ABSTRACT
Policy change continues to be an increasingly effective means of advancing the agenda of comprehensive cancer control. Efforts have moved progressively from describing how public policy can enhance the comprehensive cancer control agenda to implementation of public policy best practices at both the state and federal levels. The current political and economic contexts bring additional challenges and opportunities to the efforts surrounding comprehensive cancer control and policy. The purpose of this paper is to highlight recent policy successes, to illustrate the importance of policy as a means of advancing the comprehensive cancer control agenda, and to discuss continued policy action as we move forward in a time of healthcare reform and continuing economic uncertainty.
Subject(s)
Comprehensive Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Plan Implementation/legislation & jurisprudence , Public Policy , Colorado , Comprehensive Health Care/methods , Comprehensive Health Care/organization & administration , Guam , Health Care Reform , Health Plan Implementation/methods , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Indians, North American , Oklahoma , Program Evaluation , Risk Assessment , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Well-Integrated Screening and Evaluation for Women Across the Nation (WISEWOMAN) provides low-income, underserved women ages 40-64 with risk factor screening and lifestyle intervention and referral services to prevent cardiovascular disease (CVD). Integrating WISEWOMAN's services with the culturally appropriate medical care and support services offered by community health centers may improve the program's ability to reduce CVD burden among underserved women. METHODS: We conducted a formative assessment of the perceived opportunities, challenges, and strategies associated with integrating WISEWOMAN into community health center settings. A panel of stakeholders that included health center and WISEWOMAN representatives was convened in 2002, and a semistructured discussion guide was used to elicit perspectives about integration. We also conducted an in-depth review of WISEWOMAN's history of collaboration with health centers in North Carolina. RESULTS: Stakeholders perceived a clear need for integrating WISEWOMAN within health center settings, indicating that centers have few other resources to expand preventive services delivery and offer effective lifestyle interventions for underserved populations. Perceived barriers to integration included competing demands on health center resources, difficulties hiring staff for new programs, and administrative burdens associated with data collection and reporting. Experiences within North Carolina's WISEWOMAN project demonstrate, however, that lifestyle interventions can be designed in ways that facilitate integration by health centers. CONCLUSIONS: Integration strategies need to be tailored to the resources, skills, and capacities available within health centers. As health centers and WISEWOMAN projects gain more experience in collaborating, additional research should be conducted to identify how best to achieve integration within specific institutional and community contexts.
