ABSTRACT
AIM: To assess specialisation interests in commencing interns and create a standardised survey to aid medical schools, supervisors and health services in quantifying, understanding and supporting medical career development to improve medical workforce planning. METHOD: The Medical Specialty Interest Survey (MSIS) cross-sectional study was used. Incoming interns at a multisite tertiary hospital network in Melbourne, Australia rated their desire to pursue each specialty as a career using a Likert scale (1-5). 47 Medical Board of Australia Medical Specialties were included in the survey. RESULTS: Completion rate was 123 of 124 (99.2%). The overall mean desirability was 2.62, suggesting on average more specialties were deemed less preferred. Critical care specialties were most popular, while surgical specialties had least interest. Gastroenterology and cardiology were most popular among internal medicine specialties. General practice had low correlation with other specialties (Pearson correlation mean R coefficient 0.106 compared with overall mean 0.208), suggesting interns interested in general practice exhibit less interest in other specialties, and interest in specialisation confers low interest in general practice. Psychiatry had the lowest mean R coefficient of 0.088. CONCLUSIONS: The MSIS quantifies relative interest in 47 medical specialties and specialty interest correlations among final-year medical students/incoming interns. The MSIS may be a tool for medical schools, healthcare services and government agencies to better understand the career interest among medical students and pre-vocational doctors and therefore improve doctor retention and well-being.
ABSTRACT
Background: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death globally. Despite the effectiveness of lifestyle changes and recommended therapeutics, access to primary care and treatments to improve cardiovascular risk-factors (CRFs) remains challenging. Pharmacists and telehealth services have been proposed as potential solutions to overcome these barriers. Methods: PubMed, OVID, and CINAHL databases were searched from January 2006 to March 2023. The primary outcomes were changes from baseline in systolic/diastolic blood pressure, glycated hemoglobin (A1c), cholesterol levels, and adherence to any patient counseling. Only studies conducted in the United States and Canada were included in the review. Results: Of 110 screened bibliographic records, 14 studies were included in the review. The pharmacist-led telehealth interventions included medication therapy management, medication reviews, and counseling on lifestyle changes. Nine studies reported significant improvements with intervention, 7 studies on CRFs and 2 studies on medication adherence at the 12-month follow-up, when pharmacist-led telehealth services were compared to usual care or historical data (p < 0.05). Conclusion: This scoping review provides evidence for continued support to the development and implementation of pharmacist-led telehealth services in primary cardiovascular care. The findings suggest that pharmacist-led telehealth interventions can improve cardiovascular outcomes and adherence to drug and non-drug therapy among patients with CRFs. However, because of lack of published randomized clinical studies on patients with CRFs residing in underserved communities, future directions in research should focus on exploring the implementation of pharmacist-led telehealth services in rural or underserved communities, utilizing various payment models to enhance accessibility and feasibility.
