Non-literacy biased, culturally fair cognitive detection tool in primary care patients with cognitive concerns: a randomized controlled trial.

Dementia is often undiagnosed in primary care, and even when diagnosed, untreated. The 5-Cog paradigm, a brief, culturally adept, cognitive detection tool paired with a clinical decision support may reduce barriers to improving dementia diagnosis and care. We performed a randomized controlled trial in primary care patients experiencing health disparities (racial/ethnic minorities and socioeconomically disadvantaged). Older adults with cognitive concerns were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the 5-Cog paradigm or control. Primary outcome was improved dementia care actions defined as any of the following endpoints within 90 days: new mild cognitive impairment syndrome or dementia diagnoses as well as investigations, medications or specialist referrals ordered for cognitive indications. Groups were compared using intention-to-treat principles with multivariable logistic regression. Overall, 1,201 patients (mean age 72.8 years, 72% women and 94% Black, Hispanic or Latino) were enrolled and 599 were assigned to 5-Cog and 602 to the control. The 5-Cog paradigm demonstrated threefold odds of improvement in dementia care actions over control (odds ratio 3.43, 95% confidence interval 2.32-5.07). No serious intervention-related adverse events were reported. The 5-Cog paradigm improved diagnosis and management in patients with cognitive concerns and provides evidence to promote practice change to improve dementia care actions in primary care.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03816644 .

Role of Cognitive Frailty in Older Adults With Cardiovascular Disease.

As the older adult population expands, an increasing number of patients affected by geriatric syndromes are seen by cardiovascular clinicians. One such syndrome that has been associated with poor outcomes is cognitive frailty: the simultaneous presence of cognitive impairment, without evidence of dementia, and physical frailty, which results in decreased cognitive reserve. Driven by common pathophysiologic underpinnings (eg, inflammation and neurohormonal dysregulation), cardiovascular disease, cognitive impairment, and frailty also share the following risk factors: hypertension, diabetes, obesity, sedentary behavior, and tobacco use. Cardiovascular disease has been associated with the onset and progression of cognitive frailty, which may be reversible in early stages, making it essential for clinicians to diagnose the condition in a timely manner and prescribe appropriate interventions. Additional research is required to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the development of cognitive frailty, establish preventive and therapeutic strategies to address the needs of older patients with cardiovascular disease at risk for cognitive frailty, and ultimately facilitate targeted intervention studies.

Is the Montreal cognitive assessment culturally valid in a diverse geriatric primary care setting? Lessons from the Bronx.

BACKGROUND: Efficacy and validity of the MoCA for cognitive screening in ethnoculturally and linguistically diverse settings is unclear. We sought to examine the utility and discriminative validity of the Spanish and English MoCA versions to identify cognitive impairment among diverse community-dwelling older adults. METHODS: Participants aged ≥65 with cognitive concerns attending outpatient primary care in Bronx, NY, were recruited. MoCA and neuropsychological measures were administered in Spanish or English, and a neuropsychologist determined cognitive status (normal with subjective cognitive concerns [SCC], mild cognitive impairment [MCI], and dementia). One-way ANOVA compared cognitive statuses. ROC analyses identified optimal MoCA cutpoints for discriminating possible cognitive impairment. RESULTS: There were 231 participants, with mean age 73, 72% women, 43% Hispanic; 39% Black/African American; 113 (49%) completed testing in English and 118 (51%) in Spanish. Overall MoCA mean was 17.7 (SD = 4.3). Neuropsychological assessment identified 90 as cognitively normal/SCC, average MoCA 19.9 (SD = 4.1), 133 with MCI, average MoCA 16.6 (SD = 3.7), and 8 with dementia, average MoCA 10.6 (SD = 3.1). Mean English MoCA average was 18.6 (SD = 4.1) versus Spanish 16.7 (SD = 4.3). The published cutpoint ≤23 for MCI yielded a high false-positive rate (79%). ROC analyses identified ≤18.5 as the score to identify MCI or dementia using the English MoCA (65% sensitivity; 77% specificity) and ≤16.5 for the Spanish MoCA (64% sensitivity;73% specificity) in this sample of older adults with cognitive concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Current MoCA cutpoints were inappropriately high in a culturally/linguistically diverse urban setting, leading to a high false-positive rate. Lower Spanish and English MoCA cutpoints may improve diagnostic accuracy for identifying cognitive impairment in this group, highlighting the need for the creation and validation of accurate cognitive screeners for ethnoculturally and linguistically diverse older adults.

Epidemiology of Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome in the Kerala Einstein Study: Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The southern India state of Kerala has among the highest proportion of older adults in its population in the country. An increase in chronic age-related diseases such as dementia is expected in the older Kerala population. Identifying older individuals early in the course of cognitive decline offers the best hope of introducing preventive measures early and planning management. However, the epidemiology and pathogenesis of predementia syndromes at the early stages of cognitive decline in older adults are not well established in India. OBJECTIVE: The Kerala Einstein Study (KES) is a community-based cohort study that was established in 2008 and is based in the Kozhikode district in Kerala state. KES aims to establish risk factors and brain substrates of motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR), a predementia syndrome characterized by the presence of slow gait and subjective cognitive concerns in individuals without dementia or disability. This protocol describes the study design and procedures for this KES project. METHODS: KES is proposing to enroll a sample of 1000 adults ≥60 years old from urban and rural areas in the Kozhikode district of Kerala state: 200 recruited in the previous phase of KES and 800 new participants to be recruited in this project. MCR is the cognitive phenotype of primary interest. The associations between previously established risk factors for dementia as well as novel risk factors (apathy and traumatic brain injury) and MCR will be examined in KES. Risk factor profiles for MCR will be compared between urban and rural residents as well as with individuals who meet the criteria for mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Cognitive and physical function, medical history and medications, sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle patterns, and activities of daily living will be evaluated. Participants will also undergo magnetic resonance imaging and electrocardiogram investigations. Longitudinal follow-up is planned in a subset of participants as a prelude to future longitudinal studies. RESULTS: KES (2R01AG039330-07) was funded by the US National Institutes of Health in September 2019 and received approval from the Indian Medical Council of Research to start the study in June 2021. We had recruited 433 new participants from urban and rural sites in Kozhikode as of May 2023: 41.1% (178/433) women, 67.7% (293/433) rural residents, and 13.4% (58/433) MCR cases. Enrollment is actively ongoing at all the KES recruitment sites. CONCLUSIONS: KES will provide new insights into risk factors and brain substrates associated with MCR in India and will help guide future development of regionally specific preventive interventions for dementia. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/49933.

A neuropsychologically based employment intervention for women with multiple sclerosis: A quasi-randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Job loss is common in multiple sclerosis (MS) and frequently associated with depression, fatigue, and cognitive dysfunction. Identifying these modifiable risk factors and providing "at-risk" women with a neuropsychologically-based intervention may improve employment outcomes. Our study seeks to investigate the utility of a neuropsychologically-based intervention with varying levels of treatment and follow-up, and evaluate treatment and employment outcomes among groups. METHOD: In this longitudinal, quasi-randomized controlled trial, employed women with MS meeting criteria on screening measures were considered "at-risk" for job instability and randomized to one of two neuropsychological testing interventions (standard-care group received testing and phone feedback of results and recommendations; experimental group received testing and in-person feedback with subsequent care-coordinator calls from a nurse to help coordinate recommendation completion). Participants who did not meet criteria were considered "low-risk" and only followed over time. RESULTS: 56 women in the treatment groups (standard-care = 23; experimental = 33) and 63 women in the follow-only group were analyzed at 1 year. Rates of decreased employment were similar between standard-care (17.4%) and experimental (21.2%) groups (OR = .782, 95% CI .200-3.057). However, the experimental group completed significantly more treatment recommendations, t(53) = -3.237, p = .002. Rates of decreased employment were also similar between the "low-risk" (17.5%) and "at-risk" groups (19.6%), (OR = .721, 95% CI .285-1.826). CONCLUSION: Employment outcomes were similar at 1 year between treatment groups receiving differing levels of a neuropsychologically-based intervention, however treatment adherence significantly improved in the experimental group. Treatment groups also had similar employment outcomes as compared to a "low-risk," no intervention group, suggesting that engaging in either neuropsychological intervention may have impacted job stability.

A neuropsychologically-based intervention with increased follow-up support for employed women with multiple sclerosis: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate feasibility and acceptability of a neuropsychologically-based vocational intervention with increased follow-up support for women with multiple sclerosis. DESIGN: Single-blinded parallel-group randomized controlled trial with 12-month follow-up. SETTING: Tertiary-care multiple sclerosis center. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-nine employed women with multiple sclerosis meeting criteria on measures of cognitive dysfunction (Symbol Digit Modalities Test), fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale), and/or depression (Beck Depression Inventory/Patient Health Questionnaire). INTERVENTIONS: Participants received either neuropsychological testing and phone feedback regarding findings and tailored recommendations (standard-care treatment), or testing, in-person feedback, and two calls from a care-coordinator (experimental treatment). MEASURES: Feasibility measures included enrollment and attrition rates, and compliance to recommendations at 12-months between groups. Acceptability was evaluated by participants' report of benefit from interventions. Secondary analyses included evaluation of symptom changes (cognition, fatigue, depression) from baseline to 12-months. RESULTS: Of 49 women meeting screening measure thresholds, 44 were randomized to treatment groups (attrition: standard-care = 8, experimental = 6), and 30 completed the study (standard-care = 14, experimental = 16). Recommendation adherence rates did not significantly differ between standard-care and experimental groups (31% vs 49%). However, 16/16 experimental participants at least partially completed given recommendations as compared to 8/14 in the standard-care group. Participants across groups (97%) reported benefit from participation. No significant differences in symptom outcomes between groups at 12-months. CONCLUSION: In-person feedback and care-coordinator calls were feasible and acceptable additions to a neuropsychological intervention and may serve to increase recommendation adherence. Given high drop-out rate, particularly prior to testing, future research may explore avenues to improve completion rates and maximize benefits of such interventions.

Relationship Between Anxiety and Cognition in Multiple Sclerosis: Implications for Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety, which is very prevalent in multiple sclerosis (MS) but understudied, has been shown to negatively affect cognition in many different populations. Slowed information processing speed underlies most cognitive impairments in MS, including verbal learning. The aim of this study was to look at how anxiety influences cognition-specifically processing speed and verbal learning-in MS. METHODS: Eligibility criteria were adults (≥18 years) who had a diagnosis of clinically definite MS and had participated in neuropsychological research projects. A retrospective medical record review was conducted on the neuropsychological testing data. Two hierarchical multiple regressions were conducted to determine the unique contributions of processing speed and anxiety on verbal learning in MS, after adjusting for demographic and disability variables. Two separate mediation analyses were conducted to determine the relationship between processing speed, verbal learning, and anxiety. RESULTS: Participants (N = 141) ranged in age from 18-91 years. Based on the multiple regression analyses, processing speed (ß = 0.55, ΔR 2 = 0.27, P < .001) and anxiety (ß = -0.34, ΔR 2 = 0.11, P < .001) were uniquely significant predictors of verbal learning. Based on the mediation analyses, there was a significant indirect effect of anxiety on verbal learning through processing speed (ab = -0.31, 95% CI = -0.60 to -0.09). There was also a significant indirect effect of processing speed on verbal learning through anxiety (ab = -0.05, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest a bidirectional relationship of anxiety and processing speed on verbal learning in MS. Anxiety has a significant effect on cognition and should not be overlooked. Interventions targeting anxiety may improve cognition in MS.

Short Report: Adherence to Neuropsychological Recommendations in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to nonmedication recommendations is typically low, as seen in various health populations. Because literature on adherence to treatment recommendations made after neuropsychological testing in multiple sclerosis (MS) is lacking, this study evaluated adherence and reasons for nonadherence. Relationships between adherence to recommendations and various other factors in patients with MS were also evaluated. METHODS: Of 66 adult patients seen for neuropsychological testing at an MS center, 55 were eligible for this study. Forty-five patients (mean age, 43.4 years; 75.6% women) were reached by phone, and all agreed to an interview involving questions regarding adherence to treatment recommendations. Other information was obtained through retrospective medical record review. RESULTS: Overall self-reported adherence to recommendations made from neuropsychological testing was 38%. Adherence rates varied by recommendation type: psychopharmacological management had the highest rate (80%), and referrals for cognitive rehabilitation had the lowest (6.5%). Reasons for nonadherence included needing more information and wanting to speak with one's physician regarding the recommendations. Adherence was associated with patients' ability to spontaneously recall at least some of their recommendations and with receiving both a written report and a phone call with test results. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to recommendations made after neuropsychological testing for patients with MS is low. Points of intervention may be to give directed feedback for each recommendation and to provide both a written report and a phone call with results and recommendations. Asking patients to repeat back the recommendations may be a simple and efficient way to increase understanding and improve adherence.