Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Psychiatr Serv ; 52(12): 1639-43, 2001 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11726756

ABSTRACT

Surveys estimate that 1.8 to 3.6 percent of workers in the U.S. labor force suffer from major depression. Depression has a significant impact on vocational functioning. Seventeen to 21 percent of the workforce experiences short-term disability during any given year, and 37 to 48 percent of workers with depression experience short-term disability. Studies indicate that treating workplace depression provides favorable cost offsets for employers, although a number of methodological issues have influenced the interpretation of these findings. In addition to disability costs, cost analyses need to include lost wages and indirect costs to employers, such as the costs of hiring and training new employees. In general, employers are not aware of the extent of the indirect costs of untreated depression. They have mistaken assumptions about the availability of effective treatment, and they are unaware of how often depression contributes to worker disability. The workers' compensation system and the courts have been slow to recognize depression as a work-related disability, and as a result employers have few incentives to treat and prevent workplace depression.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major/economics , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Occupational Diseases/economics , Occupational Diseases/therapy , Workplace , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Humans , Mental Health Services/economics , Occupational Diseases/psychology , Workers' Compensation/economics
3.
Acad Psychiatry ; 21(3): 166-7, 1997 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24442903
4.
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law ; 24(3): 319-31, 1996.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8889132

ABSTRACT

This study is a test of the so-called subversion hypothesis, which posits that mentally disordered persons who commit minor offenses are prosecuted primarily for the purpose of imposing mental health treatment on them through evaluation and treatment for incompetency to stand trial. These persons, according to the subversion hypothesis, find themselves in the criminal process because they do not meet the stringent civil commitment standards, but do meet the less stringent criteria for a disorderly conduct prosecution. The findings, based on 893 disorderly conduct prosecutions in a single jurisdiction over a two-year period, do not lend general support to the subversion hypothesis.


Subject(s)
Commitment of Mentally Ill/legislation & jurisprudence , Ethics , Mental Competency/legislation & jurisprudence , Violence/legislation & jurisprudence , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Violence/psychology , Wisconsin
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...