Ondansetron is effective to treat spinal or epidural morphine-induced pruritus.

BACKGROUND: Spinally and epidurally administered morphine is frequently associated with pruritus. Isolated case reports indicate that ondansetron may be effective in this context. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of ondansetron to treat this side effect. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 100 patients with pruritus (> 4 on a visual analog scale, on which 0 represents no pruritus and 10 represents worst pruritus imaginable) after spinal or epidural administration of morphine, received either 8 mg ondansetron intravenously (ondansetron group) in 100 ml NaCl 0.9% or vehicle (placebo group). A decrease of more than 4 points on the visual analog scale 60 min after treatment was considered a success. Changes in levels of pain and sedation, hemodynamic values, and other side effects were checked regularly. The presence or absence of pruritus was assessed for the last time 24 h later. RESULTS: The two groups were similar for demographic characteristics, the route of administration of morphine, and severity of pruritus at the beginning of the study. The ondansetron group showed a success rate of 70% versus 30% for the placebo group (P > 0.05). Among the successfully treated patients, three (9%) in the ondansetron group and six (40%) in the placebo group reported the recurrence of pruritus (P < 0.05). Among the successfully treated patients, none complained of residual pruritus 24 h later. No changes in pain or sedation levels were noted. Hemodynamic values remained stable, hemoglobin oxygen saturation did not decrease, and no other side effects were observed. CONCLUSION: The administration of 8 mg ondansetron intravenously is an effective treatment for spinally or epidurally administered morphine-induced pruritus. In this clinical condition the treatment is safe and well tolerated.

[Antiemetic effect of propofol]. / Antiemetische Wirkung von Propofol.

Propofol is known to possess direct antiemetic effects. Its use for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia has been shown to be associated with a lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) when compared to any other anaesthetic drug or technique. However, its mechanism of action in this context is still not well understood. In this article, the best ways to take advantage of propofol's antiemetic properties are emphasized. The possible effects of propofol on the cerebral cortex, its interactions with the dopaminergic and the serotoninergic systems are evaluated by the known clinical and basic science results. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of using propofol to decrease the incidence of PONV in clinical practice are discussed.