Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
Foot Ankle Surg ; 27(2): 231-234, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32546327

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of our cadaveric study was to determine the proximity of nail insertion and interlocking mechanisms in the Phantom® Lapidus Intramedullary Nail System to neurologic and tendinous structures in the foot. METHODS: We used 10 fresh-frozen human lower-extremity specimen cadavers. For each specimen, the Nail System was inserted as described in the published technique guide. We then performed dissection on the tibialis anterior tendon, extensor hallucis longus tendon, and medial dorsal cutaneous branch of the superficial peroneal nerve and we measured and averaged the distances from each of these structures from the nail. RESULTS: The tibialis anterior tendon was in closest proximity to the insertion of the proximal medial interlock K-wire with an average distance of 0.4mm from the tendon. The extensor hallucis longus tendon was in closest proximity to nail insertion with an average distance of 1.2mm. The medial dorsal cutaneous branch of the superficial peroneal nerve was in closest proximity to the distal interlock K-wire with an average distance of 7.5mm. CONCLUSIONS: The tibialis anterior tendon, extensor hallucis longus tendon, and the medial dorsal cutaneous branch of the superficial peroneal nerve are at risk with the insertion of the nail system. Blunt dissection should be performed using this system with a path to bone before instrumentation to reduce the risk of nerve and tendon injury in the foot.


Subject(s)
Ankle/innervation , Bone Nails , Foot/innervation , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/adverse effects , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/instrumentation , Cadaver , Dissection , Humans , Peroneal Nerve/pathology , Tendon Injuries/etiology , Tendon Injuries/prevention & control
2.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther ; 37(5): 253-9, 2007 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17549954

ABSTRACT

This manuscript offers current information regarding the examination, conservative treatment, and surgical treatment for individuals with posttraumatic arthritis. Although inflammatory and osteoarthritis can occur, posttraumatic arthritis is the most common form of arthritis to affect the ankle. Posttraumatic ankle arthritis occurs in a generally younger, active population. It is radiographically characterized by an asymmetrical degenerative process and may be associated with a history of trauma, instability, and/or lower extremity malalignment. When choosing between conservative/nonoperative versus surgical intervention, the extent of subchondral bone exposed and the time over which the arthritis has developed are factors that should be considered. The role and effectiveness for conservative treatment, such as medication, patient education, shoe modification, bracing, stretching, mobilization, strengthening, and symptom management, needs to be further determined. Surgical procedures for posttraumatic ankle arthritis can include distraction arthroplasty, arthrodesis, or total ankle arthroplasty. Unlike the relatively new procedure of distraction arthroplasty, the outcomes for arthrodesis have been well defined. Arthrodesis generally has a good outcome, but its limitations have been recognized. These limitations include the extended time required to achieve fusion, potential for nonunion, arthritis developing in adjacent joints, leg length discrepancy, malalignment, chronic edema, symptoms due to the hardware, stress fractures, and continued pain. While first generation total ankle arthroplasty led to poor results, advancements in prosthetic design and surgical technique have revived optimism regarding total ankle arthroplasty as an alternative to arthrodesis. The key for the future of total ankle arthroplasty may not be related to the development of newer ankle components but rather in refining the criteria to determine who would best benefit from joint replacement versus fusion.


Subject(s)
Ankle Injuries/complications , Arthritis/etiology , Arthritis/therapy , Ankle Injuries/physiopathology , Arthritis/physiopathology , Arthritis/surgery , Arthrodesis , Arthroplasty, Replacement , Biomechanical Phenomena , Humans , Orthotic Devices , Physical Therapy Modalities , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...