Anterior corneal optical aberrations induced by photorefractive keratectomy for hyperopia.

PURPOSE: Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for hyperopia requires both a steepening of the central cornea and a flattening of the mid-periphery to achieve its effect and is likely to affect the optical aberrations of the eye. METHODS: Nine patients underwent PRK to correct between +2.00 and +4.00 D of hyperopia (first eye treated for each patient) using the Summit Technology Apex Plus excimer laser. Anterior corneal aberrations for pupil diameters of 3, 5.5 and 7 mm were estimated from corneal topography data (TMS-1), assuming a uni-index, single surface cornea. Refractive error was assessed using retinoscopy and standard subjective tests. RESULTS: Apart from the intended change in refraction (mean spherical equivalent manifest refraction, +4.60 +/- 1.60 D before surgery and +0.70 +/- 1.60 D at 1 year after surgery), the most significant change was in spherical aberration. Anterior corneal spherical aberration was positive (+1.60 +/- 0.60 D for a 5.5-mm pupil) before surgery and became negative after surgery (-1.80 +/- 1.20 D at 1 year). The change in spherical aberration was related to the achieved change in refractive error. CONCLUSIONS: The large change (approximately 3.00 D) in spherical aberration (from positive to negative aberration) has implications for the optical performance of the whole eye, where the effects of lenticular aberration must also be considered.

Hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy with the erodible mask and axicon system: two year follow-up.

PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy and long-term stability of hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy (H-PRK) using the erodible mask and Axicon system. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, England. METHODS: Forty-three patients (43 eyes), with a mean preoperative refraction (spherical equivalent) of +4.54 diopters (D) (range +1.75 to +7.50 D), were treated using an Apex Plus(R) excimer laser (Summit Technology). This uses an erodible mask to ablate a 6. 50 mm diameter hyperopic correction and an Axicon to fashion a 1.50 mm blend zone around the correction. The overall ablation diameter was 9.50 mm. Follow-up was 2 years. RESULTS: At 2 years, the mean manifest refraction was +0.16 D (range +4.125 to -4.000 D), with the induced correction appearing stable after 9 months. Based on the Munnerlyn algorithm, predictability was acceptable for corrections up to +4.50 D, with 68% of eyes within +/-1.00 D of the predicted correction. It was poorer for +6.00 D corrections, with 33% of eyes within +/-1.00 D of that expected. Patient satisfaction was high. Forty eyes (93%) had an improvement in uncorrected near visual acuity and 37 (86%), an improvement in uncorrected distance acuity. A peripheral ring of haze, 6.5 mm in diameter, appeared in all eyes 1 month postoperatively. Its intensity was maximal at 3 to 9 months and then diminished over time. There were no significant differences in measurements of the central corneal transparency at 12 and 24 months and those preoperatively. Measurements of flicker contrast sensitivity, forward light scatter (glare), and scotopic halos showed no significant differences between preoperative values and those measured after 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Achieved H-PRK corrections with the erodible mask and Axicon system agreed closely with the Munnerlyn algorithm, with refractive stability after 9 months. Predictability was acceptable for corrections up to +4.50 D. Axial corneal transparency was not compromised and visual performance, in terms of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, forward light scatter, and night halos, was not impaired.

Photorefractive keratectomy. A 6-year follow-up study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the long-term stability and efficacy of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. DESIGN: Patients who participated in the first United Kingdom photorefractive keratectomy clinical trial were asked to attend a 6-year follow-up assessment. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-three patients (68%) of the original cohort of 120 participants were observed for 6 years. A Summit Technology UV200 excimer laser with a 4-mm ablation zone had been used with patients allocated to one of six groups according to their preoperative refraction. Each group received one of the following spherical corrections: -2, -3, -4, -5, -6, or -7 diopters (D). Within each group, all patients received an identical treatment, and thus emmetropia was not the goal in all patients. INTERVENTION: The induced refractive change, objective corneal haze, glare, and halo measurements, together with possible late-phase complications, were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All groups achieved a refractive undercorrection, and the magnitude of the undercorrection was related to the size of the attempted correction. The induced refraction stabilized by 6 to 12 months and has been maintained up to the 6-year follow-up stage. RESULTS: Ninety-one percent of patients who underwent a -2.00-D correction and 76% of patients who received a -3.00-D correction were within +/- 1 D of the intended refraction at 6 years. Fifty-seven percent of the -4.00-D group and 50% of those in the -5.00-D group were within +/- 1 D, and this was reduced further to 43% in the -6.00-D group and 19% in the -7.00-D group. Six patients (7%) had evidence of residual corneal haze, which was visually significant in two patients (3%). Ten patients (12%) had significant night halos due to the small 4-mm ablation zone that was used in this early treatment trial. CONCLUSIONS: There was no further regression of the refraction after 1 year, and, more important, there was no sign of hyperopic shift or diurnal fluctuation in the patients' refraction. In addition, corneal haze appeared to reduce further with time, with no intraocular or retinal side effects being noted. Night halos remain a significant reported problem in a small number of patients who were treated with the 4-mm ablation zone.

Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of hyperopia using an erodible mask and axicon system.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to evaluate photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of hyperopia using the erodible mask and Axicon system. METHODS: Forty-three patients (43 eyes) with a mean refraction (spherical equivalent) of +4.54 diopter (D) (range, +1.75 to +7.50 D) were treated using a Summit Technology "Apex Plus" excimer laser. This system uses an erodible mask to create a 6.50-mm diameter hyperopic correction over the axial cornea. An Axicon then is used to fashion a 1.50-mm "blend zone" around the correction. On the basis of preoperative refractions, patients were assigned to 3 groups: 2 groups of 14 patients underwent either "+2.00 D" or "+3.00 D" corrections and 15 patients had "+4.00 D" corrections. RESULTS: All patients had a reduction in their hyperopia with an overcorrection, especially in the first month after surgery and some stability in the refractive change at 3 to 6 months. The mean manifest refraction (n = 43) at 6 months was -0.17 D (range, +4.50 D to -3.125 D). Patient satisfaction was high. At 6 months, all eyes had an improvement in unaided near visual acuity. Unaided distance acuity was improved in 37 eyes (86%). A ring of haze 6.5 mm in diameter appeared in all eyes 1 month after surgery. Night halo measurements at 6 months showed no differences from preoperative levels. Flicker contrast sensitivity and forward light scatter (glare) measurements showed no differences after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In this short-term study, photorefractive keratectomy for hyperopia using the erodible mask and Axicon system appeared to be a promising procedure. Visual performance, in terms of flicker contrast sensitivity, forward light scatter, and night halos, was not compromised. There was an overcorrection based on the manufacturer's algorithms. Manipulation of the treatment algorithms should improve future predictability.