Splenic embolization in liver transplant recipients: early outcomes.

Clinical improvement has been reported following splenic embolization for a wide variety of indications. Improvement following splenic embolization has been described in cirrhotic patients awaiting hepatic transplantation who are not candidates for surgical splenectomy. Occasionally, patients who have undergone hepatic transplantation have conditions that may also benefit from nonsurgical intervention with splenic embolization. Indications include persistent hypersplenism and pancytopenia precluding optimal treatment with antiviral therapy or chemotherapy, risk for persistent gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage, and splenic artery steal syndrome attenuating hepatic arterial perfusion. Limited data is available on the outcome of splenic embolization in liver transplant recipients. We present the early outcomes of liver transplant recipients who were treated with splenic embolization. A retrospective chart review of all liver transplant recipients who underwent splenic embolization between 1997 and 2006 was performed, under minimal-risk study approval by the institutional review board. Five liver transplant recipients received splenic embolization: 3 for persistent hypersplenism, 1 for increased risk of gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage, and 1 for splenic artery steal syndrome. The patients with hypersplenism demonstrated hematologic improvement, the patient with gastroesophageal varices did not experience any hemorrhage on follow-up, and the patient with splenic artery steal experienced resolution of the steal phenomenon. Postembolization syndrome was observed but no splenic abscess or death occurred. Mean follow-up was 20.2 months. In conclusion, splenic embolization is a safe and effective nonsurgical alternative for a variety of indications in liver transplant recipients.

Preoperative chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing liver transplantation: influence of emergent versus elective procedures on patient survival and tumor recurrence rate.

Our purpose was to compare the recurrence rate and survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had elective transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), immediate preoperative TACE, or no treatment prior to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). A total of 132 patients with HCC had TACE prior to OLT. Eighteen patients had no TACE before OLT and functioned as a control group. The urgent group included 35 patients embolized less than 24 h before OLT and the elective group included 97 patients embolized greater than 1 day before transplantation. These groups were compared with regard to tumor staging, hepatic synthetic function, and post-TACE tumor necrosis and survival and recurrence rates. Patients were followed for a mean of 780 days post OLT (1-2912 days). The tumor staging was similar between groups but the Childs-Pugh score in the urgent and untreated group was significantly higher than that of the other groups. The degree of necrosis at explant was also significantly different between the two treated groups, with an average 35% necrosis in the patients embolized less than 24 h before OLT vs 77% in the elective group (p < 0.002). Recurrence rate in the urgent group was 8 of 35 (23%) in a median of 580 days, 20 of 97 (21%) in a median of 539 days in the elective group, and 2 of 18 (11%) in a median of 331 days in the no-TACE group. Survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 91%, 80%, and 72% in the elective group, 79%, 58%, and 39% in the urgent group, and 69%, 61%, and 41% in the no-TACE group, respectively. The urgent and no-TACE groups had significantly worse survival compared with the other groups; however, the tumor recurrence rates were statistically the same among all three groups. TACE within 24 h of OLT causes an average of 35% necrosis and elective TACE increases necrosis further to 77%. Despite this difference, the tumor recurrence rate in the three groups is equivalent and no different from that in the group that received no treatment before OLT. The decreased survival in the immediate and no-TACE groups was due to non-cancer-related deaths.