Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 894: 457-465, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27080687

ABSTRACT

An unexpected finding of previous psychophysical studies is that listeners show highly replicable, individualistic patterns of decision weights on frequencies affecting their performance in spectral discrimination tasks--what has been referred to as individual listening styles. We, like many other researchers, have attributed these listening styles to peculiarities in how listeners attend to sounds, but we now believe they partially reflect irregularities in cochlear micromechanics modifying what listeners hear. The most striking evidence for cochlear irregularities is the presence of low-level spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) measured in the ear canal and the systematic variation in stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs), both of which result from back-propagation of waves in the cochlea. SOAEs and SFOAEs vary greatly across individual ears and have been shown to affect behavioural thresholds, behavioural frequency selectivity and judged loudness for tones. The present paper reports pilot data providing evidence that SOAEs and SFOAEs are also predictive of the relative decision weight listeners give to a pair of tones in a level discrimination task. In one condition the frequency of one tone was selected to be near that of an SOAE and the frequency of the other was selected to be in a frequency region for which there was no detectable SOAE. In a second condition the frequency of one tone was selected to correspond to an SFOAE maximum, the frequency of the other tone, an SFOAE minimum. In both conditions a statistically significant correlation was found between the average relative decision weight on the two tones and the difference in OAE levels.


Subject(s)
Cochlea/physiology , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Humans
2.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 787: 203-11, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23716225

ABSTRACT

We rely critically on our ability to 'hear out' (segregate) individual sound sources in a mixture. Yet, despite its importance, little is known regarding this -ability. Perturbation analysis is a psychophysical method that has been successfully applied to related problems in vision [Murray, R.F. 2011. J. of Vision 11, 1-25]. Here the approach is adapted to audition. The application proceeds in three stages: First, simple speech and environmental sounds are synthesized according to a generative model of the sound--producing source. Second, listener decision strategy in segregating target from non--target (noise) sources is determined from decision weights (regression coefficients) relating listener judgments regarding the target to lawful perturbations in acoustic parameters, as dictated by the generative model. Third, factors limiting segregation are identified by comparing the obtained weights and residuals to those of a maximum-likelihood (ML) observer that optimizes segregation based on the equations of motion of the generating source. Here, the approach is applied to test between the two major models of sound source segregation; target enhancement versus noise cancellation. The results indicate a tendency of noise segregation to preempt target enhancement when the noise source is unchanging. However, the results also show individual differences in segregation strategy that are not evident in the measures of performance accuracy alone.


Subject(s)
Loudness Perception/physiology , Models, Neurological , Psychoacoustics , Psychophysics/methods , Speech Perception/physiology , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Hearing Loss/therapy , Humans , Noise , Phonetics , Signal Detection, Psychological/physiology
3.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 130(5): 2882-90, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22087917

ABSTRACT

Spectral density (D), defined as the number of partials comprising a sound divided by its bandwidth, has been suggested as cue for the identification of the size and shape of sound sources. Few data are available, however, on the ability of listeners to discriminate differences in spectral density. In a cue-comparison, forced-choice procedure with feedback, three highly practiced listeners discriminated differences in the spectral density of multitone complexes varying in bandwidth (W = 500-1500 Hz), center frequency (f(c) = 500-2000 Hz), and number of tones (N = 6-31). To reduce extraneous cues for discrimination, the overall level of the complexes was roved, and the frequencies were drawn at random uniformly over a fixed bandwidth and center frequency for each presentation. Psychometric functions were obtained relating percent correct discrimination to ΔD in each condition. For D < 0.02 Hz(-1), the steepness of the functions remained constant across conditions, but for D > 0.02 Hz(-1), they increased with D. The increase, moreover, was accompanied by a reduction in the upper asymptote of the functions. The data were well fit by a model in which spectral density discrimination is determined by the frequency separation of components on an equivalent rectangular bandwidth scale, yielding a roughly constant Weber fraction of ΔD/D = 0.3.


Subject(s)
Discrimination, Psychological , Pitch Discrimination , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Audiometry , Cues , Feedback, Psychological , Female , Humans , Models, Theoretical , Psychoacoustics , Sound Spectrography , Time Factors , Young Adult
4.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 130(2): EL62-8, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21877772

ABSTRACT

Impact sounds synthesized according to a physical model have increasingly become the stimulus of choice in studies of sound source perception. Few studies, however, have incorporated manner of contact in their models because of the complexity of the mechanics involved. Here a simplified model of contact is described suitable for application to perceptual research. The results of the simplified model are shown to be in good agreement with those of more comprehensive numerical methods receiving prior acoustic validation [Chaigne and Lambourg, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 1422-1432 (2001)]. The advantages of the model for applications to perceptual research are discussed.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Auditory Pathways/physiology , Models, Theoretical , Sound Localization , Algorithms , Computer Simulation , Humans , Motion , Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted , Reproducibility of Results , Sound , Time Factors , Vibration
5.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 129(4): 2104-11, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21476666

ABSTRACT

The auditory discrimination of force of impact was measured for three groups of listeners using sounds synthesized according to first-order equations of motion for the homogenous, isotropic bar [Morse and Ingard (1968). Theoretical Acoustics pp. 175-191]. The three groups were professional percussionists, nonmusicians, and individuals recruited from the general population without regard to musical background. In the two-interval, forced-choice procedure, listeners chose the sound corresponding to the greater force of impact as the length of the bar varied from one presentation to the next. From the equations of motion, a maximum-likelihood test for the task was determined to be of the form Δlog A + αΔ log f > 0, where A and f are the amplitude and frequency of any one partial and α = 0.5. Relative decision weights on Δ log f were obtained from the trial-by-trial responses of listeners and compared to α. Percussionists generally outperformed the other groups; however, the obtained decision weights of all listeners deviated significantly from α and showed variability within groups far in excess of the variability associated with replication. Providing correct feedback after each trial had little effect on the decision weights. The variability in these measures was comparable to that seen in studies involving the auditory discrimination of other source attributes.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Auditory Perception/physiology , Models, Neurological , Music , Psychoacoustics , Adult , Discrimination, Psychological/physiology , Feedback , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult
6.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 127(1): 350-60, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20058982

ABSTRACT

A computational formula is derived for estimating the constraints limited auditory sensitivity imposes on auditory identification of the material and geometric properties of struck bars. The formula combines a model of the transverse motion of the bar with empirical psychometric functions to map out "null" regions in the bar's physical parameter space where changes in the frequency, amplitude, and decay of partials are likely below threshold for detection. Parameters of the physical space include bar density, Young's modulus, fluid and viscoelastic damping factors, bar length, and bar cross-sectional area (as related to bar shape and hollowness). The formula is used to estimate the possible effect of limited sensitivity in past studies on the auditory identification of bar attributes. The results suggest that sensitivity may, indeed, have played a role in some studies, and that apparent discrepancies in results may be understood based on whether the predominant source of damping was internal or external to the bar. The formula identifies conditions representing an expected bound on identification performance and thereby may be used to aid in the design of future studies for which the struck bar is the sound source of choice.


Subject(s)
Acoustics , Auditory Perception , Mechanical Phenomena , Models, Biological , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Algorithms , Auditory Threshold , Female , Humans , Male , Motion , Psychoacoustics , Psychometrics
7.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 124(6): 3784-92, 2008 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19206804

ABSTRACT

Impact sounds were synthesized according to standard textbook equations given for the motion of simply supported, metal plates. In a two-interval, forced-choice procedure, highly practiced listeners identified from these sounds a predefined class of target plates based on their particular material and geometric properties. The effects of two factors on identification were examined: the relative level of partials comprising the sounds and the relative amount of information (given as the difference in d(')) each partial provided for identification. In different conditions one factor was fixed while the other either increased or decreased with frequency. The effect on listener identification in each case was determined from a logistic discriminant analysis of trial-by-trial responses, yielding a vector of listener decision weights on the frequency and decay of individual partials. The weights increased proportionally with relative level, but were largely uninfluenced by relative information content--a result exactly opposite to that expected from a maximum-likelihood observer. The dominant effect of relative level was replicated for other sound sources (clamped bars and stretched membranes) and was not diminished by randomizing the relative level of partials across trials. The results are taken to underscore the importance of relative level in the identification of rudimentary sound sources.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perception , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Cues , Discriminant Analysis , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Models, Biological , Reproducibility of Results , Sound Spectrography , Time Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...