Elevation of Donor-derived Cell-free DNA Before Biopsy-proven Rejection in Kidney Transplant.

BACKGROUND: Standard-of-care biomarkers for renal allograft rejection are lagging indicators, signaling existing organ injury. This precludes early intervention, when immunological cascades leading to rejection are most susceptible. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) shows promise as an early indicator of rejection, allowing earlier and possibly more effective treatment. This analysis was designed to assess this promise using real-world dd-cfDNA testing evidence. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of the prospective, observational ProActive registry study (NCT04091984) assessed dd-cfDNA and serum creatinine levels before biopsy in 424 patients with ≥1 dd-cfDNA test (n = 1013) in the 6 mo before biopsy. RESULTS: Of 4667 enrolled patients, 1631 patients had ≥18 mo of follow-up data, of which 424 had a biopsy and were included in this analysis. Twenty-six biopsies showed antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), 62 showed T cell-mediated rejection, and 336 showed nonrejection; each from a unique patient. dd-cfDNA fractions were significantly elevated 5 mo before ABMR biopsies, and 2 mo before T cell-mediated rejection biopsies, compared with nonrejection biopsies. In contrast, serum creatinine did not discriminate between rejection and nonrejection in advance, or concurrent with biopsy. Among patients with nonrejection biopsies, estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly lower in cases with ≥2 increased dd-cfDNA results (≥1%), compared with those with 0 or 1 increased dd-cfDNA result. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that dd-cfDNA is an early indicator of biopsy-proven rejection, especially ABMR, suggesting a greater role for dd-cfDNA in surveillance to identify patients at high risk of ongoing or future rejection, thus requiring closer monitoring, biopsy, or other management changes.

Differential in Kidney Graft Years on the Basis of Solitary Kidney, Simultaneous Liver-Kidney, and Kidney-after-Liver Transplants.

BACKGROUND: The number of simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) transplants has significantly increased in the United States. There has also been an increase in kidney-after-liver transplants associated with 2017 policy revisions aimed to fairly allocate kidneys after livers. SLK and kidney-after-liver candidates are prioritized in allocation policy for kidney offers ahead of kidney-alone candidates. METHODS: We compared kidney graft outcomes of kidney-alone transplant recipients with SLK and kidney-after-liver transplants using paired kidney models to mitigate differences among donor risk factors. We evaluated recipient characteristics between transplant types and calculated differential graft years using restricted mean survival estimates. RESULTS: We evaluated 3053 paired donors to kidney-alone and SLK recipients and 516 paired donors to kidney-alone and kidney-after-liver recipients from August 2017 to August 2022. Kidney-alone recipients were younger, more likely on dialysis, and Black race. One-year and 3-year post-transplant kidney graft survival for kidney-alone recipients was 94% and 86% versus SLK recipients 89% and 80%, respectively, P < 0.001. One-year and 3-year kidney graft survival for kidney-alone recipients was 94% and 84% versus kidney-after-liver recipients 93% and 87%, respectively, P = 0.53. The additional kidney graft years for kidney-alone versus SLK transplants was 21 graft years/100 transplants (SEM=5.0) within 4 years post-transplantation, with no significant difference between kidney-after-liver and kidney-alone transplants. CONCLUSIONS: Over a 5-year period in the United States, SLK transplantation was associated with significantly lower kidney graft survival compared with paired kidney-alone transplants. Most differences in graft survival between SLK and kidney-alone transplants occurred within the first year post-transplantation. By contrast, kidney-after-liver transplants had comparable graft survival with paired kidney-alone transplants.

Clinical outcomes from the Assessing Donor-derived cell-free DNA Monitoring Insights of kidney Allografts with Longitudinal surveillance (ADMIRAL) study.

The use of routine monitoring of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) after kidney transplant may allow clinicians to identify subclinical allograft injury and intervene prior to development of clinically evident graft injury. To evaluate this, data from 1092 kidney transplant recipients monitored for dd-cfDNA over a three-year period was analyzed to assess the association of dd-cfDNA with histologic evidence of allograft rejection. Elevation of dd-cfDNA (0.5% or more) was significantly correlated with clinical and subclinical allograft rejection. dd-cfDNA values of 0.5% or more were associated with a nearly three-fold increase in risk development of de novo donor-specific antibodies (hazard ratio 2.71) and were determined to be elevated a median of 91 days (interquartile range of 30-125 days) ahead of donor specific antibody identification. Persistently elevated dd-cfDNA (more than one result above the 0.5% threshold) predicted over a 25% decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate over three years (hazard ratio 1.97). Therefore, routine monitoring of dd-cfDNA allowed early identification of clinically important graft injury. Biomarker monitoring complemented histology and traditional laboratory surveillance strategies as a prognostic marker and risk-stratification tool post-transplant. Thus, persistently low dd-cfDNA levels may accurately identify allograft quiescence or absence of injury, paving the way for personalization of immunosuppression trials.

Adequate tacrolimus exposure modulates the impact of HLA class II molecular mismatch: a validation study in an American cohort.

Clinicians have few tools to predict the risk of alloimmune injury that would guide immunosuppression management in renal transplant patients. We evaluated human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR/DQ molecular mismatch to predict de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) during the first year of transplant and explored how differences in tacrolimus exposure may modulate this risk. HLA-DR and -DQ eplet mismatches were determined between 444 donor-recipient pairs in Denver, Colorado between 2007 and 2013. Previously defined mismatch thresholds stratified recipients into low- (N = 119), intermediate- (N = 153), and high- (N = 172) risk categories. The area under the curve for DSA at 1 year was 0.84 and 0.82 for HLA-DR and HLA-DQ eplet mismatches, respectively. Compared to low-risk patients, there was a graded increase in risk of DR/DQ DSA in intermediate (HR 15.39, 95% CI 2.01-118.09, p = .009) and high-risk (HR 23.81, 95% CI 3.17-178.66, p = 0.002) categories. Intermediate- and high-risk patients with a mean tacrolimus <6 ng/ml versus >8 ng/ml had increased risk of DR/DQ DSA at 1 year (HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.05-5.22, p = .04). HLA molecular mismatch represents a reproducible, objective, and clinically relevant tool to stratify patients by alloimmune risk and may help guide personalized immunosuppression management.

Tacrolimus Intrapatient Variability, Time in Therapeutic Range, and Risk of De Novo Donor-Specific Antibodies.

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus (TAC) is the most important agent for maintenance immunosuppression and prevention of immunologic injury to the renal allograft, yet there remains no consensus on how best to monitor drug therapy. Both high TAC intrapatient variability and low TAC time in therapeutic range (TTR) have been associated with risk of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA). In this study, we hypothesized that the risk associated with high TAC coefficient of variation (CV) is a result of low TAC TTR rather than the variability itself. METHODS: We analyzed the risk of dnDSA, acute rejection, or death-censored graft loss by non-dosed-corrected TAC CV and TAC TTR during the first posttransplant year in a cohort of 538 patients with a median follow-up period of 4.1 years. RESULTS: Patients with CV >44.2% and TTR <40% (high intrapatient variability and low TTR) had a high risk of dnDSA (adjusted OR = 4.93, 95% confidence interval = 2.02-12.06, P < 0.001) and death-censored graft loss by 5 years (adjusted HR = 4.00, 95% confidence interval = 1.31-12.24, P = 0.015) when compared with patients with CV >44.2% and TTR ≥40% (high intrapatient variability and optimal TTR), while the latter patients had similar risk to patients with CV <44.2% (lower intrapatient variability). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that previously reported immunologic risk associated with high TAC intrapatient variability is due to time outside of therapeutic range rather than variability in and of itself when evaluating absolute non-dose-corrected TAC levels irrespective of reason or indication.

High levels of dd-cfDNA identify patients with TCMR 1A and borderline allograft rejection at elevated risk of graft injury.

The clinical importance of subclinical, early T cell-mediated rejection (Banff TCMR 1A and borderline lesions) remains unclear, due, in part to the fact that histologic lesions used to characterize early TCMR can be nonspecific. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is an important molecular marker of active graft injury. Over a study period from June 2017 to May 2019, we assessed clinical outcomes in 79 patients diagnosed with TCMR 1A/borderline rejection across 11 US centers with a simultaneous measurement of dd-cfDNA. Forty-two patients had elevated dd-cfDNA (≥0.5%) and 37 patients had low levels (<0.5%). Elevated levels of dd-cfDNA predicted adverse clinical outcomes: among patients with elevated cfDNA, estimated glomerular filtration rate declined by 8.5% (interquartile rate [IQR] -16.22% to -1.39%) (-3.50 mL/min/1.73 m2 IQR -8.00 to -1.00) vs 0% (-4.92%, 4.76%) in low dd-cfDNA patients (P = .004), de novo donor-specific antibody formation was seen in 40% (17/42) vs 2.7% (P < .0001), and future or persistent rejection occurred in 9 of 42 patients (21.4%) vs 0% (P = .003). The use of dd-cfDNA may complement the Banff classification and to risk stratify patients with borderline/TCMR 1A identified on biopsy.

Complement fragments are biomarkers of antibody-mediated endothelial injury.

Antibody-mediated rejection (AbMR) adversely affects long-term graft survival in kidney transplantation. Currently, the diagnosis of AbMR requires a kidney biopsy, and detection of complement C4d deposition in the allograft is one of the diagnostic criteria. Complement activation also generates several soluble fragments which could potentially provide non-invasive biomarkers of the process. Furthermore, microvesicles released into the plasma from injured cells can serve as biomarkers of vascular injury. To explore whether soluble complement fragments or complement fragments bound to endothelial microvesicles can be used to non-invasively detect AbMR, we developed an in vitro model in which human endothelial cells were exposed to anti-HLA antibodies and complement sufficient serum. We found that complement fragments C4a and sC5b-9 were increased in the supernatants of cells exposed to complement-sufficient serum compared to cells treated complement-deficient serum. Furthermore, complement activation on the cell surface was associated with the release of microvesicles bearing C4 and C3 fragments. We next measured these analytes in plasma from kidney transplant recipients with biopsy-proven acute AbMR (n = 9) and compared the results with those from transplant recipients who also had impaired allograft function but who did not have AbMR (n = 30). Consistent with the in vitro results, complement fragments C4a and Ba were increased in plasma from patients with AbMR compared to control subjects (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively). Endothelial microvesicle counts were not increased in patients with AbMR, however, and the number of microvesicles with C4 and C3 bound to the surface was actually lower compared to control subjects (both P < 0.05). Our results suggest that plasma complement activation fragments may be useful as non-invasive biomarkers of antibody-mediated complement activation within the allograft. Complement-opsonized endothelial microvesicles are decreased in patients with AbMR, possibly due to enhanced clearance of microvesicles opsonized with C3 and C4 fragments.

Endothelial Microparticles and Systemic Complement Activation in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: Endothelial microparticles are associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and complement activation. We hypothesized that the complement pathway is activated in patients with CKD via endothelial microparticles and that complement activation correlates with endothelial dysfunction in CKD. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed complement data of 30 healthy subjects, 30 patients with stage III/IV CKD, and 30 renal transplant recipients with stage III/IV CKD, evaluating the potential correlation of complement fragments with brachial artery flow-mediated dilation, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration glomerular filtration rate, and urinary albumin/creatinine ratio. Endothelial microparticles were characterized via proteomic analysis and compared between study groups. Complement fragment Ba was significantly increased in CKD and post-kidney transplant CKD. Plasma Ba levels correlated significantly with lower brachial artery flow-mediated dilation, lower Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration glomerular filtration rate, and higher urinary albumin/creatinine ratio. Factor D levels were significantly higher in the plasma microparticles of patients with CKD versus healthy controls. Plasma microparticles isolated from patients with CKD and containing factor D activated the alternative pathway in vitro. CONCLUSION: The alternative complement pathway is activated in CKD and correlates with endothelial dysfunction and markers of CKD. Future studies are needed to evaluate whether endothelial microparticles with increased factor D play a pathologic role in CKD-associated vascular disease. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02230202.

Defining kidney allograft benefit from successful pancreas transplant: separating fact from fiction.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To define the natural history of kidney allograft loss related to recurrent diabetes following transplant, and to understand the potential benefit of pancreas transplantation upon kidney allograft survival. RECENT FINDINGS: A postulated benefit of simultaneous pancreas kidney transplant is that, unlike kidney transplant alone, euglycemia from the added pancreas allograft may confer a nephroprotective benefit and prevent recurrent diabetic nephropathy in the renal allograft. Recent large database analyses and long-term histological assessments have been published that assist in quantifying the problem of recurrent diabetic nephropathy and answering the question of the potential benefits of euglycemia. Further data may be extrapolated from larger single-center series that follow the prognosis of early posttransplant diabetes mellitus as another barometer of risk from diabetic nephropathy and graft loss. SUMMARY: Recurrent diabetic nephropathy following kidney transplant is a relatively rare, late occurrence and its clinical significance is significantly diminished by the competing risks of death and chronic alloimmune injury. Although there are hints of a protective effect upon kidney graft survival with pancreas transplant, these improvements are small and may take decades to appreciate. Clinical decision-making regarding pancreas transplant solely based upon nephroprotective effects of the kidney allograft should be avoided.

Complement factor H protects mice from ischemic acute kidney injury but is not critical for controlling complement activation by glomerular IgM.

Natural IgM binds to glomerular epitopes in several progressive kidney diseases. Previous work has shown that IgM also binds within the glomerulus after ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) but does not fully activate the complement system. Factor H is a circulating complement regulatory protein, and congenital or acquired deficiency of factor H is a strong risk factor for several types of kidney disease. We hypothesized that factor H controls complement activation by IgM in the kidney after I/R, and that heterozygous factor H deficiency would permit IgM-mediated complement activation and injury at this location. We found that mice with targeted heterozygous deletion of the gene for factor H developed more severe kidney injury after I/R than wild-type controls, as expected, but that complement activation within the glomeruli remained well controlled. Furthermore, mice that are unable to generate soluble IgM were not protected from renal I/R, even in the setting of heterozygous factor H deficiency. These results demonstrate that factor H is important for limiting injury in the kidney after I/R, but it is not critical for controlling complement activation by immunoglobulin within the glomerulus in this setting. IgM binds to glomerular epitopes after I/R, but it is not a significant source of injury.

Live donor kidney - PAK versus SPK: how to decide?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients with type 1 diabetes and end stage renal disease face a complex choice when considering the relative risks and benefits of kidney transplant alone with or without subsequent pancreas after kidney transplant (PAK) or simultaneous kidney pancreas transplant (SPK). RECENT FINDINGS: SPK is considered the optimal treatment regarding long-term patient survival, but when also faced with the option of living donor kidney transplant with the potential for PAK later, the ideal option is less clear. SUMMARY: This review summarizes the current literature regarding SPK, living donor kidney transplant alone, and PAK transplant outcomes and examines the relative risks of pre- and posttransplant variables that impact patient and graft survival to help inform this complex treatment decision.

Current status of pancreas transplantation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review recent pancreas transplantation outcomes and indications and describe studies of the impact of pancreas transplant upon patient survival and secondary complications. RECENT FINDINGS: A number of surgical advances have occurred that have improved the early success rate of transplant, and modern immunosuppressive strategies have improved the rate of longer term allograft survival. Pancreas transplant is associated with a mortality benefit when performed in patients with end-stage renal disease in combination with kidney transplant, but questions regarding the impact upon secondary diabetic complications together with the risk assumed by the surgical procedure and the attendant immunosuppression in the nonuremic patient may have tempered enthusiasm for broader expansion of transplantation. Thus, despite these advances, the number of pancreas transplants performed annually is falling consistently. Efforts to define optimal donor and recipient characteristics and understand the pathophysiological impact of pancreas transplant are active areas of research that may lead to greater expansion of pancreas transplant in the future. SUMMARY: The review summarizes these advances, including the utilization patterns of pancreas transplant and current concepts of patient selection and graft monitoring, and places into perspective the current and future role of pancreas transplantation as a therapeutic option in diabetes.

Multiorgan transplantation.

Kidney transplantation has proven to be the gold standard therapy for severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) due to multiple etiologies in individuals deemed eligible from a surgical standpoint. While kidney transplantation is traditionally considered in conditions of native kidney disease such as diabetes and immunological or inherited causes of kidney disease, an increasing indication for kidney transplantation is kidney dysfunction in the setting of other severe organ dysfunction that requires transplant, such as severe liver or heart disease. In these settings, multiorgan transplantation is now commonly performed, with controversy regarding the appropriate utilization of kidneys transplanted both from a physiological perspective (distinguishing those who require a kidney transplant) and also from an ethical perspective (allocation of a scarce resource to a more morbid population). These issues persist in the setting of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK), in which utilization for patients with type 1 diabetes has been historically accepted. Questions of physiological benefit persist, and utilization is waning despite broader allocation policies that encourage SPK, including consideration for patients with type 2 diabetes. The purpose of this review will be to summarize the physiological data regarding multiorgan transplantation and place these into context while reviewing current allocation policy in the United States.

The Complement System and Antibody-Mediated Transplant Rejection.

Complement activation is an important cause of tissue injury in patients with Ab-mediated rejection (AMR) of transplanted organs. Complement activation triggers a strong inflammatory response, and it also generates tissue-bound and soluble fragments that are clinically useful markers of inflammation. The detection of complement proteins deposited within transplanted tissues has become an indispensible biomarker of AMR, and several assays have recently been developed to measure complement activation by Abs reactive to specific donor HLA expressed within the transplant. Complement inhibitors have entered clinical use and have shown efficacy for the treatment of AMR. New methods of detecting complement activation within transplanted organs will improve our ability to diagnose and monitor AMR, and they will also help guide the use of complement inhibitory drugs.