surveyed changes in use of nitrous oxide in Scandinavia and its justifications during the last two decades. METHODS: All 191 departments of anaesthesia in the Scandinavian countries were requested by email to answer an electronic survey in SurveyMonkey. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-five (64%) of the departments responded; four were excluded. The 121 departments provided 807.520 general anaesthetics annually. The usage of nitrous oxide was reported in 11.9% of cases, ranging from 0.6% in Denmark to 38.6% in Iceland while volatile anaesthetics were employed in 48.9%, lowest in Denmark (22.6%) and highest in Iceland (91.9%). Nitrous oxide was co-administered with volatile anaesthetics in 21.5% of general anaesthetics [2.4% (Denmark) -34.5% (Iceland)]. Use of nitrous oxide was unchanged in five departments (4%), decreasing in 75 (62%) and stopped in 41 (34%). Reasons for decreasing or stopping use of nitrous oxide were fairly uniform in the five countries, the most important being that other agents were 'better', whereas few put weight on its potential risk for increasing morbidity. Decision to stop using nitrous oxide was made by the departments except in four cases. Of 87 maternity wards, nitrous oxide was used in 72, whereas this was the case in 42 of 111 day-surgery units. CONCLUSION: The use of nitrous oxide has decreased in the Scandinavian countries, apparently because many now prefer other agents. Difference in practices between the five countries were unexpected and apparently not justified on anticipated evidence only.

Lung elastance and transpulmonary pressure can be determined without using oesophageal pressure measurements.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to demonstrate that lung elastance and transpulmonary pressure can be determined without using oesophageal pressure measurements. METHODS: Studies were performed on 13 anesthetized and sacrificed ex vivo pigs. Tracheal and oesophageal pressures were measured and changes in end-expiratory lung volume (ΔEELV) determined by spirometry as the cumulative inspiratory-expiratory tidal volume difference. Studies were performed with different end-expiratory pressure steps [change in end-expiratory airway pressure (ΔPEEP)], body positions and with abdominal load. RESULTS: A PEEP increase results in a multi-breath build-up of end-expiratory lung volume. End-expiratory oesophageal pressure did not increase further after the first expiration, constituting half of the change in ΔEELV following a PEEP increase, even though end-expiratory volume continued to increase. This resulted in a successive left shift of the chest wall pressure-volume curve. Even at a PEEP of 12 cmH(2) O did the end-expiratory oesophageal (pleural) pressure remain negative. CONCLUSIONS: A PEEP increase resulted in a less than expected increase in end-expiratory oesophageal pressure, indicating that the chest wall and abdomen gradually can accommodate changes in lung volume. The rib cage end-expiratory spring-out force stretches the diaphragm and prevents the lung from being compressed by abdominal pressure. The increase in transpulmonary pressure following a PEEP increase was closely related to the increase in PEEP, indicating that lung compliance can be calculated from the ratio of the change in end-expiratory lung volume and the change in PEEP, ΔEELV/ΔPEEP.

Intravenous boluses of fentanyl, 1 µg kg⁻¹, and remifentanil, 0.5 µg kg⁻¹, give similar maximum ventilatory depression in awake volunteers.

BACKGROUND: The relative respiratory effects of fentanyl and remifentanil, administered as i.v. bolus, have not previously been studied. We determined what remifentanil bolus dose gave the same maximum depression of ventilation as 1 µg kg(-1) of fentanyl. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers rebreathed in a system designed to dampen variations in end-tidal carbon dioxide tension PE'CO2 so that measurements would be obtained at similar levels of CO(2) stimulation. The minute ventilation was measured before (V(preinj)) and after injection (V(nadir)) of fentanyl, 1 µg kg(-1), and remifentanil, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 µg kg(-1). The remifentanil doses were plotted against V(nadir)/V(preinj) in a log-probit diagram to determine what amount gave the same maximum ventilatory depression as the fentanyl dose. RESULTS: V(nadir) was [median (inter-quartile range)] 51 (38-64)% of V(preinj) after fentanyl, and 70 (61-77), 50 (46-56), and 29 (24-38)%, respectively, after remifentanil. The nadir occurred 5.0 (4.4-7.0) min after fentanyl, and 3.8 (2.7-4.6), 2.9 (2.7-3.2), and 3.0 (2.7-3.2) min after remifentanil injection. PE'CO2 at ventilation nadir was 6.26 (5.98-6.62) kPa after fentanyl, and 6.18 (6.12-6.50), 6.11 (5.91-6.45), and 6.11 (5.93-6.45) kPa after remifentanil 0.25, 0.5, and 1 µg kg(-1), respectively. A remifentanil dose of 0.47 (0.42-0.62) µg kg(-1) was equidepressant to 1 µg kg(-1) of fentanyl. Fifteen minutes after fentanyl injection, the median minute ventilation was 30-40% less than after injection of remifentanil, 0.25 and 0.5 µg kg(-1) (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Fentanyl, 1 µg kg(-1), and remifentanil, 0.5 µg kg(-1), gave similar maximum ventilatory depression. The onset of and recovery from ventilatory depression were faster with remifentanil.

Positive end-expiratory pressure-induced changes in end-expiratory lung volume measured by spirometry and electric impedance tomography.

BACKGROUND: A bedside tool for monitoring changes in end-expiratory lung volume (ΔEELV) would be helpful to set optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. The hypothesis of this study was that the cumulative difference of the inspiratory and expiratory tidal volumes of the first 10 breaths after a PEEP change accurately reflects the change in lung volume following a PEEP alteration. METHODS: Changing PEEP induces lung volume changes, which are reflected in differences between inspiratory and expiratory tidal volumes measured by spirometry. By adding these differences with correction for offset, for the first 10 breaths after PEEP change, cumulative tidal volume difference was calculated to estimate ΔEELV(VT) ((i-e)) . This method was evaluated in a lung model and in patients with acute respiratory failure during a PEEP trial. In patients, ΔEELV(VT) ((i-e)) were compared with simultaneously measured changes in lung impedance, by electric impedance tomography (EIT), using calibration vs. tidal volume to estimate changes in ΔEELV(EIT) . RESULTS: In the lung model, there was close correlation (R(2) = 0.99) between ΔEELV(VT) ((i-e)) and known lung model volume difference, with a bias of -4 ml and limits of agreement of 42 and -50 ml. In 12 patients, ΔEELV(EIT) was closely correlated to ΔEELV(VT) ((i-e)) (R(2) = 0.92), with mean bias of 50 ml and limits of agreement of 131 and -31 ml. Changes in EELV estimated by EIT (ΔEELV(EIT) ) exceeded measurements by spirometry (ΔEELV(VT) ((i-e)) ), with 15 (±15)%. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that spirometric measurements of inspiratory-expiratory tidal volumes agree well with impedance changes monitored by EIT and can be used bedside to estimate PEEP-induced changes in EELV.

Effect of patient position and PEEP on hepatic, portal and central venous pressures during liver resection.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that blood loss during liver resection may be reduced if central venous pressure (CVP) is kept at a low level. This can be achieved by changing patient position but it is not known how position changes affect portal (PVP) and hepatic (HVP) venous pressures. The aim of the study was to assess if changes in body position result in clinically significant changes in these pressures. METHODS: We studied 10 patients undergoing liver resection. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and CVP were measured using fluid-filled catheters, PVP and HVP with tip manometers. Measurements were performed in the horizontal, head up and head down tilt position with two positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels. RESULTS: A 10° head down tilt at PEEP 5 cm H(2) O significantly increased CVP (11 ± 3 to 15 ± 3 mmHg) and MAP (72 ± 8 to 76 ± 8 mmHg) while head up tilt at PEEP 5 cm H(2) O decreased CVP (11 ± 3 to 6 ± 4 mmHg) and MAP (72 ± 8 to 63 ± 7 mmHg) with minimal changes in transhepatic venous pressures. Increasing PEEP from 5 to 10 resulted in small increases, around 1 mmHg in CVP, PVP and HVP. There was no significant correlation between changes in CVP vs. PVP and HVP during head up tilt and only a weak correlation between CVP and HVP by head down tilt. CONCLUSIONS: Changes of body position resulted in marked changes in CVP but not in HVPs. Head down or head up tilt to reduce venous pressures in the liver may therefore not be effective measures to reduce blood loss during liver surgery.

Prolonged moderate pressure recruitment manoeuvre results in lower optimal positive end-expiratory pressure and plateau pressure.

BACKGROUND: In acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), recruitment manoeuvres (RMs) are used frequently. In pigs with induced ALI, superior effects have been found using a slow moderate-pressure recruitment manoeuvre (SLRM) compared with a vital capacity recruitment manoeuvre (VICM). We hypothesized that the positive recruitment effects of SLRM could also be achieved in ALI/ARDS patients. Our primary research question was whether the same compliance could be obtained using lower RM pressure and subsequent positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Secondly, optimal PEEP levels following the RMs were compared, and the use of volume-dependent compliance (VDC) to identify successful lung recruitment and optimal PEEP was evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective randomised cross-over study where 16 ventilated patients with early ALI/ARDS each were subjected to the two RMs, followed by decremental PEEP titration. Volume-dependent initial, middle and final compliance (C(ini) , C(mid) and C(fin) ) were determined. Electric impedance tomography and end-expiratory lung volume measurements were used to follow lung volume changes. RESULTS: The maximum response in compliance, PaO2/FIO2, venous admixture and C(ini) /C(fin) after recruitment, during decremental PEEP, was at significantly lower PEEP and plateau pressure after SLRM than VICM. Fewer patients responded in gas exchange after the SLRM, which was not the case for lung mechanics. The response in C(ini) was more pronounced than in conventional compliance. CONCLUSIONS: The same compliance increase is achieved with SLRM as with VICM, and lower PEEP can be used, with correspondingly lower plateau pressures. VDC seems promising to identify successful recruitment and optimal PEEP.

A new non-radiological method to assess potential lung recruitability: a pilot study in ALI patients.

INTRODUCTION: Potentially recruitable lung has been assessed previously in patients with acute lung injury (ALI) by computed tomography. A large variability in lung recruitability was observed between patients. In this study, we assess whether a new non-radiological bedside technique could determine potentially recruitable lung volume (PRLV) in ALI patients. METHODS: Sixteen mechanically ventilated patients with early ALI/ARDS were subjected to a recruitment manoeuvre and decremental PEEP titration. Electric impedance tomography, together with measurements of end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and tracheal pressure, were used to determine PRLV. The method defines fully recruited open lung volume (OLV) as the volume reached at the end of two consecutive vital capacity manoeuvres to 40 cmH2O. It also uses extrapolation of the baseline alveolar pressure/volume curve up to 40 cmH2O, the volume reached being the non-recruited lung volume. The difference between the fully recruited and the non-recruited volume was defined as PRLV. RESULTS: We observed a considerable heterogeneity among the patients in lung recruitability, PRLV range 11-47%. In a post hoc analysis, dividing the patients into two groups, a high and a low PRLV group, we found at baseline before the recruitment manoeuvre that the high PRLV group had lower compliance and a lower fraction of EELV/OLV. CONCLUSIONS: Using non-invasive radiation-free bedside methods, it may be possible to measure PRLV in ALI/ARDS patients. It is possible that this technique could be used to determine the need for recruitment manoeuvres and to select PEEP level on the basis of lung recruitability.

End-expiratory lung volume and ventilation distribution with different continuous positive airway pressure systems in volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has been shown to improve oxygenation and a number of different CPAP systems are available. The aim of this study was to assess lung volume and ventilation distribution using three different CPAP techniques. METHODS: A high-flow CPAP system (HF-CPAP), an ejector-driven system (E-CPAP) and CPAP using a Servo 300 ventilator (V-CPAP) were randomly applied at 0, 5 and 10 cmH2O in 14 volunteers. End-expiratory lung volume (EELV) was measured by N2 dilution at baseline; changes in EELV and tidal volume distribution were assessed by electric impedance tomography. RESULTS: Higher end-expiratory and mean airway pressures were found using the E-CPAP vs. the HF-CPAP and the V-CPAP system (P<0.01). EELV increased markedly from baseline, 0 cmH2O, with increased CPAP levels: 1110±380, 1620±520 and 1130±350 ml for HF-, E- and V-CPAP, respectively, at 10 cmH2O. A larger fraction of the increase in EELV occurred for all systems in ventral compared with dorsal regions (P<0.01). In contrast, tidal ventilation was increasingly directed toward dorsal regions with increasing CPAP levels (P<0.01). The increase in EELV as well as the tidal volume redistribution were more pronounced with the E-CPAP system as compared with both the HF-CPAP and the V-CPAP systems (P<0.05) at 10 cmH2O. CONCLUSION: EELV increased more in ventral regions with increasing CPAP levels, independent of systems, leading to a redistribution of tidal ventilation toward dorsal regions. Different CPAP systems resulted in different airway pressure profiles, which may result in different lung volume expansion and tidal volume distribution.

Regional intratidal gas distribution in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome assessed by electric impedance tomography.

BACKGROUND: Regional tidal volume distribution and end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) distribution in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI, ARDS) have previously been investigated using computed tomograpy and electric impedance tomography (EIT). In the present study, we utilized the high temporal resolution of EIT to assess intratidal gas distribution. METHODS: Sixteen ventilator patients with ALI/ARDS were studied. EIT was used for analysis of intertidal, intratidal and EELV regional distribution. Intratidal regional gas distribution (ITV) was analyzed by dividing the regional tidal impedance signal into eight iso-volume parts. Alveolar pressure/volume curves during ongoing ventilation and volume-dependent compliance during the initial inspiration (Cini) were calculated. A low-pressure (~32 cm H2O) recruitment maneuver and a decremental PEEPtrial were implemented. RESULTS: The increase in EELV was preferentially distributed to non-dependent lung regions. The intratidal gas distribution pattern was similar to the tidal volume distribution following increased PEEP; non-dependent distribution decreased and dependent distribution increased during inspiration. Cini increased, indicating successful recruitment. The distribution varied widely among individual patients. In one patient with a low EELV, the ITV pattern showed that non-dependent distribution increased and dependent distribution decreased. This coincided with minimal improvement in volume-dependent compliance. This patient probably needed higher recruitment pressure. In one patient with a high baseline EELV, there was very little change in regional ITV, and non-dependent Cini decreased. This was probably a patient with low potential recruitability, who required only moderate PEEP. CONCLUSION: On-line intratidal gas distribution monitoring offers additional information on recruitability and optimal PEEP.