Nutritional Assessment in Patients after Gastric Electrical Stimulation (GES).

BACKGROUND: Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is used for patients with drug-refractory gastroparesis (Gp) symptoms. Approximately two-thirds of patients with Gp symptoms are either overweight or obese. We aimed to assess symptoms and nutritional status pre-GES and post-GES placement in a large sample of drug-refractory Gp patients. METHODS: We conducted a chart review of 282 patients with drug-refractory Gp who received temporary followed by permanent GES at an academic medical center. Gastrointestinal symptoms were collected by a traditional standardized PRO (0-4, 0 being asymptomatic and 4 being worst symptoms), baseline nutritional status by BMI plus subjective global assessment (SGA score A, B, C, for mild, moderate, and severe nutritional deficits), ability to tolerate diet, enteral tube access, and parenteral therapy were assessed at baseline and after permanent GES placement. RESULTS: Comparing baseline with permanent, GES was found to significantly improve upper GI symptoms in all quartiles. Of the 282 patients with baseline body mass index (BMI) information, 112 (40%) patients were severely malnourished at baseline, of which 36 (32%) patients' nutritional status improved after GES. Among all patients, 76 (68%) patients' nutritional status remained unchanged. Many patients with high BMI were malnourished by SGA. CONCLUSION: We conclude that symptomatic patients of different BMIs showed improvement in their GI symptoms irrespective of baseline nutritional status. Severely malnourished patients were found to have an improvement in their nutritional status after GES therapy. We conclude that BMI, even if high, is not by itself a contraindication for GES therapy for symptomatic patients.

Gastroparesis and Gastroparesis Syndromes as Neuromuscular Disorders.

Gastroparesis syndromes (GpS) are a spectrum of disorders presenting with characteristic symptoms increasingly recognized as being gastrointestinal (GI) neuromuscular disorders (NMDs). This review focuses on GpS as a manifestation of neurologic disorders of GI NMD. GpS can be associated with systemic abnormalities, including inflammatory, metabolic, and serologic disorders, as well as autoimmune antibodies via nerve and muscle targets in the GI tract, which can be treated with immunotherapy, such as intravenous immunoglobulin. GpS are associated with autonomic (ANS) and enteric (ENS) dysfunction. Disorders of ANS may interact with the ENS and are the subject of continued investigation. ENS disorders have been recognized for a century but have only recently begun to be fully quantified. Anatomic structural changes in the GI tract are increasingly recognized in GpS. Detailed descriptions of anatomic changes in GpS, and their correlation with physiologic findings, have opened a new era of investigation. The management of GpS, when viewed as GI NMD, has shifted the paradigms of both diagnosis and treatment. This article concludes with current approaches to GpS directed at underlying neuromuscular pathology.

Baseline Characteristics and Predictive Factors of Intravenous Immunoglobulin Response in Drug and Device Refractory Gastroparesis Symptoms.

INTRODUCTION: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been shown in a small pilot series to be helpful for some patients with gastroparesis that is refractory to drugs, devices, and surgical therapies. Many but not all patients have serologic neuromuscular markers. We hypothesize that those patients with serologic markers and/or longer duration of therapy would have better responses to IVIG. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 47 patients with a diagnosis of gastroparesis and gastroparesis-like syndrome that had all failed previous therapies including available and investigational drugs, devices, and/or pyloric therapies. Patients had a standardized 12-week course of IVIG, dosed as 400 mg/kg per week intravenously. Symptom assessment was done with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) compliant traditional patient-reported outcomes. Success to IVIG was defined as 20% or greater reduction in average symptom scores from baseline to the latest evaluation. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (30%) had a response, and 33 (70%) had no response per our definition. Patients responding had a higher glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 positivity (64% vs. 30%, P =0.049, missing=3) and longer duration of therapy (>12 wk/continuous: 86% vs. 48%, P =0.09). CONCLUSIONS: In this moderately sized open-label series of refractory patients with gastroparesis symptoms treated with IVIG, 30% of patients responded. While serologic markers and extended therapies show a trend to greater response, neither was statistically significant, except for glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 which showed a higher positivity rate in responders. We conclude that a clinical trial of IVIG may be warranted in severely refractory patients with gastroparesis symptoms.

Investigating Defects of Esophageal Motility in Lung Transplant Recipients.

Background: Lung transplant patients are at risk of developing chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) of which bronchitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is the most common. These patients also are noted to develop gastrointestinal (GI) disease. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is implicated in BOS, and diagnosis and treatment of GERD may help to decrease incidence of BOS. Methods: A total of 131 lung transplant recipients with post-transplant evaluation between 2012 and 2019 were studied. Of 60 post-transplant evaluations with at least 6 months of post-transplant follow-up that included impedance testing, high-resolution manometry (HRM), and pH testing, procedures were performed according to recognized standards. Results: Of 60 patients, 56 (93%) were alive at 1-year post-transplant. The patients were found to have high rates of GI motility diseases: 37 patients (62%) had abnormal impedance testing, 50 patients (83%) had abnormal HRM results, 22 patients (37%) had abnormal pH test results. There was associated high rejection rates in patients with abnormal esophageal motility. There were 37 patients that had abnormal impedance test results and of those 25 patients (67%) developed rejection. Fifty patients had abnormal post-transplant HRM studies, 33 (66%) had an acute cellular rejection episode. Twenty-two patients had abnormal pH results, with 14 (63%) having an acute cellular rejection. Conclusions: Patients undergoing lung transplantation were found to have increased incidence of abnormal GI motility studies of the esophagus. These patients were further found to have increased rejection rates and BOS which has been associated with worsened mortality. Developing a formalized pre- and post-transplant motility study process, using evolving technologies for these patients, may provide guidance of at-risk patients for CLAD and early treatment to prevent CLAD.

Low-Resolution Electrogastrogram at Baseline and Response to Temporary Gastric Electrical Stimulation-A Comparison of Cutaneous With Mucosal Recordings.

INTRODUCTION: Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is a widely accepted therapy for gastroparesis symptoms, but how a brief cutaneous electrogastrogram (EGG) can be used in conjunction with GES has not been well defined. We evaluated the clinical importance of EGG, its correlation with mucosal electrograms (mEGs), gastric emptying tests (GETs), and gastrointestinal symptoms before and after temporary GES (tGES). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 1345 patients; 991 had complete data. EGG measurements like frequency and amplitude were recorded at baseline and five days post-tGES using short recording periods. A total of 266 participants having additional cutaneous propagation values were separately analyzed. Patients underwent solid GET before and after tGES and self-reported symptoms using standardized traditional patient-reported outcomes (TradPRO) scores. Pearson correlations were assessed at baseline, post-stimulation, and their changes over the follow-up period. RESULTS: EGG measures correlated with symptoms and GET results. Patients with abnormal baseline cutaneous frequency had higher baseline total symptom scores (p < 0.003). Post-tGES, one-hour gastric emptying was significantly changed (p < 0.0001) and was mainly observed with abnormal baseline cutaneous frequencies (p < 0.0001). Cutaneous frequency significantly increased after tGES (p < 0.0001), correlating positively with TradPRO scores and one-hour gastric emptying. Mucosal and cutaneous measures correlated pre- and post-treatment. Of the 266 patients, 153 changed propagation states between baseline and temporary; changing states from lower at baseline to higher at temporary was more likely than vice versa. Short EGG recording times can demonstrate changes after the bioelectric therapy of GES. CONCLUSION: EGG is valuable in the diagnosis of delayed gastric emptying and comparable with mEG. It is less invasive and can identify patients who may require GES. Frequency, amplitude, their ratio (frequency-amplitude ratio), and propagation appear to be reliable measures of EGG. EGG provides cost-effective measurement of electrophysiological properties and significantly correlates with important clinical measures. Shorter EGG recording times may be adequate to see changes from bioelectric therapies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number for the study is NCT03876288.

Baseline predictive factors for foregut and hindgut response to long-term gastric electrical stimulation using augmented energy.

INTRODUCTION: Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) has been recommended for drug refractory patients with gastroparesis, but no clear baseline predictors of symptom response exist. We hypothesized that long-term predictors to GES for foregut and hindgut symptoms exist, particularly when using augmented energies. PATIENTS: We evaluated 307 patients at baseline, 1 week post temporary GES, and one year after permanent GES. Baseline measures included upper and lower symptoms by patient-reported outcomes (PRO), solid and liquid gastric emptying (GET), cutaneous, mucosal, and serosal electrophysiology (EGG, m/s EG), BMI, and response to temporary stimulation. METHODS: Foregut and hindgut PRO symptoms were analyzed for 12-month patient outcomes. All patients utilized a standardized energy algorithm with the majority of patients receiving medium energy at 12 months. Patients were categorized based on change in average GI symptom scores at the time of permanent GES compared to baseline using a 10% decrease over time as the cutoff between improvers versus non-improvers. RESULTS: By permanent GES implant, average foregut and hindgut GI symptom scores reduced 42% in improved patients (n = 199) and increased 27% in non-improved patients (n = 108). Low BMI, baseline infrequent urination score, mucosal EG ratio, and proximal mucosal EG low-resolution amplitude remained significant factors for improvement status. CONCLUSIONS: GES, for patients responding positively, improved both upper/foregut and lower/hindgut symptoms with most patients utilizing higher than nominal energies. Low baseline BMI and the presence of infrequent urination along with baseline gastric electrophysiology may help identify those patients with the best response to GES/bio-electric neuromodulation.

Pathophysiology of Gastroparesis Syndromes Includes Anatomic and Physiologic Abnormalities.

BACKGROUND: Factors underlying gastroparesis are not well defined. AIMS: We hypothesized that multiple systems may be involved in patients with gastroparesis symptoms and performed a comparative physiologic study. METHODS: We studied 43 consecutive eligible patients with gastroparetic symptoms categorized by GI symptoms, metabolic status, illness quantification, and gastric physiology. Patients were evaluated by two methods in each of five core areas: inflammatory, autonomic, enteric, electrophysiologic, and hormonal with abnormalities examined by correlations. RESULTS: Patients had similar GI symptoms regardless of baseline gastric emptying or diabetic/idiopathic status, and all patients demonstrated abnormalities in each of the 5 areas studied. Nearly all patients presented with elevated markers of serum TNFα (88%) and serum IL-6 (91%); elevated cutaneous electrogastrogram frequency (95%); and interstitial cells of Cajal count abnormalities (inner: 97%, outer: 100%). Measures of inflammation correlated with a number of autonomic, enteric anatomy, electrophysiologic and hormonal abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that patients with the symptoms of gastroparesis have multiple abnormalities, when studied by traditional, as well as newer, diagnostic assessments. Inflammation appears to be a fundamental abnormality that affects other organ systems in symptomatic patients. Future work on gastroparetic syndromes and their treatment may benefit from a focus on the diffuse nature of their illness, diverse pathophysiologic mechanisms involved, especially the possible causes of underlying inflammation and disordered hormonal status. TRAIL REGISTRY: This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov under study # NCT03178370 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03178370 .

The Surgeon's Role in Gastric Electrical Stimulation Therapy for Gastroparesis.

INTRODUCTION: Gastroparesis, which can be viewed as a syndrome featuring nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain, and associated other symptoms and findings, is increasingly seen by surgeons. Gastroparesis is associated with a number of gastrointestinal anatomic and physiologic findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This article reviews the use of bioelectric therapy of neuromodulation, via gastric electrical stimulation, for patients with drug refractory gastroparesis syndromes including surgical aspects of device placement and subsequent management. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In addition to an overall approach to the placement and subsequent management of gastric electrical stimulation devices, several newer concepts are discussed. The role of pyloric dysfunction in gastroparesis is also discussed including how stimulation devices and pyloric therapies may be used in concert. The additions of full-thickness gastrointestinal biopsies along with other physiologic, including GI electrophysiology, as well as some serologic measures, are also discussed. In addition, evolving approaches and emerging technologies for bioelectric neuromodulation of the gastrointestinal tract are introduced. CONCLUSIONS: Gastroparesis syndromes can be approached in a systematic manner based on known pathophysiology and when indicated can be helped with surgical therapies including neuromodulation.

Gastric Electrical Stimulation Has an Effect on Gastric Interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) That is Associated With Mast Cells.

Introduction Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is an emerging therapy for gastric motility disorders, showing improvement of gastroparesis related symptoms in previous studies. Interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) and mast cells have been shown to have a relevant role in gastroparesis pathogenesis. However, the exact effects of GES in those cells is relatively unknown. Methods Full thickness biopsies (FTBx) of 20 patients with refractory gastroparesis were obtained at the time of GES placement and repeated when the device was exchanged (mean of 22.5 months between biopsies). A patient-reported outcomes survey was obtained during each office visit during this period. All biopsies were stained with cluster of differentiation 117 (CD117), S100, and mast cell tryptase antibodies and were analyzed. Results Half of the patients had a significant increase of ICC during the repeated biopsy compared with baseline (p=0.01) and the other half had significant decrease in ICC levels (p=0.006) but there was no noticeable difference in mast cells counts at baseline between groups. Mast cells analysis was performed in two different groups depending on ICC change from the baseline biopsy (CD117 increase vs CD117 decrease). There was only a significant increase of mast cells count within the CD117 worsened ICC group (p=0.007). Conclusion No significant increase in the number of mast cells count seen in patients who received a GES may indicate an improvement in overall inflammation in patients with refractory gastroparesis after GES placement.

Gastric Electrical Stimulators Causing Erosion Through the Colonic Wall.

Gastroparesis is a chronic motor disorder of the stomach characterized by the demonstration of delayed gastric emptying without obstruction and a grouping of symptoms including nausea, vomiting, early satiety, postprandial fullness, bloating and abdominal pain. When conservative medical management is not effective, gastric electrical stimulation is an effective alternative. Gastric electrical stimulation, in general, has had a low complication rate as of yet, with the most common being infection of the implanted device. We present a complication in which the gastric electrical stimulator electrodes eroded through the colonic wall.

Effects of Gastric Neuromodulation on Crohn's Disease in Patients With Coexisting Symptoms of Gastroparesis.

INTRODUCTION: Crohn's Disease (CD) results from chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract involving TNF-α release. Gastrointestinal electrical stimulation (GES), a form of neuromodulation used to treat upper GI motility symptoms (UGI Sx), exerts an anti-inflammatory effect via TNF-α suppression. We hypothesized patients with CD symptoms in patients with gastroparesis (GP) may respond to GES. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 284 patients with symptomatic gastroparesis (Gp Sx), who underwent GES placement. Patients with Gp Sx were evaluated by validated GI Sx patient reported outcome. Scores were obtained at baseline, after temporary GES placement and after permanent GES placement. Eleven patients from this cohort with coexisting CD were analyzed for improvements in their CD symptomatology using the Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI). HBI scores were compared from before GES to after two sequential applications of electrical stimulation (temporary then permanent). A 3-point decrease in HBI indicated a clinical response and an HBI <5 indicated clinical remission after GES. An unadjusted repeated measures model was used in the analysis with statistical significance set at p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: Our cohort prevalence of CD was 3.9% (2 M & 9 F, mean age 49.8 yrs.). Within both the Gp + CD & Gp subgroups, UGI Sx substantially improved after temporary and permanent GES. Furthermore, 55% of the GP + CD subgroup demonstrated a clinical response by HBI, while one patient achieved clinical remission (p < 0.01). CD medications were reviewed before and after GES placement, and any interval changes are unlikely to explain the improved HBI scores. DISCUSSION: We conclude that both UGI and CD symptoms in GP + CD patients responded well to GES. The interaction of Gp and CD and the effects of neuromodulation on CD symptoms warrant additional investigation.

Gastric Electrical Stimulation Is an Effective Treatment Modality for Refractory Gastroparesis in a Postsurgical Patient with Pancreatic Cancer.

Gastroparesis-related hospital visits contribute significantly to healthcare costs. Gastroparesis can lead to chronic symptoms, such as nausea, vomiting, bloating, early satiety, and abdominal pain. It can result in a significant impairment of quality of life. Diabetes and postsurgery are common causes for gastroparesis, but most cases of gastroparesis are idiopathic in presumed etiology. Malignancy-related gastroparesis has also recently been described in the literature, and pancreatic cancer is a malignancy commonly associated with gastroparesis. Whipple surgery for pancreatic cancer is often complicated by gastroparesis during its postoperative course. We report a case where gastric electrical stimulation was an effective treatment option in the treatment of refractory malignancy-related gastroparesis.

Multi-day, multi-sensor ambulatory monitoring of gastric electrical activity.

OBJECTIVE: Bioelectrial signals known as slow waves play a key role in coordinating gastric motility. Slow wave dysrhythmias have been associated with a number of functional motility disorders. However, there have been limited human recordings obtained in the consious state or over an extended period of time. This study aimed to evaluate a robust ambulatory recording platform. APPROACH: A commercially available multi-sensor recording system (Shimmer3, ShimmerSensing) was applied to acquire slow wave information from the stomach of six humans and four pigs. First, acute experiments were conducted in pigs to verify the accuracy of the recording module by comparing to a standard widely employed electrophysiological mapping system (ActiveTwo, BioSemi). Then, patients with medically refractory gastroparesis undergoing temporary gastric stimulator implantation were enrolled and gastric slow waves were recorded from mucosally-implanted electrodes for 5 d continuously. Accelerometer data was also collected to exclude data segments containing excessive patient motion artefact. MAIN RESULTS: Slow wave signals and activation times from the Shimmer3 module were closely comparable to a standard electrophysiological mapping system. Slow waves were able to be recorded continuously for 5 d in human subjects. Over the 5 d, slow wave frequency was 2.8 ± 0.6 cpm and amplitude was 0.2 ± 0.3 mV. SIGNIFICANCE: A commercial multi-sensor recording module was validated for recording electrophysiological slow waves for 5 d, including in ambulatory patients. Multiple modules could be used simultaneously in the future to track the spatio-temporal propagation of slow waves. This framework can now allow for patho-electrophysiological studies to be undertaken to allow symptom correlation with dysrhythmic slow wave events.

Gastroparesis syndromes: Response to electrical stimulation.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Factors underlying gastroparesis are not well defined, nor is the mechanism of action of gastric electrical stimulation (GES). We hypothesized that GES acts via several mechanisms related to underlying disordered pathophysiology. METHODS: We studied 43 consecutive eligible patients with gastroparetic symptoms, previously evaluated by two methods in each of five core areas: inflammatory, autonomic, enteric, electrophysiologic, and hormonal; and also categorized by GI symptoms, metabolic status, illness quantification, and gastric physiology. We then studied 41 patients who underwent temporary GES for 5-7 days. Thirty-six of those patients were implanted and 30 were followed up at 6 months after permanent GES. RESULTS: In previous but separately reported work, patients had similar GI symptoms regardless of baseline gastric emptying or diabetic/idiopathic status and all patients demonstrated abnormalities in each of the five areas studied. After GES, patients showed early and late effects of electrical stimulation with changes noted in multiple areas, categorized by improvement status. CONCLUSION: Patients with symptoms of gastroparesis have multiple abnormalities, including systemic inflammation and disordered hormonal status. GES affects many of these abnormalities. We conclude electrical stimulation improves symptoms and physiology with (a) an early and sustained anti-emetic effect; (b) an early and durable gastric prokinetic effect in delayed emptying patients; (c) an early anti-arrhythmic effect that continues over time; (d) a late autonomic effect; (e) a late hormonal effect; (f) an early anti-inflammatory effect that persists; and (g) an early and sustained improvement in health-related quality of life. This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov under study # NCT03178370 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03178370).

The Effect of Gastric Electrical Stimulation on Small Bowel Motility in Patients With Gastroparesis and Concomitant Pancreatic and Small Bowel Dysfunction: From Animal Model to Human Application.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patients with gastroparesis often have biliary/pancreatic and small bowel symptoms but the effects of gastric electrical stimulation on small bowel electrical activity of the mid-gut have not been studied. Animal model aim: Establish gastric and upper small bowel/biliary slow wave activity relationships with electrical stimulation. Human study aim: Demonstrate improvement in symptoms associated with proximal small bowel dysmotility in gastric stimulated patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Animal model: In vivo evoked responses of duodenal and Sphincter of Oddi measures recorded during gastric electrical stimulation in a nonsurvival swine model (N = 3). High-resolution electrical slow wave mapping of frequency, amplitude, and their ratio, for duodenal and Sphincter of Oddi electrical activity were recorded. Human study: Patients (N = 8) underwent temporary gastric stimulation with small bowel electrodes. Subjective and objective data was collected before and after temporary gastric stimulation. Symptom scores, gastric emptying times, and mucosal electrograms via low-resolution mapping were recorded. RESULTS: Animal gastric stimulation resulted in some changes in electrical activity parameters, especially with the highest energies delivered but the changes were not statistically significant. Human study revealed improvement in symptom and illness severity scores, and changes in small bowel mucosal slow wave activity. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric electrical stimulation in an animal model seems to show nonsignificant effects small bowel slow wave activity and myoelectric signaling, suggesting the existence of intrinsic neural connections. Human data shows more significance, with possible potential for therapeutic use of electrical stimulation in patients with gastroparesis and pancreato-biliary and small bowel symptoms of the mid-gut. This study was limited by the nonsurvival pig model, small sample size, and open label human study.

Differences in Referral Access to Care Between Gastrointestinal Subspecialty Patients: Barriers and Opportunities.

Purpose: Referral access to subspecialty care for patients with gastrointestinal (GI) diseases is not well defined, but has significant importance to patients. We hypothesized that patients experience barriers to care in two common gastroenterology subspecialties, Hepatology and Motility, in a university medical center. Methods: Two hundred thirteen clinic patients (mean age 46.5 years; 66.5% female; 85.6% Caucasians) completed a formatted questionnaire on access to care. Hepatology patients were older (49.7 years, p=0.008); motility patients predominantly female (76.8%, p<0.001). Gender distribution was even for hepatology (51.2% female). Both groups were overweight (mean body mass index 28.4). Results: Patients waited a mean 89.5 days to be seen by a subspecialist. There were differences by subspecialty (107.6 days for motility vs. 64.3 days for hepatology, p=0.022). A larger percentage of motility patients were told nothing was wrong with them (16.8%, p<0.01) and could not be helped (42.1%, p=0.000). Conclusions: Access to care for subspecialty gastroenterology patients in a university center appears to be impacted by a number of variables. While there are similarities, differences exist between these two subspecialties. Motility patients were more likely to have been told they have nothing wrong with them, suffer setbacks financially, and suffer mood problems. Their wait time for appointments was also greater than hepatology patients. Further investigations of referral access for gastroenterology patients may yield additional insights into disease-specific barriers to accessing subspecialty care.

Clinical Efficacy of Serum-Derived Bovine Immunoglobulin in Patients With Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can have autoimmunity and/or intestinal barrier dysfunction as part of pathophysiology and may be refractory to all available treatment options. Serum-derived bovine immunoglobulin (SBI) binds microbial components with postulated downstream effects of normalized gut immune and barrier function, which may be useful for managing IBD. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of SBI in the management of refractory IBD, particularly symptoms of chronic diarrhea and loose stools. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed charts for patients diagnosed with IBD (n = 40) who were refractory to standard treatment. Patients received oral SBI 5 g daily for a period of at least 6 weeks. Twelve patients with IBD fulfilled study inclusion criteria. Each patient graded the severity and frequency of gastrointestinal symptoms before starting SBI and at 6 weeks of treatment using a standardized patient assessment form. Means and standard deviations for all symptom scores at baseline and week 6 of treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean symptom scores decreased significantly for nausea (P = 0.02 for severity and P = 0.03 for mean symptom score) and diarrhea (P = 0.0006, P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0001 for severity, frequency and mean symptom score, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Therapy with SBI alleviated some refractory gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with IBD, including nausea and diarrhea. Increased duration, dosage and/or frequency of SBI might provide additional symptom improvement and could be tested through controlled clinical trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up.

Ambulatory gastric mucosal slow wave recording for chronic experimental studies.

Dysrhythmic bioelectric slow wave activity have been implicated in major functional motility disorders such as gastroparesis and chronic unexplained nausea and vomiting, but its correlation to symptoms is still unclear. For patients with severe gastroparesis, high-frequency gastric stimulation is offered as a therapy in some centers. Temporary gastric electrical stimulation has also been proposed an approach to screen patients who would benefit from the implantation of a permanent stimulator. In this study we introduced novel methods for recording slow wave activity from the gastric mucosa during the entire temporary stimulation phase of 5 days, in 3 patients. An ambulatory recording system was applied to record 3 channels of mucosal slow wave activity, as well as three axis accelerometer data to monitor when the patient was mobile. Techniques were developed to detect large movements and these time periods were excluded from analyses of mucosal slow waves. The frequency and amplitude of the slow waves was calculated in a 5 min segment, with 75% overlap, for the entire duration. In feasibility studies, the slow wave frequency and amplitude for the patients were 3.0±0.96 cpm and 1.43±1.75 mV. Large variations in slow wave amplitude were seen in comparsion to slow wave frequency, which were concordant with previous studies. The use of the ambulatory system will allow for investigation of pathophysiology, correlation of electrophysiology data to patient symptoms and to determine the effects of post-prandial and noctural slow wave patterns. We anticipate that future use of slow wave information alongside patient symptoms may allow improved selection of patients for stimulaton techniques.