High-Value Epilepsy Care in the United States: Predictors of Increased Costs and Complications from the National Inpatient Sample Database 2016-2019.

BACKGROUND: For patients with medically refractory epilepsy, newer minimally invasive techniques such as laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) have been developed in recent years. This study aims to characterize trends in the utilization of surgical resection versus LITT to treat medically refractory epilepsy, characterize complications, and understand the cost of this innovative technique to the public. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database was queried from 2016 to 2019 for all patients admitted with a diagnosis of medically refractory epilepsy. Patient demographics, hospital length of stay, complications, and costs were tabulated for all patients who underwent LITT or surgical resection within these cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 6019 patients were included, 223 underwent LITT procedures, while 5796 underwent resection. Significant predictors of increased patient charges for both cohorts included diabetes (odds ratio: 1.7, confidence interval [CI]: 1.44-2.19), infection (odds ratio: 5.12, CI 2.73-9.58), and hemorrhage (odds ratio: 2.95, CI 2.04-4.12). Procedures performed at nonteaching hospitals had 1.54 greater odds (CI 1.02-2.33) of resulting in a complication compared to teaching hospitals. Insurance status did significantly differ (P = 0.001) between those receiving LITT (23.3% Medicare; 25.6% Medicaid; 44.4% private insurance; 6.7 Other) and those undergoing resection (35.3% Medicare; 22.5% Medicaid; 34.7% private Insurance; 7.5% other). When adjusting for patient demographics, LITT patients had shorter length of stay (2.3 vs. 8.9 days, P < 0.001), lower complication rate (1.9% vs. 3.1%, P = 0.385), and lower mean hospital ($139,412.79 vs. $233,120.99, P < 0.001) and patient ($55,394.34 vs. $37,756.66, P < 0.001) costs. CONCLUSIONS: The present study highlights LITT's advantages through its association with lower costs and shorter length of stay. The present study also highlights the associated predictors of LITT versus resection, such as that most LITT cases happen at academic centers for patients with private insurance. As the adoption of LITT continues, more data will become available to further understand these issues.

Alfred Washington Adson: Perspectives on Intracranial Neurosurgery and the Responsibilities of the Neurosurgeon.

In a period when the budding field of neurosurgery was believed to have little promise, Dr Alfred Washington Adson founded and led the first neurosurgical department at Mayo Clinic. He was not without reservations-surgical intervention for neurological conditions was rarely pursued because of poor outcomes and high complication rates, and Dr Adson acknowledged his early concerns about the future of neurosurgery in his memoirs. However, his education, mentorship, his training, and his first neurosurgical cases helped to shape the impact he ultimately had on the field and his legacy as a neurosurgeon. Dr Adson trained with several renowned Mayo general surgeons, notably his mentor Dr Emil Beckman, whose desire for operative precision shaped Dr Adson's drive to develop his own skills as a surgeon. Two years into his residency, he became the youngest staff surgeon and was tasked with managing the neurosurgical cases at Mayo. The five neurosurgical cases overseen by Dr Adson in the next year illuminated the opportunity for neurosurgery to drastically improve the lives of patients. Dr Adson, given the option of continuing as either a general surgeon or a neurosurgeon, ultimately chose to pursue neurosurgery. This article seeks to provide a historical perspective on the neurosurgeon Dr Alfred Washington Adson using primary and secondary accounts from the Mayo archives, highlighting his contributions to the early understanding of intracranial pathology and how his early experiences as a trainee developed into a personal passion for self-improvement, education, and advocacy for health care in America.

A Review of Preoperative Embolization Effectiveness in Patients With Arteriovenous Malformations.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Preoperative embolization of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) remains controversial. This study sought to analyze the cost-effectiveness of preoperative embolization of AVMs. METHODS: Patients who underwent AVM resection at a single institute (January 1, 2015-December 31, 2020) were analyzed. Patients with preoperative embolization (embolization cohort) were compared with those without preoperative embolization (nonembolization cohort). Cost-effectiveness score (CE) was the primary outcome of interest and was determined by dividing the total 1-year cost by effectiveness, which was derived from a validated preoperative to last follow-up change in the modified Rankin Scale utility score. A lower CE signifies a more cost-effective treatment strategy. RESULTS: Of 188 patients, 88 (47%) underwent preoperative embolization. The mean (SD) total cost was higher in the embolization group than in the nonembolization group ($117 594 [$102 295] vs $84 348 [$82 326]; P < .001). The mean (SD) CE was higher in the embolization cohort ($336 476 [$1 303 842]) than in the nonembolization cohort ($100 237 [$246 255]; P < .001). Among patients with Spetzler-Martin (SM) grade I and II AVMs, the mean (SD) CE was higher in the embolization (n = 40) than in the nonembolization (n = 72) cohort ($164 950 [$348 286] vs $69 021 [$114 938]; P = .004). Among patients with SM grade III AVMs, the mean (SD) CE was lower in the embolization (n = 33) than in the nonembolization (n = 25) cohort ($151 577 [$219 130] vs $189 195 [$446 335]; P = .006). The mean (SD) CE was not significantly different between cohorts among patients with higher-grade AVMs (embolization cohort [n = 3] vs nonembolization cohort [n = 15]: $503 639 [$776 492] vs $2 048 419 [$4 794 758]; P = .49). The mean CE for embolized SM grade III aneurysms was nonsignificant in the ruptured group; however, for the unruptured group, CE was significantly higher in the embolization cohort (n = 26; $160 871 [$240 535]) relative to the nonembolization cohort (n = 15; $108 152 [$166 446]) ( P = .006). CONCLUSION: Preoperative embolization was cost-effective for patients with SM grade III AVMs but not for patients with lower-grade AVMs.

Flow diversion for basilar quadrifurcation aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Flow-diverting devices (FDDs), such as the Pipeline Embolization Device, have been gaining traction for treating challenging posterior circulation aneurysms. Few previous studies have focused on using FDDs to treat aneurysms of the basilar quadrifurcation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the use of FDDs to treat patients with basilar quadrifurcation aneurysms. Patients were assessed for aneurysm type, previous aneurysm treatment, technical success, periprocedural complications, and long-term aneurysm occlusion. RESULTS: 34 patients were assessed; aneurysms of the basilar apex (n=23) or superior cerebellar artery (SCA) (n=7), or both (n=1), and posterior cerebral artery (PCA) (n=3). The mean (SD) largest aneurysm dimension was 8.7 (6.1) mm (range 1.9-30.8 mm). 14 aneurysms were previously surgically clipped or endovascularly coiled. All aneurysms had a saccular morphology. Complete or near-complete occlusion was achieved in 30 of 34 patients (88%) at final angiographic follow-up, a mean (SD) of 6.6 (5.4) months (range 0-19 months) postoperatively. No patient experienced postoperative symptomatic occlusions of the SCA or PCA; 4 patients developed asymptomatic posterior communicating artery occlusions; 28 patients (82%) experienced no complications; whereas 3 (9%) experienced major complications and 3 (9%) experienced minor complications; and 1 patient died as a result of subarachnoid hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: Flow diversion may be a safe and effective option to treat basilar quadrifurcation aneurysms. Previously treated basilar quadrifurcation aneurysms with recurrence or residual lesion may benefit from additional treatment with an FDD. Further prospective studies should be directed toward validating these findings.

Postoperative Outcomes for Spinal Fusion Procedures in Pediatric Patients with Anemia: A Retrospective and Multivariate Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative anemia is known to be associated with perioperative complications in many surgical interventions. Here, we examine the effects of preoperative anemia on peri-operative complications and postoperative outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing spinal fusion. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was conducted using the American College of Surgeons Pediatric National Surgery Quality Improvement Program Database between 2012-2020. Current Procedural Terminology codes 22800, 22,802, 22,804, 22,840, 22,842, 22,843, and 22,844 were included to represent all primary spinal fusion procedures performed. Patients without preoperative hematocrit (HCT) levels were excluded. Classification of anemia was determined via age- and sex-adjusted HCT levels. Patient demographics, preoperative comorbidities and risk factors, and 30-day postoperative outcomes were compared between the 2 cohorts using univariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed to determine if anemia severity was independently associated with worse postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 30,243 pediatric patients were included in this study, with 26,621 not having preoperative anemia and 3622 having preoperative anemia. Pediatric patients with anemia have increased length of stay (LOS) (6.7 ± 9.6 vs. 5 ± 6, P < 0.001), 30-day unplanned reoperation rate (4% vs. 2.8%, P < 0.001), and total blood transfused (489.9 ± 497.8 vs. 423.4 ± 452.6, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis supported anemia and degree of its severity as an independent predictor of increased length of stay (LOS), reoperation rate, and postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative anemia leads to worse outcomes in pediatric spinal fusion procedures. Utilizing HCT recordings could be factored into the equation for optimal patient selection and prevention of post-operative complications.

Timing and Morbidity of Intracranial Meningioma Resection Complications.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial meningioma resection is associated with multiple acute postoperative complications, including cerebrovascular accidents, surgical site infections, and pneumonia. There is a paucity of research on the postoperative timeframe of these complications. Therefore, our objective is to characterize intracranial meningioma resection complications' time courses. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Project registry was queried for intracranial meningioma resection cases using CPT codes 61512 and 61519 from years 2016 to 2021. Baseline patient characteristics and 30-day complication frequency were calculated. The mean, median, and interquartile range of postoperative days to occurrence for 17 complications were calculated. Percent incidence predischarge was recorded. Time-to-occurrence curves were created. Rates of 30-day mortality and increased length-of-stay were compared between patients with and without each complication using a χ2 test. A covariance matrix showing associations between 11 complications using the Pearson method was made. Significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Ten thousand eight hundred ninety cases were analyzed. The most frequent complications' median and interquartile range of postoperative days to occurrence and percentage occurring predischarge were bleeding requiring transfusion (0.0, 0.0-0.0, 99.9%), cerebrovascular accident/stroke with neurological deficit (2.0, 1.0-6.0, 83.8%), unplanned intubation (4.0, 1.0-8.0, 75.1%), on a ventilator for >48 hours (3.0; 2.0-5.5; 88.1%), deep vein thrombosis/thrombophlebitis (12.5, 5.2-19.7, 41.3%), urinary tract infection (13.0, 7.0-20.0, 44.2%), pneumonia (8.0, 4.0-16.0, 60.5%), and pulmonary embolism (14.0, 6.0-20.0, 29.1%). Most complications were associated with increased mortality and length-of-stay. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative meningioma resection complications have varying morbidity and timeframes. Surgeons should be aware of complication timing to better manage postoperative care.

Association between external ventricular drain removal or replacement and prophylactic anticoagulation in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a propensity-adjusted analysis.

BACKGROUND: Withholding prophylactic anticoagulation from patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) before external ventricular drain (EVD) removal or replacement remains controversial. This study analyzed whether prophylactic anticoagulation was associated with hemorrhagic complications related to EVD removal. METHOD: All aSAH patients treated from January 1, 2014, to July 31, 2019, with an EVD placed were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were compared based on the number of prophylactic anticoagulant doses withheld for EVD removal (> 1 vs. ≤ 1). The primary outcome analyzed was deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) after EVD removal. A propensity-adjusted logistic-regression analysis was performed for confounding variables. RESULTS: A total of 271 patients were analyzed. For EVD removal, > 1 dose was withheld from 116 (42.8%) patients. Six (2.2%) patients had a hemorrhage associated with EVD removal, and 17 (6.3%) patients had a DVT or PE. No significant difference in EVD-related hemorrhage after EVD removal was found between patients with > 1 versus ≤ 1 dose of anticoagulant withheld (4 of 116 [3.5%] vs. 2 of 155 [1.3%]; p = 0.41) or between those with no doses withheld compared to ≥ 1 dose withheld (1 of 100 [1.0%] vs. 5 of 171 [2.9%]; p = 0.32). After adjustment, withholding > 1 dose of anticoagulant versus ≤ 1 dose was associated with the occurrence of DVT or PE (OR 4.8; 95% CI, 1.5-15.7; p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: In aSAH patients with EVDs, withholding > 1 dose of prophylactic anticoagulant for EVD removal was associated with an increased risk of DVT or PE and no reduction in catheter removal-associated hemorrhage.

The placebo effect of transcutaneous electrical stimulation.

The placebo effect of transcutaneous electrical stimulation was studied in 93 patients in a double-blind cross-over trial using a genuine stimulator and a placebo machine. Placebo analgesic effect occurred in 32% of trials, as compared with 48% for actual stimulation. The placebo effect of the transcutaneous electrical stimulator is similar to the placebo effect that is noted in other double-blind studies in which medications are used.