Impact of diabetes on clinical outcome in severely burned patients.

INTRODUCTION: According to the International Diabetes Federation, approximately 425 million people worldwide suffer from diabetes mellitus, a figure that will double in the next 20 years. Data on the ratio of treated diabetics in burn intensive care units remain scarce and the effects on the mortality rate are poorly defined. METHODS: Our retrospective, single-centre study aimed to evaluate differences in the risk factors due to diabetes mellitus, the clinical outcome and the patient population of diabetic patients after severe burn injuries over a time period of 21 years. RESULTS: Despite increasing numbers of diabetic patients, the ratio of burn patients suffering from diabetes remained stable during the study period. The risk factors for mortality were higher age (OR 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.04, p < 0.0001), female sex (OR 1.56, 95% CI, 1.06-2.29, p = 0.025), higher % total body surface area (TBSA) (OR 3.88, 95% CI, 2.81-5.46, p < 0.0001), full thickness burns (OR 8.58, 95% CI, 3.84 - 23.60, p < 0.0001) and the presence of inhalation injuries (OR 4.68, 95% CI, 3.15-7.02, p < 0.0001) Patients with diabetes had a smaller extent of burned areas with a median TBSA of 30% (quartiles: 22-50%, p = 0.036) compared to non-diabetic patients (35% (25-55%)) but had a similar length of stay with a median of 29 (quartiles: 13-44) days vs. 23 (10-48) days. Outcome analysis showed an overall mortality of 35.6%. Diabetes was not associated with higher mortality rate after burn injury in a univariate model (OR 1.80, 95% CI 0.92-3.51). After correction for %TBSA, the effect of diabetes on mortality was significant (OR 2.80, 95% CI, 1.33-5.90). CONCLUSION: Our data indicate higher mortality rates (50-100%) of diabetic patients with TBSA greater than 40% in severely burned patients compared to non-diabetic patients without a significant outcome due to the low number of cases in the subgroup analyses.

Does obesity impact the outcome of severely burned patients?

Although obesity appears to be an important predictor of mortality and morbidity, little data about the impact of body mass index (BMI) on the outcome of severely burned patients are available. Patients admitted to the General Hospital Vienna between 1994 and 2014, who underwent surgery because of burn injuries, were enrolled in this study. BMI was used to divide patients into five groups: BMI 18.5 to 24.9, 25 to 29.9, 30 to 34.9, 35 to 39.9, and > 40. The groups were compared in terms of difference of mortality and morbidity. Of 460 patients, 34.3% (n = 158) died. Mortality rates were the lowest in patients with obesity class III and the highest in patients with BMI 35 to 39.9 (BMI 18.5-24.9: 30.5%, BMI 25-29.9: 31.5%, BMI 30-34.9: 41.3%, BMI 35-39.9: 55.5%, BMI > 40: 30%; P = .031). BMI was not found to be an independent risk factor when corrected with age, percent total body surface area burned, full-thickness burns, and inhalation injury. No significant differences in length of stay, inhalation trauma, pneumonia, wound infection, sepsis, and invasive ventilation were observed. BMI as an independent risk factor for severely burned patients could not be confirmed via multivariate analysis.

Gender has no influence on mortality after burn injuries: A 20-year single center study with 839 patients.

BACKGROUND: According to the ABSI - Abbreviated Burn Severity Index - women exhibit an increased risk of succumbing to burn injuries. In contrast, following non-thermal trauma, increased mortality has been shown for the male gender. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate gender-specific differences among burn patients with special regard to burn mortality. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 839 patients who were admitted to the Burn Intensive Care Unit (BICU) and underwent surgical treatment between June 1994 and December 2014. In-hospital mortality was the main clinical endpoint. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models for the association between sex and mortality. RESULTS: In total, we included 530 male and 309 female burn patients. All patients had at least partial-thickness burns and underwent one or more operative procedures. Women were significantly older than men (mean 60.0 years vs 46.2 years; p<0.001). Despite having smaller injuries (24.6% vs 30.3% total body surface area (TBSA); p<0.001), burn mortality among women significantly differed from that of men (27.8% vs 21.7%; OR 1.39, p=0.045, 95% CI 1.01-1.92). This association, however, did not persist after adjusting for age, %TBSA, inhalation injury and full-thickness burns (OR 1.07, p=0.77, 95% CI 0.68-1.70). CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing research directed at women's health, the assoziation between gender and burn mortality has yielded conflicting results. This study does not support a gender-specific difference in burn mortality in our study population.