Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Vojnosanit Pregl ; 72(5): 427-30, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26165050

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Bone allografts are frequently used in orthopedic reconstructive procedures carrying a high risk for recipients. To assess the nature and frequency of allograft contamination and associated surgical infection the case records from our institutional bone bank were reviewed. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the microbiology of discarded bone allografts and the surgical site of the recipients. A case series of patients who acquired surgical site infection after allogenic bone transplantation was presented. Swab culturing was conducted on 309 femoral heads from living donors who underwent partial and total hip arthroplasty between January 2007 and December 2013. To prevent potential bone allograft contamination we used saline solution of 2.0 mg/ml of amikacin during thawing. The overall infection rate was analyzed in 197 recipients. RESULTS: Of the 309 donated femoral heads, 37 were discarded due to bacterial contamination, giving the overall contamination rate of 11.97%. The postoperative survey of 213 bone allotransplantations among 197 recipients showed the infection rate of 2.03%. The coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was the most commonly identified contaminant of bone allografts and recipient surgical sites. CONCLUSION: The allograft contamination rate and the infection rate among recipients in our institution are in accordance with the international standards. The coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was the most commonly identified contaminant of bone allografts,and recipient surgical sites. There is no strong evidence that surgical site infections were associated with bone allograft utilization. We plan further improvements in allograft handling and decontamination with highly concentrated antibiotic solutions in order to reduce infection risk for recipients.


Subject(s)
Allografts/microbiology , Bone Transplantation/adverse effects , Femur/microbiology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Acinetobacter/isolation & purification , Adult , Aged , Enterococcus faecalis/isolation & purification , Female , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Proteus mirabilis/isolation & purification , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolation & purification , Retrospective Studies , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Staphylococcus epidermidis/isolation & purification , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Viridans Streptococci/isolation & purification
2.
Cell Tissue Bank ; 15(4): 567-72, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24549703

ABSTRACT

We analyzed the incidence and predisposing factors for overall discard rate after retrieval of 295 femoral head allografts. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the quality system of institutional bone banking and to ensure that we can provide high standard allografts with low infection rate. Audit of bone banking was conducted on 295 donors and 180 recipients. Of the 295 donated femoral heads 77 were discarded, giving an overall discard rate of 26.1 %. At retrieval, 37 allografts were positive, giving an overall contamination rate of 12.54 %. The organism most commonly identified was Staphylococcus species. Seven (2.37 %) of the 295 allografts failed the blood screening tests. Twelve allografts (4.06 %) were discarded because of suspected damage of the packaging or disuse during surgery. Due to donor death or inability to perform serology retests, 21 (7.11 %) allografts were discarded. In the postoperative survey an infection rate of 2.22 % was found. After 7 years of bone banking, our results show that overall discard rate and allograft related infection rate are in accordance with the international standards. The leading cause of allograft discarding was bacterial contamination influenced by the surgical team. We suggest stringent aseptic allograft handling during harvesting and thawing within highly concentrated antibiotic solution to reduce a possibility of its contamination.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Bone Banks/standards , Bone Transplantation/standards , Clinical Audit/standards , Femur Head/transplantation , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Allografts , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Cryopreservation/standards , Female , Femur Head/microbiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Serbia/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...