Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 68
Filter
1.
Br J Haematol ; 2024 May 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38802107

ABSTRACT

The Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG) LY.17 is an ongoing multi-arm randomized phase II trial evaluating novel salvage therapies compared with R-GDP (rituximab, gemcitabine, dexamethasone and cisplatin) in autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT)-eligible patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (RR-DLBCL). This component of the LY.17 trial evaluated a dose-intensive chemotherapy approach using a single cycle of inpatient R-DICEP (rituximab, dose-intensive cyclophosphamide, etoposide and cisplatin) to achieve both lymphoma response and stem cell mobilization, shortening time to ASCT. This report is the result of the protocol-specified second interim analysis of the 67 patients who were randomized to either 1 cycle of R-DICEP or to 3 cycles of R-GDP. The overall response rate (ORR) was 65.6% for R-DICEP and 48.6% for R-GDP. The ASCT rate was 71.9% versus 54.3%, and 1-year progression-free survival rate was 42% versus 32%, respectively, for R-DICEP versus R-GDP. Although the improvement in ORR for R-DICEP versus R-GDP exceeded the pre-specified 10% threshold to proceed to full accrual of 64 patients/arm, higher rates of grade 3-5 toxicities, and the need for hospitalization led to the decision to stop this arm of the study. CCTG LY.17 will continue to evaluate different salvage regimens that incorporate novel agents.

2.
Curr Oncol ; 31(3): 1470-1476, 2024 03 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38534944

ABSTRACT

This commentary provides a detailed overview of the extensive stakeholder engagement efforts critical to the development of the Future of Cancer Impact (FOCI) in Alberta report. The overarching aim of the FOCI report was to support informed and strategic discussions and actions that will help key stakeholders in the province prepare for a future with increasing cancer incidence and survival. Employing a comprehensive approach and a diverse range of engagement activities, insights from a wide spectrum of stakeholders were gathered and subsequently used to shape the content of the report. This inclusive process ensured broad representation of perspectives, contributing to a deeper understanding of the complexities in cancer care. The outcome is a robust, consensus-driven report with recommendations set to drive significant transformations within the healthcare system. These efforts highlight the critical role of extensive, inclusive, and collaborative engagement in shaping healthcare initiatives and advancing discussions crucial for the future of cancer care in Alberta.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care , Neoplasms , Humans , Alberta , Consensus , Stakeholder Participation
3.
Can Urol Assoc J ; 18(3): E73-E79, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38010229

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDC-ASCT) is standard therapy for metastatic germ cell tumors (mGCTs) in patients whose disease progresses during or after conventional chemotherapy. We conducted a retrospective review of HDC-ASCT in relapsed mGCT patients in the province of Alberta, Canada, over the past two decades. METHODS: Patients with mGCTs who received HDC-ASCT at two provincial cancer referral centers from 2000-2018 were identified from institutional databases. Baseline clinical and treatment characteristics were collected, as well as overall survival (OS ) and disease-free survival (DFS). Relevant prognostic variables were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were identified. The median age was 28 years (range 19-56). A majority (95%) had non-seminoma histology and testis/retroperitoneal primary (84%). Twenty patients (47%) had poor-risk disease, as per The International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCC), at start of first-line chemotherapy. HDC-ASCT was used as second-line therapy in 65% of patients, and 58% of ASCT patients received tandem transplants. Median followup after ASCT was 22 months (range 2-181). At last followup, 42% of patients were alive without disease, including 3/7 (43%) of patients with primary mediastinal disease. Two-year and five-year DFS/OS ratios were 44%/65% and 38%/45%, respectively. Median OS and DFS for all patients were 30.0 months (13.3-46.6) and 8.0 months (0.9-15.1), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We found that HDC-ASCT is an effective salvage therapy in mGCT, consistent with existing literature. Patients appeared to benefit regardless of primary site. Although limited by small sample size, we found a numerical difference in DFS and OS between second- and third-line HDC-ASCT and single vs. tandem ASCT.

4.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 64(7): 1253-1261, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37173288

ABSTRACT

The Lymphoma Diagnostic Pathway (LDP) was developed based upon clinical best practice guidelines and implemented in large urban centers where lymphoma treatment is provided in Alberta, Canada. A return-on-investment analysis of the implementation of this care pathway was conducted to inform future sustainability and expansion. A cohort design with propensity score matching and difference-in-difference estimation methods were used comparing both cost and return (reduced health service utilization) between patients who were diagnosed within the LDP and those who were diagnosed outside the LDP. LDP resulted in $1800 avoided HSU costs per patient. The LDP has been found to be cost-saving with an ROI of 5.3 (ranging from 3.95-8.97) - for every $1 invested, LDP resulted in a $5.30 return for the health system due to capacity improvements in ED, inpatient, outpatient, and a reduction in GP service utilization. Further study of implementation including patient/provider satisfaction and uptake is recommended.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Alberta/epidemiology
5.
Cytotherapy ; 24(12): 1225-1231, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36057497

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AIMS: The value of routine chimerism determination after myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is unclear, particularly in the setting of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. METHODS: Blood samples were collected at 3 months post-HCT from 558 patients who received myeloablative conditioning and ATG-based GVHD prophylaxis. Chimerism was assessed using multiplex polymerase chain reaction of short tandem repeats in sorted T cells (CD3+) and leukemia lineage cells (CD13+CD33+ for myeloid malignancies and CD19+ for B-lymphoid malignancies). ATG exposure was determined using a flow cytometry-based assay. The primary outcomes of interest were relapse and chronic GVHD (cGVHD). RESULTS: Incomplete (<95%) T-cell chimerism and leukemia lineage chimerism were present in 17% and 4% of patients, respectively. Patients with incomplete T-cell chimerism had a significantly greater incidence of relapse (36% versus 22%, subhazard ratio [SHR] = 2.03, P = 0.001) and lower incidence of cGVHD (8% versus 25%, SHR = 0.29, P < 0.001) compared with patients with complete chimerism. In multivariate modeling, patients with high post-transplant ATG area under the curve and any cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus other than donor/recipient seropositivity (non-D+R+) had an increased likelihood of incomplete T-cell chimerism. Patients with incomplete leukemia lineage chimerism had a significantly greater incidence of relapse (50% versus 23%, SHR = 2.70, P = 0.011) and, surprisingly, a greater incidence of cGVHD (45% versus 20%, SHR = 2.64, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: High post-transplant ATG exposure and non-D+R+ CMV serostatus predispose patients to incomplete T-cell chimerism, which is associated with an increased risk of relapse. The increased risk of cGVHD with incomplete B-cell/myeloid chimerism is a novel finding that suggests an important role for recipient antigen-presenting cells in cGVHD pathogenesis.


Subject(s)
Cytomegalovirus Infections , Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia , Humans , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Antilymphocyte Serum , Chimerism , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Chronic Disease , Cytomegalovirus , Recurrence
6.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 63(10): 2444-2452, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35459424

ABSTRACT

Secondary central nervous system lymphoma (SCNSL) affects approximately 5% of patients with aggressive large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) and is associated with poor outcomes. This retrospective, multicenter study included 62 consecutive patients with SCNSL intended for transplant with high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX)-based induction followed by high-dose thiotepa, busulfan, melphalan, rituximab (TBMR) conditioning and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Median age was 58 years (range 20-75) and 52 (84%) patients had ECOG performance status >1 at diagnosis of SCNSL. Fifty-two (84%) patients completed induction and proceeded to TBMR/ASCT. With median follow-up 5.7 years, 5-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 53% (95% CI 39-65%) and 65% (95% CI 51-76%) for all patients and 62% (95% CI 45-74%) and 73% (95% CI 57-84%) for those undergoing TBMR/ASCT, respectively. Despite a historically poor prognosis, HD-MTX-based induction followed by TBMR/ASCT has the potential to achieve long-term survival in a substantial proportion of patients with SCNSL.


Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Neoplasms , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse , Neoplasms, Second Primary , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Autografts , Busulfan/adverse effects , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/drug therapy , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/etiology , Melphalan/therapeutic use , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Second Primary/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Rituximab/therapeutic use , Thiotepa/therapeutic use , Transplantation, Autologous , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
7.
J Palliat Med ; 25(6): 915-924, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35119311

ABSTRACT

Background: An increasing number of patients with end-of-life (EOL) conditions, particularly those with advanced cancer, are presenting to the emergency department (ED). Objectives: To assess the characteristics, management and short-term outcomes of ED patients with advanced cancer compared to patients with other EOL conditions. Methodology/Design: A secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study. Setting/Participants: Volunteer emergency physicians in two Canadian EDs identified presentations for advanced cancer and other EOL conditions with the aid of a modified screening tool March-August 2018. Results: Among the 663 presentations by patients with EOL conditions, 272 (41%) presented with advanced cancer. The majority of presentations for advanced cancer (81%) or other EOL conditions (77%) were by patients with unmet palliative care (PC) needs. Patients with advanced cancer were significantly less likely to have active goals of care (GOC) documented on their charts (53% vs. 75%; p < 0.001). While no significant differences were found between the groups, the majority of presentations involved imaging, investigations, consultations, and hospitalization. Presentations for advanced cancer were more likely to receive a postdischarge referral (38% vs. 23%; p < 0.001). Referrals to PC consultations or postdischarge referrals were infrequent. Regression analysis found that patients with advanced cancer were associated with shorter length of stay (LOS). Conclusions: The majority of presentations for advanced cancer or other EOL conditions involved significant resource use. Patients with cancer experienced shorter LOS; however, had less documentation of GOC and gaps in referrals to PC services were identified. Interventions should be explored to promote early GOC discussions and PC referrals in this patient group.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Terminal Care , Aftercare , Canada , Death , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Neoplasms/therapy , Palliative Care , Patient Discharge , Prospective Studies
8.
Transplant Cell Ther ; 28(4): 218.e1-218.e4, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35123117

ABSTRACT

The ZUMA-7 trial demonstrated the superiority of second-line chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy over standard of care chemotherapy with or without autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for relapsed/refractory (r/r) large B cell lymphoma (LBCL). We conducted a retrospective population-based analysis to determine eligibility for second-line CAR-T cell therapy in the real-world setting. Among 125 patients with r/r LBCL between 2015 and 2019, 82% progressed within 12 months of first-line chemoimmunotherapy (CIT), 40% were treated with intention-to-transplantation, 22% underwent ASCT, and 7% achieved a durable remission after ASCT. With a median follow-up of 2.8 years, the median overall survival (OS) was 5.1 months, and 3-year OS was 15% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7% to 20%) for all patients and 10% (95% CI, 5% to 17%) for those progressing within 12 months of CIT. Although only 14% of patients met all the ZUMA-7 study inclusion criteria, as many as 65% of patients progressing within 12 months of CIT had adequate performance status to be considered potentially eligible for second-line CAR T cell therapy. Whereas the current standard of care results in poor outcomes for most patients with r/r LBCL, the use of CAR T cell therapy in second-line therapy could substantially increase the proportion of patients able to receive curative-intent treatment at first progression of LBCL.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse , Receptors, Chimeric Antigen , Humans , Immunotherapy, Adoptive , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/therapy , Receptors, Chimeric Antigen/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation, Autologous
9.
CMAJ Open ; 9(4): E1120-E1127, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34848553

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Delays in cancer diagnosis have been associated with reduced survival, decreased quality of life after treatment, and suboptimal patient experience. The objective of the study was to explore the perspectives of a group of family physicians and other specialists regarding potentially avoidable delays in diagnosing cancer, and approaches that may help expedite the process. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using interviews with physicians practising in primary and outpatient care settings in Alberta between July and September 2019. We recruited family physicians and specialists who were in a position to discuss delays in cancer diagnosis by email via the Cancer Strategic Clinical Network and the Alberta Medical Association. We conducted semistructured interviews over the phone, and analyzed data using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Eleven family physicians and 22 other specialists (including 7 surgeons or surgical oncologists, 3 pathologists, 3 radiologists, 2 emergency physicians and 2 hematologists) participated in interviews; 22 were male (66.7%). We identified 4 main themes describing 9 factors contributing to potentially avoidable delays in diagnosis, namely the nature of primary care, initial presentation, investigation, and specialist advice and referral. We also identified 1 theme describing 3 suggestions for improvement, including system integration, standardized care pathways and a centralized advice, triage and referral support service for family physicians. INTERPRETATION: These findings suggest the need for enhanced support for family physicians, and better integration of primary and specialty care before cancer diagnosis. A multifaceted and coordinated approach to streamlining cancer diagnosis is required, with the goals of enhancing patient outcomes, reducing physician frustration and optimizing efficiency.


Subject(s)
Critical Pathways/standards , Delayed Diagnosis/prevention & control , Neoplasms , Physicians, Family/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care , Specialization/statistics & numerical data , Triage , Alberta/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/methods , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/therapy , Physician's Role , Primary Health Care/methods , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/standards , Qualitative Research , Quality Improvement , Referral and Consultation/organization & administration , Time-to-Treatment/standards , Triage/organization & administration , Triage/standards
11.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 22(11): 1417-1427, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33711241

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Over the past two decades, deeper understanding of B-cell signaling pathways and other mechanisms of lymphomagenesis have yielded promising targets for novel drugs in the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.Areas covered: This article provides a comprehensive review of approved synthetic drugs targeting the BTK, PI3K, immunomodulation, proteasome, HDAC, EZH2, and nuclear export pathways in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The review includes coverage of the pharmacology, efficacy, toxicity, and active areas of research for each drug. The authors also provide their expert perspectives on the field and their opinions for the future.Expert opinion: Although novel synthetic drugs have generally not impacted clinical practice to the same extent as immune and cellular therapies, there remains an important role for targeted drugs in the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, particularly in the relapsed setting and for patients ineligible for more intensive therapies. Clinical outcomes and tolerability may improve further with the development of newer generations of synthetic drugs and emerging combination regimens with other targeted and immune therapies.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin , Synthetic Drugs , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/drug therapy , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Signal Transduction , Synthetic Drugs/pharmacology , Synthetic Drugs/therapeutic use
12.
PLoS One ; 15(9): e0239374, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32970713

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Significant intervals from the identification of suspicious symptoms to a definitive diagnosis of cancer are common. Streamlining pathways to diagnosis may increase survival, quality of life post-treatment, and patient experience. Discussions of pathways to diagnosis from the perspective of patients and family members are crucial to advancing cancer diagnosis. AIM: To examine the perspectives of a group of patients with cancer and family members in Alberta, Canada, on factors associated with timelines to diagnosis and overall experience. METHODS: A qualitative approach was used. In-depth, semi-structured interviews with patients with cancer (n = 18) and patient relatives (n = 5) were conducted and subjected to a thematic analysis. FINDINGS: Participants struggled emotionally in the diagnostic period. Relevant to their experience were: potentially avoidable delays, concerns about health status, and misunderstood investigation process. Participants emphasized the importance of their active involvement in the care process, and had unmet supportive care needs. CONCLUSION: Psychosocial supports available to potential cancer patients and their families are minimal, and may be important for improved experiences before diagnosis. Access to other patients' lived experiences with the diagnostic process and with cancer, and an enhanced supportive role of family doctors might help improve experiences for patients and families in the interval before receiving a diagnosis of cancer, which may have a significant impact on wellbeing.


Subject(s)
Family/psychology , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/psychology , Adult , Aged , Alberta , Emotions , Female , Health Status , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Social Support
13.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 17(8): 957-967, 2019 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31390594

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Reductions in adjuvant chemotherapy dose <85% for historical regimens (ie, cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/fluorouracil) are known to affect breast cancer survival. This threshold, in addition to early versus late dose reductions, are poorly defined for third-generation anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy. In patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant 5-fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel (FEC-D), we evaluated the impact of chemotherapy total cumulative dose (TCD), and early (FEC) versus late (D only) dose reductions, on survival outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with stage I-III, hormone receptor-positive/negative, HER2-negative breast cancer treated with adjuvant FEC-D chemotherapy from 2007 through 2014 in Alberta, Canada, were included. TCD for cycles 1 to 6 of <85% or ≥85% was calculated. Average cumulative dose was also calculated for early (cycles 1-3) and late (cycles 4-6) chemotherapy. Survival outcomes (disease-free survival [DFS] and overall survival [OS]) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier and multivariate analysis. Cohorts were evaluated for uniformity. RESULTS: Characteristics were reasonably balanced for all cohorts. Overall, 1,302 patients were evaluated for dose reductions, with 16% being reduced <85% (n=202) relative to ≥85% (n=1,100; 84%). Patients who received TCD ≥85% relative to <85% had superior 5-year DFS (P=.025) and OS (P<.001) according to Kaplan-Meier analysis, which remained significant on univariate and multivariate analyses. In stratified late and early dose reduction cohorts, DFS and OS showed a significant inferior survival trend for dose reduction early in treatment administration in 5-year Kaplan-Meier (P=.002 and P<.001, respectively) and multivariate analyses (hazard ratio [HR], 1.46; P=.073, and HR, 1.77; P=.011, respectively). Dose delays of <14 or ≥14 days and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use did not affect outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy TCD <85% for adjuvant FEC-D affects breast cancer survival. Late reductions (D only) were not shown to adversely affect DFS or OS. Conversely, early reductions (FEC±D) negatively affected patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Adult , Aged , Alberta/epidemiology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Combined Modality Therapy , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
14.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 25(8): 1505-1510, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30965138

ABSTRACT

While no widely accepted standard treatment regimen exists for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), growing evidence supports an approach that incorporates autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as consolidative therapy when feasible. In November 2011, the Alberta Hematology Tumor Team established a new clinical practice guideline (CPG) for PCNSL involving high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX)/cytarabine-based induction followed by ASCT for eligible patients using a thiotepa and busulfan (TBu) conditioning regimen that omitted cyclophosphamide from the regimen that was used before 2011. This retrospective study analyzed all 64 patients with PCNSL diagnosed consecutively in 3 Canadian centers between November 2011 and December 2017 to evaluate adherence to the 2011 CPG and associated outcomes. Of the 64 patients with PCNSL, 38 were initiated on the transplantation-eligible protocol, of whom 30 underwent successful ASCT, and 26 were deemed transplantation-ineligible, of whom only 7 completed the transplantation-ineligible HDMTX-based protocol. For the transplantation-eligible and -ineligible cohorts, the projected 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 83.8% and 14.3% and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 78.1% and 0%, respectively. For the 30 patients who underwent TBu/ASCT, the 3-year OS and PFS rates were 92.7% and 88.9%, respectively, with no treatment-related mortality or significant neurotoxicity. These real-world results highlight the efficacy and tolerability of TBu/ASCT consolidation for PCNSL in patients young and fit enough for an intensive treatment program, along with the significant need for improved therapies for older or less fit patients with PCNSL.


Subject(s)
Busulfan/administration & dosage , Central Nervous System Neoplasms , Lymphoma , Thiotepa/administration & dosage , Transplantation Conditioning , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alberta , Autografts , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/diagnosis , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/mortality , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/therapy , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Lymphoma/diagnosis , Lymphoma/mortality , Lymphoma/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate
15.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 60(8): 1934-1941, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30628511

ABSTRACT

Phase II data suggest a benefit to autotransplantation for aggressive T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (T-NHL) in first remission; randomized trials have yet to validate this. We performed a retrospective analysis of aggressive T-NHL patients in the intergroup randomized consolidative autotransplant trial (SWOG 9704). Of the 370 enrolled, 40 had T-NHL: 12 were not randomized due to ineligibility (n = 1), choice (n = 2), or progression (n = 9), leaving 13 randomized to control and 15 to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Two ASCT patients refused transplant and one failed mobilization. The 5-year landmark PFS/OS estimates for ASCT vs. control groups were 40% vs. 38% (p = .56), and 40% vs. 45% (p = .98), respectively. No difference was seen based on IPI, or histologic subtype. Only 1/7 receiving BCNU-based therapy survived vs. 4/5 receiving TBI. Aggressive T-NHL autotransplanted in first remission did not appear to benefit from consolidative ASCT. This and the 30% who dropped out pre-randomization mostly to progression, suggests that improved induction regimens be developed.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Lymphoma, T-Cell/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Humans , Lymphoma, T-Cell/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Transplantation, Autologous , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
16.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 60(1): 133-141, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29966465

ABSTRACT

Although chemoimmunotherapy improves outcomes for patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), approximately 20% of patients experience early disease progression within two years of treatment and subsequently poor median survival. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate survival rates of patients with early relapse who were treated with or without autologous transplantation. Of 517 patients with FL and who received chemoimmunotherapy, 152 relapsed and survived a minimum of four months after progression, including 84 (55.3%) with early relapse ≤2 years following initial therapy and 68 (44.7%) with later relapse. Five-year survival was superior for patients who received autologous transplantation compared to non-transplanted patients within the early relapse group (85.4% vs 57.9%, p = .001), but not within the late relapse group (p = .64). Given the limitations of a retrospective study, our study may suggest that the use of autologous transplantation for FL patients who relapse within two years of initial chemoimmunotherapy is associated with improved survival.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Lymphoma, Follicular/therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Alberta/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Lymphoma, Follicular/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Rituximab/therapeutic use , Survival Rate , Time Factors , Transplantation, Autologous , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
17.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 18(12): 829-835, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30243571

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with low tumor burden follicular lymphoma (FL) are commonly managed with watchful waiting (WW). The incidence of organ dysfunction and/or transformation at disease progression, and subsequent impact on outcomes is poorly understood. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients managed with WW during 1994 to 2011 were identified through the Alberta Lymphoma Database. Individuals receiving immediate rituximab (R)-chemotherapy were identified as a comparator group to those on WW who received R-chemotherapy at progression. Endpoints included transformation, organ dysfunction, time to progression, time to next treatment, progression-free survival (PFS) after chemotherapy, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: We identified 238 patients managed with WW (28.9% of registry patients) during this 17-year period. The median follow up was 8.2 years. At a median of 29.9 months, 58 (24.4%) of these patients developed organ dysfunction and/or transformation. Of 169 (71%) patients who required therapy, 10-year OS was inferior for those with transformation (hazard ratio, 2.88; P = .002) and organ dysfunction (hazard ratio, 2.10; P = .028). PFS after R-chemotherapy and OS in patients without organ dysfunction and/or transformation was not affected by the initial WW period, compared with immediate R-chemotherapy. WW resulted in increased high risk FL International Prognostic Index scores at initiation of R-chemotherapy (45% vs. 20%), and more frequent transformation at progression (5-year risk, 17.8% vs. 3.5%; P < .001). Baseline characteristics did not predict organ dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Patients with FL accepting initial WW should be aware of the 1 in 4 risk of organ dysfunction and/or transformation, and subsequent inferior OS. Physicians should consider surveillance for progression to consider early therapy.


Subject(s)
Lymphoma, Follicular/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic , Disease Management , Disease Progression , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Lymphoma, Follicular/epidemiology , Lymphoma, Follicular/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Organ Dysfunction Scores , Proportional Hazards Models , Survival Analysis , Tumor Burden , Watchful Waiting , Young Adult
18.
Cytotherapy ; 20(5): 706-714, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29580864

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a potentially fatal complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation (detectable DNAemia) predisposes to the development of PTLD. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 306 patients monitored for EBV DNAemia after Thymoglobulin-conditioned HCT to determine the utility of the monitoring in the management of PTLD. DNAemia was monitored weekly for ≥12 weeks post-transplantation. RESULTS: Reactivation was detected in 82% of patients. PTLD occurred in 14% of the total patients (17% of patients with reactivation). PTLD was treated with rituximab only when and if the diagnosis was established. This allowed us to evaluate potential DNAemia thresholds for pre-emptive therapy. We suggest 100,000-500,000 IU per mL whole blood as this would result in unnecessary rituximab administration to only 4-20% of patients and near zero mortality due to PTLD. After starting rituximab (for diagnosed PTLD), sustained regression of PTLD occurred in 25/25 (100%) patients in whom DNAemia became undetectable. PTLD progressed or relapsed in 12/17 (71%) patients in whom DNAemia was persistently detectable. DISCUSSION: In conclusion, for pre-emptive therapy of PTLD, we suggest threshold DNAemia of 100,000-500,000 IU/mL. Persistently detectable DNAemia after PTLD treatment with rituximab appears to have 71% positive predictive value and 100% negative predictive value for PTLD progression/relapse.


Subject(s)
DNA, Viral/blood , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Herpesvirus 4, Human/genetics , Lymphoproliferative Disorders/etiology , Lymphoproliferative Disorders/virology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/blood , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/immunology , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/virology , Female , Herpesvirus 4, Human/immunology , Humans , Lymphoproliferative Disorders/blood , Lymphoproliferative Disorders/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Rituximab/therapeutic use , Virus Activation , Young Adult
20.
Haematologica ; 103(2): 288-296, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29097500

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to create a bioclinical model, based on clinical and molecular predictors of event-free and overall survival for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated on the Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG) LY12 prospective study. In 91 cases, sufficient histologic material was available to create tissue microarrays and perform immunohistochemistry staining for CD10, BCL6, MUM1/IRF4, FOXP1, LMO2, BCL2, MYC, P53 and phosphoSTAT3 (pySTAT3) expression. Sixty-seven cases had material sufficient for fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for MYC and BCL2 In addition, 97 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples underwent digital gene expression profiling (GEP) to evaluate BCL2, MYC, P53, and STAT3 expression, and to determine cell-of-origin (COO) using the Lymph2Cx assay. No method of determining COO predicted event-free survival (EFS) or overall survival (OS). Factors independently associated with survival outcomes in multivariate analysis included primary refractory disease, elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) at relapse, and MYC or BCL2 protein or gene expression. A bioclinical score using these four factors predicted outcome with 3-year EFS for cases with 0-1 vs 2-4 factors of 55% vs 16% (P<0.0001), respectively, assessing MYC and BCL2 by immunohistochemistry, 46% vs. 5% (P<0.0001) assessing MYC and BCL2 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) by digital gene expression, and 42% vs 21% (P=0.079) assessing MYC and BCL2 by FISH. This proposed bioclinical model should be further studied and validated in other datasets, but may discriminate relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients who could benefit from conventional salvage therapy from others who require novel approaches. The LY12 study; clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: 00078949.


Subject(s)
Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/diagnosis , Models, Biological , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2/analysis , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc/analysis , Adult , Aged , Female , Gene Expression Profiling , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Recurrence , Salvage Therapy/methods , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...