Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Microb Drug Resist ; 17(3): 457-61, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21612512

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) survival on environmental surfaces: glass, wood, vinyl, plastic, and cloth. Effects of relative humidity (RH) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) were examined. Surfaces were inoculated with 10(7)-10(8) colony forming units per milliliter (CFU/ml)of MRSA with and without 1% BSA and incubated at 35°C at 45%-55% and 16% RH. Surfaces were sampled, and each collected sample was re-suspended in phosphate buffer, spread plated, and incubated at 35°C for 24 hrs; resulting colonies were enumerated. Samples were collected immediately on drying, and at 3 hrs, 24 hrs, 2 days, 3 days, 4 days, and 5 days. Results demonstrated that MRSA survived the longest on plastic and vinyl and for the least amount of time on wood (p < 0.001). BSA enabled MRSA to survive for significantly longer duration (p < 0.001). The number of CFU/ml was significantly lesser on surfaces stored in 45%-55% RH versus 16% RH. This study demonstrates that viable MRSA bacteria can remain on surfaces for days, which may impact the public health of occupants in workplace and residential settings.


Subject(s)
Fomites/microbiology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/physiology , Humidity , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification
2.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 73(11): 3505-10, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17416685

ABSTRACT

This research was designed to evaluate surface sampling protocols for use with culture and quantitative PCR (QPCR) amplification assay for detection of the gram-negative bacterial biothreat simulant Erwinia herbicola on a variety of surface materials. Surfaces selected for evaluation were wood laminate, glass and computer monitor screens, metal file cabinets, plastic arena seats, nylon seat cushions, finished concrete flooring, and vinyl tile flooring. Laboratory and test chamber studies were performed to evaluate two sampling methods, a sponge and a macrofoam swab, for detection of E. herbicola on surface materials. In laboratory trials, seven materials were inoculated with a known concentration of E. herbicola cells and samples were collected from the surfaces of the materials to determine sampling efficiencies. Culture analysis was ineffective for assessing E. herbicola collection efficiency because very few culturable cells were obtained from surface samples. QPCR demonstrated that E. herbicola DNA was present in high concentrations on all of the surface samples, and sampling efficiencies ranged from 0.7 to 52.2%, depending on the sampling method and the surface material. The swab was generally more efficient than the sponge for collection of E. herbicola from surfaces. Test chamber trials were also performed in which E. herbicola was aerosolized into the chamber and allowed to settle onto test materials. Surface sampling results supported those obtained in laboratory trials. The results of this study demonstrate the capabilities of QPCR to enhance the detection and enumeration of biocontaminants on surface materials and provide information on the comparability of sampling methods.


Subject(s)
Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Environmental Microbiology , Erwinia/isolation & purification , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Colony Count, Microbial , Computers , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Erwinia/genetics , Erwinia/growth & development , Floors and Floorcoverings , Glass , Interior Design and Furnishings , Sensitivity and Specificity , Wood/microbiology
3.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 70(12): 7040-5, 2004 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15574898

ABSTRACT

Current surface sampling methods for microbial contaminants are designed to sample small areas and utilize culture analysis. The total number of microbes recovered is low because a small area is sampled, making detection of a potential pathogen more difficult. Furthermore, sampling of small areas requires a greater number of samples to be collected, which delays the reporting of results, taxes laboratory resources and staffing, and increases analysis costs. A new biological surface sampling method, the Biological Sampling Kit (BiSKit), designed to sample large areas and to be compatible with testing with a variety of technologies, including PCR and immunoassay, was evaluated and compared to other surface sampling strategies. In experimental room trials, wood laminate and metal surfaces were contaminated by aerosolization of Bacillus atrophaeus spores, a simulant for Bacillus anthracis, into the room, followed by settling of the spores onto the test surfaces. The surfaces were sampled with the BiSKit, a cotton-based swab, and a foam-based swab. Samples were analyzed by culturing, quantitative PCR, and immunological assays. The results showed that the large surface area (1 m2) sampled with the BiSKit resulted in concentrations of B. atrophaeus in samples that were up to 10-fold higher than the concentrations obtained with the other methods tested. A comparison of wet and dry sampling with the BiSKit indicated that dry sampling was more efficient (efficiency, 18.4%) than wet sampling (efficiency, 11.3%). The sensitivities of detection of B. atrophaeus on metal surfaces were 42 +/- 5.8 CFU/m2 for wet sampling and 100.5 +/- 10.2 CFU/m2 for dry sampling. These results demonstrate that the use of a sampling device capable of sampling larger areas results in higher sensitivity than that obtained with currently available methods and has the advantage of sampling larger areas, thus requiring collection of fewer samples per site.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution, Indoor , Bacillus/isolation & purification , Environmental Microbiology , Environmental Monitoring/instrumentation , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Specimen Handling/methods , Bacillus/genetics , Bacillus/physiology , Culture Media , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Equipment Contamination , Immunoassay , Metals , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sensitivity and Specificity , Spores, Bacterial/isolation & purification , Surface Properties , Wood
5.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 70(8): 4740-7, 2004 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15294810

ABSTRACT

The efficacy of currently available decontamination strategies for the treatment of indoor furnishings contaminated with bioterrorism agents is poorly understood. Efficacy testing of decontamination products in a controlled environment is needed to ensure that effective methods are used to decontaminate domestic and workplace settings. An experimental room supplied with materials used in office furnishings (i.e., wood laminate, painted metal, and vinyl tile) was used with controlled dry aerosol releases of endospores of Bacillus atrophaeus ("Bacillus subtilis subsp. niger," also referred to as BG), a Bacillus anthracis surrogate. Studies were performed using two test products, a foam decontaminant and chlorine dioxide gas. Surface samples were collected pre- and posttreatment with three sampling methods and analyzed by culture and quantitative PCR (QPCR). Additional aerosol releases with environmental background present on the surface materials were also conducted to determine if there was any interference with decontamination or sample analysis. Culture results indicated that 10(5) to 10(6) CFU per sample were present on surfaces before decontamination. After decontamination with the foam, no culturable B. atrophaeus spores were detected. After decontamination with chlorine dioxide gas, no culturable B. atrophaeus was detected in 24 of 27 samples (89%). However, QPCR analysis showed that B. atrophaeus DNA was still present after decontamination with both methods. Environmental background material had no apparent effect on decontamination, but inhibition of the QPCR assay was observed. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of two decontamination methods and illustrate the utility of surface sampling and QPCR analysis for the evaluation of decontamination strategies.


Subject(s)
Bacillus/drug effects , Bacillus/isolation & purification , Chlorine Compounds/pharmacology , Decontamination/methods , Oxides/pharmacology , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Air Pollution, Indoor , Anthrax/prevention & control , Bacillus/genetics , Bacillus/physiology , Chlorine Compounds/administration & dosage , Culture Media , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Interior Design and Furnishings , Oxides/administration & dosage , Spores, Bacterial/drug effects , Spores, Bacterial/genetics , Spores, Bacterial/isolation & purification , Spores, Bacterial/physiology , Surface Properties
6.
Curr Opin Biotechnol ; 15(3): 170-4, 2004 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15193322

ABSTRACT

The sampling and analysis of airborne microorganisms has received attention in recent years owing to concerns with mold contamination in indoor environments and the threat of bioterrorism. Traditionally, the detection and enumeration of airborne microorganisms has been conducted using light microscopy and/or culture-based methods; however, these analyses are time-consuming, laborious, subjective and lack sensitivity and specificity. The use of molecular methods, such as quantitative polymerase chain reaction amplification, can enhance monitoring strategies by increasing sensitivity and specificity, while decreasing the time required for analysis.


Subject(s)
Air Microbiology , Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Microbiological Techniques , Aerosols , Air , Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Environmental Microbiology , Filtration , Polymerase Chain Reaction , RNA, Ribosomal/chemistry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL