The congregational setting of pastoral counseling: a study of pastoral counseling theorists from 1949-1999.

Examines, through content analysis, the major authors in the field of pastoral counseling since 1949 with the goal to determine the degree to which pastoral counseling theory in the second half of the twentieth century attended to the context of parish ministry. Reports on trends in the field's orientation and notes that a particular viewpoint, or range of viewpoints, has driven the core of pastoral counseling theory and methodology. Attempts to answer the question, Does the literature of pastoral counseling address the counseling situations typically encountered by congregational pastors and provide an adequate methodology suited to the context of parish ministry?

Pastoral counseling and the changing times.

Recalls that although long-term psychotherapy was the underpinning of pastoral counseling in its early days of development and remains so for many practitioners today, recent outcome studies demonstrate that brief counseling is what in fact counselees prefer and is as effective as long-term therapy. It is what congregational pastors traditionally practiced for generations. Suggests that pastoral care-givers practice short-term counseling, arguing that the dissonance that occurs when one believes in the superiority of long-term counseling but nevertheless engages in primarily short-term counseling disrupts therapeutic ends. Proposes that brief pastoral counseling needs to be the model of choice for contemporary pastoral counselors, not only for practical reasons but for moral reasons as well.

Serum concentrations of cefepime (BMY-28142), a broad-spectrum cephalosporin, in dogs.

Serum concentrations of cefepime (BMY-28142) were determined for four dosing regimes, 10 mg/kg or 20 mg/kg, given as single subcutaneous (SC) or intramuscular injections (IM) to dogs. Serial serum samples were analyzed for the presence of cefepime by high-performance liquid chromatography. In experiment 1, the overall mean (+/- SEM) serum concentration (for a 12-hour period) after a dose of 20 mg/kg for SC and IM routes (4.9 +/- 0.74 micrograms/ml and 5.5 +/- 0.63 micrograms/ml, respectively) was twice that for the 10 mg/kg dose given either SC or IM (2.2 +/- 0.31 micrograms/ml and 2.8 +/- 0.47 micrograms/ml, respectively). There was no significant difference (p greater than 0.05) in mean serum concentrations for SC and IM routes of administration at the same dosage. In subsequent experiments, 5 doses of cefepime (20 mg/kg) were administered IM at 12-hour (experiment 2) or 24-hour (experiment 3) intervals. The mean (+/- SEM) peak serum concentration was 12.1 +/- 1.59 micrograms/ml, 2 hours after the 2nd injection in experiment 2. In experiment 3, the mean (+/- SEM) peak serum concentration was 10.9 +/- 1.34 micrograms/ml, 4 hours after the 1st injection. Mean trough concentrations in experiment 2 were greater than or equal to 0.5 microgram/ml and less than or equal to 0.5 in experiment 3. Multiple IM doses produced transient edema at the injection site and mild lameness in all dogs. Cefepime was highly active against single canine isolates of Staphylococcus intermedius, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli, with minimum inhibitory concentrations of 0.125 microgram/ml, 1 microgram/ml and 0.3 microgram/ml, respectively.

Body fluid concentrations and pharmacokinetics of chloramphenicol given to mares intravenously or by repeated gavage.

Serum concentrations and the pharmacokinetics of chloramphenicol were determined in 6 healthy mares after a single IV administration (50 mg/kg of body weight) or after the 1st and 5th sequential intragastric (IG) administration (50 mg/kg/6 hours) of chloramphenicol. Synovial fluid, peritoneal fluid, CSF, and urinary concentrations of chloramphenicol after the IG administrations also were determined. Mean (+/- SEM) overall elimination rate constant (K) values for the IV, 1st IG, and 5th IG dosages were 0.42 +/- 0.064/hr, 0.42 +/- 0.049/hr, and 0.29 +/- 0.074/hr, respectively, and were not significantly different from one another (P greater than 0.05). Bioavailability was 40 +/- 8.6% after the 1st IG administration and was 21 +/- 5.2% after the 5th IG administration. Values for the area under the curve (AUC) for the 1st and 5th IG dosages were significantly different from the AUC value for the IV dosage, and the AUC value for the 5th IG dosage was significantly different from that for the 1st IG dosage. Chloramphenicol was administered to 2 mares in 6 consecutive doses; the first and last doses were given IV and the others were given IG. Mean K values after the 2 IV doses were 0.38 +/- 0.112/hr and 0.56 +/- 0.078/hr, which were not significantly different from each other or from the mean value for the IV dosage given to all 6 mares. Absorption of chloramphenicol decreased with repeated IG administrations, resulting in lower concentrations of chloramphenicol with subsequent administrations. Five consecutive IG doses of chloramphenicol were administered to 4 of the mares in a separate experiment and did not alter intestinal xylose absorption.