Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in immunocompromised patients with cardiogenic shock: a cohort study and propensity-weighted analysis.

PURPOSE: The outcomes of immunocompromised patients with cardiogenic shock treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) are seldom documented, making ECMO candidacy decisions challenging. This study aims (1) to report outcomes of immunocompromised patients treated with VA-ECMO, (2) to identify pre-ECMO predictors of 90-day mortality, (3) to assess the impact of immunodepression on 90-day mortality, and (4) to describe the main ECMO-related complications. METHODS: This is a retrospective, propensity-weighted study conducted in two French experienced ECMO centers. RESULTS: From January 2006 to January 2022, 177 critically ill immunocompromised patients (median (interquartile range, IQR) age 49 (32-60) years) received VA-ECMO. The main causes of immunosuppression were long-term corticosteroids/immunosuppressant treatment (29%), hematological malignancy (26%), solid organ transplant (20%), and solid tumor (13%). Overall 90-day and 1-year mortality were 70% (95% confidence interval (CI) 63-77%) and 75% (95% CI 65-79%), respectively. Older age and higher pre-ECMO lactate were independently associated with 90-day mortality. Across immunodepression causes, 1-year mortality ranged from 58% for patients with infection by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or asplenia, to 89% for solid organ transplant recipients. Hemorrhagic and infectious complications affected 39% and 54% of patients, while more than half the stay in intensive care unit (ICU) was spent on antibiotics. In a propensity score-weighted model comparing the 177 patients with 942 non-immunocompromised patients experiencing cardiogenic shock on VA-ECMO, immunocompromised status was independently associated with a higher 90-day mortality (odds ratio 2.53, 95% CI 1.72-3.79). CONCLUSION: Immunocompromised patients undergoing VA-ECMO treatment face an unfavorable prognosis, with higher 90-day mortality compared to non-immunocompromised patients. This underscores the necessity for thorough evaluation and careful selection of ECMO candidates within this frail population.

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in adults treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common complication in adults treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest. We aimed to determine risk factors, prevalence and outcomes associated with VA-ECMO-associated UGIB in adult patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study (2014-2022) on consecutive VA-ECMO patients in the medical and infectious disease intensive care unit of Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, Paris, France. UGIB was defined as (i) an overt bleeding (haematemesis, melena, haematochezia) or (ii) acute anaemia associated with a lesion diagnosed on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. VA-ECMO-associated UGIB was defined as an UGIB occurring during VA-ECMO, or up to 10 days after decannulation in patients weaned off extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Cause-specific models were used to identify factors associated with UGIB and death, respectively. RESULTS: Among the 455 patients included, 48 (10%) were diagnosed with UGIB after a median of 12 [7; 23] days following ECMO cannulation. Mortality occurred in 36 (75%) patients with UGIB and 243 (60%) patients without. UGIB patients had longer intensive care unit stays (32 [19; 60] vs 18 [7; 37] days; P < 0.01), longer ECMO (14 [9; 18] vs 7 [4; 11] days; P < 0.01) and mechanical ventilation durations (21 [16; 36] vs 10 [5; 20] days; P < 0.01), as compared to non-UGIB patients. Ninety upper gastrointestinal endoscopies were performed, and the most frequent lesions detected were gastro-duodenal ulcers (n = 23, 26%), leading to 11/90 therapeutic procedures. By multivariable analysis, a history of peptic ulcer [cause-specific hazard ratio (CSHR) 2.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.01; 8.51]], a dual antiplatelet therapy (CSHR 2.0, 95% CI [1.07; 3.72]) and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CSHR 2.78, 95% CI [1.42; 5.45]) were independently associated with an increased risk of UGIB. CONCLUSIONS: In adult patients under VA-ECMO, a history of gastric ulcer, dual antiplatelet therapy and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation were independently associated with an increased risk of UGIB. This study highlights the potential role of acute ischaemia-reperfusion injury in the pathophysiology of VA-ECMO-associated UGIB.

Donors brain-dead after successful resuscitation of cardiac arrest: Early outcome and postoperative complications of lung recipients.

BACKGROUND: The outcomes of lung transplantation (LT) recipients who received a graft from a brain-dead donor after successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest (CA donors) have been poorly described. This study compared the one-year survival of LT recipients depending on the CA status of the donor. METHODS: This prospective observational single-centre study analysed all consecutive patients who underwent LT at Bichat Claude Bernard Hospital, Paris, between January 2016 and December 2020. All donors who experienced CA prior to organ donation, regardless of rhythm or duration, were considered CA donors. The postoperative complications and outcomes of LT recipients were analysed. The one-year survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Independent risk factors for one-year mortality were assessed using multivariate analysis (p < 0.05 was considered significant). The Paris North Hospitals Institutional Review Board approved the study. RESULTS: A total of 236 LT recipients were analysed and 66 (28%) received a graft from a CA donor. The median durations of no/low flow were 4 [0-10]/20 [15-30] minutes, respectively. Shockable and non-shockable rhythms were observed in 11 (17%) and 47 (72%) of the CA donors, respectively. The characteristics of the grafts and early postoperative complications were not different in the CA and non-CA groups. Receiving a graft from a CA donor was not an independent risk factor for recipient one-year mortality. CONCLUSION: Receiving a graft from a CA donor did not worsen the outcome of LT recipients. Acceptation of these grafts must be systematically considered to increase the pool of available grafts.

Relationship between liver dysfunction, lipoprotein concentration and mortality during sepsis.

BACKGROUND: High-density lipoproteins (HDLs) are synthesized by the liver and display endothelioprotective properties, including anti-inflammatory, antiapoptotic, antithrombotic and antioxidant effects. In both septic and chronic liver failure patients, a low HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) concentration is associated with overmortality. Whereas sepsis-associated liver dysfunction is poorly defined, the aim of this study was to characterize the relationship between liver dysfunction, lipoprotein concentrations and mortality in septic patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted in a university hospital ICU. All consecutive patients admitted for septic shock or sepsis were included. Total cholesterol, HDL-C, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), and triglyceride levels were assessed at admission. Sepsis-associated liver dysfunction was defined as a serum bilirubin≥ 2N or aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase concentrations ≥ 2N. Short-term and one-year prognostic outcomes were prospectively assessed. RESULTS: A total of 219 septic patients were included, and 15% of them presented with sepsis-associated liver dysfunction at admission. Low concentrations of lipoproteins were associated with mortality at Day 28 in the overall population. Sepsis-associated liver dysfunction at admission was associated with overmortality. In this subgroup, patients had a lower HDL-C concentration than patients without hepatic dysfunction (HDL-C = 0.31 [0.25, 0.55] mmol/L vs. 0.48 [0.29, 0.73] mmol/L, p = 0.0079) but there was no relationship with the outcome. Interestingly, no correlation was observed between lipoprotein concentrations and liver dysfunction markers. CONCLUSION: Sepsis-associated liver dysfunction at ICU admission is strongly associated with overmortality and is associated with a lower HDL-C concentration. However, in this subgroup of patients, HDL-C concentration had no relationship with mortality. Further exploratory studies are needed to better understand the interaction between lipoproteins and liver dysfunction during sepsis.

Relationship between lipoprotein concentrations and short-term and 1-year mortality in intensive care unit septic patients: results from the HIGHSEPS study.

BACKGROUND: High-density lipoproteins (HDLs), particles characterized by their reverse cholesterol transport function, display pleiotropic properties, including anti-inflammatory and antioxidant functions. Moreover, all lipoproteins (HDLs but also low-density lipoproteins (LDLs)) neutralize lipopolysaccharides, leading to increased bacterial clearance. These two lipoproteins decrease during sepsis, and an association between low lipoprotein levels and poor outcome was reported. The goals of this study were to characterize the lipid profile of septic patients hospitalized in our intensive care unit (ICU) and to determine the relationship with the outcome. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted in a university hospital ICU. All consecutive patients admitted for septic shock or sepsis were included. Total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and triglyceride levels were assessed at admission (day 1), at day 3, and at ICU discharge. When available, a prehospitalization lipid profile collected prior to the patient's hospitalization was compiled. Short-term and 1-year prognostic outcomes were prospectively assessed. RESULTS: A total of 205 patients were included. We found a decrease in HDL-C concentration between previous values and those at admission, followed by an additional decrease at day 3. At ICU discharge, the concentration was higher than that at day 3 but did not reach the concentration measured prior to hospitalization (prior HDL-C = 1.22 (1.04-1.57) mmol/l; day 1 HDL-C = 0.44 (0.29-0.70) mmol/l; day 3 HDL-C = 0.30 (0.25-0.48) mmol/l; and HDL-C at discharge = 0.65 (0.42-0.82) mmol/l). A similar trend was found for LDL-C (prior LDL-C = 2.7 (1.91-3.33) mmol/l; day 1 LDL-C = 1.0 (0.58-1.50) mmol/l; day 3 LDL-C = 1.04 (0.64-1.54) mmol/l; and LDL-C at discharge = 1.69 (1.26-2.21) mmol/l). Mixed models for repeated measures of lipoprotein concentrations showed a significant difference in HDL-C and LDL-C concentrations over time between survivors and nonsurvivors at day 28. An HDL-C concentration at admission of less than 0.4 mmol/l was associated with increased mortality at day 28 (log-rank test, p = 0.034) but not at 1 year (log-rank test, p = 0.24). An LDL-C concentration at admission of less than 0.72 mmol/l was associated with increased mortality at day 28 and at 1 year (log-rank test, p < 0.001 and p = 0.007, respectively). No link was found between prior lipid profile and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: We showed no relationship between the prehospitalization lipid profile and patient outcome, but low lipoprotein levels in the ICU were strongly associated with short-term mortality.

Accuracy of a multiparametric score based on pulse wave analysis for prediction of fluid responsiveness: ancillary analysis of an observational study.

PURPOSE: The pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) monitor is a non-invasive pulse contour cardiac output (CO) device that cannot be considered interchangeable with the gold standard for CO estimation. It, however, generates additional hemodynamic indices that need to be evaluated. Our objective was to investigate the performance of a multiparametric predictive score based on a combination of several parameters generated by the PRAM monitor to predict fluid responsiveness. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a prospective observational study from April 2016 to December 2017 in two French teaching hospitals. We included critically ill patients who were monitored by esophageal Doppler monitoring and an invasive arterial line, and received a 250-500 mL crystalloid fluid challenge. The main outcome measure was the predictive score discrimination evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve. RESULTS: The three baseline PRAM-derived parameters associated with fluid responsiveness in univariate analysis were pulse pressure variation, cardiac cycle efficiency, and arterial elastance (P < 0.01, P = 0.03, and P < 0.01, respectively). The median [interquartile range] predictive score, calculated after discretization of these parameters according to their optimal threshold value was 3 [2-3] in fluid responders and 1 [1-2] in fluid non-responders, respectively (P < 0.001). The area under the curve of the predictive score was 0.807 (95% confidence interval, 0.662 to 0.909; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A multiparametric score combining three parameters generated by the PRAM monitor can predict fluid responsiveness with good positive and negative predictive values in intensive care unit patients.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Le moniteur PRAM (pressure recording analytical method) est un dispositif non invasif de surveillance du débit cardiaque (DC) fondé sur la mesure de contour de l'onde de pouls qui ne peut être considéré comme interchangeable avec la référence de l'estimation du DC. Cependant, ce dispositif génère des indices hémodynamiques supplémentaires qui doivent être évalués. Notre objectif était d'examiner la performance d'un score prédictif multiparamétrique fondé sur une combinaison de plusieurs paramètres générés par le moniteur PRAM afin de prédire la réponse au remplissage volémique. MéTHODE: Analyse secondaire d'une étude observationnelle prospective entre avril 2016 et décembre 2017 dans deux hôpitaux universitaires français. Nous avons inclus des patients en état critique monitorés par un Doppler oesophagien et une ligne artérielle invasive, et ayant reçu un bolus de cristalloïdes de 250­500 mL. Le critère d'évaluation principal était la discrimination du score prédictif telle qu'évaluée par la surface sous la courbe de fonction d'efficacité de l'observateur (ROC). RéSULTATS: Les trois paramètres de base dérivés du PRAM associés à la réponse au remplissage dans l'analyse univariée étaient la variation de pression différentielle, l'efficacité du cycle cardiaque, et l'élastance artérielle (P < 0,01, P = 0,03, et P < 0,01, respectivement). Le score prédictif médian [écart interquartile], calculé après discrétisation de ces paramètres selon leur valeur seuil optimale, était de 3 [2­3] chez les répondeurs au remplissage et de 1 [1­2] chez les non-répondeurs, respectivement (P < 0,001). La surface sous la courbe du score prédictif était de 0,807 (intervalle de confiance 95 %, 0,662 à 0,909; P < 0,001). CONCLUSION: Un score multiparamétrique combinant trois paramètres générés par le moniteur PRAM peut prédire la réponse au remplissage volémique avec de bonnes valeurs prédictives positives et négatives chez les patients à l'unité de soins intensifs.

Monitoring haemodynamic response to fluid-challenge in ICU: comparison of pressure recording analytical method and oesophageal Doppler: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: The ability of the pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) in tracking change in cardiac output (ΔCO) after a fluid challenge in ICU needs to be evaluated with the most contemporary comparison methods recommended by experts. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to report the trending ability of PRAM in tracking ΔCO after a fluid challenge in ICU and to compare this with oesophageal Doppler monitoring (ODM). DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Hôpital Lariboisière and Hôpital Européen George Pompidou, Paris, France, from April 2016 to December 2017. PATIENTS: Critically ill patients admitted to ICU with monitoring of CO monitored by ODM and invasive arterial pressure. INTERVENTION: ΔCO after fluid challenge was simultaneously registered with ODM and PRAM connected to the arterial line. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Polar statistics (mean angular bias, radial limits of agreement and polar concordance rate) and clinical concordance evaluation (error grid and clinical concordance rate). Predictors of bias were determined. RESULTS: Sixty-eight fluid challenge were administered in 49 patients. At the time of fluid challenge, almost all were mechanically ventilated (99%), with 85% receiving norepinephrine. Admission diagnosis was septic shock in 70% of patients. Patients had a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of 10 [7 to 12] and a median Simplified Acute Physiology Score II of 61 [49 to 69]. Relative ΔCO bias was 7.8° (6.3°) with radial limits of agreement of ±41.7°, polar concordance rate 80% and clinical concordance rate 74%. ΔCO bias was associated with baseline bias (P = 0.007). Baseline bias was associated with radial location of the arterial line (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: When compared with ODM, PRAM has insufficient performance to track ΔCO induced by fluid challenge in ICU patients. Baseline bias is an independent predictor of trending bias. TRIAL REGISTRATION: IRB 00010254-2016-033.