Lower Limb Joint Mechanics during Maximal Accelerative and Decelerative Running.

INTRODUCTION: Maximal acceleration and deceleration tasks are frequently required in team sports, often occurring rapidly in response to external stimuli. Accelerating and decelerating can be associated with lower limb injuries; thus, knowledge of joint mechanics during these tasks can improve the understanding of both human high performance and injury mechanisms. The current study investigated the fundamental differences in lower limb joint mechanics when accelerating and decelerating by directly comparing the hip, knee, and ankle joint moments and work done between the two tasks. METHODS: Twenty participants performed maximal effort acceleration and deceleration trials, with three-dimensional marker trajectories and ground reaction forces collected simultaneously. Experimental data were combined with inverse dynamics analysis to compute joint moments and work. RESULTS: Net joint work for all lower limb joints was positive during acceleration and negative during deceleration. This occurred because of significantly greater positive work production from the ankle and hip during acceleration and significantly greater negative work production from all joints during deceleration. The largest contributions to positive work during acceleration came from the ankle, followed by the hip and knee joints, whereas the largest contributions to negative work during deceleration came from the knee and hip joints, followed by the ankle. Peak joint moments were significantly greater when decelerating compared with accelerating, except for the peak ankle plantarflexion and hip flexion moments, which were significantly greater when accelerating. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings may help to guide training interventions, which aim to enhance the performance of acceleration and deceleration tasks, while also mitigating the associated injury risk.

Time-restricted eating improves measures of daily glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: Examine the effect of 5 d/wk, 9-h time-restricted eating (TRE) protocol on 24-h glycaemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: Nineteen adults with T2D (10 F/9 M; 50 ± 9 y, HbA1c 7.6% (60 mmol/mol), BMI ∼34 kg/m2) completed a pre-post non-randomised trial comprising of a 2-wk Habitual monitoring period followed by 9-h (10:00-19:00 h) TRE for 4-wk. Glycaemic control was assessed via continuous glucose monitoring (CGM; for mean 24-h glucose concentrations, 24-h total area under the curve (AUC) and glucose variability metrics), with dietary records and physical activity monitoring. Changes in CGM measures, dietary intake and physical activity were assessed with linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: TRE did not alter dietary energy intake, macronutrient composition or physical activity, but reduced the daily eating window (-2 h 35 min, P < 0.001). Compared to the Habitual period, 24-h glucose concentrations (mean, SD) and AUC decreased in the 4-wk TRE period (mean: -0.7 ± 1.2 mmol/L, P = 0.02; SD: -0.2 ± 0.3 mmol/L, P = 0.01; 24-h AUC: -0.9 ± 1.4 mmol/L⋅h-1 P = 0.01). During TRE, participants spent 10% more time in range (3.9-10.0 mmol/L; P = 0.02) and 10% less time above range (>10.0 mmol/L; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Adhering 5 d/wk. to 9-h TRE improved glycaemic control in adults with T2D, independent of changes in physical activity or dietary intake. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12618000938202.

You Can't Replicate What You Can't See: A Call for Researchers to Share Their Data and Avoid "Fragile" Correlations.

SYNOPSIS: We suggest that a measure of a correlation's fragility is the minimum number of items that, when replaced with the group median, result in a nonsignificant correlation on reanalysis. Between January 2000 and July 2021, there were 1769 significant correlations reported in 142 papers published in this journal, and only 51 correlations (2.9%) had available data (scatter plots from which we could digitize the raw data). Twenty-six of these 51 correlations were fragile at 4 or fewer replacements. Five of the reported significant correlations were not significant when we replicated the analysis from the extracted data. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2021;51(12):556-558. doi:10.2519/jospt.2021.0112.