System suitability in bioanalytical LC/MS/MS.

System suitability is widely recognized as a critical component of bioanalysis. This paper discusses a generic system suitability test that monitors instrument performance throughout a run when used for liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) in bioanalysis. This system suitability process is designed to ensure that the LC/MS/MS system is performing in a manner that leads to the production of accurate and reproducible data that can be submitted with confidence to regulatory agencies. This process contains tests for signal stability, carryover, and instrument response. This approach is integrated throughout an analytical run and has been used in the analysis of over 25,000 batches of clinical samples. Two case studies are presented in which quality control samples and standards meet all acceptance criteria (based on Standard Operating Procedures and the Food and Drug Administration's recommendations for bioanalytical method validation) but failed the proposed system suitability test, and thus were rejected. In these case studies, the concentrations of a significant number of clinical samples (over 35%) were affected, resulting in changes of more than 15% when the samples were reanalyzed. These data indicate that the poor performance of an LC/MS/MS system could adversely affect the calculated concentrations of unknown samples even though the results for quality control samples appear to be acceptable.

Pharmacokinetics of plasma enfuvirtide after subcutaneous administration to patients with human immunodeficiency virus: Inverse Gaussian density absorption and 2-compartment disposition.

OBJECTIVE: Enfuvirtide (T-20) is the first of a novel class of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) drugs that block gp41-mediated viral fusion to host cells. The objectives of this study were to develop a structural pharmacokinetic model that would adequately characterize the absorption and disposition of enfuvirtide pharmacokinetics after both intravenous and subcutaneous administration and to evaluate the dose proportionality of enfuvirtide pharmacokinetic parameters at a subcutaneous dose higher than that currently used in phase III studies. METHODS: Twelve patients with HIV infection received 4 single doses of enfuvirtide separated by a 1-week washout period in an open-label, randomized, 4-way crossover fashion. The doses studied were 90 mg (intravenous) and 45 mg, 90 mg, and 180 mg (subcutaneous). Serial blood samples were collected up to 48 hours after each dose. Plasma enfuvirtide concentrations were measured with use of a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. RESULTS: Enfuvirtide plasma concentration-time data after subcutaneous administration were well described by an inverse Gaussian density function-input model linked to a 2-compartment open distribution model with first-order elimination from the central compartment. The model-derived mean pharmacokinetic parameters (+/-SD) were volume of distribution of the central compartment (3.8 +/- 0.8 L), volume of distribution of the peripheral compartment (1.7 +/- 0.6 L), total clearance (1.44 +/- 0.30 L/h), intercompartmental distribution (2.3 +/- 1.1 L/h), bioavailability (89% +/- 11%), and mean absorption time (7.26 hours, 8.65 hours, and 9.79 hours for the 45-mg, 90-mg, and 180-mg dose groups, respectively). The terminal half-life increased from 3.46 to 4.35 hours for the subcutaneous dose range from 45 to 180 mg. CONCLUSIONS: An inverse Gaussian density function-input model linked to a 2-compartment open distribution model with first-order elimination from the central compartment was appropriate to describe complex absorption and disposition kinetics of enfuvirtide plasma concentration-time data after subcutaneous administration to patients with HIV infection. Enfuvirtide was nearly completely absorbed from subcutaneous depot, and pharmacokinetic parameters were linear up to a dose of 180 mg in this study.

Effect of colesevelam on lovastatin pharmacokinetics.

OBJECTIVE: To assess potential interactions of colesevelam hydrochloride and lovastatin in healthy volunteers when lovastatin alone was administered with dinner, both lovastatin and colesevelam were administered with dinner, and colesevelam was administered with dinner and lovastatin was administered 4 hours later with a snack. METHODS: A single-center, open-label, 3-period, crossover drug interaction study was performed with 22 healthy volunteers. Blood samples were collected at specified intervals before and after dosing, and plasma concentrations of lovastatin and lovastatin hydroxyacid were measured using a liquid chromatography/mass spectroscopy/mass spectroscopy method. RESULTS: Maximal concentration (Cmax), AUC from time 0 to the last time point measured (AUC0-t), and AUC0-infinity values for lovastatin were 102%, 94%, and 104%, and for lovastatin hydroxyacid were 102%, 91%, and 92%, respectively, of control values when colesevelam and lovastatin were coadministered with dinner. Administration of colesevelam with dinner and lovastatin 4 hours later with a snack resulted in a decreased Cmax and AUC0-t for lovastatin (63% and 37%, respectively; p < 0.05) and an increased Cmax and AUC0-t for lovastatin hydroxyacid (61% and 50%, respectively; p < 0.05), both compared with lovastatin alone administered with dinner. CONCLUSIONS: Colesevelam had no significant effect on lovastatin pharmacokinetics when coadministered with lovastatin at dinner. A split-dosing regimen resulted in alterations in pharmacokinetic parameters for lovastatin and lovastatin hydroxyacid that are likely due to known differences in the pharmacokinetics of lovastatin when administered to patients with meals or in a fasting state.