ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although Zimbabwe has transitioned out of the 30 high-burden countries, it still remained in the 30 high multidrug-resistant (MDR)/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (TB) burden. Rapid detection of rifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH) is essential for the diagnosis of MDR-TB. The World Health Organization has recommended the use of molecular WHO-recommended rapid diagnostic (mWRD) for TB and DR-TB. STANDARD™ M10 MDR-TB assay is a new molecular rapid diagnostic assay developed by SD Biosensor for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and RIF and INF resistance. This study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of STANDARD™ M10 MDR-TB assay. METHODS: The study was conducted on 214 samples with different MTB and RIF and INH resistance status. The STANDARD™ M10 MDR-TB assay was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, MGIT culture, and phenotypic drug susceptibility testing are used as comparative methods. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of STANDARD™ M10 MDR-TB assay for the detection of MTB are 99% and 97.9%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the assay for detection of MDR-TB were 97.8% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The STANDARD™ M10 MDR-TB assay demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in the detection of MTB and RIF and INH resistance. This molecular assay can also be used as an alternative to other mWRD assays.
Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents , Isoniazid , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Rifampin , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/drug effects , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolation & purification , Rifampin/pharmacology , Zimbabwe , Humans , Isoniazid/pharmacology , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/microbiology , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/diagnosis , Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methodsABSTRACT
We recently demonstrated that accelerating the relaxation of nonphotochemical quenching leads to higher soybean photosynthetic efficiency and yield. In response, Sinclair et al. assert that improved photosynthesis cannot improve crop yields and that there is only one valid experimental design for proving a genetic improvement in yield. We explain here why neither assertion is valid.
Subject(s)
Crops, Agricultural , Glycine max , Photosynthesis , Glycine max/genetics , Glycine max/physiology , Crops, Agricultural/genetics , Crops, Agricultural/physiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is a public health concern globally. MDR-TB is defined as resistance to rifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH), the two-major anti-TB first-line TB treatment drugs. Rapid identification of MDR-TB can contribute significantly to the control of TB. The GenoType® MTBDRplus Ver 2.0 assay is a molecular assay used to detect genetic mutations that result in RIF and INH resistance. The aim of this study was to validate the performance of the GenoType® MTBDRplus Ver 2.0 assay for the detection of INH and RIF resistance. METHODS: Fifty-five stored Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates were tested using both the mycobacterial growth indicator tube (MGIT), antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), and the GenoType® MTBDRplus Ver 2.0 assay. The MGIT AST was done according to the BBL MGIT AST SIRE system with RIF and INH final critical concentrations of 1.0 µg/ml and 0.1 µg/ml, respectively. The GenoType® MTBDRplus assay (Hain Lifescience, Germany) was performed following the manufacturer's instructions. RESULTS: The GenoType® MTBDRplus Ver 2.0 assay had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 100% for INH and RIF resistance. The intra-assay precision for the assay was 100%. CONCLUSION: The GenoType® MTBDRplus Ver 2.0 assay's sensitivity and specificity show that the assay is highly accurate for the detection of RIF and INH resistance and thus can be used as an alternate platform due to its shorter results turnaround time.
Subject(s)
Antibiotics, Antitubercular/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Genotyping Techniques/methods , Isoniazid/pharmacology , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Rifampin/pharmacology , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/diagnosis , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/drug effects , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cervical chlamydia infection poses high risk of pregnancy complications and neonatal infection. Reference methods for the detection of chlamydia infection are not available for routine use in developing countries. Point-of-care (POC) tests can bridge this gap. This study evaluated Cortez Onestep Chlamydia Rapicard™ insta test for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnant women at Mbare Polyclinic and determined the prevalence of C. trachomatis. METHODS: This was a cross sectional study in 242 pregnant women aged ≥18 years attending their first ANC visit at Mbare polyclinic in Harare, Zimbabwe. Data collection form was used to obtain demographic and predisposing factors to Chlamydia infection and two endocervical swabs were collected from each patient. One specimen was examined by the POC test at the clinic and the other by SDA method in the laboratory. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the rapid kit were 71.4%, 99.6%, 90.9% and 98.3% respectively. Prevalence of C. trachomitis was 5.8% by SDA method. CONCLUSION AND GLOBAL HEALTH IMPLICATIONS: The kit's sensitivity (71.4%) and specificity (99.6%) implies that the rapid test is an important test which needs further evaluations. The prevalence of C. trichomitis of 5.8% is comparable to studies done elsewhere in Africa.
