Combination of Exercise Testing Criteria to Diagnose Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease.

Objectives: Nothing is known about the interest of the combination of exercise tests to diagnose Lower-extremity Peripheral Artery Disease (LEPAD). The aim of this study was to assess if combining exercise testing criteria [post-exercise Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) + exercise-oximetry (exercise-TcPO2)] improves the detection of lower limbs arterial stenoses as compared with post-exercise ABI using American Heart Association (AHA) criteria, or exercise-TcPO2 alone. Material and Methods: In a prospective monocentric study, consecutive patients with exertional-limb pain and normal resting-ABI referred to our vascular center (Rennes, France) were assessed from May 2016 to February 2018. All included patients had a computed tomography angiography (CTA), a resting-ABI, a post-exercise ABI and an exercise-TcPO2. AHA post-exercise criteria, new validated post-exercise criteria (post-exercise ABI decrease ≥18.5%, post-exercise ABI decrease <0.90), and Delta from Rest of Oxygen Pressure (Total-DROP) ≤-15mmHg (criterion for exercise-TcPO2) were used to diagnose arterial stenoses ≥50%. For the different combinations of exercise testing criteria, sensitivity or specificity or accuracies were compared with McNemar's test. Results: Fifty-six patients (mean age 62 ± 11 years old and 84% men) were included. The sensitivity of the combination of exercise testing criteria (post-exercise ABI decrease ≥18.5%, or post-exercise ABI decrease <0.90 or a Total-DROP ≤-15mmHg) was significantly higher (sensitivity = 81% [95% CI, 71-92]) than using only one exercise test (post-exercise AHA criteria (sensitivity = 57% [43-70]) or exercise-TcPO2 alone (sensitivity = 59% [45-72]). Conclusions: Combination of post-exercise ABI with Exercise-TcPO2 criteria shows better sensitivity to diagnose arterial stenoses compared with the AHA post-exercise criteria alone or Exercise-TcPO2 criteria used alone. A trend of a better accuracy of this combined strategy was observed but an external validation should be performed to confirm this diagnostic strategy.

Impact of an Educational Intervention on Ankle-Brachial Index Performance Among Medical Students and Fidelity Assessment at Six Months.

BACKGROUND: The resting ankle-brachial index (ABI) is a clinical test to diagnose peripheral artery disease. The Wyatt's score has been proposed to assess the students' performance on ABI measurement on a healthy volunteer (HV). No study has shown that this score is sensitive to different teaching methods. In this randomized controlled trial, we wanted to determine whether didactic learning alone or didactic learning combined with experiential learning improves proficiency in the ABI procedure assessed by the Wyatt's score. METHODS: Medical students (n = 30) received a didactic learning, including (1) a presentation of the ABI guidelines and (2) a video demonstration. Each student was then randomized into 2 groups ("the no experiential learning group" and "the experiential learning group"). An initial evaluation was performed after the didactic learning and then the final evaluation at the end of the intervention. A student was considered to be proficient when he performed a correct ABI procedure on an HV. The correct procedure corresponds to the following: (1) correctly answered Wyatt's score and (2) a difference in the ABI measurement between a professor in vascular medicine and a student was ≤0.15. RESULTS: No student was proficient at the initial evaluation. At the final evaluation, there was a significant difference between the number of proficient students for the Wyatt's score depending on their learning group [didactic alone (1/10) or didactic + experiential training (15/20)] and also for the ABI procedure [didactic alone (0/10) or didactic + experiential training (16/20)]. At 6 months, among the 12 students who passed the final evaluation, 4 students passed both the Wyatt's score and the ABI measurement. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the Wyatt's score was sensitive to an educational intervention and no improvement was found in the case of "no experiential learning." The Wyatt's score could be used to evaluate the student on ABI measurement after an educational intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Vascular Medicine Department of Rennes University Hospital (France). This was approved by the ethics review board of our institution (no. 16.150).

Description of Doppler waveforms to detect lower extremity peripheral artery disease.

Doppler waveforms analysis is a interesting to diagnose peripheral artery disease as suggested by the international recommendations. However as mentioned in the present letter, there is a lack of consensus about the terminology that should be used.

Performance of noninvasive laser Doppler flowmetry and laser speckle contrast imaging methods in diagnosis of Buerger disease: A case report.

RATIONALE: Buerger disease (BD) is a nonatherosclerotic, inflammatory, segmental vascular occlusive disease, which affects small and medium-sized arteries and veins and is triggered by substantial tobacco exposure. Angiographic findings consistent with BD are required for diagnosis. Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) and laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) could represent potential noninvasive alternative techniques to angiography. PATIENT CONCERNS: We report the case of a 49-year-old smoker who developed an ischemic ulcer in the distal segment of the second finger of the left hand. He had no medical history. DIAGNOSES: In our vascular center, LDF and LSCI are conducted routinely for digital artery disease diagnosis. LDF was indicative of digital obstructive artery disease (DOAD). Postocclusive reactive hyperemia, assessed by LCSI, demonstrated no skin blood flow (SBF) perfusion in the distal phalanx of the thumb, index, middle, and auricular fingers. Angiography confirmed BD, showing distally located multisegmental vessel occlusion and corkscrew collaterals in this patient's hands. INTERVENTIONS: Ilomedine treatment was initiated and smoking cessation was definitive. OUTCOMES: Recently, the patient had an improvement in clinical condition despite the persistence of a small zone of necrosis of the left index finger 28 days post-treatment. LESSONS: Our observation suggests that where suspicion of BD is based on clinical criteria, combining LDF and LSCI could represent a noninvasive, safe means of reaching BD diagnosis. Further clinical trials are necessary to confirm this novel observation.

Heterogeneity of Doppler waveform description is decreased with the use of a dedicated classification.

BACKGROUND: The analysis of Doppler ultrasound waveforms (DW) provides a method for detecting and evaluating arterial stenosis in the lower limb arteries but no recommendation exists on how to describe the DWs. Aims of this study were to assess the heterogeneity of the description of DWs among vascular residents and the impact of the use of a 4-item classification. METHODS: Thirty different DWs were presented to residents using Microsoft PowerPoint® slides. They were invited to describe the 30 DWs before and after the presentation of a 4-item classification (triphasic, biphasic, monophasic, and others). The heterogeneity was assessed by the number of different answers used by the residents. Nineteen residents with six to eighteen months of vascular medicine training and ultrasound experience were included. RESULTS: The average of different answers was 9 ± 4 for the whole analysis of the 30 DWs without the use of a specific classification, whereas the average was 2 ± 1 using the 4-item classification (p < 0.005). There was a significant difference in correct answers, i. e. in combined continuous waveforms and pulsed waveforms between experienced residents and younger residents (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Using a 4-item classification for DWs reduced the heterogeneity of the DW description. There is an urgent need to standardize the DW description in order to improve the patients care with peripheral artery disease.

Noninvasive Peripheral Artery Disease Screening Tools: A Deficient Knowledge among French Vascular Residents from 4 Medical Schools.

BACKGROUND: Ankle-brachial index (ABI) at rest, postexercise ABI, and toe-brachial index (TBI) are essential diagnostic tools recommended for peripheral artery disease (PAD) diagnosis. Our study investigates the level of knowledge on these 3 tests among vascular medicine residents from 4 French medical schools in France. METHODS: We included 19 vascular medicine residents in a cross-sectional study. During an annual obligatory seminar, all residents accepted to fill 3 questionnaires concerning knowledge about these 3 tests. RESULTS: All residents accepted to fill 3 questionnaires. None of the residents correctly knows how to perform all pressure measurements (ABI, postexercise ABI, and TBI). Two residents had the knowledge to perform the whole ABI at rest procedure, whereas no resident had the knowledge to perform neither the postexercise ABI (P = 0.48) nor the TBI (P = 0.48). Twelve residents correctly completed the question regarding the interpretation of ABI at rest, whereas 2 correctly completed the postexercise ABI question (P = 0.001) and 4 the TBI question (P = 0.02). The number of residents who have performed more than 20 measurements is higher regarding ABI at rest than postexercise ABI and TBI (84%, 5%, and 37% respectively; P < 0.001 and P = 0.006 respectively) and significantly less often in postexercise ABI than TBI (5% vs. 37%; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows for the first time that residents' knowledge of pressure measurements (resting-ABI, postexercise ABI, and TBI) of 4 French medical school are insufficient although the importance of pressure measurement has been strongly highlighted by the newly released PAD guidelines (2016) for PAD diagnosis.

How to become proficient in performance of the resting ankle-brachial index: Results of the first randomized controlled trial.

The resting ankle-brachial index (ABI) is a first-line test to diagnose peripheral artery disease (PAD). No randomized controlled trial (RCT) has yet been conducted to determine the best teaching method to become proficient in the ABI procedure. We conducted a monocentric RCT to determine whether didactic learning alone or didactic learning combined with experiential learning improved proficiency in the ABI procedure. Medical students ( n = 30) received didactic learning, including (i) a presentation of the ABI guidelines and (ii) a video demonstration. Each student was then randomized into two groups ('no experiential learning group' and 'experiential learning group'). An initial evaluation was performed after the didactic learning and a final evaluation at the end of the intervention. A student was considered to be proficient when he or she performed a correct ABI procedure on a healthy individual and a patient. The correct procedure corresponds to (i) following guidelines and (ii) a difference in ABI measurement between a vascular specialist and a student of ≤ 0.15. No student was proficient at the initial evaluation. At the final evaluation, in the didactic learning group, the number of proficient students was not improved compared with the initial evaluation (0/10 vs 1/10). In the experiential learning group, the number of proficient students was significantly improved (0/20 vs 11/20; p < 0.05). At the final evaluation, there was a significant difference between the number of proficient students depending on their learning group. In conclusion, didactic learning alone is insufficient to gain proficiency in the ABI procedure. Combining didactic learning with experiential learning significantly improved the students' proficiency.