ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Biosimilars of filgrastim are in widespread clinical use in Europe. This phase III study compares biosimilar filgrastim (EP2006), with the US-licensed reference product, Neupogen(®), in breast cancer patients receiving (neo)adjuvant myelosuppressive chemotherapy (TAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 218 patients receiving 5 µg/kg/day filgrastim over six chemotherapy cycles were randomized 1:1:1:1 into four arms. Two arms received only one product (nonalternating), biosimilar or reference, and two arms (alternating) received alternating treatments during each cycle (biosimilar then reference or vice versa). The primary end point was duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) during cycle 1. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were balanced between the four treatment arms. Noninferiority of biosimilar versus the reference was demonstrated: DSN (days) in cycle 1 was 1.17 ± 1.11 (biosimilar, N = 101) and 1.20 ± 1.02 (reference, N = 103), 97.5% confidence interval lower boundary for the difference was -0.26 days (above the predefined limit of -1 day). No clinically meaningful differences were observed regarding any other efficacy parameter: incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN); hospitalization due to FN; incidence of infections; depth and time of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) nadir and time to ANC recovery during cycle 1 and across all cycles. The pattern and frequency of adverse events were similar across all treatments. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that biosimilar and the reference filgrastim are similar with no clinically meaningful differences regarding efficacy and safety in prevention of severe neutropenia. Biosimilar filgrastim could represent an important alternative to the reference product, potentially benefiting public health by increasing access to filgrastim treatment. STUDY NUMBER: NCT01519700.
Subject(s)
Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Filgrastim/analogs & derivatives , Filgrastim/therapeutic use , Neutropenia/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Female , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neutropenia/drug therapy , Young AdultABSTRACT
Mismatches between donor and recipient for human platelet antigens (HPA) may affect the success of transplantation due to: (a) serving as minor histocompa-tibility antigens and therefore render recipients at risk for graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), (b) inhibition of thrombopoiesis due to platelet antibodies. We therefore evaluated the occurrence of GvHD and need of platelet support by prospective analysis of donor-recipient pairs (n=53) for HPA-1, -2, -3, and -5 allotypes and screening for platelet antibodies prior to transplantation and in weekly intervals until day 100 after transplantation. Neither the incidence of GvHD nor the onset of thrombopoiesis, nor the CCI after platelet transfusions, nor the frequency of platelet transfusions was affected by HPA mismatches. Settings of homozygous donors vs heterozygous recipients or homozygous recipients vs heterozygous donors were not associated with any adverse effects on the outcome of the transplantation. Thus, the HPA-match does not affect the success of transplantation.
Subject(s)
Antigens, Human Platelet/immunology , Bone Marrow Transplantation/mortality , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/mortality , Myeloablative Agonists/administration & dosage , Platelet Transfusion , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Graft vs Host Disease/immunology , Graft vs Host Disease/mortality , Humans , Incidence , Isoantigens/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Platelet Count , Prospective Studies , Reticulocyte CountABSTRACT
The demand for blood components is constantly increasing, while the exclusion criteria for donors are strengthened in order to reach maximal safety for donors and patients. To counterbalance reduced availability of volunteers, multicomponent collections (MCC) is an attractive approach to produce more than one component during a single apheresis procedure from one donor, such as packed red blood cells (PRBCs) and platelet concentrates (PCs). Further, the exposures of patients to a limited number of donors reduces the possibility of alloimmunization and transfusion-related diseases. We measured the quality of PRBCs and PCs obtained by MCC, using the MCS+ device with the LDPRBC program, Revision B, and compared them with the quality of manually collected PRBCs and PCs collected with the Revision C2 of the MCS+. We found higher pH levels and lower hemolysis assessed by means of fHb and K+ in the supernatant of PRBCs over the whole storage period of 42 days in MCC-derived PRBCs. The functional metabolism assessed by intracellular ATP was higher in PRBCs collected by MCC than in manually collected units. Furthermore, PCs obtained during MCC showed an increase in p-selectin expression on day 5 of storage compared to PCs collected with the Revision C2 of the MCS+. The p-selectin expression on MCC platelets was within the range of p-selectin expression found in PCs obtained by other apheresis devices. These results indicate less storage lesion in MCC-derived PRBCs compared to manually collected units and no compromise in the quality of MCC PCs obtained in the same apheresis procedure.
Subject(s)
Cytapheresis/instrumentation , Cytapheresis/methods , Adenosine Triphosphate/analysis , Adult , Blood Platelets , Blood Preservation , Cytapheresis/standards , Erythrocyte Transfusion/instrumentation , Erythrocyte Transfusion/methods , Erythrocyte Transfusion/standards , Erythrocytes , Fetal Hemoglobin/analysis , Hemolysis , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Male , Plateletpheresis/instrumentation , Plateletpheresis/methods , Plateletpheresis/standards , Potassium/analysis , Quality Control , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Platelet antibodies are detectable in only about 50% of patients with chronic autoimmune thrombocytopenia (AITP). We determined platelet antibodies against GPIa/IIa, GPIb/IX, GPIIb/IIIa, and GPV and reticulated platelets in three female patients with AITP, before and after immunoadsorption treatment. None of the three patients' sera contained platelet antibodies prior to treatment. Thereafter, anti-GPIIb/IIIa, anti-GPIb/IX (n = 3), and anti-GPV (n = 1) were detectable in the patients' sera. These antibody specificities were also found in the eluates from the immunoadsorption columns. Only one patient had elevated levels of reticulated platelets. Immunoadsorption treatment did not induce a sustained increase of platelet counts in any patient. Immunoadsorption treatment in AITP can induce redistribution of antibodies into the circulation.
Subject(s)
Autoantibodies/blood , Blood Platelets/immunology , Immunosorbent Techniques , Platelet Membrane Glycoproteins , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/immunology , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Antibody Specificity , Female , Humans , Platelet Count , Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex/immunology , Platelet Glycoprotein GPIb-IX Complex/immunologyABSTRACT
Simian-human immunodeficiency viruses (SHIV) allow the evaluation of antiviral strategies that target the envelope glycoproteins of the human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) in macaques. We previously protected neonates from oral challenge with cell-free SHIV-vpu+ by passive immunization with synergistic human neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (Baba et al., Nat Med 6:200-206, 2000). mAbs were administered prenatally to pregnant dams and postnatally to the neonates. Here, we used solely postnatal or postexposure mAb treatment, thus significantly reducing the amount of mAbs necessary. All neonatal monkeys were also protected with these abbreviated mAb regimens. Our results are directly relevant for humans because we used mAbs that target HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins. Thus, the large-scale use of passive immunization with neutralizing mAbs may be feasible in human neonates. The mAbs, being natural human proteins, can be expected to have low toxicity. Passive immunization has promise to prevent intrapartum as well as milk-borne virus transmission from HIV-1-infected women to their infants.
Subject(s)
Animals, Newborn/immunology , HIV/immunology , Immunization, Passive/methods , Macaca mulatta/immunology , Simian Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/immunology , Simian Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/prevention & control , Simian Immunodeficiency Virus/immunology , Administration, Oral , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , Blotting, Western , HIV Antibodies/immunology , Human Immunodeficiency Virus Proteins , Humans , Immunity, Mucosal , Simian Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/transmission , Time Factors , Viral Load , Viral Regulatory and Accessory Proteins/physiologyABSTRACT
Several reports have described the existence of synergy between neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). Synergy between human MAbs b12, 2G12, 2F5, and 4E10 in neutralization of primary isolates is of particular interest. Neutralization synergy of these MAbs, however, has not been studied extensively, and the mechanism of synergy remains unclear. We investigated neutralization synergy among this human antibody set by using the classical approach of titrating antibodies mixed at a fixed ratio as well as by an alternative, variable ratio approach in which the neutralization curve of one MAb is assessed in the presence and absence of a fixed, weakly neutralizing concentration of a second antibody. The advantage of this second approach is that it does not require mathematical analysis to establish synergy. No neutralization enhancement of any of the MAb combinations tested was detected for the T-cell-line-adapted molecular HIV-1 clone HxB2 using both assay formats. Studies of primary isolates (89.6, SF162, and JR-CSF) showed neutralization synergy which was relatively weak, with a maximum of two- to fourfold enhancement between antibody pairs, thereby increasing neutralization titers about 10-fold in triple and quadruple antibody combinations. Analysis of b12 and 2G12 binding to oligomeric envelope glycoprotein by using flow cytometry failed to demonstrate cooperativity in binding between these two antibodies. The mechanism by which these antibodies synergize is, therefore, not yet understood. The results lend some support to the notion that an HIV-1 vaccine that elicits moderate neutralizing antibodies to multiple epitopes may be more effective than hereto supposed, although considerable caution in extrapolating to a vaccine situation is required.
Subject(s)
HIV-1/immunology , AIDS Vaccines/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal/metabolism , Flow Cytometry , HIV-1/metabolism , Humans , Neutralization TestsABSTRACT
The identification and epitope mapping of broadly neutralizing anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) antibodies (Abs) is important for vaccine design, but, despite much effort, very few such Abs have been forthcoming. Only one broadly neutralizing anti-gp41 monoclonal Ab (MAb), 2F5, has been described. Here we report on two MAbs that recognize a region immediately C-terminal of the 2F5 epitope. Both MAbs were generated from HIV-1-seropositive donors, one (Z13) from an antibody phage display library, and one (4E10) as a hybridoma. Both MAbs recognize a predominantly linear and relatively conserved epitope, compete with each other for binding to synthetic peptide derived from gp41, and bind to HIV-1(MN) virions. By flow cytometry, these MAbs appear to bind relatively weakly to infected cells and this binding is not perturbed by pretreatment of the infected cells with soluble CD4. Despite the apparent linear nature of the epitopes of Z13 and 4E10, denaturation of recombinant envelope protein reduces the binding of these MAbs, suggesting some conformational requirements for full epitope expression. Most significantly, Z13 and 4E10 are able to neutralize selected primary isolates from diverse subtypes of HIV-1 (e.g., subtypes B, C, and E). The results suggest that a rather extensive region of gp41 close to the transmembrane domain is accessible to neutralizing Abs and could form a useful target for vaccine design.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , HIV Antibodies/immunology , HIV Envelope Protein gp41/immunology , HIV-1/immunology , Amino Acid Motifs , Amino Acid Sequence , Antibody Specificity , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Epitopes , Flow Cytometry , HIV Envelope Protein gp41/chemistry , Humans , Molecular Sequence Data , Neutralization TestsABSTRACT
Neonatal macaques were completely protected against oral challenge with SHIV-vpu+, a simian-human immunodeficiency virus that encodes the envelope gene of a laboratory-adapted HIV strain, by pre- and post-natal treatment with a triple combination of human neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). The mAbs were directed either against the CD4 binding site, a glycosylation-dependent gp120 epitope, or against a linear epitope on gp41. This triple combination was highly synergistic in vitro and neutralized primary HIV completely. Subsequently, oral challenge was performed with pathogenic SHIV89.6P, an animal-passaged variant of a chimeric virus that encodes the envelope gene of the primary, dual-tropic HIV89.6. Only post-natal treatment with a similar triple mAb combination was used. One out of 4 mAb-treated infants was completely protected from infection. In the other 3 treated animals, there was a tendency towards lower peak viral RNA loads compared with untreated controls. Two out of 4 mAb-treated infants maintained normal CD4+ T-cell numbers, in contrast to all controls that had steep declines at 2 weeks post-challenge. We conclude that the triple mAb combination significantly protected the neonates, even against mucosal challenge with pathogenic SHIV89.6P. Passively administered synergistic human mAbs may play a role in preventing mother-infant transmission of HIV, both against intrapartum transmission as well as against infection through breast milk. As passive immunization is a tool to assess correlates of immune protection, we conclude that the epitopes recognized by the mAbs in our combinations are important for AIDS vaccine development. Future passive immunization studies may reveal other important conserved epitopes.
Subject(s)
AIDS Vaccines/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , HIV Antibodies/administration & dosage , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV/immunology , Immunization, Passive , Simian Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/prevention & control , Simian Immunodeficiency Virus/immunology , Vaccination , AIDS Vaccines/immunology , Administration, Oral , Animals , Animals, Newborn , Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , Cesarean Section , Delivery, Obstetric , Disease Models, Animal , Female , HIV Antibodies/immunology , HIV Envelope Protein gp120/immunology , HIV Envelope Protein gp41/immunology , Humans , Immunity, Maternally-Acquired , Infant, Newborn , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Lactation , Macaca mulatta , Maternal-Fetal Exchange , Milk/virology , Neutralization Tests , Pilot Projects , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Species Specificity , Virus Assembly , Virus SheddingABSTRACT
To develop immunoprophylaxis regimens against mother-to-child human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) transmission, we established a simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) model in neonatal macaques that mimics intrapartum mucosal virus exposure (T.W. Baba, J. Koch, E.S. Mittler et al: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 10:351-357, 1994). We protected four neonates from oral SHIV-vpu+ challenge by ante- and postpartum treatment with a synergistic triple combination of immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 human anti-HIV-1 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (T.W. Baba, V. Liska, R. Hofmann-Lehmann et al: Nature Med 6:200-206, 2000), which recognize the CD4-binding site of Env, a glycosylation-dependent gp120, or a linear gp41 epitope. Two neonates that received only postpartum mAbs were also protected from oral SHIV-vpu+ challenge, indicating that postpartum treatment alone is sufficient. Next, we evaluated a similar mAb combination against SHIV89.6P, which encodes env of primary HIV89.6. One of four mAb-treated neonates was protected from infection and two maintained normal CD4+ T-cell counts. We conclude that the epitopes recognized by the three mAbs are important determinants for achieving protection. Combination immunoprophylaxis with synergistic mAbs seems promising to prevent maternal HIV-1 transmission in humans.
Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/transmission , HIV Infections/transmission , HIV-1/pathogenicity , Immunization, Passive , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Simian Immunodeficiency Virus/physiology , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/prevention & control , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Chimera , Disease Models, Animal , Female , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/therapeutic use , Infant, Newborn , Macaca mulatta , Male , Postpartum Period , PregnancyABSTRACT
To develop prophylaxis against mother-to-child human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission, we established a simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) infection model in neonatal macaques that mimics intrapartum mucosal virus exposure (T. W. Baba et al., AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 10:351-357, 1994). Using this model, neonates were protected from mucosal SHIV-vpu(+) challenge by pre- and postnatal treatment with a combination of three human neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), F105, 2G12, and 2F5 (Baba et al., Nat. Med. 6:200-206, 2000). In the present study, we used this MAb combination only postnatally, thereby significantly reducing the quantity of antibodies necessary and rendering their potential use in humans more practical. We protected two neonates with this regimen against oral SHIV-vpu(+) challenge, while four untreated control animals became persistently infected. Thus, synergistic MAbs protect when used as immunoprophylaxis without the prenatal dose. We then determined in vitro the optimal MAb combination against the more pathogenic SHIV89.6P, a chimeric virus encoding env of the primary HIV89.6. Remarkably, the most potent combination included IgG1b12, which alone does not neutralize SHIV89.6P. We administered the combination of MAbs IgG1b12, 2F5, and 2G12 postnatally to four neonates. One of the four infants remained uninfected after oral challenge with SHIV89.6P, and two infants had no or a delayed CD4(+) T-cell decline. In contrast, all control animals had dramatic drops in their CD4(+) T cells by 2 weeks postexposure. We conclude that our triple MAb combination partially protected against mucosal challenge with the highly pathogenic SHIV89.6P. Thus, combination immunoprophylaxis with passively administered synergistic human MAbs may play a role in the clinical prevention of mother-to-infant transmission of HIV type 1.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , Simian Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/immunology , Simian Immunodeficiency Virus/immunology , Administration, Oral , Animals , Animals, Newborn , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Drug Synergism , Humans , Immunity, Mucosal , Immunization, Passive , Macaca , Simian Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/prevention & control , Simian Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/transmissionABSTRACT
Therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is often restricted to lifelong support with red blood cell units (RBCU). A variety of immune phenomena associated with antibody production have been reported in MDS patients. Therefore, we hypothesized that red cell antibodies are more frequent in patients with MDS compared to other regularly transfused patients. Red cell antibodies were determined in 42 MDS patients, in 28 patients with other hematological disorders, and in a historical group of 129 patients with end-stage renal failure. All of these patients received frequent red cell substitution therapy, at least two RBCU in biweekly intervals. Red cell antibodies were detected in 9 of 42 patients with MDS, in 3 of 28 patients with other hematological disorders, and in 4 of 129 patients with end-stage renal failure. Evidence of red cell antibodies was displayed by 6 of 27 MDS patients treated with prestorage leukocyte-depleted RBCU and 3 of 15 MDS patients transfused with bedside leukocyte-filtered RBCU. Red cell antibodies are frequent in patients with hematological disorders who require repetitive red cell transfusions. The formation of alloantibodies to red cell antigens is as frequent in MDS patients as in other patients with hematological disorders.
Subject(s)
Erythrocyte Transfusion/adverse effects , Erythrocytes/immunology , Isoantibodies/blood , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Hematologic Diseases/blood , Hematologic Diseases/immunology , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/blood , Kidney Failure, Chronic/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/blood , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Peptides derived from the heptad repeats of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) gp41 envelope glycoprotein, such as T20, can efficiently inhibit HIV type 1 (HIV-1) entry. In this study, replication of HIV-1 was inhibited more than 100-fold in a T-helper cell line transduced with a retrovirus vector expressing membrane-anchored T20 on the cell surface. Inhibition was independent of coreceptor usage.
Subject(s)
HIV Envelope Protein gp41/physiology , HIV-1/physiology , Peptide Fragments/physiology , T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer/virology , Amino Acid Sequence , Cell Line , Cell Membrane/metabolism , Enfuvirtide , Genetic Vectors , HIV Envelope Protein gp41/chemistry , HIV Envelope Protein gp41/genetics , HIV Envelope Protein gp41/metabolism , Humans , Molecular Sequence Data , Peptide Fragments/chemistry , Peptide Fragments/genetics , Peptide Fragments/metabolism , Retroviridae/genetics , Transduction, Genetic , Virus ReplicationABSTRACT
Flu Avert IN vaccine is a new, live attenuated virus vaccine for equine influenza. We tested this vaccine in vivo to ascertain 1) its safety and stability when subjected to serial horse to horse passage, 2) whether it spread spontaneously from horse to horse and 3) its ability to protect against heterologous equine influenza challenge viruses of epidemiological relevance. For the stability study, the vaccine was administered to 5 ponies. Nasal swabs were collected and pooled fluids administered directly to 4 successive groups of naïve ponies by intranasal inoculation. Viruses isolated from the last group retained the vaccine's full attenuation phenotype, with no reversion to the wild-type virus phenotype or production of clinical influenza disease. The vaccine virus spread spontaneously to only 1 of 13 nonvaccinated horses/ponies when these were comingled with 39 vaccinates in the same field. For the heterologous protection study, a challenge model system was utilised in which vaccinated or naïve control horses and ponies were exposed to the challenge virus by inhalation of virus-containing aerosols. Challenge viruses included influenza A/equine-2/Kentucky/98, a recent representative of the 'American' lineage of equine-2 influenza viruses; and A/equine-2/Saskatoon/90, representative of the 'Eurasian' lineage. Clinical signs among challenged animals were recorded daily using a standardised scoring protocol. With both challenge viruses, control animals reliably contracted clinical signs of influenza, whereas vaccinated animals were reliably protected from clinical disease. These results demonstrate that Flu Avert IN vaccine is safe and phenotypically stable, has low spontaneous transmissibility and is effective in protecting horses against challenge viruses representative of those in circulation worldwide.
Subject(s)
Horse Diseases/prevention & control , Influenza A virus/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/standards , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/veterinary , Administration, Intranasal , Animals , Female , Horse Diseases/transmission , Horses , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Male , Nebulizers and Vaporizers/veterinary , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/prevention & control , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/transmission , Phenotype , Safety , Serial Passage , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vaccination/veterinary , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology , Vaccines, Attenuated/standards , Virus SheddingABSTRACT
We have established a panel of human monoclonal antibodies against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). The antibodies 2F5 and 2G12 have been identified to be two of the most potently in vitro neutralizing antibodies against HIV-1. Here we report on a further antibody, 4E10, of similar in vitro neutralizing potency. 4E10 binds to a novel epitope C terminal of the ELDKWA sequence recognized by 2F5, which has been so far the only described broadly neutralizing anti-gp41 antibody. Both 4E10 and 2F5 bind only weakly to infected cells compared with gp120-specific 2G12 and polyclonal anti-HIV-1 immunoglobulin (HIVIG), but show potent in vitro neutralizing properties. 4E10 neutralizes potently not only tissue culture-adapted strains but also primary isolates of different clades, including A, B, C, D, and E. Viruses that were found to be resistant to 2F5 were neutralized by 4E10 and vice versa; none of the tested isolates was resistant to both anti-gp41 antibodies. This confirms that the region recognized by 2F5 and 4E10 is essential for viral infectivity and may be important for vaccine design. Moreover, our results suggest that 4E10 should be further investigated for passive anti-HIV immunotherapy.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , Epitopes/immunology , HIV Envelope Protein gp41/immunology , HIV-1/immunology , Neutralization Tests , Amino Acid Sequence , Cell Line , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Flow Cytometry , Fluorescent Antibody Technique , Giant Cells , HIV-1/classification , Humans , Molecular Sequence Data , Species SpecificityABSTRACT
Although maternal human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) transmission occurs during gestation, intrapartum and postpartum (by breast-feeding), 50-70% of all infected children seem to acquire HIV-1 shortly before or during delivery. Epidemiological evidence indicates that mucosal exposure is an important aspect of intrapartum HIV transmission. A simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) macaque model has been developed that mimics the mucosal exposure that can occur during intrapartum HIV-1 transmission. To develop immunoprophylaxis against intrapartum HIV-1 transmission, we used SHIV-vpu+ (refs. 5,6), a chimeric simian-human virus that encodes the env gene of HIV-IIIB. Several combinations of human monoclonal antibodies against HIV-1 have been identified that neutralize SHIV-vpu+ completely in vitro through synergistic interaction. Here, we treated four pregnant macaques with a triple combination of the human IgG1 monoclonal antibodies F105, 2G12 and 2F5. All four macaques were protected against intravenous SHIV-vpu+ challenge after delivery. The infants received monoclonal antibodies after birth and were challenged orally with SHIV-vpu+ shortly thereafter. We found no evidence of infection in any infant during 6 months of follow-up. This demonstrates that IgG1 monoclonal antibodies protect against mucosal lentivirus challenge in neonates. We conclude that epitopes recognized by the three monoclonal antibodies are important determinants for achieving substantial protection, thus providing a rational basis for AIDS vaccine development.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , HIV-1/immunology , Immunity, Mucosal , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Simian Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/prevention & control , Simian Immunodeficiency Virus/immunology , Animals , Chimera , Female , HIV-1/genetics , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Macaca mulatta , Neutralization Tests , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Simian Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/immunology , Simian Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/transmission , Simian Immunodeficiency Virus/geneticsABSTRACT
The development of the human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1)/simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) chimeric virus macaque model (SHIV) permits the in vivo evaluation of anti-HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein immune responses. Using this model, others, and we have shown that passively infused antibody can protect against an intravenous challenge. However, HIV-1 is most often transmitted across mucosal surfaces and the intravenous challenge model may not accurately predict the role of antibody in protection against mucosal exposure. After controlling the macaque estrous cycle with progesterone, anti-HIV-1 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies 2F5 and 2G12, and HIV immune globulin were tested. Whereas all five control monkeys displayed high plasma viremia and rapid CD4 cell decline, 14 antibody-treated macaques were either completely protected against infection or against pathogenic manifestations of SHIV-infection. Infusion of all three antibodies together provided the greatest amount of protection, but a single monoclonal antibody, with modest virus neutralizing activity, was also protective. Compared with our previous intravenous challenge study with the same virus and antibodies, the data indicated that greater protection was achieved after vaginal challenge. This study demonstrates that antibodies can affect transmission and subsequent disease course after vaginal SHIV-challenge; the data begin to define the type of antibody response that could play a role in protection against mucosal transmission of HIV-1.