Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pharmacotherapy ; 35(4): 388-95, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25884527

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To estimate periprocedural bleeding risk before elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by using a point-of-care bleeding risk calculator and to document changes in anticoagulant use and bleeding complications after implementation of use of this calculator. DESIGN: Prospective observational pilot study with a historical control cohort. SETTING: Tertiary care medical center. PATIENTS: The pilot cohort consisted of 100 patients undergoing ad hoc PCI during elective cardiac catheterization procedures between January and May 2013, whose bleeding risk and accompanying PCI anticoagulant recommendations were determined by the use of a pre-PCI point-of-care bleeding risk calculator. The historical control cohort consisted of all patients who underwent elective PCI at the same facility between April 1, 2011, and March 31, 2012, before implementation of use of the bleeding risk calculator. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The pre-PCI bleeding risk calculator distinguished patients in the pilot cohort as high risk (score 12 or higher) or low risk (lower than 12) for bleeding after a PCI procedure. The primary outcome was bivalirudin use in the pilot cohort compared with its use in the historical control cohort. Implementation of the bleeding risk calculator significantly decreased bivalirudin use compared with bivalirudin use in the historical control cohort (87% in the control cohort vs 60% in the pilot cohort, p<0.01). Bivalirudin use remained high in patients at high bleeding risk (82.2% in the pilot cohort vs 87.4% in the control cohort, p=0.3) and its use was decreased in patients at low bleeding risk (41.8% in the pilot cohort vs 87.1% in the control cohort, p<0.01). The incidence of bleeding complications in the pilot cohort was comparable with that in the control cohort (1% vs. 0.4%, p=0.37), although this pilot study was underpowered to potentially detect a significant change in the incidence of bleeding complications. CONCLUSION: A simple bleeding risk calculator can substantially reduce overall bivalirudin use by specifically decreasing its use among patients at low bleeding risk while maintaining its use among patients at high bleeding risk. The incidence of bleeding complications remained unchanged despite decreasing bivalirudin use among patients undergoing elective coronary catheterization who were at low risk for bleeding.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Point-of-Care Systems , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Health Care Costs , Hemorrhage/economics , Hirudins , Humans , Male , Peptide Fragments/therapeutic use , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Risk Assessment
2.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 83(5): 1737-43, 2007 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17462391

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Given the large number of patients undergoing cardiac operations annually, it is important to identify populations at high risk for adverse outcomes. This observational study was conducted to determine the incidence of preoperative heparin-platelet factor 4 (HPF4) antibodies and to assess the associated risk of postoperative adverse outcomes in a nonselected cardiac surgery patient population. METHODS: Between March 2002 and December 2004, 1114 (92%) of 1209 patients undergoing cardiac surgery with heparin were tested in an unselected manner for HPF4 antibodies. Main outcome measures were HPF4 antibody seropositivity and fatal and nonfatal adverse clinical outcomes after cardiac surgery. RESULTS: Of those screened, 60 (5.4%) of 1114 had positive HPF4 antibodies preoperatively. These patients had longer mean postoperative length of stay (14.0 days versus 9.8 days, p = 0.05), a higher incidence of prolonged (> or = 96 hours) mechanical ventilation (20.3% versus 9.2%, p = 0.02), acute limb ischemia (5.1% versus 0.9%, p = 0.03), renal complications including dialysis (20.3% versus 10.5%, p = 0.03), and gastrointestinal complications (15.3% versus 5.9%, p = 0.01). Stepwise logistic regression analysis showed positive HPF4 antibody status to be an independent predictor for adverse outcome and was associated with a higher risk for renal complications, including dialysis (adjusted odds ratio 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 4.3), than was diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: In this large patient series, the presence of HPF4 antibodies before surgical heparin administration was an independent and clinically significant risk factor for postoperative adverse events after cardiac surgery. An optimal preoperative cardiac surgery risk profile should include HPF4 antibody status.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/immunology , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Heparin/immunology , Platelet Factor 4/immunology , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Aged , Antibodies , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Female , Heparin/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Thrombocytopenia/immunology , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...