ABSTRACT
The aim of evidence-based guidelines is primarily to improve patient outcomes without adding to the existing cost of care because both payers and policymakers want to identify health care costs that do not result in benefit to the patient. The purpose of the reported project was to generate a practice guideline for the treatment of uncomplicated acute cystitis in a female population, to determine the extent to which the guideline would be used by providers and to measure the cost and quality of outcomes from its use. A retrospective chart review was used to gather pre-guideline practice and cost data. Measurements included the type, frequency, and duration of antibiotic therapy and the use of urine cultures and both complications and routine followup visits. The implementation of an outpatient practice guideline resulted in a significant change in antibiotic prescribing and a trend toward a change in ordering cultures and clinic followup. There was also a significant decrease in treatment costs.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/standards , Cystitis/therapy , Evidence-Based Medicine , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/organization & administration , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Acute Disease , Ambulatory Care/economics , Cystitis/diagnosis , Cystitis/economics , Cystitis/urine , Female , Humans , Models, Organizational , Patient Care Planning/organization & administration , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To compare performance and cost analysis of two gentamicin regimens in infants >/=34 weeks' gestation requiring antibiotics for a 72-hour rule-out sepsis evaluation. A once-daily dosing (ODD) regimen of 4 mg/kg was compared with a standard twice-daily dosing (TDD) regimen of 2.5 mg/kg every 12 hours. SETTING AND DESIGN: Infants at two university-affiliated Level III nurseries were prospectively temporally allocated to receive ODD (n = 27) or TDD (n = 28) as part of their 72-hour empirical antibiotic regimen. Performance of dosing regimens was based on target serum gentamicin concentrations (SGC) established prospectively as a peak of 5 to 10 microgram/mL and a trough of 2 microgram/mL, compared with none in the ODD group. Overall, 57% of the SGCs in the TDD group were outside the target concentration range versus 7% in the ODD group. Based on questionnaire results, a total 72-hour process cost of ODD versus TDD was compared for regimens with and without use of SGC analysis. If SGCs are obtained, more than 75% of the cost associated with gentamicin therapy is attributable to SGC analysis. Based on a cost-effectiveness analysis, ODD was the dominant dosing strategy in all categories analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: ODD of gentamicin at 4 mg/kg in neonates >/=34 weeks' gestation is the preferable treatment strategy based on: 1) significantly improved SGC performance compared with TDD; 2) elimination of the need for routine SGC collection in infants on short courses of therapy; and 3) significant antibiotic-associated hospital cost savings when compared with conventional therapy of TDD and SGC analysis.
