Benefits of Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging During Breast Tissue Expansion: Literature Review and Case Series.

Breast cancer results in up to 1.6 million new candidates for yearly breast reconstruction (BR) surgery. Two-stage breast reconstruction surgery with the use of a tissue expander (TE) is a common approach to reconstructing the breast after mastectomy. However, a common disadvantage encountered with the traditional breast TE is the magnetic injection port, which has been reported to cause injuries in patients undergoing magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Therefore this type of breast TE is labeled "MR unsafe." Recent technological advances have incorporated radio-frequency identification (RFID) technology in the TE to allow for the location of the injection port without magnetic components, resulting in an MR-conditional TE. This paper aims to review the information regarding the safety profile of TEs with magnetic ports and to gather distinct clinical scenarios in which an MR-conditional TE benefits the patient during the BR process. A literature review ranging from 2018 to 2022 was performed with the search terms: "tissue expander" OR "breast tissue expander" AND "magnetic resonance imaging" OR "MRI." Additionally, a case series was collected from each of the authors' practices. The literature search yielded 13 recent peer-reviewed papers, and 6 distinct clinical scenarios were compiled and discussed. Most clinicians find MRI examinations to be the state-of-art diagnostic imaging modality. However, due to the preexisting risks associated with TEs with magnetic ports, the MRI labeling classification should be considered when deciding which TE is the most appropriate for the patient requiring MRI examinations.

Facial Allograft Donation: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of the Experiences of Family Members.

Facial allograft transplantation can be regarded as a particular and complex type of donation because of its perceptibility and the importance of the face as an identity characteristic. As research on this topic is currently lacking, the objective of this study is to explore the experiences of the family members of the donor in facial allograft donation. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted separately with the donor's family members and analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Six themes were identified: (1) Contrasting facial donation to that of more commonly donated organs; (2) Consenting to facial donation; (3) Expectations towards the recipient of the facial graft; (4) Expectations and consequences of restoration of the donor's face; (5) Relationship with the medical team during the process; and (6) Media attention. The findings of our study help to better support donor families through the facial donation process and to improve facial transplantation procedures.

The Lumbar Artery Perforator Flap in Breast Reconstruction.

SUMMARY: The lumbar artery perforator flap is a valuable alternative in breast reconstruction whenever the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap is not feasible because of insufficient or unavailable abdominal tissue. The advantage is the ideal shape and consistency of the flap, in addition to the option to perform a nerve anastomosis with the cluneal nerve. The anatomy is consistent, but there are some technical issues related to the short perforator and difficult surgical exposure in the lower back region. The inclusion of a vascular interposition graft improved the authors' results and facilitated their technical challenges and final inset of the flap. These videos guide the surgeon through the different steps involved in a breast reconstruction with the lumbar artery perforator flap.

Donor Site Morbidity after Lumbar Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The lumbar artery perforator flap is a second-choice flap in autologous breast reconstruction whenever a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is not possible. Ideal candidates are pear-shaped women who do not have enough bulk on the abdomen or thighs. Patient-reported "satisfaction with breasts" is excellent but we were curious about the donor site morbidity. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of all lumbar flap breast reconstructions performed between 2010 and 2019. Patients were invited by e-mail and telephone to take part in a BREAST-Q survey. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-four flaps were performed in 110 patients. Sixty-three patients filled out the BREAST-Q questionnaire. The most frequently observed donor site complications are seroma (35.1%), dehiscence (8.4%), and hematoma (3.2%). Correction of the donor site scar was performed in 31.8% of patients, lipofilling of the donor flank in 5.2%, and liposuction of the contralateral flank in 18.3% of patients. Body mass index (BMI) was the only significant risk factor for donor site complications. Patient-reported "satisfaction with donor site appearance" was good but significantly lower for primary reconstructions compared with secondary and tertiary procedures. Flap weight significantly influences patient-reported "physical wellbeing of the donor site." Ninety-seven percent of patients would recommend the surgery to someone in a similar position and would do it all over. CONCLUSION: The lumbar artery perforator flap is a good alternative for breast reconstruction in selected patients. The donor site issues consist mainly of seromas, prolonged discomfort, and a scar that might be noticeable to others, but patient-reported satisfaction is very high.

Nipple reconstruction in autologous breast reconstruction after areola-sparing mastectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The number of patients requesting prophylactic mastectomy with immediate reconstruction is rising. The oncological safety of techniques preserving the nipple and/or areola complex is still controversial. Nevertheless, nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and areola-sparing mastectomy (ASM) are becoming increasingly popular. After ASM, traditional nipple reconstruction techniques can be a disappointment and can lead to a deep groove around the new nipple. We describe a technique to overcome these issues and analyzed how three types of mastectomy (skin-sparing mastectomy or SSM, ASM, and NSM) compare to one another by looking into the number of wound infections, extra procedures for the loss of projection, nipple necrosis, and BREAST-Q scores. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 467 breast reconstructions performed in 351 patients between 2011 and 2017 at the University Hospital of Gent. Patients were asked to fill out the BREAST-Q questionnaire and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed and correlated to demographic information. RESULTS: Patients undergoing a nipple reconstruction after ASM are experiencing similar rates of wound problems, extra surgical procedures for the loss of projection and necrosis, compared to women with a history of SSM. When considering the "satisfaction with breast" and "satisfaction with outcome" modules of the BREAST-Q, we noted that nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) patients report lower scores than SSM and ASM patients and ASM patients seem to report a higher "satisfaction with nipple," than the other two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: An ASM is a valuable alternative to a nipple-sparing mastectomy and leads to a good esthetic result and patient satisfaction.

Comparing the Lumbar and SGAP Flaps to the DIEP Flap Using the BREAST-Q.

BACKGROUND: The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is the gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction. When the abdomen is not available, alternative donor sites can be found at the buttock, the lumbar region, or the thighs. These flaps are referred to as second-choice flaps. This study compares the superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flap and the lumbar artery perforator (LAP) flap to the DIEP flap using patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed reviewing the records of 417 women who underwent a free flap breast reconstruction with either a DIEP, an LAP, or an SGAP flap, between 2006 and 2018. Patients were asked to fill out the BREAST-Q questionnaire, and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed and correlated to the demographic information. RESULTS: The response rate was 54.5 percent, with 50 LAP, 153 DIEP, and 25 SGAP flap patients participating. When questioned about their satisfaction with breasts and satisfaction with outcome, all three procedures were rated similarly high. When comparing the physical well-being of the donor site and appearance of the donor site, LAP flap patients reported significantly lower scores than DIEP and SGAP flap patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo LAP or SGAP flap breast reconstruction seem similarly satisfied with the appearance and outcome of their free flap breast reconstruction compared with DIEP flap patients. The donor-site morbidity and its impact on the patient's well-being in SGAP and LAP flap patients have been underestimated. Despite more donor-site discomfort, the LAP and SGAP flaps are feasible alternatives whenever the DIEP flap is not possible.

The Prepectoral, Hybrid Breast Reconstruction: The Synergy of Lipofilling and Breast Implants.

Breast reconstruction modalities are based on autologous tissue transfer, implants, or a combination of both. The aim of an allogeneic breast reconstruction is to minimize the impact of the implant on surrounding tissues to achieve an aesthetically pleasing result. Accurate tissue coverage, proper implant selection, and implant location are the absolute concerns in planning an implant-based reconstruction. METHODS: A single surgeon's experience with the ergonomic, hybrid approach in primary and secondary breast reconstructions is presented. The hybrid approach is based on tissue expansion followed by serial sessions of fat grafting to augment the residual autologous (subcutaneous) compartment. The last step included the insertion of a prepectoral, ergonomic implant to obtain central core projection and additional volume. RESULTS: Fifty-six hybrid breast reconstructions were performed with a mean follow-up of 24.1 months. Aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction have been good with pleasing breast projection, natural breast motion, and optimal coverage of the prepectoral implants. CONCLUSIONS: The hybrid reconstructive approach is a reliable technique to improve the outcomes in implant-based breast reconstructions. The 2-step, prepectoral approach with expander-to-implant exchange allows better control of the final breast shape, and complications related to submuscular approaches are avoided. Fat grafting adds an autologous benefit to obtain natural results.

Lumbar Flap versus the Gold Standard: Comparison to the DIEP Flap.

BACKGROUND: The lumbar artery perforator flap is an excellent free flap for breast reconstruction whenever the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is not an option. The main indication is a lack of abdominal bulk, often seen in young BRCA-positive women seeking prophylactic amputation and immediate reconstruction. METHODS: Between October of 2010 and July of 2016, a total of 661 free flap breast reconstructions were performed. The authors retrospectively analyzed patient demographics, perioperative parameters, and secondary corrections. RESULTS: Seventy-six lumbar artery perforator flaps were retained and compared with a cohort of 560 DIEP flaps. The average body mass index for lumbar patients was 23.8 kg/m, with a mean age at operation of 46.3 years. Average body mass index for DIEP patients was 25.2 kg/m, with a mean age at operation of 48.8 years old. Lumbar artery perforator flap weight was 504 g (range, 77 to 1216 g) on average versus 530 g (range, 108 to 1968 g) for the DIEP flaps. The amount of corrective procedures performed was very similar in both cohorts: 13 percent of the lumbar artery perforator and 12 percent of the DIEP patients underwent no procedures, 62 percent in both groups underwent one procedure, and 25 percent versus 27 percent underwent two or more procedures. Lipofilling was performed in 48 percent of lumbar artery perforator flaps compared with 57 percent of the DIEP flaps (p = 0.14). Mean volume injected was 98.0 cc and 125.1 cc for lumbar artery perforator and DIEP flaps, respectively (p = 0.071). CONCLUSIONS: The lumbar flap is a good alternative whenever a DIEP flap is not possible. Bilateral autologous reconstruction is possible even in very thin patients, and secondary corrections are comparable to those for the DIEP.

Bilateral DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction to a Single Set of Internal Mammary Vessels: Technique, Safety, and Outcomes after 250 Flaps.

BACKGROUND: The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is considered the gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction. In bilateral cases, both flaps are often anastomosed to the internal mammary vessels on either side of the sternum. The authors propose a method in which both flaps are anastomosed to only the right side internal mammary artery and vein. METHODS: Between November of 2009 and March of 2018, 125 patients underwent bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction with this technique. One flap is perfused by the anterograde proximal internal mammary artery and the second one by the retrograde distal internal mammary artery after presternal tunneling. Patient demographics and operative details were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty flaps were performed. One hundred fifty-two flaps were prophylactic or primary reconstructions (60.8 percent), 70 were secondary reconstructions (28 percent), and 28 were tertiary reconstructions (11.2 percent). Mean patient age was 46 years, and the mean body mass index was 25 kg/m. Sixty patients underwent radiation therapy or chemotherapy (48 percent). The authors encountered one significant partial failure (0.4 percent) and nine complete flap failures (3.6 percent). The authors did not see a statistically significant predisposition for failure comparing the retrograde with the anterograde flow flaps, nor when comparing the tunneled with the nontunneled flaps. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' results show that anastomosing both DIEP flaps to a single set of mammary vessels is safe and reliable. The authors conclude that the retrograde flow through the distal internal mammary artery is sufficient for free flap perfusion and that subcutaneous tunneling of a free flap pedicle does not predispose to flap failure. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

The Lumbar Artery Perforator Flap in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Initial Experience with 100 Cases.

BACKGROUND: The lumbar artery perforator flap is an alternative flap in breast reconstruction for those patients who are not eligible for a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEAP) flap. Shaping of this flap is easier compared with other flaps because of the quality of the lumbar fat and the gluteal extension. METHODS: Between October of 2010 and June of 2017, a total of 100 lumbar artery perforator free flap breast reconstructions were performed in 72 patients. Patient demographics, indications, flap specifics, and complications were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Twenty-eight bilateral and 44 unilateral breast reconstructions with a lumbar artery perforator flap were performed. Mean patient age was 48 years, and the average body mass index was 23.11 kg/m. The authors report 43 preventive mastectomies for elevated cancer risk with subsequent immediate reconstruction, 34 secondary reconstructions, and 14 tertiary reconstructions. Mean operative time was 7 hours 4 minutes, including the mastectomy in primary cases. Mean flap weight was 499 g (range, 77 to 1216 g) and mean follow-up time was 30 months. The revision rate was 22 percent and nine flaps were lost. CONCLUSIONS: The lumbar artery perforator flap is a valuable alternative to the DIEAP flap in breast reconstructive surgery. It is an excellent flap for BRCA-positive patients who are typically young and have limited excess tissue at the conventional donor sites. Despite higher revision rates compared with the DIEAP flap, the lumbar flap is superior in mimicking the shape and feel of native breast tissue. Scarring at the donor site remains a sore point but can be easily treated and used to an advantage to contour the flanks. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Microneedling: Where do we stand now? A systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Patients who suffer from scars or wrinkles have several therapeutic options to improve the appearance of their skin. The available treatment modalities that provide desirable results are often overtly invasive and entail a risk of undesirable adverse effects. Microneedling has recently emerged as a non-ablative alternative for treating patients who are concerned with the aesthetic changes that result from injury, disease or ageing. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to evaluate the current evidence in the literature on microneedling. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed by searching the electronic databases PubMed and Google Scholar. The reviewed articles were analysed and compared on study design, treatment protocol, outcome parameters, efficacy measurement and results to evaluate the strength of the current evidence. RESULTS: Microneedling was investigated in experimental settings for its effects on atrophic acne scars, skin rejuvenation, hypertrophic scars, keloids, striae distensae, androgenetic alopecia, melasma and acne vulgaris. Several clinical trials used randomisation and single-blindation to strengthen the validity of the study outcome. Microneedling showed noteworthy results when used on its own and when combined with topical products or radiofrequency. When compared with other treatments, it showed similar results but was preferred due to minimal side effects and shorter downtime. CONCLUSION: This systematic review positions microneedling as a safe and effective therapeutic option for the treatment of scars and wrinkles. The current literature does show some methodological shortcomings, and further research is required to truly establish microneedling as an evidence-based therapeutic option for treating scars, wrinkles and other skin conditions.

Lumbar artery perforators: an anatomical study based on computed tomographic angiography imaging.

BACKGROUND: The free lumbar artery perforator flap has recently been introduced as a potentially valuable option for autologous breast reconstruction in a subset of patients. Up to date, few anatomical studies, exploring the lumbar region as a donor site for perforator- based flaps, have been conducted. METHODS: An anatomical study of the position of the dominant lumbar artery perforator was performed, using the preoperative computed tomographic angiography images of 24 autologous breast reconstruction patients. In total, 61 dominant perforators were determined, 28 on the left and 33 on the right side. A radiologist defined the position of the perforator as coordinates in an xy-grid. RESULTS: Dominant perforators were shown to originate from the lumbar arteries at the level of lumbar vertebrae three or four. Remarkably, approximately 85% of these lumbar artery perforators enter the skin at 7-10 cm lateral from the midline (mean left 8.6 cm, right 8.2 cm). CONCLUSION: This study concludes a rather constant position of the dominant perforator. Therefore, preoperative-computed tomographic angiography is not always essential to find this perforator and Doppler ultrasound could be considered as an alternative, thereby carefully assessing all advantages and disadvantages inherent to either of these imaging methods.

Facial nerve regeneration after facial allotransplantation: A longitudinal clinical and electromyographic follow-up of lip movements during speech.

INTRODUCTION: Facial allotransplantation constitutes a reconstructive option after extensive damage to facial structures. Functional recovery has been reported but remains an issue. CASE REPORT - METHODS: A patient underwent facial allotransplantation after a ballistic injury with extensive facial tissue damage. Speech motor function was sequentially assessed clinically, along with repeated electromyography of lip movements during a follow-up of 3 years. RESULTS: Facial nerve recovery could be demonstrated within the first month, followed by a gradual increase in electromyographic amplitude and decrease in reaction times. These were accompanied by gradual improvement of clinical assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Axonal recovery starts early after transplantation. Electromyographic testing is sensitive in demonstrating this early recovery, which ultimately results in clinical improvements.

Pre-expanded Anterolateral Thigh Perforator Flap for Phalloplasty.

The anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforator flap for phalloplasty is gaining popularity because it avoids the well-known scars of the radial forearm flap. However, scars are not eliminated, just moved to a different location, the thigh, that can for some patients be of great sexual value. Preexpansion of the ALT flap allows primary donor site closure, thus avoiding not only the unsightly appearance of a skin grafted ALT donor site, but also the skin graft donor site scar. Preoperative perforator location by means of computed tomography angiography allows safe expander placement through 2 small remote incisions.

Intratissular expansion-mediated, serial fat grafting: A step-by-step working algorithm to achieve 3D biological harmony in autologous breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction involves the use of autologous tissues or implants. Occasionally, microsurgical reconstruction is not an option because of insufficient donor tissues. Fat grafting has become increasingly popular in breast surgery. The challenge with this technique is how to reconstruct a stable and living "scaffold" that resembles a breast. METHODS: Breast reconstruction (n = 7) was performed using intratissular expansion with serial deflation-lipofilling sessions. Mean age of the patients was 41 years (22-53). The expander generated a vascularized capsule at 8 weeks, which demarcated a recipient site between the skin and the capsule itself, and functioned as a vascular source for angiogenesis. Serial sessions of deflation and lipofilling were initiated at 8 weeks with removal of the expander at the completion of the treatment. An average of 644 ml (range, 415 ml-950 ml) of lipoaspirate material was injected to reconstruct the breast mound. An average of 4 (range, 3 to 5) fat-grafting sessions with a 3-month interval was needed to achieve symmetry with the contralateral breast. The average follow-up was 14 months (range, 9-29 months). MRI examination was performed at 8 months to analyze tissue survival and the residual volume. RESULTS: MRI examination retained tissue survival and the mean reconstructed breast volume was 386 ml (range, 231 ml-557 ml). An aesthetically pleasant breast mound was created, with a high satisfaction rate. CONCLUSION: We could reconstruct an aesthetically pleasant and stable breast mound in a selected group of patients by using intratissular expansion and fat grafting.

Bipedicled DIEAP flaps for reconstruction of limb soft tissue defects in male patients.

BACKGROUND: Extensive soft tissue deficiencies involving the limbs can be difficult to reconstruct and may require more than one microsurgical flap transfer to cover the defect. This can be particularly challenging in male patients, where the sacrifice of a donor muscle could result in considerable comorbidity. This paper describes the use of the bipedicled deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEAP) flap to perform a one-stage reconstruction of extensive soft tissue defects in male patients. METHODS: By using preoperative multidetector computed tomographic (MDCT) angiography, the dominant perforators of the abdominal wall were identified and the bipedicled DIEAP flap was used for a one-stage reconstruction of complicated tissue loss in 12 male patients. In seven of these flaps, a microsurgical anastomosis between the two epigastric pedicles of the DIEAP flap was carried out. The feasibility of the procedure, clinical outcome, and possible associated comorbidities were evaluated. RESULTS: Successful large tissue reconstructions were performed using all four traditional zones of the DIEAP flap, with dimensions of flaps ranging from 20 × 8 to 50 × 17 cm. Venous congestion was seen to develop in two flaps, one of which was salvaged by performing an additional venous anastomosis, but the other flap failed to survive. Apart from this, complications were minimal. CONCLUSIONS: Soft tissue coverage of extensive wounds in male patients without sacrificing muscle flaps can be challenging. This extended utilization of the entire DIEAP flap has helped us to address this issue.

Autologous plasma and its supporting role in fat graft survival: A relevant vector to counteract resorption in lipofilling.

Fat grafting has become a widespread technique for different reconstructive and esthetic purposes. However, the disadvantage of fat grafting is the unpredictable resorption rate that often necessitates repetitive procedures, which in turn may have an impact on the morbidity. During the immediate, post-graft, ischemic period, cells survive due to the process of plasmatic imbibition. This biological phenomenon precedes the ingrowth of neo-capillaries that eventually nourish the graft and help establish a long-term homeostatic equilibrium. Both partners, the graft and the recipient bed, contribute to the revascularization process. Hypothetically, enrichment of the recipient site with autologous plasma could have a beneficial role to enhance fat graft survival. We investigated whether plasma supported the viability of the lipoaspirate (LA) material. Plasma was isolated from blood samples collected from eight patients during the elective lipofilling procedures. An in vitro study assessed the viability of LA cells using plasma as a culture medium compared to the traditional culture media. In vitro analysis confirmed sustained viability of LA cells compared to the standard media and control media during 7 consecutive days. The behavior of the fat grafts in plasma showed similarities with those incubated in the traditional culture media. In future, these findings could be translated to a clinical setting. Plasma is the only autologous substrate available in large quantities in the human body. The addition of the supporting agents, such as plasma, could contribute to a better graft survival with more stable clinical outcomes in the long term. The rationale behind the technique is based on the phenomenon of plasmatic imbibition and the reasoning that the extracellular matrix plays a pivotal role in cellular survival.

DIEAP flap for safe definitive autologous breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the commonest form of cancer in women affecting almost a quarter of a million patients in the US annually. 30 percent of these patients and patients with genetic mutations undergo removal of the breast, as highlighted in a high profile celebrity patient. Although breast reconstruction with free microvascular transfer of a DIEAP flap from the abdomen is an ideal form of reconstruction, there have been misgivings about the complexity and potential complications. This study was aimed at clearing these misunderstandings and establishing the value of this form of breast reconstruction. METHODS: 1036 DIEAP flap breast reconstructions carried out at the University Hospital, Gent (five year period) and at the Sana Kliniken, Düsseldorf (three year period) were included prospectively. Comorbid factors like chemotherapy, radiotherapy, patient age >65 years, BMI >30 and smoking were recorded. Outcomes were evaluated over a mean follow up of 2 years. RESULTS: Overall complication rate related to the reconstructed breast and donor abdominal area was 6.8 percent. Total flap loss was seen in only 0.8 percent. The mean operating time was less than five hours. Older age, higher BMI, chemotherapy and radiotherapy did not have a significant influence on complication rates, however smoking resulted in significant delay in wound healing in the breast (p = 0.025) and abdominal wounds (p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: The DIEAP flap is an excellent option for breast reconstruction, with a low level of donor site morbidity and complications. It is an autologous reconstruction that provides a stable long term result.

Longitudinal progress of overall intelligibility, voice, resonance, articulation and oromyofunctional behavior during the first 21 months after Belgian facial transplantation.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to document the longitudinal progress of speech intelligibility, speech acceptability, voice, resonance, articulation and oromyofunctional behavior in a male facial transplant patient 8 days, 15 days, 5 months, 12 months and, finally, 21 months after surgery. METHOD: Identical objective (Dysphonia Severity Index, nasometry, acoustic analysis) and subjective (consensus perceptual evaluation, Dutch speech intelligibility test; flexible videolaryngostroboscopy/naso-endoscopy) assessment techniques and questionnaires (speech and voice handicap index, oral health impact profile, facial disability index) were used during each of the five postsurgical assessments. RESULTS: The pattern of results shows a longitudinal progress of speech intelligibility and acceptability and of the interactive processes underpinning overall speech intelligibility. Vocal quality is normal and resonance is characterized by hypernasality. The phonetic inventory is complete but four phonetic disorders remain. Outcomes pertaining to articulation (formant analysis) show evident progress over time. Lip functions are improving but still decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Transplantation of the face in this patient has largely restored speech. To what extent resonance, articulation, and lip functions can be enhanced by the permanent use of a palatal obturator, by specialized facial and lip movement exercises in combination with motor-oriented speech therapy, is subject for further research. Learning outcomes Facial transplantation: Readers will be able to (1) describe the relationship between facial transplantation and the impact on speech and oromyofunctional behavior, (2) identify variables that influence the outcome after facial transplantation, (3) define an assessment protocol after facial transplantation, (4) define facial transplantation.

Complex facial reconstruction by vascularized composite allotransplantation: the first Belgian case.

INTRODUCTION: Complex injuries to the central part of the face are difficult to reconstruct with the current plastic surgery methods. The ultimate one-staged approach to restore anatomy and vital facial functions is to perform a vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA). METHODS: A 54-year-old man suffered from a high-energy ballistic injury, resulting in a large central facial defect. A temporary reconstruction was performed with a free plicated anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap. Considering the goal to optimally restore facial function and aesthetics, VCA was considered as an option for facial reconstruction. A multidisciplinary team approach, digital planning, and cadaver sessions preceded the transplantation. RESULTS: A digitally planned facial VCA was performed involving the bilateral maxillae, the hard palate, a part of the left mandible, and the soft tissues of the lower two-thirds of the face. Due to meticulous preparations, minimal adjustments were necessary to achieve good fitting in the recipient. At week 17, a grade 4 rejection was successfully treated; sensory and motor recovery was noted to occur from the fourth postoperative month. Several serious infectious and medical problems have occurred until 15-months postoperatively; following that, the clinical situation has remained stable. Two years postoperatively, the patient and his family are very satisfied with the overall outcome and social reintegration in the community is successful. CONCLUSION: The first face transplant in Belgium (#19 worldwide) was successful because of a meticulous 3-year preparation by a large multidisciplinary team. In our experience, preparatory cadaver dissections and three-dimensional (3D) computed tomographic (CT) modeling were valuable tools for an optimal intraoperative course and good alignment of the bony structures. Continuous long-term multidisciplinary follow-up is mandatory for surveillance of the complications associated with the immunosuppressive regime and for functional assessment of the graft.