Electron-shuttling antibiotics structure bacterial communities by modulating cellular levels of c-di-GMP.

Diverse organisms secrete redox-active antibiotics, which can be used as extracellular electron shuttles by resistant microbes. Shuttle-mediated metabolism can support survival when substrates are available not locally but rather at a distance. Such conditions arise in multicellular communities, where the formation of chemical gradients leads to resource limitation for cells at depth. In the pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14, antibiotics called phenazines act as oxidants to balance the intracellular redox state of cells in anoxic biofilm subzones. PA14 colony biofilms show a profound morphogenic response to phenazines resulting from electron acceptor-dependent inhibition of ECM production. This effect is reminiscent of the developmental responses of some eukaryotic systems to redox control, but for bacterial systems its mechanistic basis has not been well defined. Here, we identify the regulatory protein RmcA and show that it links redox conditions to PA14 colony morphogenesis by modulating levels of bis-(3',5')-cyclic-dimeric-guanosine (c-di-GMP), a second messenger that stimulates matrix production, in response to phenazine availability. RmcA contains four Per-Arnt-Sim (PAS) domains and domains with the potential to catalyze the synthesis and degradation of c-di-GMP. Our results suggest that phenazine production modulates RmcA activity such that the protein degrades c-di-GMP and thereby inhibits matrix production during oxidizing conditions. RmcA thus forms a mechanistic link between cellular redox sensing and community morphogenesis analogous to the functions performed by PAS-domain-containing regulatory proteins found in complex eukaryotes.

Using a Concept Inventory to Reveal Student Thinking Associated with Common Misconceptions about Antibiotic Resistance.

Misconceptions, also known as alternate conceptions, about key concepts often hinder the ability of students to learn new knowledge. Concept inventories (CIs) are designed to assess students' understanding of key concepts, especially those prone to misconceptions. Two-tiered CIs include prompts that ask students to explain the logic behind their answer choice. Such two-tiered CIs afford an opportunity for faculty to explore the student thinking behind the common misconceptions represented by their choice of a distractor. In this study, we specifically sought to probe the misconceptions that students hold prior to beginning an introductory microbiology course (i.e., preconceptions). Faculty-learning communities at two research-intensive universities used the validated Host-Pathogen Interaction Concept Inventory (HPI-CI) to reveal student preconceptions. Our method of deep analysis involved communal review and discussion of students' explanations for their CI answer choice. This approach provided insight valuable for curriculum development. Here the process is illustrated using one question from the HPI-CI related to the important topic of antibiotic resistance. The frequencies with which students chose particular multiple-choice responses for this question were highly correlated between institutions, implying common underlying misconceptions. Examination of student explanations using our analysis approach, coupled with group discussions within and between institutions, revealed patterns in student thinking to the participating faculty. Similar application of a two-tiered concept inventory by general microbiology instructors, either individually or in groups, at other institutions will allow them to better understand student thinking related to key concepts in their curriculum.

Identification of an anchor residue for CheA-CheY interactions in the chemotaxis system of Escherichia coli.

Transfer of a phosphoryl group from autophosphorylated CheA (P-CheA) to CheY is an important step in the bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction pathway. This reaction involves CheY (i) binding to the P2 domain of P-CheA and then (ii) acquiring the phosphoryl group from the P1 domain. Crystal structures indicated numerous side chain interactions at the CheY-P2 binding interface. To investigate the individual contributions of the P2 side chains involved in these contacts, we analyzed the effects of eight alanine substitution mutations on CheA-CheY binding interactions. An F214A substitution in P2 caused ∼1,000-fold reduction in CheA-CheY binding affinity, while Ala substitutions at other P2 positions had small effects (E171A, E178A, and I216A) or no detectable effects (H181A, D202A, D207A, and C213A) on binding affinity. These results are discussed in relation to previous in silico predictions of hot-spot and anchor positions at the CheA-CheY interface. We also investigated the consequences of these mutations for chemotaxis signal transduction in living cells. CheA(F214A) was defective in mediating localization of CheY-YFP to the large clusters of signaling proteins that form at the poles of Escherichia coli cells, while the other CheA variants did not differ from wild-type (wt) CheA (CheA(wt)) in this regard. In our set of mutants, only CheA(F214A) exhibited a markedly diminished ability to support chemotaxis in motility agar assays. Surprisingly, however, in FRET assays that monitored receptor-regulated production of phospho-CheY, CheA(F214A) (and each of the other Ala substitution mutants) performed just as well as CheA(wt). Overall, our findings indicate that F214 serves as an anchor residue at the CheA-CheY interface and makes an important contribution to the binding energy in vitro and in vivo; however, loss of this contribution does not have a large negative effect on the overall ability of the signaling pathway to modulate P-CheY levels in response to chemoattractants.

Kinetics of ATP and TNP-ATP binding to the active site of CheA from Thermotoga maritima.

The mechanism of nucleotide binding to the active site of Thermotoga maritima CheA was investigated using stopped-flow fluorescence experiments that monitored binding of ATP and TNP-ATP to the catalytic domain (P4) of CheA that had been engineered to include a tryptophan residue as a fluorescent reporter group at the active site (P4(F487W)). Rapid decreases in protein intrinsic fluorescence and increases in TNP-ATP fluorescence were observed during binding reactions, and time courses were analyzed to define the kinetic mechanisms for ATP and TNP-ATP binding. This analysis indicated that binding of ATP(Mg(2+)) to P4(F487W) involves a single reversible step with a k(on) of 0.92 +/- 0.09 microM(-1) s(-1), a k(off) of 1.9 +/- 0.4 s(-1), and a K(d) of 1.5-2.1 microM (all values determined at 4 degrees C). Binding of TNP-ATP(Mg(2+)) to P4(F487W) involves a more complicated mechanism, requiring at least three sequential steps. Computer simulations and nonlinear regression analysis were used to estimate the rate constants of the forward and reverse reactions for each of the three steps in the reaction scheme [Formula: see text] Similar analysis indicated that an alternative reaction scheme, involving a rate-limiting conformational change in P4 prior to TNP-ATP binding, did an equally good job of accounting for all of the kinetics results:[Formula: see text] In both models, steps 2 and 3 have slow reversal rates that contribute to the high affinity of the active site for TNP-ATP (K(d) = 0.015 microM). These results highlight the dramatic effect of the TNP moieties on CheA-nucleotide interactions, and they provide the first detailed information about the kinetic mechanism underlying interaction of a protein histidine kinase with this tight-binding inhibitor.

Protein histidine kinases: assembly of active sites and their regulation in signaling pathways.

Protein histidine kinases (PHKs) function in Two Component Signaling pathways utilized extensively by bacteria and archaea. Many PHKs participate in three distinct, but interrelated signaling reactions: autophoshorylation, phosphotransfer (to a partner Response Regulator (RR) protein), and dephosphorylation of this RR. Detailed biochemical and structural characterization of several PHKs has revealed how the domains of these proteins can interact to assemble the three active sites that promote the necessary chemistry and how these domain interactions might be regulated in response to sensory input: the relative orientation of helices in the PHK dimerization domain can reorient, via cogwheeling (rotation) and kinking (bending), to effect changes in PHK activities that probably involve sequestration/release of the PHK catalytic domain by the dimerization domain.

The two active sites of Thermotoga maritima CheA dimers bind ATP with dramatically different affinities.

CheA is a central component of the chemotaxis signal transduction pathway that allows prokaryotic cells to control their movements in response to environmental cues. This dimeric protein histidine kinase autophosphorylates via an intersubunit phosphorylation reaction in which each protomer of the dimer binds ATP, at an active site located in its P4 domain and then catalyzes transfer of the gamma-phosphoryl group of ATP to the His(45) side chain within the P1 domain of the trans protomer. Here we utilize the fluorescent nucleotide analogue TNP-ATP [2'(3')-O-(2,4,6-trinitrophenyl)adenosine 5'-triphosphate] to investigate the two ATP-binding sites of the Thermotoga maritima CheA dimer (TmCheA) and the single site of the isolated TmP4 domain (a monomer). We define the affinity of CheA for TNP nucleotides and, by competition, for unmodified ATP. The two ATP-binding sites of the TmCheA dimer exhibit dramatically different affinities for TNP-ATP (K(d1)(TNP) approximately 0.0016 muM and K(d2)(TNP) approximately 22 muM at 4 degrees C in the presence of Mg(2+)) as well as for ATP (K(d1)(ATP) approximately 6 muM and K(d2)(ATP) approximately 5000 muM at 4 degrees C in the presence of Mg(2+)) and in their ability to influence the fluorescence of bound TNP-ATP. The ATP-binding site of the isolated TmP4 domain interacts with ATP and TNP-ATP in a manner similar to that of the high-affinity site of the TmCheA dimer. These results suggest that the two active sites of TmCheA homodimers exhibit large differences in their interactions with ATP. We consider possible implications of these differences for the CheA autophosphorylation mechanism and for CheA function in bacterial cells.

Analysis of ATP binding to CheA containing tryptophan substitutions near the active site.

Signal transduction in the chemotaxis system of Escherichia coli involves an autophosphorylating protein histidine kinase, CheA. At the active site of CheA, phenylalanine residues 455 and 459 occupy positions near the ATP-binding pocket, immediately adjacent to one of the hinge regions of a loop that undergoes an ATP-induced conformational change ("lid closure") that has been characterized previously in X-ray crystal structures [Bilwes et al. (2001) Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 353-360]. We generated versions of CheA carrying F455W and F459W replacements and investigated whether the fluorescence properties of the introduced tryptophan side chains were affected by nucleotide binding in a manner that would provide a signal for investigating the dynamics of active site events, such as ATP binding and lid closure. Our results indicate that CheA(F455W) is useful in this regard, but CheA(F459W) is not. CheA(F455W) retained full catalytic activity and exhibited easily monitored fluorescence changes upon binding nucleotide: we observed a 25-30% decrease in CheA(F455W) fluorescence emission intensity at 330 nm upon binding ATP in the absence of Mg(2+); in the presence of Mg(2+), the emission spectrum of the CheA(F455W):ATP complex was red-shifted by 5 nm and exhibited an increased intensity (approximately 20% higher at 345 nm relative to that of uncomplexed CheA(F455W)). Different fluorescence changes were observed when two ATP analogues (ADPNP and ADPCP) were used instead of ATP and when Mn(2+) or Ca(2+) was used in place of Mg(2+). We exploited the fluorescence changes induced by Mg(2+)-ATP to explore the kinetics and mechanism of nucleotide binding by CheA(F455W). In the absence of Mg(2+), binding appears to involve a simple one-step equilibrium (k(assn) = 0.7 microM(-1) s(-1) and k(dissn) = 270 s(-1) at 4 degrees C). In the presence of Mg(2+), the binding mechanism involves at least two steps: (i) rapid, relatively weak binding followed by (ii) a rapid, reversible step (k(forward) = 300 s(-1) and k(reverse) =15 s(-1) at 4 degrees C) that enhanced the overall affinity of the complex and generated an increase in W455 fluorescence. This second step could reflect a conformational change at the CheA active site, such as lid closure. These results provide the first insight into the dynamics of nucleotide binding and substrate-induced conformational changes at the active site of a protein histidine kinase.

Phosphorylation and binding interactions of CheY studied by use of Badan-labeled protein.

In the chemotaxis signal transduction pathway of Escherichia coli, the response regulator protein CheY is phosphorylated by the receptor-coupled protein kinase CheA. Previous studies of CheY phosphorylation and CheY interactions with other proteins in the chemotaxis pathway have exploited the fluorescence properties of Trp(58), located immediately adjacent to the phosphorylation site of CheY (Asp(57)). Such studies can be complicated by the intrinsic fluorescence and absorbance properties of CheA and other proteins of interest. To circumvent these difficulties, we generated a derivative of CheY carrying a covalently attached fluorescent label that serves as a sensitive reporter of phosphorylation and binding events and that absorbs and emits light at wavelengths well removed from potential interference by other proteins. This labeled version of CheY has the (dimethylamino)naphthalene fluorophore from Badan [6-bromoacetyl-2-(dimethylamino)naphthalene] attached to the thiol group of a cysteine introduced at position 17 of CheY by site-directed mutagenesis. Under phosphorylating conditions (or in the presence of beryllofluoride), the fluorescence emission of Badan-labeled CheY(M17C) exhibited an approximately 10 nm blue shift and an approximately 30% increase in signal intensity at 490 nm. The fluorescence of Badan-labeled CheY(M17C) also served as a sensitive reporter of CheY-CheA binding interactions, exhibiting an approximately 50% increase in emission intensity in the presence of saturating levels of CheA. Compared to wild-type CheY, Badan-labeled CheY exhibited reduced ability to autodephosphorylate and could not interact productively with the phosphatase CheZ. However, with respect to autophosphorylation and interactions with CheA, Badan-CheY performed identically to wild-type CheY, allowing us to explore CheA-CheY phosphotransfer kinetics and binding kinetics without interference from the fluorescence/absorbance properties of CheA and ATP. These results provide insights into CheY interactions with CheA, CheZ, and other components of the chemotaxis signaling pathway.

Association and dissociation kinetics for CheY interacting with the P2 domain of CheA.

The chemotaxis system of Escherichia coli makes use of an extended two-component sensory response pathway in which CheA, an autophosphorylating protein histidine kinase (PHK) rapidly passes its phosphoryl group to CheY, a phospho-accepting response regulator protein (RR). The CheA-->CheY phospho-transfer reaction is 100-1000 times faster than the His-->Asp phospho-relays that operate in other (non-chemotaxis) two-component regulatory systems, suggesting that CheA and CheY have unique features that enhance His-->Asp phospho-transfer kinetics. One such feature could be the P2 domain of CheA. P2 encompasses a binding site for CheY, but an analogous RR-binding domain is not found in other PHKs. In previous work, we removed P2 from CheA, and this decreased the catalytic efficiency of CheA-->CheY phospho-transfer by a factor of 50-100. Here we examined the kinetics of the binding interactions between CheY and P2. The rapid association reaction (k(assn) approximately 10(8)M(-1)s(-1) at 25 degrees C and micro=0.03 M) exhibited a simple first-order dependence on P2 concentration and appeared to be largely diffusion-limited. Ionic strength (micro) had a moderate effect on k(assn) in a manner predictable based on the calculated electrostatic interaction energy of the protein binding surfaces and the expected Debye-Hückel shielding. The speed of binding reflects, in part, electrostatic interactions, but there is also an important contribution from the inherent plasticity of the complex and the resulting flexibility that this allows during the process of complex formation. Our results support the idea that the P2 domain of CheA contributes to the overall speed of phospho-transfer by promoting rapid association between CheY and CheA. However, this alone does not account for the ability of the chemotaxis system to operate much more rapidly than other two-component systems: k(cat) differences indicate that CheA and CheY also achieve the chemical events of phospho-transfer more rapidly than do PHK-RR pairs of slower systems.

CheZ phosphatase localizes to chemoreceptor patches via CheA-short.

We have investigated the conditions required for polar localization of the CheZ phosphatase by using a CheZ-green fluorescent protein fusion protein that, when expressed from a single gene in the chromosome, restored chemotaxis to a DeltacheZ strain. Localization was observed in wild-type, DeltacheZ, DeltacheYZ, and DeltacheRB cells but not in cells with cheA, cheW, or all chemoreceptor genes except aer deleted. Cells making only CheA-short (CheA(S)) or CheA lacking the P2 domain also retained normal localization, whereas cells producing only CheA-long or CheA missing the P1 and P2 domains did not. We conclude that CheZ localization requires the truncated C-terminal portion of the P1 domain present in CheA(S). Missense mutations targeting residues 83 through 120 of CheZ also abolished localization. Two of these mutations do not disrupt chemotaxis, indicating that they specifically prevent interaction with CheA(S) while leaving other activities of CheZ intact.

CheA kinase and chemoreceptor interaction surfaces on CheW.

Chemotactic responses of Escherichia coli to aspartic acid are initiated by a ternary protein complex composed of Tar (chemoreceptor), CheA (kinase), and CheW (a coupling protein that binds to both Tar and CheA and links their activities). We used a genetic selection based on the yeast two-hybrid assay to identify nine cheW point mutations that specifically disrupted CheW interaction with CheA but not with Tar. We sequenced these single point mutants and purified four of the mutant CheW proteins for detailed biochemical characterizations that demonstrated the weakened affinity of the mutant CheW proteins for CheA, but not for Tar. In the three-dimensional structure of CheW, the positions affected by these mutations cluster on one face of the protein, defining a potential binding interface for interaction of CheW with CheA. We used a similar two-hybrid approach to identify four mutation sites that disrupted CheW binding to Tar. Mapping of these "Tar-sensitive" mutation sites and those from previous suppressor analysis onto the structure of CheW defined an extended surface on a face of the protein that is adjacent to the CheA-binding surface and that may serve as an interface for CheW binding to Tar.

CheW binding interactions with CheA and Tar. Importance for chemotaxis signaling in Escherichia coli.

The initial signaling events underlying the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli to aspartic acid occur within a ternary complex that includes Tar (an aspartate receptor), CheA (a protein kinase), and CheW. Because CheW can bind to CheA and to Tar, it is thought to serve as an adapter protein in this complex. The functional importance of CheW binding interactions, however, has not been investigated. To better define the role of CheW and its binding interactions, we performed biochemical characterization of six mutant variants of CheW. We examined the ability of the purified mutant CheW proteins to bind to CheA and Tar, to promote formation of active ternary complexes, and to support chemotaxis in vivo. Our results indicate that mutations which eliminate CheW binding to Tar (V36M) or to CheA (G57D) result in a complete inability to form active ternary complexes in vitro and render the CheW protein incapable of mediating chemotaxis in vivo. The in vivo signaling pathway can, however, tolerate moderate changes in CheW-Tar and CheW-CheA affinities observed with several of the mutants (G133E, G41D, and 154ocr). One mutant (R62H) provided surprising results that may indicate a role for CheW in addition to binding CheA/receptors and promoting ternary complex formation.