Midazolam-flumazenil versus propofol anaesthesia for scoliosis surgery with wake-up tests.

BACKGROUND: Wake-up tests may be necessary during scoliosis surgery to ensure that spinal function remains intact. METHODS: Intra- and postoperative wake-up tests were performed together with somatosensory cortical evoked potentials (SCEPs) monitoring in 40 patients randomized to either midazolam (M) or propofol (P) infusions for scoliosis surgery. Other anaesthetic medication was similar in both groups. At the surgeon's request, N2O was turned off and midazolam or propofol infusions were discontinued. In the M group, flumazenil was given in refracted doses. Patients were asked to move hands and feet. The test was repeated immediately after the end of surgery. RESULTS: The median intraoperative wake-up times were 2.9 min in the M group and 16.0 min in the P group. The respective postoperative wake-up times were 1.8 and 13.9 min. The quality of both intra- and postoperative arousals was significantly better in the M group. Twelve patients in the P group could not be awakened intraoperatively within 15 min and were given naloxone. One of these patients woke up violently and dislodged the endotracheal tube. Another patient in the P group had explicit recall of the test, but no pain. Five patients in the M group became resedated in the recovery room. Cost of anaesthetic drugs was similar in both groups. Satisfactory intraoperative SCEPs were recorded from 17 patients in each group. There were no neurological sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: Wake-up tests can be conducted faster and better with midazolam-flumazenil sequence compared with propofol.

Readiness for surgery after axillary block: single or multiple injection techniques.

We have assessed prospectively the time to readiness for surgery following axillary block (sum of block performance and latency times) in 80 patients. The brachial plexus was identified using a nerve stimulator, and anaesthetized with 45 mL of mepivacaine 1% with adrenaline 5 micrograms mL-1. In group 1 (single injection) the whole volume of mepivacaine was injected after locating only one of the plexus nerves. In group 2 (multiple injections) at least three plexus nerves were located, and the volume of mepivacaine was divided between them. Sensory block was assessed by a blinded observer every 10 min. Patchy analgesia was supplemented after electrolocating the unblocked nerves after 20, 30 or 40 min. The patient was pronounced ready for surgery when analgesia was present in all areas to be operated upon, which always included the three nerves to the hand. The single injection technique required less time for block performance (mean 5.5 min) than multiple injections (mean 9.5 min), P < 0.0001. However, latency of the block was longer and the requirement for supplemental nerve blocks was greater, after single injections (33 min and 57%) than after multiple injections (15.5 min and 7%, respectively), P < 0.0001. As a result, readiness for surgery was achieved faster in group 2 (25 min), than in group 1 (38.5 min), P < 0.0001. After supplementation, block effectiveness was 100% in group 1 and 98% in group 2 (NS). The frequency of adverse effects (vessel puncture or paraesthesia) was similar in both groups. No neurological sequelae were observed. We conclude that the multiple injection technique takes longer to perform than single injection, but that readiness for surgery is faster because of shorter block latency and better spread of analgesia.

Intra-arterial regional anaesthesia for hand surgery with alkalinized 0.5% lignocaine.

Intra-arterial regional anaesthesia (IARA) for hand surgery is an old, forgotten technique. One of the causes of low popularity may be a scalding sensation in the hand during intra-arterial injection of lignocaine, which may be caused by low pH of lignocaine's solution. In this randomized, double-blind study, normal (pH 5.2-5.3) or alkalinized (pH 7.2-7.3) preservative-free 0.5% lignocaine 1.5 mg kg-1 was injected into the radial arteries of forty adult patients to produce anaesthesia for ambulatory hand surgery. Scalding sensation in the hand during intra-arterial injection (VAS) was less pronounced with alkalinized lignocaine (P = 0.04). The time of onset and regression of analgesia was similar in both groups. Four patients in group 1 (normal lignocaine) and six patients in group 2 (alkalinized lignocaine) needed supplemental analgesia at the start of surgery (NS). Cannulation time, operating conditions, motor blockade, surgical-, and tourniquet pain scores (VAS) and patient's acceptance were similar. Three patients (two in group 1 and one in group 2) had minor systemic adverse effects after tourniquet release (NS). Nine patients in group 1 and seven in group 2 developed minor bruises after cannulation (NS). No other sequelae of intra-arterial injections were observed. We conclude that alkalinized 0.5% lignocaine was less painful on injection than normal lignocaine and should be preferred for intra-arterial anaesthesia for hand surgery.

Intra-arterial regional analgesia of the hand.

Fifteen millilitre of 0.5% lignocaine was injected into the radial artery to provide analgesia for hand surgery in an elderly arthritic female patient. She experienced only minimal discomfort during injection and analgesia was excellent. No untoward effects were observed. This technique is recommended when other methods of regional analgesia are unavailable.