Evaluation of the effect of selecting gluteal injection site on the pain injection based on anthropometric indices and body shape pattern: A randomised controlled trial study.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study was aimed at comparing the effect of injection site selection based on anthropometric indices and body shape pattern on pain injection. BACKGROUND: Pain is one of the common complications of intramuscular injection. Selecting the right place for gluteal injection is one of the challenges of nursing which can increase the safety and success of the injection and thereby reduce the pain severity caused by it. DESIGN: Open-label randomized controlled trial study. METHODS: In this study, 162 eligible subjects referred to the emergency unit of Vasei Hospital of Sabzevar, Iran were randomly assigned to three groups of control, anthropometric indices and body shape pattern. Subjects in the control group received dorsogluteal injection (traditional way). In the anthropometric group, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and anterior superior iliac spine to iliac tubercle (ASIS-IT), and in body shape pattern group, observed body shape indices (OBS), BMI and sex were used to select the gluteal injection site. Pain injection was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The CONSORT checklist was used. RESULTS: The mean age of the participant was 39.43 ± 13.16 and 43.21% (n = 70) were male. Based on multiple linear regression analysis, the mean pain injection was substantially lower in body shape pattern as compared to the control group (r2 : .26; bxy = -0.41; 95% CI: -0.81, -0.01; p = .043). The mean pain injection was significantly greater in the left leg injection than right one (r2 : .26; bxy = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.06, 0.81; p = .021). CONCLUSIONS: Findings of this study suggest that the selection of a gluteal injection site based on body shape pattern in comparison with traditional dorsogluteal injection method has a significant effect on pain injection relief. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses can choose the appropriate gluteal injection site based on the body shape pattern to reduce the pain of the intramuscular (IM) gluteal injections.

Evaluation of the Impact of Handoff Based on the SBAR Technique on Quality of Nursing Care.

BACKGROUND: Effective communication, including the complete and accurate transfer of information and the prevention of misrepresentation and misinterpretation of patient-centered data during handoff, can enhance the quality of patient care and safety. PURPOSE: This study was aimed at evaluating the impact of bedside handoff using the Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (SBAR) technique, on the quality of nursing care. METHODS: The Quality Patient Care Scale (QUALPACS) was completed by the patient while nurses performed a verbal bedside shift handoff and after receiving education on the purpose and proper use of the SBAR communication tool. RESULTS: The mean age of subjects was 51.29 ± 8.02 years. We found a significant increase in the mean score of QUALPACS dimensions, namely psychosocial (P < .001), physical (P < .001), and communication (P < .001) after SBAR implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that using the SBAR handoff technique increases the quality of nursing care in all QUALPACS dimensions.

Evaluating the Use of a Modified Early Warning Score in Predicting Serious Adverse Events in Iranian Hospitalized Patients: A Prognostic Study.

INTRODUCTION: Assessment of early clinical warning signs and appropriate response can prevent serious adverse events in hospitalized patients. The Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) is an applicable early warning sign system that can be used to predict serious adverse events. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive capacity of the MEWS to identify patients in an Iranian hospital who are at risk of developing serious adverse events. METHODS: In this prognostic study, 381 adult patients from the emergency department who were admitted to an inpatient hospital unit of an Iranian hospital from May 2018 to October 2018 were included. The MEWS tool was completed for each patient at the time of admission and then daily for a period of up to 30 continuous days after admission or until the development of a serious adverse event. Receiver operating characteristic, specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values were calculated. RESULTS: In this study, a MEWS of ≥3 on admission was associated with an increased likelihood of developing serious adverse events within 30 days of admission with the area under the curve of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-0.85), sensitivity of 82.81% (95% CI: 71.3-91.1), specificity of 75.39% (95% CI: 70.3-80), positive predictive value of 40.5% (95% CI: 35.2-45.9), and negative predictive value of 95.6% (95% CI: 92.7-97.4). DISCUSSION: A MEWS ≥3 on admission can predict the occurrence of serious averse events in patients admitted to an Iranian hospital for 30 continuous days.