Implantable loop recorder in unexplained syncope: classification, mechanism, transient loss of consciousness and role of major depressive disorder in patients with and without structural heart disease.

OBJECTIVE: To stratify mechanisms and predictors of unexplained syncope documented by an implantable loop recorder (ILR) in patients with and without structural heart disease (SHD). DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study in consecutive patients of a university cardiac centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An ILR was implanted in 70 patients (34 male/36 female, aged 55 (17) years) in whom syncope remained unexplained after thorough testing. SHD was present in 33 patients (ischaemic cardiomyopathy in 16, dilated cardiomyopathy in 9 and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in 8) and absent in 37 patients (mean (SD) left ventricular ejection fraction 46 (4)% vs 61 (7)%, respectively). RESULTS: A syncopal recurrence occurred during 16 (8) months in 30 patients (91%) with SHD and in 30 patients (81%) without SHD. Fifteen patients (45%) versus 19 patients (51%), respectively, had an ILR-documented arrhythmia at the time of recurrence which led to specific treatment. The remaining 15 patients (45%) with SHD and 11 patients (30%) without SHD had normal sinus rhythm at the time of the recurrence. On stepwise multivariate analysis only major depressive disorder was predictive for early recurrence during ILR follow-up (p = 0.01, hazard ratio = 3.35, 95% CI 1.1 to 7.1). Fifty seven per cent of patients with major depressive disorder had sinus rhythm during recurrence compared with 31% of patients without the disorder (p = 0.01). Conversely, no patient with major depressive disorder had asystole compared with 33% without (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of SHD has little predictive value for the occurrence or type of arrhythmia in patients with unexplained syncope. Patients with major depressive disorder are prone to early recurrence of symptoms and have no evidence of arrhythmia in most cases. The ILR leads to specific treatment in half of all patients.

Attenuation correction for myocardial perfusion imaging. A comparison between SPECT and PET imaging by polar map analysis.

AIM: We investigated the impact of photon attenuation in myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT and PET in patients with coronary artery disease. In fact, the regional tracer distribution can be quantitatively assessed by polar map analysis if the effects of photon attenuation are accounted for. PET imaging permits accurate measurement of and correction for photon attenuation, whereas results of attenuation correction in SPECT imaging have been inconsistent. PATIENTS, METHODS: We compared photon attenuation in resting perfusion imaging studies with SPECT ((99m)Tc-sestamibi) and PET ((13)N-ammonia) from 21 patients. Transaxial images were reconstructed with and without attenuation correction and reoriented into short axis images. Polar map analysis was utilized to generate regional tracer uptake in six anatomical segments. RESULTS: Average segmental photon attenuation calculated as the ratio of counts in corrected and uncorrected images was 7.2 +/- 1.4 in SPECT and 14.0 +/- 3.1 in PET imaging (p < 0.01). This attenuation factor was significantly related to body mass index for both methods (p < 0.001). While attenuation correction for SPECT imaging did compensate for attenuation effects in the inferior wall (from -15% to +6% vs. PET), relative tracer uptake in the anterior wall in SPECT images was significantly reduced after attenuation correction (from -2% to -18% vs. PET, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Differential effects of attenuation correction for myocardial SPECT perfusion imaging need to be considered when algorithms designed to compensate effects of photon attenuation in SPECT imaging are employed in clinical practice.

Unexplained syncope in patients with structural heart disease and no documented ventricular arrhythmias: value of electrophysiologically guided implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.

AIMS: To evaluate electrophysiologically guided implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients with syncope, structural heart disease and no documented sustained ventricular tachycardia (sVT). METHODS AND RESULTS: Programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) was performed in 52 patients (age 62+/-10 years): 40 patients had ischaemic and 12 patients had idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. On PVS sVT and ventricular fibrillation were induced in seven and four patients, respectively, and two patients spontaneously experienced symptomatic sVT. These patients received an ICD (ICD group, n=13). Non-inducible patients were left on conventional therapy (non-ICD group, n=39). During 5+/-2.8 years five ICD patients received therapies, all appropriate. There were seven non-sudden deaths and overall survival analysis revealed no significant difference. Recurrent syncope occurred in five ICD and four non-ICD patients and did not correlate well with sVT. The positive and negative predictive values of PVS for tachyarrhythmias or sudden death were 36 and 98%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Syncope per se does not necessarily herald a bad prognosis. PVS identifies high-risk patients. Induction of ventricular fibrillation with double or triple extrastimuli is of limited value. Patients with poor left ventricular function and bad clinical condition benefit most from an ICD. Syncope and sVT are not necessarily correlated during follow-up, which may merit consideration.

Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of depolarization and repolarization may complicate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in Brugada syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Dynamic variations in electrophysiologic phenomena inherent to the Brugada syndrome may complicate therapy with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 1997 and 1999, 3 of 7 patients with Brugada syndrome (1 man and 2 women, mean age 42 years) received an ICD. During follow-up, 2 patients experienced multiple inappropriate shocks. Simultaneously with dynamic changes in the surface ECG, endocardial ECGs revealed a dynamic decrease in the right ventricular R wave and an increase in the corresponding T wave, resulting in T wave oversensing. With ajmaline administration, these dynamic changes in endocardial signals were reproducible at different right ventricular sites, whereas left ventricular epicardial signals remained stable. Incremental AAI pacing and exercise stress testing resulted in similar changes in right ventricular endocardial signals, but normalization of the surface ECG apart from progressively increasing S waves in leads II, V5, and V6. Orciprenaline administration had no effect on ECG phenomena. After implantation of a left ventricular epicardial lead for sensing and pacing, no inappropriate tachycardia detection recurred. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that, in Brugada syndrome, spontaneous or ajmaline-induced changes in the surface ECG may be paralleled by significant variations in the right ventricular endocardial electrogram that may result in ICD malfunction. Implantation of a left ventricular epicardial lead for sensing and pacing may be the ultimate successful approach in certain patients. To assure proper ICD function, ajmaline testing during ICD implantation appears to be helpful.

E 047/1: a new class III antiarrhythmic agent.

The efficacy, pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of E 047/1, an amiodarone derivative, were evaluated in patients with acute supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmia. In an open, nonrandomized prospective multicenter trial, 20 patients were treated with three different i.v. dosage regimens of E 047/1. Arrhythmia termination indicated efficacy. Pharmacokinetics were determined by measurements of drug plasma levels. Safety was judged by changes of blood pressure, heart rate, ECG parameters, and appearance of adverse events. For local tolerability, effects at the site of infusion were assessed. In patients with atrial fibrillation and/or atrial flutter, drug plasma levels and prolongation of QT interval were correlated with efficacy. In 10 (50%) patients, therapeutic intervention with E 047/1 was successful. Drug plasma levels rapidly decreased within 1 h after administration. Blood pressure values and ECG parameters stayed constant during the observation period. Proarrhythmic effects were not observed. As adverse events, vertigo, vomiting, and nausea in three (15%) and hypotension in one (5%) patient, respectively, occurred in the high-dose bolus regimen only. At the site of infusion, no adverse effects were found. No dependency between drug plasma levels and arrhythmia termination was found. E 047/1 has proven to be efficient and safe in the treatment of arrhythmia. E 047/1 is characterized by rapid plasma elimination, absence of proarrhythmic or cardiodepressive effects, mild adverse events, and excellent local tolerability. For further investigation, we recommend a combined bolus- and weight-adapted infusion regimen.

Local anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia for cardioverter-defibrillator implantation.

AIMS: Cardioverter-defibrillators are conventionally implanted under general anaesthesia. However, implantation under conscious sedation is being increasingly used. It has been shown that cardioverter-defibrillators can be implanted in a more pacemaker-like approach: under local anaesthesia for the surgical procedure, and with mild sedation for defibrillation threshold testing only. The aim of the present study was to compare local and general anaesthesia in defibrillation threshold testing and implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty patients were assigned to two groups: in the first 20 consecutive patients the cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted under general anaesthesia (GA), and in the subsequent 20 patients under local anaesthesia (LA). There was no significant difference between the two groups in regard of age, body weight, underlying disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, and NYHA classification. The defibrillation threshold was 13.7 +/- 5.5 J under local anaesthesia versus 10.7 +/- 4.7 J under general anaesthesia (n.s.). For defibrillation threshold testing 7.9 +/- 3.6 shocks had to be applied in patients under general anaesthesia versus 6.2 +/- 1.3 shocks under local anaesthesia (n.s.). Mean heart rate, arterial oxygen saturation and mean arterial blood pressure remained stable throughout defibrillation threshold testing, irrespective of the type of anaesthesia used. The duration of the surgical procedure was 62 +/- 16 min under GA and 60 +/- 14 min under LA (n.s.), however, the entire implantation procedure was significantly longer in patients under general anaesthesia than in those under local anaesthesia (124 +/- 24 min and 97 +/- 22 min, respectively, p < 0.005). There were no complications in either group and the procedure was well tolerated. With the use of local anaesthesia the cost of anaesthesia were reduced by 72%. CONCLUSION: Local anaesthesia in combination with mild sedation is as safe and well tolerated as general anaesthesia in cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. Lidocaine used for local anaesthesia does not adversely affect the defibrillation threshold. Device implantation in a pacemaker-like approach results in a significant reduction in total procedure time and costs, and facilitates scheduling of the procedure.