Unconditioned and conditioned effects of intranasally administered insulin vs placebo in healthy men: a randomised controlled trial.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: In humans, the intranasal route allows insulin to reach the brain while maintaining peripheral euglycaemia. Our aims were to examine acute (unconditioned) effects of central insulin on normal-range blood glucose and hormones in men, and to find out whether the effects of intranasal insulin can be learnt via classical conditioning. METHODS: In a randomised controlled trial, 32 healthy normal-weight men (mean age 24.2 [SEM 0.5], mean BMI 22.4 [0.3]) received a conditioned stimulus (CS) and six administrations of either soluble H-insulin 100 (20 U [0.2 ml]; group 1; n = 16) or vehicle (0.2 ml; group 2; n = 16) on day 1. The CS was the tarry smell of meta-cresol (used as a stabilising vehicle in many insulin preparations and placebos). On day 2, all participants received the CS and six administrations of placebo. Participants and experimenters were blinded to group assignment. Sixteen individuals were randomised to and analysed in each group. Participants were sequentially numbered for group allocation. The main outcome measures were blood glucose and insulin, expressed as cumulative difference-from-baseline changes. RESULTS: While maintaining euglycaemia, intranasal insulin induced an increase of peripheral insulin on day 1 (group 1, 17.78 [21.88] pmol/l vs group 2, -10.24 [9.42] pmol/l), and also on day 2 when the CS was given with placebo (group 1, 12.53 [5.57] pmol/l vs group 2, -5.51 [6.16] pmol/l). Moreover, a moderate reduction of blood glucose on day 1 (group 1, -0.54 [0.36] mmol/l vs group 2, 0.58 [0.48] mmol/l) was obtained (all p values <0.05). There were no adverse side effects. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: The unconditioned blood glucose decrease on day 1 and the unconditioned and conditioned increases of peripheral insulin are indicative of brain-pancreas cross-talk. The conditionability of the hormonal responses reveals new applications for intranasal insulin. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00000537 http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/ FUNDING: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG STO 323/1-1 and 1-2.

Pavlovian conditioning of taste aversion using a motion sickness paradigm.

OBJECTIVE: Pavlovian conditioning of taste aversion has rarely been investigated in healthy humans using motion sickness as the unconditioned stimulus (US). METHODS: Ninety subjects were pretested for susceptibility to illusory motion (vection) in a rotating drum. Thirty-two subjects susceptible to pseudomotion were assigned randomly to two groups and received either water 1 hour before rotation and a novel taste (elderberry juice, conditioned stimulus, [CS]) immediately before rotation in a rotating chair (conditioning group), or the sequence of water and juice was reversed (control group). During the test session 1 week later, all subjects were exposed to water 1 hour before and juice immediately before rotation. The amount of liquids ingested, nausea ratings, rotation tolerance, and blood levels of hormones (ACTH, ADH, PP) were evaluated. RESULTS: Subjects in the conditioning group developed taste aversion toward the novel taste, but not subjects in the control group. Postrotation nausea rating was affected marginally by conditioning, but rotation tolerance was not changed by conditioning. ACTH and ADH but not PP levels increased with rotation, but were unaffected by conditioning. CONCLUSIONS: Pavlovian conditioning of behavioral, but not of endocrine, indicators was effective in susceptible subjects using a rotating chair as US and a single CS-US pairing.

Anticipatory symptoms and anticipatory immune responses in pediatric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: features of a classically conditioned response?

UNLABELLED: There is considerable evidence from studies in adult patients that classical conditioning contributes to anticipatory nausea and/or vomiting (ANV) in cancer chemotherapy: The stimuli predicting the infusion serve as conditioned stimuli (CS). When reexposed to the CS, some patients experience ANV prior to infusion onset. In adult patients, anticipatory immunomodulation (AIM) has also been observed. The present study examines whether ANV and AIM occur in pediatric cancer patients and whether they show features of a conditioned response. METHODS: Nineteen pediatric cancer patients (M = 10.1 years, > 2 previous chemotherapies) were studied over two consecutive cycles (A, B). In both cycles, self-reported symptoms, for example nausea and vomiting, were recorded from two days prior to the onset (Day -2), during infusion, and two days after the end of the infusion (Day +2). In Cycle B, blood was drawn at home at Day -2, and at Day 0 in the hospital prior to infusion onset, thus using a quasi-experimental variation of the CS content of the environment. Immune parameters valid for tumor defense and cytotoxic competence (natural killer cell activity [NKCA], plasma interleukin [IL]-1beta, IL-2, IL-10, interferon [IFN]-gamma, tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-alpha) and cortisol were measured. RESULTS: ANV was reported by 7 patients in at least one cycle. In Cycle A, ANV was positively associated with emetogenity of chemotherapy. Features of ANV-duration and occurrence-tended to be positively associated with those of posttreatment nausea and vomiting. AN increased as infusion onset time approached. NKCA and IFN-gamma increased from home to hospital, independent from cortisol level. The NKCA increase was predominantly observed in patients with ANV. CONCLUSIONS: ANV in pediatric patients showed features of a CR. Immune parameters were sensitive to the CS content of the environment, predominantly in patients with ANV. This is consistent with the manifestation of multiple CRs.

Pavlovian conditioning of immune function: animal investigation and the challenge of human application.

Pavlovian conditioning of immune functions provided early impetus to the rapidly expanding knowledge of bi-directional communication among the immune, endocrine, and central nervous systems. Since these early investigations, the phenomenology of this response has been well characterized. However the neural mechanisms and biological relevance of conditioned immunomodulation remain unclear. To this end, we present here data from our laboratories that have: (1) revealed some of the neural mechanisms and biological relevance of an animal model of conditioned immunomodulation; (2) demonstrated the conditionability and potential mechanisms of conditioned immune responses in healthy humans, and (3) investigated conditioned immunomodulation in a clinical sample. Together, these data demonstrate that animal models provide a basis for investigating mechanisms whereby conditioned changes in immune function may modulate health status in a clinical realm.

Classically conditioned responses following repeated insulin and glucose administration in humans.

This paper describes the neural basis and the role of Pavlovian conditioning in the modification of blood glucose and related endocrine parameters after repeated insulin and glucose administration. Pavlovian conditioning requires that conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (US) are both detected in the central nervous system (CNS), where the CS-US association takes place. We will therefore elucidate the detectability of insulin and glucose in the CNS. Since current data focus almost exclusively on animals, we conducted a placebo-controlled insulin conditioning experiment in humans (Experiment 1). Compared with the control group with CS-placebo pairings throughout, the experimental group with previous CS-insulin pairings in the acquisition phase showed a conditioned decrease in blood glucose and a trend for a conditioned baseline insulin increase, and an increase in cortisol levels relative to baseline and cumulative number of neuroglycopenic symptoms in the CS-placebo test session. The conditionability of glucose administration also had to be examined; experiments using an arbitrary CS and glucose are extremely rare, even in animals. Glucose is the natural stimulus for endogenous insulin secretion, so studies on cephalic-phase insulin release (CPIR) will be reviewed in this paper. We implemented a placebo-controlled three-group design (Experiment 2): Subjects received either CS-insulin, CS-glucose or CS-placebo pairings during the acquisition. Together, our results demonstrate the conditionability mainly of insulin, but also of glucose effects in healthy humans. The clinical relevance and future research perspectives are outlined with an emphasis on insulin in the brain and its role in learning and memory.

Classical conditioning of insulin effects in healthy humans.

OBJECTIVE: Classical conditioning of insulin effects was examined in healthy humans using a placebo-controlled design. This study examined whether subjects who experienced a conditioned stimulus (CS) paired with insulin in the acquisition phase of a conditioning protocol would show a conditioned decrease of blood glucose when receiving the CS with a placebo injection in the test phase. METHODS: Twenty healthy male students were assigned either to group 1, which received insulin (0.035 IU/kg i.v.), or to group 2, which received i.v. saline on 4 consecutive days (acquisition). On day 5 (test), both groups were injected with saline. The CS was an olfactory stimulus. Blood glucose, serum insulin, plasma glucagon, plasma catecholamines, serum cortisol, and symptoms were repeatedly measured during each session. RESULTS: In the test phase, group 1 reacted with a significantly larger decrease of blood glucose after presentation of the CS than group 2. Within group 1, a larger conditioned blood glucose decrease was associated with features that enhance classical conditioning (ie, intensity of the unconditioned response and intensity of the CS). Furthermore, in group 1, there was an increase of baseline insulin from day 1 to day 5 and a tendency for insulin reduction after CS presentation. Groups also tended to differ in cortisol and neuroglycopenic symptoms after CS presentation. CONCLUSIONS: Conditioned effects in blood glucose are in accordance with the predictions. As a result of the exploratory analyses, our data also provide hints about conditioned changes in insulin, counterregulatory hormones, and symptoms.

Effects of overshadowing on conditioned nausea in cancer patients: an experimental study.

The infusion of cytotoxic drugs in cancer patients is often accompanied by posttreatment nausea (PN). In addition, patients complain about nausea prior to an infusion [i.e., anticipatory nausea (AN)]. AN is mainly explained by classical conditioning, with the infusion as the unconditioned stimulus (US) and with the stimuli signaling the infusion as conditioned stimuli (CS). Despite this conditioning etiology, a specifically derived therapy to attenuate the CS-US contingency is missing. The purpose of this study is to develop and to test an overshadowing procedure for prevention of AN, and also for the modification of PN intensity. Sixteen cancer patients were assigned to one of two groups: Overshadowing+ (OV+) and Overshadowing- (OV-). At the start of all infusions of two consecutive chemotherapy cycles A and B (acquisition), OV+ subjects drank a saliently tasting beverage (the overshadowing CS), whereas group OV- drank water. All patients received water in cycle C (test). Self-reported symptoms and heart rates were recorded. As expected, in cycle C (test), no patient of group OV+ showed AN, whereas two patients of group OV- developed AN. There was a tendency for a reduction of the intensity of PN, in terms of duration and latency after overshadowing, in cycle C: OV+ patients tended to show a shorter duration and a longer latency between end of infusion and PN onset. In OV-, there was a significantly larger heart rate deceleration in both measurement periods, in the anticipatory and the posttreatment measurement period. Data suggest to apply overshadowing for prevention of AN and modification of PN. Physiological markers of conditioned nausea are revealed. After its procedural implementation, the technique can be used in larger samples now.

[Anticipatory nausea and anticipatory vomiting, food aversion and anticipatory immunomodulation: classical conditioning in cytostatic drug treatment of pediatric chemotherapy patients]. / Antizipatorische Ubelkeit und antizipatorisches Erbrechen, Nahrungsaversion und antizipatorische Immunmodulation: Klassische Konditionierung bei zytostatisch behandelten pädiatrischen Chemotherapiepatienten.

Nausea and/or vomiting are adverse side-effects of cancer chemotherapeutic drugs in adult as well as pediatric cancer patients' complicating treatment and compliance. Nausea and vomiting are not only experienced as posttreatment symptoms after chemotherapy (i.e., posttreatment nausea and/or vomiting). In a subgroup of cancer patients, these symptoms also occur prior to a chemotherapeutic drug infusion, called anticipatory nausea (AN) and anticipatory vomiting (AV). The aim of this paper is to present a model derived from basic psychology to explain anticipatory symptoms as learned responses based on classical conditioning. In addition, food aversions and also immunomodulation are interpreted as conditioned responses. Some data on prevalence of ANV in a pediatric sample and on the correspondence between anticipatory symptoms and predictions from the conditioning model are presented. Finally, therapeutic techniques to prevent AN and/or AV are deduced from the conditioning model.

Effects of different accessibility of reinforcement schedules on choice in humans.

Based on the delay-reduction hypothesis, a less profitable schedule should be rejected if its duration exceeds the mean delay to reinforcement. It should be accepted if its duration is shorter than the mean delay. This was tested for humans, using a successive-choice schedule. The accessibility of the less profitable (variable-interval 18 s) schedule was varied by changing the duration (in terms of a fixed interval) of the waiting-time component preceding its presentation. Forty-eight students were randomly assigned to three groups. In Phase 1, the duration of the less profitable schedule equaled the mean delay to reinforcement in all groups. In Phase 2, waiting time preceding the less profitable schedule was reduced in Group 1 and increased in Group 2. Thus, the schedule was correlated either with a relative delay increase (Group 1) or a delay reduction (Group 2). In Group 3, conditions remained unchanged. As predicted, acceptance of the less profitable schedule decreased in Group 1 and increased in Group 2. The increased acceptance in Group 2 was accompanied by a decreased acceptance of the more profitable (variable-interval 3 s) schedule, resembling a pattern of negative contrast. Response rates were higher under the component preceding (a) the more profitable schedule in Group 1 and (b) the less profitable schedule in Group 2. Implications for the modification of human choice behavior are discussed.

Anticipatory nausea in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: classical conditioning etiology and therapeutical implications.

The delivery of cytotoxic drugs in cancer treatment is often accompanied by posttreatment side effects (e.g., nausea). Moreover, there is evidence that cancer patients are at risk to develop these side effects in anticipation of chemotherapy (i.e., anticipatory nausea [AN]). AN can be explained as the result of a classical conditioning process with the cytotoxic drug as the unconditioned stimulus (US). Stimuli paired with the US (e.g., smells, tastes) can become conditioned stimuli (CSs) eliciting AN as the conditioned response (CR). The present study was conducted to test whether AN shows characteristics of a CR. Fifty-five ambulatory cancer patients were asked to record nine kinds of physical symptoms (e.g., nausea, vomiting, sweating) on time-scheduled symptom lists: after an infusion (indicating posttreatment symptoms) and prior to their next infusion (indicating anticipatory symptoms). Each measurement period covered a maximum of 48 hours. AN was reported by ten patients (18.08%). Data revealed (a) a statistically significant association between posttreatment nausea and vomiting, respectively, and AN; (b) the occurrence of AN increased with drug emetogenity (i.e., US-intensity); and (c) the duration of AN increased with temporal proximity to the infusion. The results support the conditioning model. Thus, it is proposed to prevent AN by classical conditioning techniques (e.g., overshadowing).