Performance With an Adhesive Bone Conduction Device in Active Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant Users.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance and limits of an adhesive bone conduction hearing aid in patients implanted with an active transcutaneous bone conduction implant. Therefore, hearing performance and subjective benefit of patients with mixed and conductive hearing loss were assessed with both bone conduction devices. STUDY DESIGN AND PATIENTS: This cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care center. Fifteen subjects, who had been implanted with an active transcutaneous device previously, were included and used the adhesive hearing device for 3 weeks instead of the implant. Subjects underwent two sets of audiological tests as well as assessments of quality of life at the beginning and at the end of the testing period. RESULTS: Audiological results showed a significantly greater improvement in regards to functional hearing gain and word recognition scores with the transcutaneous bone conduction device than the nonimplantable adhesive device. Regression analysis showed a trend toward greater improvement with the transcutaneous device compared with the adhesive device in patients with an increasing bone conduction threshold. Hearing-specific and general quality-of-life questionnaires revealed no significant difference between the two devices. CONCLUSION: Patients with mixed or conductive hearing loss experience hearing gain with both, the adhesive device and the active transcutaneous device. The adhesive device may be a valuable alternative to the active transcutaneous device, depending on the individual bone conduction threshold.

Complete and incomplete recurrent laryngeal nerve injury after thyroid and parathyroid surgery: Characterizing paralysis and paresis.

BACKGROUND: Injury of the recurrent laryngeal nerve and consequent disorder of vocal fold movement is a typical complication in thyroid and parathyroid surgery. During postoperative laryngoscopy we observed not only a complete standstill (vocal fold paralysis), but also a hypomobility (paresis). In this prospective study, we investigated the difference in incidence and prognosis as well as risk-factors, intraoperative neuromonitoring, and symptoms between vocal fold paralysis and vocal fold paresis. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected and analyzed in a single high-volume thyroid center between 2012 and 2016. Vocal fold paresis was defined as hypomobility in abduction or adduction, a reduction in range and speed of vocal fold movement. Vocal fold paralysis was defined as asymmetry and missing purposeful vocal fold movement. RESULTS: The study included 4,707 surgeries and 7,992 at-risk nerves at risk. Vocal fold paralysis was diagnosed in 374 patients (4.68% of 7,992 nerves at risk) and vocal fold paresis in 114 patients (1.43%). Exclusively in the paralysis group, 36 patients (0.45%) developed permanent loss of vocal fold function (P < .001). In follow-up, vocal fold paresis patients regain normal vocal fold function significantly earlier than vocal fold paralysis (mean duration: 6.96 ± 6.506 vs 10.77 ± 7,827 weeks) and presented with significantly less symptoms like hoarseness, diplophonia, dysphagia, and dyspnea (68.8% vs 95.9 %). In intraoperative neuromonitoring, vocal fold paresis showed a significantly higher postresectional N. vagus amplitude than vocal fold paralysis patients (0.349 mV vs 0.114 mV, P < .001). CONCLUSION: After thyroidectomy, vocal fold paresis must be distinguished from vocal fold paralysis and should be implemented as a separate outcome parameter in the postoperative quality assessment.

Tenotomy of the middle ear muscles : An unknown surgical approach in Meniere's disease.

Tenotomy of the tendon of the stapedius and tensor tympani muscles is a relatively unknown therapeutic procedure in Menière's disease. Widespread approaches include medicinal treatment with betahistine or diuretics as well as interventional procedures, such as intratympanic gentamicin or glucocorticoid injection, vestibular neurectomy, labyrinthectomy or endolymphatic sac surgery. The exact pathomechanism of this approach is not fully known. It is assumed that by cutting the tendons of both middle ear muscles in cases of endolymphatic hydrops the stapes is not additionally actively pushed against the oval window but can deviate laterally and thereby does not augment the inner ear pressure even further. Studies have shown that this method does not only improve vestibular symptoms but also, in contrast to most other strategies, increases the hearing level. The formation of scar tissue and the resulting reduction of ossicular chain mobility, especially due to postoperative infections, may limit the success of tenotomy and should be considered as a possible factor in cases of limited postoperative vertigo control.

Sealing of the round and oval window niches with triamcinolone-soaked fascia as salvage surgical therapy in sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

CONCLUSIONS: Triamcinolone-soaked fascia seems to show better hearing improvement when added to tympanotomy for sudden idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL), compared to fascia round window occlusion without triamcinolone. OBJECTIVES: To analyse if adding triamcinolone to sealing the round and oval window niches with fascia results in improved audiological outcome for acute SNHL. METHODS: Fifty-three patients (27m:43 ± 12 years, 26f:45 ± 14 years) with acute SSHL ≥50dB over 3 frequencies, who failed primary therapy, underwent transcanal tympanotomy. Twenty-five patients (Group A;cortisone:14m, 11f:46 ± 9 years) received sealing of the round and oval window with fascia soaked in triamcinolone (1ml; 40mg/ml) and 28 controls (Group B;no-cortisone:13m, 15f, 42 ± 12 years) without triamcinolone. Frequency specific and pure tone average (PTA =500-1000-2000-3000Hz) results were compared between Group A and B pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: In Group A the PTA improved by ≥10dB in 21/25(83%) cases; in Group B 18/28(63%). Group A showed a statistically significantly better improvement across all frequencies, while linear regression revealed a significant decrease of posttherapeutic PTA to 94.96% of the initial PTA (p = .037). The overall PTA improved by 24dB. Group A improved from 73dB to 41dB(-32dB) PTA, Group B improved from 76dB to 56dB PTA (-20dB) (p < .05). Group A showed a significant additional decrease of 12.8dB (p < .001).

Middle ear adenoma with neuroendocrine differentiation : A pediatric case report.

BACKGROUND: Middle ear adenoma with neuroendocrine differentiation (MEA-ND), also known as carcinoid tumor of the middle ear, is an extremely rare neoplasm, especially when located within the tympanic cavity. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first pediatric case of a MEA-ND described in Europe. Excluding the present case, only three other pediatric cases of this disease have been published globally. CASE REPORT: We report on a 15-year-old female patient who presented with conductive hearing loss of the right ear. A tympanogram was flat. Ear microscopy revealed bulging of the right posterior superior tympanic quadrant. Computed tomography depicted an opacification of the middle ear and mastoid air cells without evidence of bone erosion. Paracentesis was performed assuming a serous otitis media. Since there was no liquid found the patient underwent an atticoantrotomy and mastoidectomy as therapy for cholesteatoma. Histologic examination revealed a highly differentiated neuroendocrine tumor. Immunohistochemical evaluation showed strong positivity for synaptophysin. On the basis of these results, the patient underwent a middle ear revision surgery. After 15 months, magnetic resonance imaging and octreotide scans suggested disease recurrence, prompting a second surgical revision. The histologic examination confirmed a recurrence of only 1 mm, but postoperative imaging still showed pathological diffuse enhancement. Eight years after the initial diagnosis there has been no evidence of recurrence or metastasis. CONCLUSION: In our opinion a pathological radiological result is insufficient to identify recurrent or residual disease within the tympanic cavity.