Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Radiat Res ; 192(6): 649-661, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31609677

ABSTRACT

Assessment of health effects from low-dose radiation exposures in patients undergoing diagnostic imaging is an active area of research. High-quality dosimetry information pertaining to these medical exposures is generally not readily available to clinicians or epidemiologists studying radiation-related health risks. The purpose of this study was to provide methods for organ dose estimation in pediatric patients undergoing four common diagnostic fluoroscopy procedures: the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) series, the lower gastrointestinal (LGI) series, the voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) and the modified barium swallow (MBS). Abstracted X-ray film data and physician interviews were combined to generate procedure outlines detailing X-ray beam projections, imaged anatomy, length of X-ray exposure, and presence and amount of contrast within imaged anatomy. Monte Carlo radiation transport simulations were completed for each of the four diagnostic fluoroscopy procedures across the 162-member (87 males and 75 females) University of Florida/National Cancer Institute pediatric phantom library, which covers variations in both subject height and weight. Absorbed doses to 28 organs, including the active marrow and bone endosteum, were assigned for all 162 phantoms by procedure. Additionally, we provide dose coefficients (DCs) in a series of supplementary tables. The DCs give organ doses normalized to procedure-specific dose metrics, including: air kerma-area product (µGy/mGy · cm2), air kerma at the reference point (µGy/µGy), number of spot films (SF) (µGy/number of SFs) and total fluoroscopy time (µGy/s). Organs accumulating the highest absorbed doses per procedure were as follows: kidneys between 0.9-25.4 mGy, 1.1-16.6 mGy and 1.1-9.7 mGy for the UGI, LGI and VCUG procedures, respectively, and salivary glands between 0.2-3.7 mGy for the MBS procedure. Average values of detriment-weighted dose, a phantom-specific surrogate for the effective dose based on ICRP Publication 103 tissue-weighting factors, were 0.98 mSv, 1.16 mSv, 0.83 mSv and 0.15 mSv for the UGI, LGI, VCUG and MBS procedures, respectively. Scalable database of organ dose coefficients by patient sex, height and weight, and by procedure exposure time, reference point air kerma, kerma-area product or number of spot films, allows clinicians and researchers to compute organ absorbed doses based on their institution-specific and patient-specific dose metrics. In addition to informing on patient dosimetry, this work has the potential to facilitate exposure assessments in epidemiological studies designed to investigate radiation-related risks.


Subject(s)
Databases, Factual , Fluoroscopy/methods , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Dosage , Radiometry/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Barium/pharmacokinetics , Child , Computer Simulation , Female , Humans , Male , Monte Carlo Method , Radiography , Tissue Distribution
2.
Phys Med Biol ; 64(13): 135023, 2019 07 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31013486

ABSTRACT

Of all the medical imaging modalities that utilize ionizing radiation, fluoroscopy proves to be the most difficult to assess values of patient organ dose owing to the dynamic and patient-specific nature of the irradiation geometry and its associated x-ray beam characteristics. With the introduction of the radiation dose structured report (RDSR) in the mid-2000s, however, computational tools have been developed to extract patient and procedure-specific data for each irradiation event of the study, and when coupled to a computational phantom of the patient, values of skin and internal organ dose may be assessed. Unfortunately, many legacy and even current diagnostic fluoroscopy units do not have RDSR reporting capabilities, thus limiting these dosimetry reporting advances. Nevertheless, knowledge of patient organ doses for patient care, as well as for radiation epidemiology studies, remains a research and regulatory priority. In this study, we created procedural outlines which document all radiation exposure information required for organ dose assessment, akin to a reference RDSR, for six common diagnostic fluoroscopy procedures performed at the University of Florida (UF) Shands Pediatric Hospital. These procedures include the voiding cystourethrogram, the gastrostomy-tube placement, the lower gastrointestinal study, the rehabilitation swallow, the upper gastrointestinal study, and the upper gastrointestinal study with follow through. These procedural outlines were used to develop an extensive database of organ doses for the 162-member UF/NCI (National Cancer Institute) library of pediatric hybrid phantoms, with each member varying combinations of sex, height, and weight. The organ dose assessment accounts for the varying x-ray fields, fluoroscopy time, relative concentration of x-ray contrast in the organs, and changes in the fluoroscope output due to patient size. Furthermore, we are also reporting organ doses normalized to total fluoroscopy time, reference point air kerma, and kerma-area product, effectively providing procedure dose coefficients. The extensive organ dose library produced in this study may be used prospectively for patient organ dose reporting or retrospectively in epidemiological studies of radiation-associated health risks.


Subject(s)
Databases, Factual , Fluoroscopy , Radiation Dosage , Universities , Body Weight , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Exposure , Radiometry
3.
Med Phys ; 44(10): 5498-5508, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28777466

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To quantify differences in computationally estimated computed tomography (CT) organ doses for patient-specific voxel phantoms to estimated organ doses in matched computational phantoms using different matching criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patient-specific computational voxel phantoms were created through CT image segmentation. In addition, each patient-specific phantom was matched to six computational phantoms of the same gender based, respectively, on age and gender (reference phantoms), height and weight, effective diameter (both central slice and exam range average), and water equivalent diameter (both central slice and exam range average). Each patient-specific phantom and matched computational phantom were then used to simulate six different torso examinations using a previously validated Monte Carlo CT dosimetry methodology that accounts for tube current modulation. Organ doses for each patient-specific phantom were then compared with the organ dose estimates of each of the matched phantoms. RESULTS: Relative to the corresponding patient-specific phantoms, the root mean square of the difference in organ dose was 39.1%, 20.3%, 22.7%, 21.6%, 20.5%, and 17.6%, for reference, height and weight, effective diameter (central slice and scan average), and water equivalent diameter (central slice and scan average), respectively. The average magnitude of difference in organ dose was 24%, 14%, 16.9%, 16.2%, 14%, and 11.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Overall, these data suggest that matching a patient to a computational phantom in a library is superior to matching to a reference phantom. Water equivalent diameter is the superior matching metric, but it is less feasible to implement in a clinical and retrospective setting. For these reasons, height-and-weight matching is an acceptable and reliable method for matching a patient to a member of a computational phantom library with regard to CT dosimetry.


Subject(s)
Monte Carlo Method , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiometry/instrumentation , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Radiation Dosage
4.
Med Phys ; 44(10): 5423-5432, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28688151

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To physically validate the accuracy of a Monte Carlo-based, phantom-derived methodology for computed tomography (CT) dosimetry that utilizes organ doses from precomputed axial scans and that accounts for tube current modulation (TCM). METHODS: The output of a Toshiba Aquilion ONE CT scanner was modeled, based on physical measurement, in the Monte Carlo radiation transport code MCNPX (v2.70). CT examinations were taken of two anthropomorphic phantoms representing pediatric and adult patients (15-yr-old female and adult male) at various energies, in which physical organ dose measurements were made using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs). These exams (chest-abdomen-pelvis) were modeled using organ dose data obtained from the computationally equivalent phantom of each anthropomorphic phantom. TCM was accounted for by weighting all organ dose contributions by both the relative attenuation of the phantom and the image-derived mA value (from the DICOM header) at the same z-extent (cranial-caudal direction) of the axial dose data. RESULTS: The root mean squares of percent difference in organ dose when comparing the physical organ dose measurements to the computational estimates were 21.2, 12.1, and 15.1% for the uniform (no attenuation weighting), weighted (computationally derived), and image-based methodologies, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these data suggest that the Monte Carlo-based dosimetry presented in this work is viable for CT dosimetry. Additionally, for CT exams with TCM, local attenuation weighting of organ dose contributions from precomputed axial dosimetry libraries increases organ dose accuracy.


Subject(s)
Monte Carlo Method , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiometry/instrumentation , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/instrumentation , Humans
5.
Radiat Res ; 187(2): 229-240, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28118113

ABSTRACT

Advanced imaging technologies (AIT) are being developed for passenger airline transportation. They are designed to provide enhanced security benefits by identifying objects on passengers that would not be detected by methodologies now used for routine surveillance. X-ray backscatter imaging is one AIT system being considered. Since this technology is based on scanning passengers with ionizing radiation, concern has been raised relating to the health risks associated with these exposures. Recommendations for standards of radiation safety have been proposed by the American National Standards Institute published in ANSI/HPS N43.17-2009. A Monte Carlo based methodology for estimating organ doses received from an X-ray backscatter AIT system is presented. Radiological properties of a reference scanner including beam intensity, geometry and energy spectra were modeled based on previous studies and physical measurements. These parameters were incorporated into a Monte Carlo source subroutine and validated with comparison of simulated versus measured data. One extension of this study was to calculate organ and effective dose on a wide range of potential passengers. Computational phantoms with realistic morphologies were used including adults of 5th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 95th percentile weight, children of 5th, 50th and 95th percentile weight, and the developing fetus of 15, 25, and 38 weeks after conception. Additional sensitivity studies were performed to evaluate effects of passenger positioning within the scanner, energy spectrum and beam geometry, as well as failure mode analyses. Results for routine operations yielded a maximum effective dose to the adult and pediatric passengers of 15 and 25 nSv per screen, respectively. The developing fetus received a maximum organ dose and whole body dose of 16 nGy and 8.5 nGy per screen, respectively. The sensitivity analyses indicated that variations in positioning, energy spectra, and beam geometry yielded a range of effective doses per screen that were an order of magnitude below the ANSI recommendation.


Subject(s)
Air Travel , Radiation Dosage , Radiography/adverse effects , Scattering, Radiation , Adult , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Male , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiography/instrumentation , Radiometry , X-Rays/adverse effects
6.
Med Phys ; 42(3): 1268-79, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25735282

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Kilovoltage (kV) x-rays pose a significant challenge for radiation dosimetry. In the kV energy range, even small differences in material composition can result in significant variations in the absorbed energy between soft tissue and the detector. In addition, the use of electronic systems in light detection has demonstrated measurement losses at high photon fluence rates incident to the detector. This study investigated the feasibility of using a novel dual scintillator detector and whether its response to changes in beam energy from scatter and hardening is readily quantified. The detector incorporates a tissue-equivalent plastic scintillator and a gadolinium oxysulfide scintillator, which has a higher sensitivity to scatter x-rays. METHODS: The detector was constructed by coupling two scintillators: (1) small cylindrical plastic scintillator, 500 µm in diameter and 2 mm in length, and (2) 100 micron sheet of gadolinium oxysulfide 500 µm in diameter, each to a 2 m long optical fiber, which acts as a light guide to transmit scintillation photons from the sensitive element to a photomultiplier tube. Count rate linearity data were obtained from a wide range of exposure rates delivered from a radiological x-ray tube by adjusting the tube current. The data were fitted to a nonparalyzable dead time model to characterize the time response. The true counting rate was related to the reference free air dose air rate measured with a 0.6 cm(3) Radcal(®) thimble chamber as described in AAPM Report No. 111. Secondary electron and photon spectra were evaluated using Monte Carlo techniques to analyze ionization quenching and photon energy-absorption characteristics from free-in-air and in phantom measurements. The depth/energy dependence of the detector was characterized using a computed tomography dose index QA phantom consisting of nested adult head and body segments. The phantom provided up to 32 cm of acrylic with a compatible 0.6 cm(3) calibrated ionization chamber to measure the reference air kerma. RESULTS: Each detector exhibited counting losses of 5% when irradiated at a dose rate of 26.3 mGy/s (Gadolinium) and 324.3 mGy/s (plastic). The dead time of the gadolinium oxysulfide detector was determined to be 48 ns, while the dead time of the plastic scintillating detector was unable to accurately be calculated due to poor counting statistics from low detected count rates. Noticeable depth/energy dependence was observed for the plastic scintillator for depths greater than 16 cm of acrylic that was not present for measurements using the gadolinium oxysulfide scintillator, leading us to believe that quenching may play a larger role in the depth dependence of the plastic scintillator than the incident x-ray energy spectrum. When properly corrected for dead time effects, the energy response of the gadolinium oxysulfide scintillator is consistent with the plastic scintillator. Using the integrated dual detector method was superior to each detector individually as the depth-dependent measure of dose was correctable to less than 8% between 100 and 135 kV. CONCLUSIONS: The dual scintillator fiber-optic detector accommodates a methodology for energy dependent corrections of the plastic scintillator, improving the overall accuracy of the dosimeter across the range of diagnostic energies.


Subject(s)
Optical Fibers , Scintillation Counting/instrumentation , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/instrumentation , Electrons , Monte Carlo Method , Phantoms, Imaging , Photons
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...