Radiation exposure during orthodontic treatment: risk to children and adolescents.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate radiation risk to children and adolescents during orthodontic treatment by retrieving number and type of radiographs from the patient records. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Radiographs, along with justifications for radiation exposure, were obtained retrospectively from the patient records of 1,790 children and adolescents referred to two Swedish orthodontic clinics. Data were grouped according to treatment stage: treatment planning, treatment, and follow-up. Estimated risk was calculated using the concept of effective dose. RESULTS: Each patient had received around seven radiographs for orthodontic purposes. The most common exposures during treatment planning were one panoramic, one lateral, and three intraoral periapical radiographs. A small number of patients received a tomographic examination (8.2%). Few justifications for treatment planning and follow-up, but more in the actual treatment stage, had been recorded. The most common examinations were to assess root resorption and the positions of unerupted teeth, or simply carry out an unspecified control. The estimated risk of developing fatal cancer was considered low. The radiation risk from orthodontic treatment was equivalent to about 5-10 days of natural background radiation. CONCLUSIONS: Children and adolescents sometimes undergo multiple radiographic examinations, but despite the low radiation burden, accumulated radiation exposure should be considered and justified in young patients.

Choice of radiography in orthodontic treatment on children and adolescents: A questionnaire-based study performed in Sweden.

The aim was to investigate the objective and choice of different radiographic examinations used in orthodontic treatment of children and adolescents, using a web-based questionnaire directed toward specialists in orthodontics. The questionnaire was distributed to 255 orthodontists in Sweden. In total, 142 responses were received, and 11 specialists were interviewed. Questions were related to the use of radiography during different treatment stages; modifications to the treatment regimen owing to radiographic findings; and the use of and/or need for guidelines in radiography. Radiographic examinations were performed in all treatment stages and mainly during treatment planning. Panoramic radiographs were always or often used by the respondents (99%), less frequently used were lateral radiographs (66%) and intra-oral radiographs of the incisor regions (69%). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was sparsely employed. A majority of the respondents considered that radiographic findings often or occasionally affected the treatment. Local- or clinic-specific guidelines were used by 85% of respondents. The need for national guidelines was considered low. The frequent use of panoramic radiography together with application of local guidelines, may indicate that radiographic selection criteria are not individualised. National guidelines might facilitate updates on radiographic techniques, and on radiation doses and risks in young patients.