Use of insect repellent as personal protection among women of childbearing age in an arbovirus endemic area in Northeastern Brazil.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the factors associated with the individual use of insect repellent by women of childbearing age living in area endemic for arboviruses in Fortaleza, Brazil. METHODS: This is a cohort study carried out between 2018 and 2019 with women aged between 15 and 39 years in Fortaleza, state of Ceará, Brazil. A total of 1,173 women users of one of the four selected primary health care units participated in the study. The outcome was divided into: continued use, discontinued use, and nonuse of insect repellent. Crude and adjusted multinominal logistic regression analysis was carried out guided by a hierarchical model, with presentation of the respective odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). The independent variables include: socioeconomic and demographic data, environmental and sanitary characteristics, knowledge of the insect repellent, and behavioral and pregnancy-related aspects. RESULTS: Only 28% of the participants reported using insect repellent during the two waves of the cohort. Women with higher education (OR=2.55; 95%CI 1.44-4.51); who are employed (OR=1.51; 95%CI 1.12-2.03); who received guidance from healthcare professionals (OR=1.74; 95%CI 1.28-2.36) and the media (OR=1.43; 95%CI 1.01-2.02); who intensified precautions against mosquitoes during the epidemic (OR=3.64; 95%CI 2.29-5.78); and who were pregnant between 2016 and 2019 (OR=2.80; 95%CI 1.83-4.30) had increased odds for continued use of insect repellent. CONCLUSION: The use of insect repellent among women of childbearing age was associated with a higher level of education, employment, guidance on insect repellent provided by healthcare professionals and the media, behavioral changes to protect against mosquitoes during the Zika virus epidemic, and pregnancy when occurring as of the beginning of the epidemic period.

Systematic Review of Scales for Measuring Infectious Disease-Related Stigma.

Infectious disease outbreaks are associated with substantial stigma, which can have negative effects on affected persons and communities and on outbreak control. Thus, measuring stigma in a standardized and validated manner early in an outbreak is critical to disease control. We reviewed existing scales used to assess stigma during outbreaks. Our findings show that many different scales have been developed, but few have been used more than once, have been adequately validated, or have been tested in different disease and geographic contexts. We found that scales were usually developed too slowly to be informative early during an outbreak and were published a median of 2 years after the first case of an outbreak. A rigorously developed, transferable stigma scale is needed to assess and direct responses to stigma during infectious disease outbreaks.

A rapid qualitative methods assessment and reporting tool for epidemic response as the outcome of a rapid review and expert consultation.

During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Methods Sub-Group of the WHO COVID-19 Social Science Research Roadmap Working Group conducted a rapid evidence review of rapid qualitative methods (RQMs) used during epidemics. The rapid review objectives were to (1) synthesize the development, implementation, and uses of RQMs, including the data collection tools, research questions, research capacities, analytical approaches, and strategies used to speed up data collection and analysis in their specific epidemic and institutional contexts; and (2) propose a tool for assessing and reporting RQMs in epidemics emergencies. The rapid review covered published RQMs used in articles and unpublished reports produced between 2015 and 2021 in five languages (English, Mandarin, French, Portuguese, and Spanish). We searched multiple databases in these five languages between December 2020 and January 31, 2021. Sources employing "rapid" (under 6 months from conception to reporting of results) qualitative methods for research related to epidemic emergencies were included. We included 126 published and unpublished sources, which were reviewed, coded, and classified by the research team. Intercoder reliability was found to be acceptable (Krippendorff's α = 0.709). We employed thematic analysis to identify categories characterizing RQMs in epidemic emergencies. The review protocol was registered at PROSPERO (no. CRD42020223283) and Research Registry (no. reviewregistry1044). We developed an assessment and reporting tool of 13 criteria in three domains, to document RQMs used in response to epidemic emergencies. These include I. Design and Development (i. time frame, ii. Training, iii. Applicability to other populations, iv. Applicability to low resource settings, v. community engagement, vi. Available resources, vii. Ethical approvals, viii. Vulnerability, ix. Tool selection); II. Data Collection and Analysis (x. concurrent data collection and analysis, xi. Targeted populations and recruitment procedures); III. Restitution and Dissemination (xii. Restitution and dissemination of findings, xiii. Impact). Our rapid review and evaluation found a wide range of feasible and highly effective tools, analytical approaches and timely operational insights and recommendations during epidemic emergencies.

Go.Data as a digital tool for case investigation and contact tracing in the context of COVID-19: a mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: A manual approach to case investigation and contact tracing can introduce delays in response and challenges for field teams. Go.Data, an outbreak response tool developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) in collaboration with the Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network, streamlines data collection and analysis during outbreaks. This study aimed to characterize Go.Data use during COVID-19, elicit shared benefits and challenges, and highlight key opportunities for enhancement. METHODS: This study utilized mixed methods through qualitative interviews and a quantitative survey with Go.Data implementors on their experiences during COVID-19. Survey data was analyzed for basic univariate statistics. Interview data were coded using deductive and inductive reasoning and thematic analysis of categories. Overarching themes were triangulated with survey data to clarify key findings. RESULTS: From April to June 2022, the research team conducted 33 interviews and collected 41 survey responses. Participants were distributed across all six WHO regions and 28 countries. While most implementations represented government actors at national or subnational levels, additional inputs were collected from United Nations agencies and universities. Results highlighted WHO endorsement, accessibility, adaptability, and flexible support modalities as main enabling factors. Formalization and standardization of data systems and people processes to prepare for future outbreaks were a welcomed byproduct of implementation, as 76% used paper-based reporting prior and benefited from increased coordination around a shared platform. Several challenges surfaced, including shortage of the appropriate personnel and skill-mix within teams to ensure smooth implementation. Among opportunities for enhancements were improved product documentation and features to improve usability with large data volumes. CONCLUSIONS: This study was the first to provide a comprehensive picture of Go.Data implementations during COVID-19 and what joint lessons could be learned. It ultimately demonstrated that Go.Data was a useful complement to responses across diverse contexts, and helped set a reproducible foundation for future outbreaks. Concerted preparedness efforts across the domains of workforce composition, data architecture and political sensitization should be prioritized as key ingredients for future Go.Data implementations. While major developments in Go.Data functionality have addressed some key gaps highlighted during the pandemic, continued dialogue between WHO and implementors, including cross-country experience sharing, is needed ensure the tool is reactive to evolving user needs.

Self-perceived health of older adults in Latin America and the Caribbean: a scoping review.

Objective: To systematically map the existing evidence on self-perceived health among adults aged 60 and older in Latin America and the Caribbean, describe the use of the single-item measure of self-perceived health with this population, and identify gaps in the existing literature. Methods: Following PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, eight databases were searched for publications that were published between 2009 and 2019 and reported self-perceived health of adults over 60 years old in Latin America and the Caribbean. Data on study characteristics, sample characteristics, and the use and analysis of the self-perceived health measure were charted. Results: The database and secondary searches identified 516 articles. After removing duplicates and assessing titles and abstracts for inclusion, 263 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility using the inclusion criteria and an additional 89 articles were excluded. Ultimately, 174 articles were included in the scoping review. Studies included participants from 17 countries in the region, led in frequency by Brazil with 120 articles. The self-perceived health question most often included a five-category response scale (130), and response options were predominantly divided into two (86) or three (48) categories for analysis. Conclusions: Information on the health and social needs of people aged 60 and older across Latin America and the Caribbean, particularly their perceptions of health, is limited. We highlight the need to expand research throughout the region, include particularly vulnerable populations, utilize data from longitudinal and qualitative studies, and call for transparency in how questions and responses are worded and analyzed. This review serves to inform future studies, programs, and policies directed at this population.

Self-perceived health of older adults in Latin America and the Caribbean: a scoping review

[ABSTRACT]. Objective. To systematically map the existing evidence on self-perceived health among adults aged 60 and older in Latin America and the Caribbean, describe the use of the single-item measure of self-perceived health with this population, and identify gaps in the existing literature. Methods. Following PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, eight databases were searched for publications that were published between 2009 and 2019 and reported self-perceived health of adults over 60 years old in Latin America and the Caribbean. Data on study characteristics, sample characteristics, and the use and analysis of the self-perceived health measure were charted. Results. The database and secondary searches identified 516 articles. After removing duplicates and assess- ing titles and abstracts for inclusion, 263 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility using the inclusion criteria and an additional 89 articles were excluded. Ultimately, 174 articles were included in the scoping review. Studies included participants from 17 countries in the region, led in frequency by Brazil with 120 articles. The self-perceived health question most often included a five-category response scale (130), and response options were predominantly divided into two (86) or three (48) categories for analysis. Conclusions. Information on the health and social needs of people aged 60 and older across Latin America and the Caribbean, particularly their perceptions of health, is limited. We highlight the need to expand research throughout the region, include particularly vulnerable populations, utilize data from longitudinal and qualitative studies, and call for transparency in how questions and responses are worded and analyzed. This review serves to inform future studies, programs, and policies directed at this population.

[RESUMEN]. Objetivo. Realizar una búsqueda sistemática de la evidencia sobre la autopercepción de la salud en las personas mayores de 60 años en América Latina y el Caribe, describir el uso de la medición basada en un solo ítem para dicha autopercepción en este grupo poblacional y detectar posibles lagunas en la bibliografía existente. Métodos. Se realizaron búsquedas en ocho bases de datos de publicaciones aparecidas entre el 2009 y el 2019 sobre la autopercepción de la salud por las personas mayores de 60 años en América Latina y el Caribe. Las búsquedas se realizaron de conformidad con la guía de la extensión PRISMA para revisiones explorato- rias. Se graficaron los datos sobre las características del estudio, las características de la muestra y el uso y análisis de la medición de autopercepción de la salud. Resultados. Las búsquedas en las bases de datos y las secundarias permitieron localizar 516 artículos. Tras eliminar los duplicados y examinar los títulos y resúmenes para su inclusión, se utilizaron los criterios de inclusión para evaluar la admisibilidad de 263 artículos completos y se excluyeron otros 89 artículos. A fin de cuentas, quedaron seleccionados 174 artículos para la revisión exploratoria. Los estudios incluían participantes de 17 países de la región, con Brasil como el país con el mayor número (120 artículos). Lo más frecuente fue que la pregunta sobre autopercepción en materia de salud incluyera una escala de respuesta de cinco categorías (130), y las opciones de respuesta se dividían predominantemente en dos (86) o tres (48) categorías para su análisis. Conclusiones. La información sobre las necesidades sociales y de salud de las personas mayores de 60 años en América Latina y el Caribe, en particular sus percepciones sobre la propia salud, es limitada. Los autores destacan la necesidad de ampliar la investigación en toda la región, abarcar a los grupos pobla- cionales especialmente vulnerables, utilizar datos de estudios longitudinales y cualitativos y exhortar a la transparencia sobre la manera en que se formulan las preguntas y respuestas. Esta revisión sirve como fun- damento para futuros estudios, programas y políticas orientados a este grupo poblacional.

[RESUMO]. Objetivo. Mapear de forma sistemática as evidências existentes sobre a autopercepção de saúde em pes- soas com 60 anos ou mais na América Latina e no Caribe, descrever o uso de uma medida de item único da autopercepção de saúde nessa população e identificar lacunas na literatura existente. Métodos. Em conformidade com as diretrizes da extensão da ferramenta PRISMA para revisões de escopo, oito bancos de dados foram pesquisados em busca de trabalhos publicados entre 2009 e 2019 que relat- assem a autopercepção de saúde de pessoas com mais de 60 anos de idade na América Latina e no Caribe. Foram tabulados dados sobre as características do estudo, as características da amostra e o uso e a análise da medida de autopercepção de saúde. Resultados. As buscas nos bancos de dados e secundárias identificaram 516 artigos. Depois de descartar artigos repetidos e avaliar títulos e resumos para inclusão, 263 artigos completos foram avaliados quanto à elegibilidade usando os critérios de inclusão, o que levou à exclusão de mais 89 artigos. Por fim, 174 artigos foram incluídos na revisão de escopo. Os estudos incluíam participantes de 17 países da região, e o Brasil foi o país com o maior número de publicações: 120 artigos. A pergunta sobre a autopercepção de saúde incluía, na maioria das vezes, uma escala de resposta com cinco categorias (130), e as opções de resposta foram predominantemente divididas em duas (86) ou três (48) categorias para análise. Conclusões. As informações sobre as necessidades sociais e de saúde das pessoas com 60 anos ou mais na América Latina e no Caribe, especialmente suas percepções de saúde, são limitadas. Destacamos a necessidade de expandir a pesquisa em toda a região, incluir populações particularmente vulneráveis, uti- lizar dados de estudos longitudinais e qualitativos e solicitar transparência na forma como as perguntas e respostas são formuladas e analisadas. Esta análise serve de guia para futuros estudos, programas e políti- cas voltados para essa população.

"I Was Learning Every Step of the Way": Student Perceptions About a New Required Foundational Master of Public Health Program Planning Course.

OBJECTIVE: Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine created a program planning course required for all master of public health (MPH) students to address the revised 2016 Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH) foundational competencies. The objective of this study was to examine students' feedback on this new class based on their reflective writing. METHODS: Students across 3 class sections during 3 semesters (fall 2018, spring 2019, and fall 2019) wrote a reflection paper as a final assignment about their course experience (N = 102). We conducted a conventional qualitative content analysis of deidentified student responses to systematically examine themes in the overarching areas of what students found valuable about the course and what they would want to be improved. We calculated frequency counts of themes to further contextualize the findings. RESULTS: Students found the following aspects of the course valuable: a positive perception shift toward program planning (93.1%), new transferable career skills (87.3%), the course format (77.5%), course content (69.6%), working in teams (52.0%), course assignments (47.1%), and the instructional team (31.4%). Critiques included the following: more support for course assignments (39.2%), challenges of working in teams (27.5%), aspects of the course format (25.5%), gaps in course content (19.6%), and wanting more consultations with the instructional team (5.9%). About 14% of students stated there was nothing or little they would change about the course. CONCLUSION: Overall, the course received positive feedback from students. They identified several valuable course components and areas that could be enhanced, which we have worked to improve. We offer the course as a potential model for how schools and programs of public health can meet the 2016 CEPH competencies.

Self-perceived health of older adults in Latin America and the Caribbean: a scoping review / Revisión exploratoria sobre la autopercepción de la salud por las personas mayores en América Latina y el Caribe / Autopercepção de saúde de pessoas idosas na América Latina e no Caribe: revisão de escopo

ABSTRACT Objective. To systematically map the existing evidence on self-perceived health among adults aged 60 and older in Latin America and the Caribbean, describe the use of the single-item measure of self-perceived health with this population, and identify gaps in the existing literature. Methods. Following PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, eight databases were searched for publications that were published between 2009 and 2019 and reported self-perceived health of adults over 60 years old in Latin America and the Caribbean. Data on study characteristics, sample characteristics, and the use and analysis of the self-perceived health measure were charted. Results. The database and secondary searches identified 516 articles. After removing duplicates and assessing titles and abstracts for inclusion, 263 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility using the inclusion criteria and an additional 89 articles were excluded. Ultimately, 174 articles were included in the scoping review. Studies included participants from 17 countries in the region, led in frequency by Brazil with 120 articles. The self-perceived health question most often included a five-category response scale (130), and response options were predominantly divided into two (86) or three (48) categories for analysis. Conclusions. Information on the health and social needs of people aged 60 and older across Latin America and the Caribbean, particularly their perceptions of health, is limited. We highlight the need to expand research throughout the region, include particularly vulnerable populations, utilize data from longitudinal and qualitative studies, and call for transparency in how questions and responses are worded and analyzed. This review serves to inform future studies, programs, and policies directed at this population.

RESUMEN Objetivo. Realizar una búsqueda sistemática de la evidencia sobre la autopercepción de la salud en las personas mayores de 60 años en América Latina y el Caribe, describir el uso de la medición basada en un solo ítem para dicha autopercepción en este grupo poblacional y detectar posibles lagunas en la bibliografía existente. Métodos. Se realizaron búsquedas en ocho bases de datos de publicaciones aparecidas entre el 2009 y el 2019 sobre la autopercepción de la salud por las personas mayores de 60 años en América Latina y el Caribe. Las búsquedas se realizaron de conformidad con la guía de la extensión PRISMA para revisiones exploratorias. Se graficaron los datos sobre las características del estudio, las características de la muestra y el uso y análisis de la medición de autopercepción de la salud. Resultados. Las búsquedas en las bases de datos y las secundarias permitieron localizar 516 artículos. Tras eliminar los duplicados y examinar los títulos y resúmenes para su inclusión, se utilizaron los criterios de inclusión para evaluar la admisibilidad de 263 artículos completos y se excluyeron otros 89 artículos. A fin de cuentas, quedaron seleccionados 174 artículos para la revisión exploratoria. Los estudios incluían participantes de 17 países de la región, con Brasil como el país con el mayor número (120 artículos). Lo más frecuente fue que la pregunta sobre autopercepción en materia de salud incluyera una escala de respuesta de cinco categorías (130), y las opciones de respuesta se dividían predominantemente en dos (86) o tres (48) categorías para su análisis. Conclusiones. La información sobre las necesidades sociales y de salud de las personas mayores de 60 años en América Latina y el Caribe, en particular sus percepciones sobre la propia salud, es limitada. Los autores destacan la necesidad de ampliar la investigación en toda la región, abarcar a los grupos poblacionales especialmente vulnerables, utilizar datos de estudios longitudinales y cualitativos y exhortar a la transparencia sobre la manera en que se formulan las preguntas y respuestas. Esta revisión sirve como fundamento para futuros estudios, programas y políticas orientados a este grupo poblacional.

RESUMO Objetivo. Mapear de forma sistemática as evidências existentes sobre a autopercepção de saúde em pessoas com 60 anos ou mais na América Latina e no Caribe, descrever o uso de uma medida de item único da autopercepção de saúde nessa população e identificar lacunas na literatura existente. Métodos. Em conformidade com as diretrizes da extensão da ferramenta PRISMA para revisões de escopo, oito bancos de dados foram pesquisados em busca de trabalhos publicados entre 2009 e 2019 que relatassem a autopercepção de saúde de pessoas com mais de 60 anos de idade na América Latina e no Caribe. Foram tabulados dados sobre as características do estudo, as características da amostra e o uso e a análise da medida de autopercepção de saúde. Resultados. As buscas nos bancos de dados e secundárias identificaram 516 artigos. Depois de descartar artigos repetidos e avaliar títulos e resumos para inclusão, 263 artigos completos foram avaliados quanto à elegibilidade usando os critérios de inclusão, o que levou à exclusão de mais 89 artigos. Por fim, 174 artigos foram incluídos na revisão de escopo. Os estudos incluíam participantes de 17 países da região, e o Brasil foi o país com o maior número de publicações: 120 artigos. A pergunta sobre a autopercepção de saúde incluía, na maioria das vezes, uma escala de resposta com cinco categorias (130), e as opções de resposta foram predominantemente divididas em duas (86) ou três (48) categorias para análise. Conclusões. As informações sobre as necessidades sociais e de saúde das pessoas com 60 anos ou mais na América Latina e no Caribe, especialmente suas percepções de saúde, são limitadas. Destacamos a necessidade de expandir a pesquisa em toda a região, incluir populações particularmente vulneráveis, utilizar dados de estudos longitudinais e qualitativos e solicitar transparência na forma como as perguntas e respostas são formuladas e analisadas. Esta análise serve de guia para futuros estudos, programas e políticas voltados para essa população.

Global survey on COVID-19 beliefs, behaviours and norms.

Policy and communication responses to COVID-19 can benefit from better understanding of people's baseline and resulting beliefs, behaviours and norms. From July 2020 to March 2021, we fielded a global survey on these topics in 67 countries yielding over 2 million responses. This paper provides an overview of the motivation behind the survey design, details the sampling and weighting designed to make the results representative of populations of interest and presents some insights learned from the survey. Several studies have already used the survey data to analyse risk perception, attitudes towards mask wearing and other preventive behaviours, as well as trust in information sources across communities worldwide. This resource can open new areas of enquiry in public health, communication and economic policy by leveraging large-scale, rich survey datasets on beliefs, behaviours and norms during a global pandemic.

Fertility decision-making during the Zika virus epidemic in Brazil: Where is the decision?

BACKGROUND: In 2016, a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) was declared in response to the rise of microcephaly cases among newborns in Northeastern Brazil. A common reactionary measure by public health authorities was to recommend women postpone pregnancy to avoid the possible perinatal transmission of Zika virus (ZIKV). METHODS: The purpose of this study was to assess how women in Fortaleza, Brazil conceptualize pregnancy; experience facilitators and barriers to pregnancy avoidance; perceive the authorities' recommendation to postpone pregnancy due to the ZIKV outbreak; and recall their experiences during the ZIKV epidemic. Qualitative methods, specifically a Rapid Anthropological Assessment (RAA), were utilized in this study. Data collection included semi-structured interviews, triangulated with observations and informal interviews with community members. RESULTS: The sample included 35 women (18-39 years old) who exclusively utilized the national public health care system. Findings indicated that all participants perceived the ZIKV pregnancy-postponement recommendation to be counter-cultural to Brazilian social norms. Overall women's self-perceived agency to prevent pregnancy was low due to social expectations and lack of trust for contraceptives. ZIKV prevention was not seen as a reason to utilize contraceptives. Interestingly, only women who self-perceived as more affluent were willing to attempt pregnancy prevention for educational, occupational, or financial opportunity. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy postponement as a response to a ZIKV epidemic ignores gaps in reproductive agency and defies social norms, making it unrealistic and counter-cultural. Future ZIKV health recommendations must be culturally aligned with the population, and address barriers and motivators for family planning.

ZIKV-Related Ideations and Modern Contraceptive Use: Cross-Sectional Evidence from the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala.

Zika virus (ZIKV) can be sexually transmitted and can lead to severe neonatal and child health issues. The current study examines whether ZIKV-related ideational factors, including awareness of ZIKV and associated birth defects, are related to modern contraceptive use among women and men with sexual partners in four Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) countries. Data used are from cross-sectional household surveys conducted in 2018 in the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras with representative samples of men and women aged 18-49 (N = 1,100). The association between self-reported use of modern contraception and measures of Zika knowledge, risk perceptions and social norms, and contraceptive self-efficacy was examined via sex disaggregated multivariate logistic regression models. Both men (OR 3.70, 95% CI 1.36-10.06, P < 0.05) and women (OR 3.71, 95% CI 2.30-5.99, P < 0.0001), who reported discussing family planning with their partner in the last year were more likely to use modern contraception compared with those who did not. Contrary to our hypothesis, knowledge that ZIKV can affect a fetus was negatively associated with modern contraceptive use for women (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.29-0.85, P < 0.05). Given the cross-sectional nature of the survey, women not using contraception may be more likely to remember that ZIKV can affect a fetus. In the event of a related outbreak, future health promotion and communication efforts in LAC should focus on known determinants of modern contraceptive use, such as knowledge and partner communication, and knowledge of the health effects of ZIKV if pregnant, to influence family planning decision-making behavior.

Assessing the Implementation of a Behavior Change Intervention: Process Evaluation of a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial for Newborn Health.

Maternal and under five-year-old mortality rates have reduced in the last two decades globally due to concerted effort, yet newborn deaths remain unacceptably prevalent. Behavior change is an important component of interventions to address newborn health problems in low-income countries. In Cambodia, maternal and newborn mortality has markedly decreased, and continued improvements will allow the country to achieve further reduction in newborn morbidity. The results of an implementation study of the Newborn Care and Infection Control Initiative using process evaluation are presented to provide insight into the trial implementation and context of the program that may have contributed to intervention results. The study utilized a mixed method process to explore the context, mechanisms, and implementation of intervention components: training of village health support group volunteers to provide home visits, training of midwives on infection prevention and control around the perinatal period, counseling on newborn care, and provision of training materials for counseling and intervention. Implementation was evaluated through quantitative and qualitative data collection including surveys, observation, semi-structured interviews, focus groups, and visual media. Descriptive statistics summarized the quantitative data and thematic analysis was used to explore the qualitative data. The evaluation identified several factors that might have influenced the outcomes of the trial: continuity of health center staff communication, timing and ability to complete home visits, and training quality. Additional support for parents in the perinatal period, preferably provided at the community level, will contribute to further improvement in health outcomes for newborns in this area. Researchers in this context should consider mechanisms to improve the coordination of health facility staff counseling while providing support and resources to ensure home visits to families with newborns are made on time. Attention to staffing, training, and quality of newborn health interventions is critical in planning for the scaling-up of newborn health programming.

How Fear Appeal Approaches in COVID-19 Health Communication May Be Harming the Global Community.

As health professionals develop health communication for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), we implore that these communication approaches do not include fear appeals. Fear appeals, also known as scare tactics, have been widely used to promote recommended preventive behaviors. We contend that unintended negative outcomes can result from fear appeals that intensify the already complex pandemic and efforts to contain it. We encourage public health professionals to reevaluate their desire to use fear appeals in COVID-19 health communication and recommend that evidence-based health communication be utilized to address the needs of a specific community, help people understand what they are being asked to do, explain step-by-step how to complete preventative behaviors, and consider external factors needed to support the uptake of behaviors. To aid health professionals in redirecting away from the use of fear appeals, we offer a phased approach to creating health communication messages during the COVID-19 crisis.

Warming the postpartum body as a form of postnatal care: An ethnographic study of medical injections and traditional health practices in Cambodia.

Postpartum care is a critical element for ensuring survival and health of mothers and newborns but is often inadequate in low- and middle-income countries due to barriers to access and resource constraints. Newly delivered mothers and their families often rely on traditional forms of postnatal care rooted in social and cultural customs or may blend modern and traditional forms of care. This ethnographic study sought to explore use of biomedical and traditional forms of postnatal care. Data were collected through unstructured observation and in-depth interviews with 15 mothers. Participants reported embracing traditional understandings of health and illness in the post-partum period centered on heating the body through diet, steaming, and other applications of heat, yet also seeking injections from private health care providers. Thematic analysis explored concepts related to transitioning forms of postnatal care, valuing of care through different lenses, and diverse sources of advice on postnatal care. Mothers also described concurrent use of both traditional medicine and biomedical postnatal care, and the importance of adhering to cultural traditions of postnatal care for future health. Maternal and newborn health are closely associated with postnatal care, so ensuring culturally appropriate and high-quality care must be an important priority for stakeholders including understand health practices that are evolving to include injections.