The Economic Impact of Levothyroxine Dose Adjustments: the CONTROL HE Study.

BACKGROUND: In general, hypothyroidism can be adequately treated with a consistent daily dose of levothyroxine. However, the need for levothyroxine dose adjustments is frequent in clinical practice. The extent to which levothyroxine dose adjustments increase the utilization of healthcare resources has not previously been described in the clinical literature. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of our study was to measure the effect of levothyroxine dose adjustments in terms of their utilization of healthcare resources including direct and indirect costs. A secondary goal was to identify any differences in patient characteristics that may be responsible for levothyroxine dose adjustments. METHODS: A retrospective medical chart review was conducted among patients of selected healthcare providers in the USA. Patients who were recently started on levothyroxine therapy (<6 months) were excluded to avoid situations that were more likely attributable to treatment initiation than inadequate therapeutic effect. Trained nurses extracted data from patient charts and electronic medical record systems for review. We analyzed the cost of resources consumed by the frequency of levothyroxine dose changes over 24 months: 0 dose changes (no dose adjustment group); one dose change, two dose changes, three or more dose changes (≥1 dose adjustment group). RESULTS: The study included 454 patients. Overall estimated resource utilization was higher per patient in the ≥1 dose adjustment group (US$5824) vs. the no dose adjustment group (US$3166) during the 24-month study period. When direct and indirect costs were combined, overall costs of care were greatest in patients requiring three or more dose adjustments (US$8220/patient). Patients in this cohort incurred 2.5-fold greater total costs compared with patients requiring no dose adjustments (US$8220 vs. US$3166). Among the 58 patients in the group requiring three or more dose adjustments, mean direct medical costs were significantly higher than in the patients requiring no dose adjustments (US$6387 vs. US$2182). Patients with at least one dose adjustment experienced a 40.3% increase in lost productivity vs. patients who had no dose adjustments (US$1381 vs. US$984). Loss of productivity was highest among patients with three or more levothyroxine dose adjustments. Among this cohort, there was an 86.4% increase in lost productivity vs. patients who had no levothyroxine dose adjustments (US$1833 vs. US$984). CONCLUSIONS: Patients experiencing multiple levothyroxine dose adjustments were shown to consume more healthcare resources, resulting in higher costs than those who required no dose adjustments. Each care episode contributed to lost time and wages with total estimated lost productivity escalating with increasing levothyroxine dose adjustments over a 24-month period.

Retrospective Study of Patients Switched from Tablet Formulations to a Gel Cap Formulation of Levothyroxine: Results of the CONTROL Switch Study.

INTRODUCTION: Medication changes involving levothyroxine-either dose titrations or switching formulations-occur frequently in patients with erratic thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels and persistent hypothyroid symptoms. We investigated whether switching patients from levothyroxine tablets to a gel cap formulation of levothyroxine might reduce dose adjustments and improve tolerability and efficacy outcomes. OBJECTIVES: Primary study objectives included quantifying the percentage of patients achieving TSH levels within a pre-specified range, median dose changes experienced, and the percentage of patients with improved hypothyroid symptom control after switching from levothyroxine tablets to levothyroxine gel caps. METHODS: A retrospective medical chart review was conducted among 99 randomly selected hypothyroid patients who were switched from a tablet to a gel cap formulation of levothyroxine. Patients were required to have been on levothyroxine monotherapy for ≥1 year prior to the medication switch. Data was collected for 6 months pre-switch and up to 6 months post-switch. RESULTS: Of the 99 patients studied, the majority (51.5%) experienced no documented change in TSH status after the switch (P < 0.0001). However, there was a decrease in the mean number of dose changes experienced (1.61 ± 0.96 vs. 0.73 ± 0.96; P < 0.0001). Improved hypothyroid symptom control was reported among 61.6% of patients (61 of 99; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The results of CONTROL Switch support a strategy of switching patients who may experience tolerability or efficacy problems with standard levothyroxine tablets to the levothyroxine gel cap formulation.

Comorbidities, Concomitant Medications, and Diet as Factors Affecting Levothyroxine Therapy: Results of the CONTROL Surveillance Project.

BACKGROUND: The CONTROL Surveillance Project was a comprehensive patient-based survey conducted among hypothyroid patients undergoing treatment. The primary objective of the study was to specifically quantify the prevalence of factors adversely affecting levothyroxine therapy. METHODS: Participants were selected from a large proprietary database. Those eligible for the study completed a 21-question survey. RESULTS: Of the eligible hypothyroid patients, 925 (92.5%) were being treated with levothyroxine monotherapy. The mean age was 60.4 years; 755 (81.6%) were female and 168 (18.2%) were male. Almost half of those receiving levothyroxine (435, 47.0%) had at least one comorbid condition that could adversely affect its absorption: gastroesophageal reflux disease (33.8% of patients), irritable bowel syndrome (9.7%), lactose intolerance (7.8%), or a history of gastric bypass surgery or bowel resection (3.0%). Other factors reported by many patients that could adversely affect levothyroxine absorption included use of prescription medications (20.6%) and over-the-counter medications (34.3%) used to treat comorbid gastrointestinal (GI) conditions; use of dietary supplements (51.8%, primarily calcium and iron); and intake of foods/beverages high in fiber, iodine, or soy (68.0%). Of the 13.4% who reported difficulty controlling their hypothyroid symptoms, significantly more patients with comorbid GI conditions reported such difficulty (7.8 versus 5.6%, P < 0.01). Frequent changes in levothyroxine dosing (two or more dose changes in the past year) were reported by 8.0% of survey participants. Those with GI comorbidities were nearly twice as likely to have such changes (5.0 versus 3.0%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Better initial workup of patients, including identification of relevant GI comorbidities and allergies, may help in the early detection of factors that may affect the performance of levothyroxine.